CFA Sustainable-Investing Exam
Sustainable Investing Certificate(CFA-SIC) (Page 12 )

Updated On: 9-Feb-2026

One of the mam principles of stewardship codes calls for institutional investors to:

  1. regularly monitor investee companies
  2. avoid considering conflicts of interest regarding stewardship matters.
  3. act independently of other investors when escalating stewardship activity

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Principle of Monitoring:

Regular monitoring of investee companies is a fundamental principle in stewardship codes, ensuring that institutional investors remain informed about the companies in which they invest and can effectively engage with them on ESG and performance issues.

According to the CFA Institute, continuous monitoring allows investors to identify potential risks and opportunities, engage with company management, and advocate for improvements in governance and practices.

Stewardship Codes:

Stewardship codes, such as the UK Stewardship Code and the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) Global Stewardship Principles, emphasize the importance of regular monitoring as part of responsible investment practices.

The CFA Institute highlights that these codes provide frameworks and guidelines for institutional investors to follow, promoting transparency, accountability, and proactive engagement with investee companies.

Engagement and Escalation:

Regular monitoring enables investors to engage with companies on a continuous basis, addressing issues as they arise and escalating concerns if necessary. This ongoing engagement is crucial for effective stewardship and long-term value creation.

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) also advocate for regular monitoring and engagement, encouraging investors to take an active role in improving corporate behavior and sustainability practices.

Examples of Monitoring Activities:

Monitoring activities include reviewing financial statements, ESG reports, meeting with company management, and participating in shareholder meetings. These activities help investors stay informed and influence corporate strategies and practices.

The CFA Institute notes that effective monitoring involves a comprehensive approach, integrating financial analysis with ESG considerations to provide a holistic view of investee companies.


Reference:

CFA Institute, "Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues in Investing: A Guide for Investment Professionals."

UK Stewardship Code and ICGN Global Stewardship Principles documents, which outline the principles of regular monitoring and engagement.



Wastewater treatment facilities:

  1. are highly capital intensive to develop
  2. require minimal ongoing maintenance expenditures.
  3. can be maintained by lower-skilled workers once developed

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Wastewater treatment facilities are highly capital intensive to develop. The development of these facilities involves significant upfront investments in infrastructure, technology, and construction.

Infrastructure Costs: Building a wastewater treatment facility requires substantial investment in infrastructure, including pipelines, treatment plants, and equipment. These costs can be very high due to the scale and complexity of the systems needed to treat wastewater effectively.

Technology and Equipment: The technology and equipment used in wastewater treatment, such as filtration systems, chemical treatment processes, and monitoring tools, are expensive to acquire and install. Advanced technologies that improve efficiency and reduce environmental impact further increase costs.

Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring that the facility meets regulatory standards and environmental guidelines adds to the capital costs. Compliance with regulations often necessitates additional investments in specialized equipment and processes.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the capital-intensive nature of developing sustainable infrastructure projects, including wastewater treatment facilities.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Highlights the high upfront investment required for infrastructure projects aimed at improving environmental outcomes.



A portfolio manager may need to adopt a more appropriate ESG benchmark rather than a broad market benchmark if the degree of exclusions results in:

  1. low active share and low tracking error
  2. low active share and high tracking error.
  3. high active share and high tracking error.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A portfolio manager may need to adopt a more appropriate ESG benchmark rather than a broad market benchmark if the degree of exclusions results in high active share and high tracking error. High active share indicates that the portfolio significantly deviates from the benchmark, while high tracking error measures the volatility of these deviations.

High Active Share: Excluding a significant number of securities from the investment universe to align with ESG criteria can lead to a portfolio that is very different from the broad market benchmark. This high active share reflects the extent to which the portfolio composition differs from the benchmark.

High Tracking Error: The deviations from the benchmark can lead to high tracking error, indicating the portfolio's performance can vary significantly from the benchmark. This variability can be a result of the different risk and return characteristics of the excluded securities.

Appropriate ESG Benchmark: To accurately measure performance and risk, it is essential to use a benchmark that reflects the ESG criteria applied in the portfolio. An ESG-specific benchmark would provide a more relevant comparison and better align with the investment strategy.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Explains the importance of selecting appropriate benchmarks for ESG-focused portfolios to ensure alignment with investment objectives.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Discusses the impact of exclusions on portfolio metrics such as active share and tracking error, and the need for suitable ESG benchmarks.



Fund labelers are most likely classified as:

  1. regulators
  2. fund promoters.
  3. financial advisers

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Fund labelers are most likely classified as fund promoters. Fund promoters are responsible for marketing and promoting investment funds, including those with specific labels such as ESG or green funds.

Marketing Role: Fund promoters play a key role in marketing investment products to potential investors. They use labels such as ESG, green, or sustainable to attract investors interested in these themes.

Product Differentiation: By labeling funds with ESG or other sustainable labels, fund promoters differentiate their products in the market. This helps investors identify funds that align with their values and investment criteria.

Regulatory Compliance: Fund promoters must ensure that the funds meet the criteria for the labels they use. This involves compliance with relevant regulations and standards that govern the use of ESG and other sustainable labels.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the role of fund promoters in marketing and labeling investment products to attract investors.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Highlights the importance of accurate labeling and promotion of ESG funds to ensure transparency and investor trust.



According to the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), the four realms of nature include

  1. land
  2. pollution.
  3. biodiversity

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

According to the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), the four realms of nature include land, which is a critical aspect of the natural environment that businesses must consider in their sustainability and risk management strategies.

Step-by-Step

TNFD Framework:

The TNFD was established to develop a framework for organizations to report and act on evolving nature-related risks. This framework is intended to help financial institutions and companies manage risks related to biodiversity and natural capital.

The CFA Institute highlights that the TNFD framework is essential for integrating nature-related financial risks into corporate and investment decision-making processes.

Four Realms of Nature:

The TNFD identifies four realms of nature that are critical for understanding and managing nature- related risks:

Land

Oceans

Freshwater

Atmosphere

These realms encompass the major natural systems that support life on Earth and are crucial for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Significance of Land:

Land is a fundamental realm as it encompasses terrestrial ecosystems, forests, and agricultural areas. It is crucial for biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and providing resources for human activities.

The CFA Institute notes that sustainable land management practices are vital for mitigating risks related to deforestation, habitat loss, and soil degradation, which can have significant financial and environmental impacts.

Integration into ESG Strategies:

Companies and investors are increasingly recognizing the importance of integrating land-related risks into their ESG strategies. This includes assessing the impacts of their operations on land use, biodiversity, and ecosystem health.

The TNFD framework provides guidance on how to assess and report on land-related risks, helping organizations to enhance their sustainability practices and improve transparency.


Reference:

CFA Institute, "Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues in Investing: A Guide for Investment Professionals."

Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) documents, which outline the four realms of nature and their significance for ESG integration.






Post your Comments and Discuss CFA Sustainable-Investing exam prep with other Community members:

Join the Sustainable-Investing Discussion