Free Sustainable-Investing Exam Braindumps
Sustainable Investing Certificate(CFA-SIC) Questions 421–425 (page: 86)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Which of the following corporate governance structures is most common around the world?

  1. Joint auditors
  2. Single-tier boards
  3. Cumulative voting

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The single-tier board system (Option B) is the most common governance structure globally, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and many Commonwealth countries. In this system, executive and non-executive directors sit on the same board, overseeing management and strategic decisions.

Joint auditors (Option A) are primarily used in France and India for financial oversight but are not a standard governance structure.

Cumulative voting (Option C), which allows minority shareholders to have a greater voice in board elections, is common in some jurisdictions (e.g., the U.S. for shareholder rights protection) but is not a universal governance structure.


Reference:

OECD Corporate Governance Principles

World Bank: Corporate Governance Practices by Country

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance



Regulations relating to ESG investing generally involve which of the following themes?

  1. Stewardship
  2. Scenario analysis
  3. Green bond issuance

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Stewardship (Option A) is a core regulatory theme in ESG investing, focusing on how investors influence corporate behavior through active ownership (voting, engagement, and dialogue). Regulatory frameworks such as the UK Stewardship Code, Japan Stewardship Code, and EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) emphasize investor stewardship responsibilities.

Scenario analysis (Option B) is used for risk assessment, particularly in climate stress testing (e.g., TCFD recommendations), but is not the primary focus of ESG regulations.

Green bond issuance (Option C) is regulated under ICMA Green Bond Principles and EU Green Bond Standards, but ESG investing regulations are broader than just bond issuance.


Reference:

UK Stewardship Code 2020

EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)

Japan FSA: Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors



An organization conducts assessments that highlight events, behaviors, and practices that may lead to reputational and business risks and opportunities. This organization is best classified as a provider of:

  1. Advisory services
  2. Integrated research
  3. ESG news and controversy alerts

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Organizations providing ESG news and controversy alerts (Option C) specialize in tracking events, controversies, and risks related to corporate governance, sustainability, and ethics. These firms, like RepRisk, Sustainalytics, and MSCI ESG Controversies, monitor negative ESG incidents such as fraud, pollution, or labor rights violations that could affect a company's reputation and financial performance.

Advisory services (Option A) typically provide ESG strategy development, integration, and reporting but do not focus solely on controversies.

Integrated research (Option B) involves comprehensive ESG analysis, ratings, and benchmarking, but not specifically controversy monitoring.


Reference:

RepRisk ESG Controversy Database

MSCI ESG Controversy Reports

Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings Methodology



Growing income inequality most likely leads to:

  1. Less social mobility.
  2. More educational opportunities.
  3. Higher purchasing power among the middle class.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Growing income inequality is associated with reduced social mobility (Option A), meaning that individuals from lower-income backgrounds face greater challenges in moving up the economic ladder. This happens because:

Lower-income families often have limited access to quality education, healthcare, and job opportunities, making it harder for individuals to improve their economic status.

Wealth concentration among the elite leads to a decline in broad-based economic opportunity.

More educational opportunities (Option B) is incorrect because education tends to become more expensive and less accessible as income inequality increases.

Higher purchasing power among the middle class (Option C) is incorrect because growing inequality usually means that the middle class shrinks, and wealth is concentrated among the wealthy, reducing overall purchasing power.


Reference:

OECD Report: "Inequality and Social Mobility" (2022)

World Economic Forum (WEF) ­ Global Social Mobility Index

UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 10: Reduced Inequality



Which of the following statements regarding engagement and stewardship is most accurate?

  1. Smaller asset owners seek to carry out stewardship activities directly themselves.
  2. Engagement focuses on preserving and enhancing long-term value of the investee company.
  3. Investor engagement in response to a share price fall is more likely to be effective than long- standing messaging.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Engagement (Option B) is a key component of responsible stewardship, with the objective of preserving and enhancing long-term value in investee companies. Investors engage with companies on ESG issues such as climate risk, diversity, and governance to improve performance and reduce long-term risks.

Option A is incorrect because smaller asset owners often rely on collaborative engagement or delegate stewardship activities to investment managers rather than engaging directly.

Option C is incorrect because reactive engagement (triggered by share price declines) is generally less effective than proactive, long-term engagement strategies focused on sustainability improvements.


Reference:

UK Stewardship Code 2020

PRI: Active Ownership 2.0 Framework

OECD Corporate Governance and Investor Engagement



Viewing page 86 of 162
Viewing questions 426 - 430 out of 802 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss CFA Sustainable-Investing exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!