DRAG DROP (Drag and Drop is not supported)
Drag and drop the descriptions from the left onto the related OAuth-defined roles on the right.
Select and Place:

See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 66

Refer to the exhibit. This cURL POST request creates an OAuth access token for authentication with FDM API requests.

What is the purpose of the file “@token_data” that cURL is handling?

This file is given as input to store the access token received from FDM.
This file is used to send authentication-related headers.
This file contains raw data that is needed for token authentication.
This file is a container to log possible error responses in the request.

Answer(s): C

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 67

What is the result of a successful OAuth2 authorization grant flow?

The third-party service is provided with a token that allows actions to be performed.
The user has the application rights that correspond to the user's role within the application's database.
The application is provided with a token that allows actions on services on the user's behalf.
The user has administrative rights to the application's backend services.

Answer(s): C

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 68

In the three-legged OAuth2 process, after the authorization server presents a form to the resource owner to grant access, what is the next step?

The resource owner authenticates and optionally authorizes with the authorization server.
The user who owns the resource initiates a request to the OAuth client.
If the resource owner allows access, the authorization server sends the OAuth client a redirection.
A form to allow or restrict access is submitted by the owner of the resource.

Answer(s): D

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 69

Which OAuth mechanism enables clients to continue to have an active access token without further interaction from the user?

refresh grant
JWT
password grant
preshared key

Answer(s): A

Show Answer Next Question

Download PDF Next Page

Viewing page 38 of 78
Viewing questions 186 - 190 out of 507 questions

Post your Comments and Discuss Cisco 350-901 exam prep with other Community members:

Comments:

Name:

350-901 Exam Discussions & Posts
350-901 AI Verifications

Alex on: March 02, 2025
Great material
UNITED KINGDOM

justanothertechguy on: May 07, 2026
The exam felt very hard but the brain dumps and the AI Assistant made it manageable. Without them passing would have been a long shot.
Thailand

k3rn3l_k on: April 29, 2026
Underestimated this exam initially and had to grind through countless exam dumps to finally pass. The real exam questions were very hard and used the AI Assistant to get through.
UAE

CiscoFan_J on: June 04, 2026
Real exam questions threw me off despite weeks of studying and the braindumps I found were not much help.
Belgium

ahmed_certkings on: April 19, 2026
Spent weeks on this exam and it was very hard even with dumps. The real exam questions were tough.
Canada

PassedByLuck_K on: May 05, 2026
Spent weeks with brain dumps trying to prepare for this exam because the real exam questions were very hard. Barely passed and the stress was intense.
United States

fatima_netsec on: April 01, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this very hard exam and resorted to teh dumps in the end. The braindumps covered many real exam questions I struggled with during my first try.
Argentina

linuxlover99 on: May 19, 2026
Three weeks of brain dumps and the AI Assistant were just enough for this exam. It was very hard and I wasn't sure if I'd pass.
Malaysia

d3bug_dan on: April 22, 2026
Passed it using some brain dumps because this exam was very hard. The AI Assistant didn't cover everything.
Malaysia

finn_k8s on: June 17, 2026
Spent countless hours prepping for this exam and resorted to dumps at the end. The real exam questions were very hard.
Denmark

hashbang_h on: May 13, 2026
This exam was harder than expected so I relied heavily on exam dumps to pass. Without the brain dumps I doubt I would have cleared it.
Philippines

SecOpsGuy on: June 18, 2026
The exam dumps didn't quite cover the tricky questions. Those real exam questions caught me off guard and left me exhausted.
Vietnam

SkippedTheBook on: May 06, 2026
Passed it on my second try after using the exam dumps. This exam was very hard to study for.
United States

chris_infosec on: June 27, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling through challenging material and brain dumps. Those real exam questions seem endless sometimes.
Portugal

StudyGrind99 on: April 27, 2026
Three weeks of studing and I still found this exam very hard despite using all the brain dumps I could find. The AI Assistant was helpful but it still felt like navigating a maze.
UAE

vlanjockey on: July 04, 2026
Spent weeks on the brain dumps but the real exam questions caught me off guard. That AI Assistant was helpfull but this exam was very hard.
Denmark

PassedMyWife_Out on: May 04, 2026
The exam dumps didn't cover half of what showed up in the real exam questions. Very hard from start to finish.
Hungary

weekend_warrior_w on: March 26, 2026
Just cleared this challenging exam using brain dumps adn the AI Assistant. Spent many hours stressed and relieved to barely pass.
Belgium

ITpro_Sarah on: June 17, 2026
The exam was very hard and the real exam questions caught me off guard on my first attempt. I found the braindumps and AI Assistant very helpful on the second try.
United Kingdom

vlanjockey on: June 04, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam because it was very hard even with the brain dumps. Real exam questions were a lifesaver in the end.
Saudi Arabia

PassOrFail_Lol on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks on brain dumps adn needed every bit of it for this exam which was very hard. Just barely passed and the real exam questions were a real struggle.
Norway

CloudCert_2026 on: April 15, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam after underestimating it the first time despite using all those braindumps. The real exam questions were way tougher than expected.
Pakistan

homelab_hero on: April 30, 2026
Spent weeks using braindumps and the AI Assistant but this exam was very hard and I'm still amazed I passed.
Bahrain

moni on: June 26, 2026
yes. really helpful
Coimbatore, India

DevOps_Rach on: May 27, 2026
This exam was brutal with many real exam questions catching me off guard. The brain dumps barely covered the breadth of the material.
Ghana

Na on: July 03, 2026
When will this exam available?
Ahmedabad, India

gita_dataeng on: April 02, 2026
The exam questions were very hard and even the brain dumps didn't prepare me fully. Finished yesterday and I kept finding myself relying on the AI Assistant just to trace back concepts I missed.
New Zealand

GrindNeverStops on: April 01, 2026
Just cleared this challenging exam thanks to the brain dumps and the AI Assistant. Wasn't sure I would pass but they made a difference.
Bangladesh

CiscoFan_J on: April 14, 2026
Underestimated this exam and ended up spending countless hours on braindumps just to catch up. The real exam questions were very hard and I wouldn't have managed without them.
Greece

PingOfDeath_P on: May 05, 2026
Spent weeks trying different study methods but this exam was very hard. Eventually turned to exam dumps and the AI Assistant which made a difference in the real exam questions.
Austria

career_changer_c on: May 25, 2026
The AI Assistant and braindumps were key in tackling this challenging exam. Wasn't sure about passing but somehow managed with their help.
Singapore

KemTech on: June 26, 2026
Question 64 has a wrong answer. It says Serveless API (D) when should be option A (Virtual Machunes)
London, United Kingdom

JustPassedBro on: May 09, 2026
Spent weeks grinding the dumps because this exam was very hard and pushed me to my limits.
Colombia

two_jobs_no_sleep on: June 18, 2026
Finally done but this exam was very hard and the braindumps didn’t cover it all. Some of the real exam questions caught me off guard.
United States

commute_studier on: March 22, 2026
Finally done with this exam and relied on exam dumps as a last resort due to its very hard nature. The challenging exam stressed me out even with some real exam questions thrown into the mix.
Turkey

ali_cloud_sa on: May 17, 2026
Real exam questions caught me off guard adn forced a deep dive into braindumps. Passed it after grinding through exam dumps longer than expected.
Oman

json_jock on: June 01, 2026
Spent weeks going through brain dumps adn still found the exam very hard. The real exam questions were a challenge but somehow managed to pass.
Italy

LinuxPlus_Len on: April 29, 2026
Three weeks of studying and the brain dumps were still my last resort for this exam. The AI Assistant helped with grasping real exam questions but it was a very hard process.
South Korea

lunch_break_labs on: June 18, 2026
Three weeks of intense studying and endless brain dumps left me exhausted but I finally passed this exam. It was very hard and I had to rely on the AI Assistant and real exam questions to make it through.
Australia

justanothertechguy on: April 23, 2026
Passed it after a lot of struggle and the brain dumps were my last resort. Very hard when the real exam questions are nothing like expected.
New Zealand

NeverAgain_AWS on: June 12, 2026
Finished yesterday after three weeks of studying and the real exam questions caught me off guard even with the braindumps. Despite using the AI Assistant and brain dumps it was a very hard test.
South Africa

always_learning_a on: April 19, 2026
Three weeks of late nights using braindumps helped me finally clear this exam. It was painfully hard and without teh exam dumps I doubt I'd have passed.
Greece

NoSleepNoCert on: April 24, 2026
teh exam dumps were a last resort for this very hard test and the real exam questions were just as tough. Finally passed after a grueling study period with the AI Assistant lending a hand.
UAE

CertHunter on: June 23, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and the real exam quetions seriously caught me off guard. The brain dumps helped but it was still very hard.
Jordan

jakob_vmware on: April 04, 2026
Spent weeks going throgh braindumps for this challenging exam. Finally done with the help of real exam questions.
Romania

ProcrastinatedBut on: April 15, 2026
Passed it but barely. The brain dumps were crucial becuase this exam was very hard.
Luxembourg

SARMA on: June 22, 2026
By oversight, My admin certification expired. So I am trying to appear again. This guide is helping me a Lot.
Edison, United States

SleepDeprivedPass on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks going over the exam dumps and real exam questions but this exam was very hard. The AI Assistant helped a bit yet it still took two attempts to pass.
Taiwan

dmitri_linuxpro on: April 03, 2026
Fought through a challenging exam using brain dumps and the AI Assistant as my last resort. This test was very hard and I'm just relieved to be done.
Argentina

CramSession_Pro on: July 05, 2026
The exam was very hard and the real exam quetions were not what I expected at all. Spent hours with brain dumps and still struggled.
Sweden

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 27, 2026
Question 152:
Answer: Increase the dynamic channel assignment interval.
Why:

The logs show APs going down with the reason “Radio channel set,” which means the WLC is reconfiguring AP channels.

When a radio changes channels, clients can briefly disconnect. By increasing the DCA interval (default is about 10 minutes), channel changes occur less frequently, reducing user disconnections.

What each option does:

enable coverage hole detection: helps find coverage gaps, not related to channel changes.

increase the AP heartbeat timeout: affects AP-controller failure detection, not channel reconfiguration.

enable BandSelect: band steering, not about channel changes.

increase the dynamic channel assignment interval: directly reduces how often AP channels are changed, reducing user impact.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by harshahari774 on: June 21, 2026
Question 36:
The correct answer is C) GitHub Copilot Enterprise.
Why:

Copilot Enterprise is designed for organizations needing enterprise-grade identity management. It supports integration with identity providers (IdPs) like Okta, enabling SSO and SCIM provisioning to add/remove users automatically.

This centralized user management is the most cost-effective option for large teams, since admin overhead and licensing can scale more efficiently with an IdP rather than managing many individual accounts.

Other plans (Individual, Team/Business) don’t offer the same level of enterprise identity provisioning and centralized admin features, making Enterprise the best fit when you’re migrating from Bitbucket and require seamless IdP-based user management.

Kakinada, India

AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna on: June 27, 2026
Question 411:
Question 411 asks what two actions a project manager should take after the security department flags regulatory requirements.
Answer: The two correct actions are B and E.

B: Ask the security department for details about regulations. Why: You need precise, testable requirements to understand what must be complied with. Without specifics, you can’t analyze impact or plan properly.

E: Ask the team members to analyze the impact of including this regulation. Why: Impact analysis (cost, schedule, scope, risk) informs whether and how to implement the regulation and helps with prioritization and planning.

Why the other options aren’t the best immediate actions:

A: The product owner owns the backlog; without specifics, adding requirements is premature. The PM should gather details first (B) and analyze impact (E) before backlog actions.

C: Prioritizing with stakeholders is important, but you should first understand the regulation and its impact rather than asking for priority without analysis.

D: Instructing the team to include it in the next iteration skips the necessary impact analysis and refinement.

In short, gather specifics from security, then perform an impact analysis before altering backlog or sprint plans.
Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User6689 on: June 29, 2026
Question 18:
Yes. ARM templates are a good fit for this goal.

They are a declarative Infrastructure as Code (IaC) approach to define Azure resources.

Since the resources per business unit are identical, you can define them once in an ARM template and deploy it multiple times.

By parameterizing the template (e.g., per unit name, region, resource counts), you can tailor deployments for each unit while keeping the underlying configuration consistent.

ARM templates enable automated provisioning at scale and can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring repeatable, auditable deployments across many units.

They also support reuse with linked templates and can be combined with governance tools (e.g., Azure Blueprints) for standardized deployments.

In short, using ARM templates meets the requirement to automatically create identical resource sets for multiple business units with consistency and automation.
San José, Costa Rica

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 299:
The correct answer is C) Agility.
Explanation:

Agility refers to the ability to rapidly provision and deploy cloud resources (compute, storage, database) to support new projects or changes, often in minutes.

Elasticity is about automatically scaling resources to match demand, not just quick deployment.

Cost savings relate to reducing expenses, not deployment speed.

Reliability covers uptime and fault tolerance, not how fast you can deploy resources.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by cyberexus on: June 18, 2026
Question 27:
For Question 27, the best choice is B: capacity analysis of IT operations.
Why:

Capacity analysis assesses current resource utilization and forecasts future demand, helping determine whether IT resources (people, hardware, software, facilities) are sufficient to meet business needs. This directly evaluates the effectiveness of IT resource planning.

Why the others are less appropriate:

A. Budget execution status shows spending against budget, not whether resources are adequate or planned appropriately.

C. Succession plan for key IT personnel focuses on continuity of personnel, not overall resource planning effectiveness.

D. A list of new applications to be implemented describes future initiatives, not whether resource planning has properly anticipated needs.

So, capacity analysis provides the most direct evidence of whether IT resource planning is effective.
Kyiv, Ukraine

AI Explanation - verified by madhavi.chilla09 on: June 09, 2026
Question 62:
Short answer: D — Split the visuals onto multiple pages.
Why this is the best choice:

A single page with 25 visuals (15 AppSource + 10 default) can overload a report, causing slower load/interact times as each visual runs its queries. Splitting visuals across pages reduces concurrent queries and rendering work, improving perceived performance in a shared capacity.

Why the other options aren’t better:

Change DAX measures to iterator functions: Iterator functions (e.g., SUMX) often cost more CPU per row and can slow performance rather than speed it up.

Enable visual interactions: Enabling interactions can increase cross-filtering and the number of queries, potentially slowing things down; not a performance win.

Replace default visuals with AppSource visuals: AppSource visuals aren’t inherently faster; some may be heavier or less optimized. This isn’t a guaranteed performance gain.

Additional note:

In a 12M-row fact table on shared capacity, page-level optimization (fewer visuals per page) is a common, effective tactic. If needed, you can also consider aggregations or other model optimizations, but among the given options, paging the visuals is the recommended approach.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9108 on: June 16, 2026
Question 11:

The correct answer is Geolocation.

Why: A Geolocation field stores latitude and longitude values, i.e., coordinates, which is exactly what you need for tracking shipments. It also supports map integration and distance calculations (e.g., using DISTANCE in SOQL).

Why the others aren’t right:

- Geofence: used for boundary definitions, not to store raw coordinates. - Custom address: stores address text components, not the actual numeric coordinates. - External lookup: links to a record in another object/system, not coordinates.
Islamabad, Pakistan

AI Explanation - verified by prasoonmudgal96 on: June 16, 2026
Question 4:
Question 4 asks: An administrator creating an exclusion is limited to applying a rule to how many groups of hosts?

What the options imply:

- A: File exclusions are not aligned to groups or hosts — likely false; exclusions are typically scoped to groups. - B: There is a limit of three groups — the page’s answer key says this, but I’m not certain it’s universally true. - C: There is no limit and exclusions can be applied to any or all groups — plausible, allows broad coverage. - D: Each exclusion can be aligned to only one group of hosts — seems unlikely, as admins often need multi-group scope.

My take: The most sensible behavior for flexibility is that exclusions can be applied to multiple groups (i.e., option C). The idea of a hard limit (three groups) or a single-group cap would be more restrictive and less practical in larger environments.

Caveat: The provided answer key on this page lists B, but I can’t confirm that limit is guaranteed across versions. If you need a definitive answer, I’d recommend checking the latest CrowdStrike admin/docs for the exact scoping rules in your environment. Want me to walk through how to verify this in the UI or compare with other questions?

Gurugram, India

AI Explanation - verified by 15akumar on: June 23, 2026
Question 254:
Question 254 deals with how many Firewall-kernel cores you can use per cluster member when you add a new device.
Key concept:

In a Check Point cluster, the number of cores used for the Firewall-kernel on each device is limited by the device with the fewest cores in the cluster. In other words, the cluster uses the minimum core count among all members (the "lowest common denominator").

Apply it to the scenario:

Current gateway: 2 cores

New gateway: 4 cores

Minimum cores among members = 2

Therefore, each cluster member (including the 4-core device) can use only 2 Firewall-kernel cores.

Conclusion:

The correct answer is 2 cores per device. The provided answer (4 cores) is incorrect because it ignores the minimum-core rule across the cluster. If both devices had 4 cores, then you could use 4 cores per device.

Melbourne, Australia

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 26, 2026
Question 98:
For question 98, the correct choice is C.
Why C works:

The interface must be bound to the same VRF as the destination network. Here, the server 172.16.0.1 sits in VRF Bank, so the R1 interface should be in vrf forwarding bank.

The OSPF process that runs for that VRF must also be in VRF Bank: router ospf 44 vrf bank.

Use a network statement that covers 172.16.0.0/16 inside that VRF: network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0. The wildcard mask 0.0.255.255 matches 172.16.0.0–172.16.255.255, aligning with the /16 subnet you’re using (255.255.0.0 on the interface).

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: The interface isn’t bound to VRF Bank, so OSPF in VRF Bank wouldn’t see it.

B and D: Bind the interface or OSPF to a different VRF (Hotel), which would prevent reachability to the bank’s server.

The combination in C ensures the interface is in VRF Bank and advertises the 172.16.0.0/16 route within that VRF.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User5090 on: June 12, 2026
So, DoD is a single source of reference for an agile project with multiple sprints?

Short answer: Yes — typically there is a single team-wide Definition of Done (DoD) that applies across multiple sprints.

What this means:

- The DoD serves as the reference standard for every increment produced by the team in any sprint. - It’s a living artifact: if the team updates the DoD in a retrospective, the new DoD applies to future increments (not retroactively to past work).

Nuance:

- If there are multiple teams or a program, there may be a shared DoD at the program level plus individual team DoDs. Alignment is key.

Important distinctions:

- DoD vs. Acceptance Criteria: DoD is the increment-level quality bar; Acceptance Criteria are story-level conditions that determine when a specific story is done.

Practical note:

- Keep the DoD visible, and revise it as practices or goals evolve.
Shah Alam, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by User4144 on: June 23, 2026
Question 14:
Here’s how to think about Question 14.

A /30 uses 255.255.255.252. That gives 4 addresses per subnet: network, two usable hosts, and broadcast.

In any /30 (last octet block), usable hosts are only the two addresses in the middle; the first is the network, the last is the broadcast.

For the block 10.2.1.0/30 (the only option using a /30 among the choices), the addresses are:

- Network: 10.2.1.0 - Usable: 10.2.1.1 and 10.2.1.2 - Broadcast: 10.2.1.3 Therefore 10.2.1.3 (option A) is the broadcast, not usable.

Options B and C use /29 (255.255.255.248), not /30, so they don’t meet the requirement of a /30 subnet.

Option D uses 225.255.255.252 with a 209.165.201.2 address and a 225.x.x.x address is multicast (not a usable unicast interface address). So it’s also invalid for a point-to-point /30.

Conclusion:

None of the provided options give a valid usable host IP for a /30. The correct pattern would be something like 10.2.1.1/30 or 10.2.1.2/30 (within the 10.2.1.0/30 block). The stated answer (D) is not correct.

Pescara, Italy

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 348:
Question 348 explanation:

Correct answer: B — Create an XML filter as a string and pass it to the get_config() method as an argument.

Why: NETCONF responses are XML. To reduce data sent over the network, you filter at the request time by providing an XML filter (typically a subtree filter) to get_config(). This tells the server to return only the interface’s configuration.

Why the others are not correct:

- A: Using the Ixml library to parse after retrieval does not reduce the amount of data transferred; it only processes what you already got. - C: A JSON filter is not applicable to NETCONF, which returns XML; filters must be XML. - D: Using the JSON library to parse after retrieval also doesn’t reduce data transfer.

Quick example (conceptual):

- filter_xml = '''<interfaces xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces"><interface><name>Gig0/1</name></interface></interfaces>''' - m.get_config(source='running', filter=('subtree', filter_xml))
If you want, paste the exact exhibit text and I can map the reasoning more precisely.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User7665 on: July 05, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s a concise explanation of Question 1 and why the approach in the provided answer (A) is correct.

Objective

- Each connected device must reach only its correct network, which means mapping each switch port to the appropriate VLAN. - Disable all unused switch ports to reduce attack surface. - Provide fault-tolerant inter-switch connectivity so network paths remain available if one link fails.

Why the approach (A) is correct

- Assigning each port to the proper VLAN ensures devices are on their intended networks. - Disabling unused ports prevents unauthorized access. - Using redundant inter-switch links (and enabling LACP if available) provides fault tolerance and more bandwidth between Switch 1 and Switch 3.

What to configure (practical steps)

- On Switch 1: for ports 1–7, set the port to access the VLAN that matches the connected device type (servers, printers, PCs, etc.). Do not enable extra VLANs on those ports. - On Switch 3: for ports 2–8, do the same VLAN assignment based on the devices connected there (e.g., WLAN access, user devices, printers). - Inter-switch link(s): configure as a trunk carrying the required VLANs; enable LACP if you have multiple links to ensure redundancy and aggregated bandwidth. - Duplex/speed: set to Auto to avoid duplex mismatches. - Disable any port not in use. - After changes: verify with commands like show vlan brief, show interface trunk, and test connectivity (pings across VLANs as applicable).

Quick verification

- Confirm VLAN membership on each port a
Cape Town, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 295:
Question 295 explanation:

Correct answer: A) enable AAA override

Why: When ISE assigns VLANs via RADIUS attributes, you need the WLC to accept and apply those attributes. Enabling AAA Override (in the WLC, typically via the Advanced tab and the Allow AAA Override option) lets the RADIUS server’s attributes override the WLC’s local VLAN configuration. This is the standard fix to ensure clients get placed on the VLAN returned by the RADIUS server.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

- set a NAC state: not the direct mechanism to apply RADIUS-provided VLANs. - utilize RADIUS profiling: helpful for device/class identification but does not by itself override VLAN assignment. - require a DHCP address assignment: unrelated to VLAN mapping based on authentication.

Note on the exam key: The page shows answer C (utilize RADIUS profiling), but the correct Cisco practice is to enable AAA Override to allow RADIUS-provided attributes to place the client on the proper VLAN.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User6170 on: June 15, 2026
Question 16:
A opção correta é C: "Proteger as liberdades civis e aumentar a conscientização do consumidor."
Por quê:

EFF e EPIC são organizações não governamentais criadas para defender liberdades civis na esfera digital e ampliar a consciência sobre privacidade e direitos dos consumidores.

Não foram criadas para estabelecer padrões de transações online (isso costuma envolver órgãos regulatórios ou padrões técnicos).

Embora apoiem criptografia, o objetivo principal delas não é promover a segurança via criptografia como único caminho.

Não se concentram apenas em aumentar a confiança do consumidor na indústria nem em “promover segurança na Internet através de criptografia forte” como missão central.

Resumo: defender liberdades civis digitais e educar/alertar o público sobre privacidade são seus compromissos centrais.
Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User2759 on: July 04, 2026
Question 40:

Correct answer: C — The source and destination MAC addresses remain the same.

Why:

The switch learns each device’s MAC address in its CAM (MAC address) table when frames arrive.

After initial communication, the switch knows PC_A’s MAC and PC_B’s MAC and the ports they’re on.

When PC_A sends to PC_B again, the switch forwards the frame based on PC_B’s MAC and the port where PC_B is attached; it does not rewrite the frame’s MAC header.

So the frame header stays: source = PC_A’s MAC, destination = PC_B’s MAC.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Source MAC is changed: not done by a switch on a normal unicast frame.

Destination MAC replaced with ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff: only happens for broadcasts, not a regular unicast to PC_B.

Switch rewrites both MACs with its own: not how standard switching operates.

Chennai, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6418 on: June 20, 2026
Question 9:

True Positive (TP): A real security threat occurs and the monitoring system correctly detects it and raises an alert.

False Negative (FN): A real security threat occurs but the detection system misses it, so no alert is generated.

Example: If an unauthorized USB exfiltration happens and no alert is triggered, that’s a false negative. If the system detects the unauthorized USB and raises an alert, that’s a true positive.
Why it matters:

False negatives are dangerous because they allow breaches to go undetected.

True positives enable timely incident response.

How to reduce FN vs TP gaps:

Improve detection coverage (EDR/UEBA, DLP, SIEM tuning).

Regularly test detection rules and perform red-team/blue-team exercises.

Ensure comprehensive logging and cross-domain visibility so multi-source signals can be correlated.

'Ewa Beach, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User7840 on: June 28, 2026
Question 148:
Question 148 asks which migration strategy is best to modernize and convert a monolithic application into microservices and move it to AWS.

Correct answer: Refactor (D)

Why: Refactoring involves re-architecting the application to decompose it into independent microservices. This aligns with the goal of moving from a monolith to microservices, enabling independent deployment, scaling, and maintenance.

Why others aren’t correct for this goal:

- Rehost (lift-and-shift): moves the app with minimal changes, preserving the monolithic architecture. - Replatform: makes some cloud optimizations but still keeps a monolith. - Repurchase: replaces the app with a different product (often SaaS), not microservices.
High-level AWS approach after refactoring (conceptual):

Decompose into services with clear boundaries.

Deploy per-service using containers or serverless (e.g., ECS/EKS/Fargate or Lambda).

Use API Gateway for service exposure and potentially a service mesh like App Mesh for communication.

Implement per-service data stores and resilient communication, with CI/CD pipelines (CodePipeline, CodeBuild).

If you want, I can walk through how to apply this with a sample monolith-to-microservices decomposition.
Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by User6685 on: June 28, 2026
Question 26:
No. The proposed solution does not meet the goal.

APIM can secure back-end calls using client certificates. Using Basic gateway credentials is not appropriate for a back-end hosted as an Azure resource like an Azure App Service.

For an App Service back-end, configure backend authentication with a client certificate in API Management (upload the certificate to APIM and have the API Management service present it to the backend).

The explanation in the question notes that the back end is an Azure resource and should use certificate-based authentication rather than basic authentication.

Jaitpur, India

AI Explanation - verified by User3233 on: June 24, 2026
Question 22:
Question 22 asks how to enable regular expression searches in Azure Search.

Correct answer: B — Configure the QueryType property of the SearchParameters class.

Why: The QueryType determines the query syntax. The default is simple; set it to full to use the Lucene query syntax, which supports advanced forms like wildcard, fuzzy, proximity, and regular expressions.

Why the others are not correct:

- A. SearchMode controls how terms are combined (any/all), not regex capability. - C. Facets is for returning facet counts, not enabling regex. - D. Filter applies boolean filter expressions, not enabling Lucene regex syntax.
Example (conceptual):

SearchParameters sp = new SearchParameters { QueryType = QueryType.Full };

Melissa, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User2146 on: June 21, 2026
Question 37:
Question 37 asks how to run two Docker containers in Azure Container Instances (ACI) with shared, persistent storage, non-root users, and YAML-based deployment.
Key concepts to meet the requirements:

Put both containers in a single container group so they share lifecycle, resources, and the local network.

Use a shared, persistent storage volume backed by Azure File share (azureFile) so data survives container crashes and container restarts.

Mount the same volume into both containers (volumeMounts) so they can share data and state.

Ensure containers do not run as root (set non-root user in each container, typically via securityContext with runAsNonRoot: true and runAsUser: <non-root UID>).

Why azureFile?

Ephemeral volumes (like emptyDir) disappear when containers crash or stop.

Azure File shares persist independently of container lifecycle, satisfying the persistence and restart requirements.

Example approach (high level):

Create a container group with two containers.

Define a volume named, for example, sharedvolume, of type azureFile (provide shareName, storageAccountName, and access details).

In both containers, mount sharedvolume at the same path (e.g., /data).

For each container, set securityContext to runAsNonRoot and a non-root runAsUser.

Sample (conceptual):

containers: [ container1, container2 ]

volumeMounts: [ { name: sharedvolume, mountPath: /data } ]

volumes: [ { name: sharedvolume, azureFile: { shareName: "myshare", storageAccountName: "mystorage", storageAccountKey: "...", readOnly: false } } ]

securityContext for each container: runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser: 1000

By using a single cont
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 339:
Question 339 asks about why a device in Cisco DNA Center Plug and Play might be labeled as “unclaimed.”

Answer: A — The device has not been assigned a workflow.

Why:

In PnP, an Unclaimed device has been discovered but not yet assigned to a provisioning workflow (i.e., not yet claimed). It’s waiting to be placed into a workflow or site before provisioning begins.

B is incorrect: “could not be added to the fabric” describes a provisioning/fabric-join failure, not an unclaimed state.

C is incorrect: an error/provision failure would be a different status (e.g., failed).

D is incorrect: the vendor does not determine the unclaimed status.

Once you claim the device (assign it to a workflow or site), its status moves beyond Unclaimed.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna on: June 29, 2026
Question 456:
The question asks what to do during closing when a deliverable isn’t meeting customer expectations. The best move is to address the gap by renegotiating scope so that both parties are satisfied.
Answer: C
Why:

Closing doesn’t mean ignoring issues. If a deliverable doesn’t meet expectations, you should work with the customer to agree on a revised scope that will satisfy both sides. This may involve a change in scope that is processed through the change control process, leading to new acceptance criteria and sign-off.

This keeps the project aligned with customer needs while ensuring formal acceptance or a clearly defined path to resolution.

Why the other options are weaker:

A suggests the customer must issue a change request, which isn’t typically how the PM handles defects or gaps; changes usually come from the project team or customer through formal change control.

B is vague and doesn’t drive a path to resolution or re-define acceptance criteria.

D inappropriately escalates to the sponsor before attempting direct negotiation for a revised scope.

Key takeaways:

In closing, address unmet deliverables via a negotiated scope change that satisfies both parties and leads to formal acceptance.

Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User7378 on: June 10, 2026
Question 5:
Here’s how to approach Question 5.

Correct three options:

- Enable column profile - Show column profile in details pane - Enable details pane

Why these are correct:

- The min and max values are provided by the column profile. Enabling the column profile ensures statistical metadata is collected for each column. - To actually see those stats (including min/max) in the UI, you need the details pane to be visible and configured to show the profile data. - “Show column value distribution” and “Show column quality details” relate to other profiling metrics (distribution, quality) and aren’t needed to obtain min/max values.

What the other options do (not required for min/max):

- Show column value distribution: shows distribution details, not specifically the min/max. - Show column quality details: shows data quality metrics, not min/max.
In short, enable the column profile and ensure the profile is shown in the details pane, with the details pane itself enabled. This will display min and max values for each column.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User8765 on: June 10, 2026
Question 49:
Question 49 asks what “Done” means for a Development Team delivering a Sprint Increment. The two correct statements are:

C: No work left from the definition of "Done."

- Why: The Increment must meet the team’s Definition of Done (DoD); there should be no remaining work to satisfy the DoD for the items in the Increment.

E: All work to create software that is ready to be released to end users.

- Why: A done Increment is potentially releasable and ready for end users if the DoD is met.
Why the others are not correct:

A: “All work the Development Team is willing to do” is not what defines Done; Done is defined by the DoD, not willingness.

B: “Ready for integration” is only one aspect and may be part of the DoD, but it doesn’t capture the full meaning of Done being potentially releasable.

D: “Whatever the Product Owner defines as quality” is incorrect because the DoD is a shared Scrum Team concept, not solely defined by the Product Owner.

Key concepts:

Definition of Done sets the criteria the Increment must meet.

A Done Increment is potentially releasable to end users.

Algiers, Algeria

AI Explanation - verified by User3792 on: July 06, 2026
Question 32:
Question 32 asks how to track contractors (Contacts) who move between agencies (Accounts) while keeping historical accuracy.
Key concept:

A contractor can be linked to multiple agencies over time, which is a many-to-many relationship. To preserve history (which agency they were with, when, and for how long), you should model this with a relationship object that can hold attributes like start date and end date.

The recommended approach is to create a junction object to represent the relationship between Contacts and Accounts (Agencies). This lets you store relationship data (dates, roles, status) and report on historical and current associations.

Why the other options are less suitable:

A) Using a partner community doesn’t address the data modeling for historic relationships.

B) Creating a new Contact for each agency dups data and loses the single source of truth.

D) Enabling Contacts to multiple Accounts describes the capability but is effectively implemented via a junction (AccountContactRelation). Without a dedicated junction object, you lose the ability to store relationship-specific attributes.

Answer: C — Create a Junction object to track a many-to-many relationship. If you’re on newer Salesforce versions, this is often implemented via the built-in Account-Contact relationship (AccountContactRelation) behind the scenes, but the explicit junction object pattern is the clear, interview-safe approach.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by czupakam on: June 19, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s why Question 1’s answer is B and E.

Goal: Connect Vnet2 and Vnet3 so their traffic routes through Vnet1 to the Boston datacenter over ExpressRoute, and traffic between Vnet2 and Vnet3 goes via Vnet1 (hub-and-spoke with transit).

Key concepts:

Use the remote gateway: On the peering between Vnet2–Vnet1 and Vnet3–Vnet1, set “Use the remote virtual network's gateway or Route Server”. This makes Vnet2/Vnet3 send their traffic to the gateway in the remote network (Vnet1) for routing to on-prem.

Allow forwarded traffic: On those same peerings, enable “Allow for Traffic forwarded from remote virtual network” so Vnet1 can forward traffic coming from Vnet2 or Vnet3 to the remote (on-prem over ExpressRoute).

Why the other options aren’t correct:

Enabling Gateway usage on the Vnet1 peering would have Vnet1 use Vnet2/Vnet3’s gateway, which is not what you want.

The required transit behavior is achieved by B (forwarding allowed) and E (use remote gateway) on the Vnet2/Vnet3 peerings, not by the Vnet1-side settings.

Vienna, Austria

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 350:
Question 350 explanation:

Correct answer: A —

return (json.dumps({d['hostname']: d['serialNumber'] for d in json.loads(test_json)['response']}))

Why: test_json is presumably a JSON string with a structure like {"response": [ {"hostname": "...", "serialNumber": "..."}, ... ]}. The expression:

- json.loads(test_json)['response'] yields a list of dicts. - The dict comprehension builds a mapping: hostname -> serialNumber. - json.dumps(...) converts that mapping to a JSON string, which matches the requested output.

Why the others are not correct:

- B uses an invalid dict comprehension syntax. - C incorrectly applies json.loads to a value produced by json.dumps, and mixes types; it also references json.dumps(test_json)['response'], which is not valid. - D is invalid syntax for a dict comprehension and also misuses json.loads/json.dumps.

Quick example:

- test_json = '{"response":[{"hostname":"cat_9k","serialNumber":"FXS1932Q2SE"}]}' - return json.dumps({d['hostname']: d['serialNumber'] for d in json.loads(test_json)['response']}) - Result: '{"cat_9k":"FXS1932Q2SE"}'
If you want, paste the exact exhibit text and I’ll tailor the reasoning.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User4939 on: June 21, 2026
Question 5:
Question 5 asks which delimiters the Field Extractor (FX) can use. The answer key here lists Tabs and Pipes (A and B), but FX actually supports all four: Tabs, Pipes, Colons, and Spaces.
Why: FX creates field extractions by splitting an event on a chosen delimiter. Those four delimiters cover common log formats:

Tabs: field1\tfield2

Pipes: field1|field2

Colons: key:value style splits

Spaces: field1 field2 (but watch for multiple spaces or spaces within values)

Caveats:

Spaces can be tricky if values contain spaces; you may need quoting or a different extraction approach (e.g., regex).

After selecting a delimiter, verify by testing with sample events to confirm the correct fields are created.

In short: correct choices are A, B, C, and D (all four delimiters). The key you provided omits Colons and Spaces, which are also supported.
Mumbai, India

AI Explanation - verified by jjnanthakumar17 on: June 21, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s how to think about Question 1 and why startup scripts via GPO (option C) is the better fit.

Goal: Ensure the automation scripts run on every newly created VM in the on-prem Hyper-V environment.

A) SetupComplete.cmd in %windir%\setup\scripts

- Pros: Runs as Windows is being set up. - Cons: Only reliably executes during the OS deployment/setup phase. If you’re cloning or deploying from existing images, SetupComplete.cmd may not run consistently. Not the most flexible for ongoing provisioning.

B) GPO logon scripts

- Pros: Easy to assign per-user. - Cons: Requires a user to log on. If the VM is used as a server or started before any user logs in, the scripts won’t run.

C) GPO startup scripts

- Pros: Runs at computer startup under the Local SYSTEM context, independent of user logon. Ensures the scripts execute on new VMs as soon as they boot (and on subsequent boots if needed). This is normally the simplest and most reliable method for automated VM configuration in an AD environment.

D) Place scripts in a VHD

- Not automatic; nothing to trigger execution.
Bottom line: The most robust choice to guarantee the scripts run on new VMs without user interaction is option C, the startup script GPO. Note: the provided explanation in the question mentions a Azure-specific Custom Script extension, which isn’t applicable to on-prem Hyper-V.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5302 on: June 17, 2026
Question 17:
The answer is B: Unsupervised learning.

Why: The company has petabytes of unlabeled data and wants to group customers into tiers without predefined labels. Unsupervised learning is used to find natural groupings (clusters) in unlabeled data, which aligns with this goal.

How it works here: Apply clustering algorithms (e.g., K-means, hierarchical clustering, DBSCAN) on customer features (spend, behavior, demographics, etc.) to form segments or tiers.

How it differs from other options:

- Supervised learning requires labeled examples to predict a known target. - Reinforcement learning learns by interacting with an environment and optimizing a policy. - RLHF is a specialized form of RL using human feedback; not suited for static clustering tasks.

Practical follow-up: Once clusters are formed, business rules can assign tier labels or the clusters can be interpreted to define marketing segments. If labeled data becomes available later, you could switch to supervised (or semi-supervised) methods to refine the tiers.

Mumbai, India

AI Explanation - verified by User1618 on: June 11, 2026
Question 3:

Answer: No (B)

Why:

- The task is to get an assessment of an Azure environment’s design from Microsoft. That capability is provided by the Premier support plan. - The company currently has the Basic plan, which does not include this assessment. - The requirement also says to keep expenses to a minimum. Premier is the most expensive option, and there isn’t a cheaper plan that includes an architecture/design assessment. So while Premier enables the feature, it does not meet the goal of minimizing cost.

Therefore, the solution does not satisfy the goal.

Boydton, United States

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 287:
Question 287 explanation:

Key concept: A standard ACL filters by source IP only and uses a wildcard mask to define the allowed set. You can’t express “odd-numbered hosts” in a single standard ACL entry for 10.0.0.0/24.

What each option actually does:

- A: permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1 (two addresses), not all odd ones. - B: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.254 effectively matches a small pair of addresses near 10.0.0.1 (not all odd addresses across the /24). - C: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 matches only 10.0.0.1 (a single odd address). - D: permit 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254 is equivalent in effect to 0.0.0.1 (matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1); not all odd addresses.

Bottom line: None of the given single-entry options cleanly permits traffic from all odd-numbered hosts in 10.0.0.0/24. To achieve that, you’d need multiple ACL entries (one per odd address or a more complex filtering scheme), which isn’t represented by a single standard ACL line.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by mohamedmusaraf05 on: July 06, 2026
Question 418:
Question 418 is about making sure a default route is advertised into OSPF.

Core idea: The command “default-information originate” only injects a default route into OSPF if the router actually has a default route (0.0.0.0/0) in its own routing table.

Why C is correct: Configure a static default on R1 pointing to the Internet gateway (for example, 10.10.10.18). This gives R1 a 0.0.0.0/0 route, so the router will originate a default into OSPF and VLAN 20 at Site B can reach the Internet DNS.

Why the other options aren’t ideal:

- A: Adding default-information originate on R2 isn’t necessary since R1 already originates it once it has a default route; R2 would learn the default from R1. - B: Using the always keyword (default-information originate always) causes R1 to advertise a default even without a real 0.0.0.0/0 route, which can lead to blackholes. - D: Configuring a default on R2 (to 10.10.10.2) may not point toward the actual Internet gateway and won’t ensure R1 is advertising a valid default into OSPF.
Answer: C
Chennai, India

AI Explanation - verified by User8896 on: June 16, 2026
Question 14:
Question 14: The correct answer is A (Fairness).
Why:

The sentence emphasizes fairness as a core ethical principle in AI.

Fairness aims to prevent discriminatory or biased decisions based on attributes like gender, race, sexual orientation, or religion.

What this means in practice:

Ensure AI decisions are non-discriminatory and treat people equitably.

Use bias checks, diverse and representative data, and regular audits to detect and mitigate unfair outcomes.

Align with trusted AI guidance by incorporating fairness into design, testing, and monitoring processes.

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

AI Explanation - verified by User1955 on: June 23, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s how to think about Question 1.

Goal: Give the user the most time to save work during a power failure. That means put the devices that must stay powered long (the PC, any monitor) on the backup battery, and put non-critical devices on a regular surge protection path.

Key concepts:

- A UPS provides battery backup (runtime during outages) and power conditioning. - A surge protector only protects against surges; it does not provide backup power. - Do not chain a UPS through another surge protector or power strip if possible; the UPS should be plugged into a proper wall outlet.

Recommended arrangement to maximize uptime:

- Connect the UPS directly to a wall outlet (dedicated outlet if possible). - Plug the computer and monitor (the critical devices you want powered during an outage) into the UPS outlets. - Connect non-critical devices (for example, a printer or other peripherals that don’t need to stay on during an outage) to a surge protector that is plugged into a wall outlet, not into the UPS.

Why this works:

- The UPS powers the essential devices during an outage, giving you time to save work and shut down gracefully. - The surge protector protects non-critical devices from spikes without drawing from the UPS battery.
If you want, I can map a specific device list to UPS vs surge protector and explain the reasoning for each.
Johannesburg, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User7034 on: July 01, 2026
Question 15:
Question 15 asks which three standard objects are available out-of-the-box for a service/support use case. Among the options, the standard objects are:

Case: the primary object for tracking support requests.

Account: represents the customer organization and relates to Case.

Contract: stores service agreements/entitlements and is a standard object.

The options Ticket and Request are not standard Salesforce objects (they would be custom objects or just terminology for Case). So the correct choices are A, B, and E. Note: In a real setup you’d also use Contact as a standard object, but it isn’t listed here.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User2380 on: June 26, 2026
Question 6:
Question 6 asks why you’d see “Prompt not found” when opening a shared Copilot prompt from another company. The page shows the answer as C, but that seems questionable.

The answer key says: The prompt contains a reference to a file you do NOT have access to (C).

In my view, the more likely cause is: The prompt is outside of your organization (B). Copilot prompts are typically tenant-bound; sharing a prompt link across tenants is often blocked by cross-tenant restrictions or requires explicit licensing/configuration. If the external tenant hasn’t granted access or your organization’s policies block external prompts, you’d get a not-found or access-denied result.

Why B fits better:

Cross-tenant restrictions block external prompts from loading.

Licensing and prompt privacy settings can prevent access to externally shared prompts.

The error message aligns with access/app policy rather than a specific file reference.

Bottom line: The provided key says C, but the most plausible explanation is B (prompt is outside your organization) due to tenant restrictions and access controls.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6205 on: June 17, 2026
which is the body responsible for technical matters relating to accounting standards
Answer: The IASB (International Accounting Standards Board).
Explanation: The IASB is the independent standard-setting body responsible for developing and issuing IFRS. The IFRS Foundation trustees oversee governance and funding, while the IFRS Interpretations Committee handles interpretations of IFRS, not the core technical standard setting.
Maseru, Lesotho

AI Explanation - verified by User7592 on: June 17, 2026
Question 2:
Correct answer: Read-only geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS).
Explanation:

Data must be stored on multiple nodes: both GRS and RA-GRS replicate to multiple nodes in the primary region.

Data must be in separate geographic locations: RA-GRS replicates to a secondary region, meeting cross-region durability.

Data can be read from the secondary location as well as the primary: RA-GRS enables read access to the data in the secondary region (this is the key feature that differentiates RA-GRS from standard GRS).

Notes:

RA-GRS is an opt-in feature and requires the storage account to be geo-replicated.

Other options:

- Geo-redundant storage (GRS) replicates cross-region but does not provide read access to the secondary by default. - Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) stays within a single region across zones. - Locally redundant storage (LRS) stays in a single location.
Mumbai, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7847 on: July 06, 2026
Question 56:
Correct answer: B) Product owner reviews backlog refinement processes.

Why B is correct: The root cause is unclear requirements. Backlog refinement (grooming) helps ensure items are well-defined, with clear acceptance criteria and small, estimable chunks. The Product Owner owns the backlog, so improving refinement directly addresses the lack of clarity and helps the team plan and complete iterations more reliably.

Why the other options are less appropriate:

- A: Reviewing iteration length with stakeholders may help scheduling, but it doesn’t fix the underlying unclear requirements. - C: Limiting work in progress can improve flow, but it doesn’t resolve unclear requirements driving unfinished work. - D: Reviewing individual performance doesn’t tackle the systemic issue of unclear requirements.

Practical tie-in: Encourage a strong Definition of Ready in refinement sessions, so backlog items entering each sprint/iteration are clear, scoped, and testable.

Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User2335 on: June 22, 2026
Question 3:
Explication de la Question 3:

Objectif: aider une équipe avec de gros besoins de stockage de fichiers centralisés, en conservant des performances de partage locales, de manière opérationnellement efficace.

Analyse des options:

- Option 1: Déployer un Storage Gateway avec un file gateway et connecter les postes clients. Le gateway expose des partages de fichiers SMB/NFS locaux et stocke les données de manière durable dans S3. C’est une solution éprouvée pour le partage de fichiers centralisé avec cache local et scalabilité. - Option 2: Migrer les environnements vers Amazon WorkSpaces. Côté stockage, ce n’est pas l’objectif principal et cela n’offre pas un partage de fichiers centralisé performant. - Option 3: WorkDocs par utilisateur. Plus adapté à la collaboration et au stockage cloud, pas nécessairement optimal pour un partage de fichiers local à grande échelle. - Option 4: Déployer une instance EC2 avec EBS et partager le volume. EBS n’est pas conçu pour un partage efficace et direct entre de nombreux utilisateurs.

Conclusion: la solution la plus opérationnellement efficace est le déploiement d’un Storage Gateway avec un file gateway (l’option qui décrit l’usage du gateway pour des partages locaux tout en stockant dans S3).

Note: la banque de questions indique « B », mais la meilleure approche AWS est le Storage Gateway file gateway.
Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by User8281 on: June 07, 2026
Question 3:
Question 3 asks whether the given year-end configuration meets these goals:

Q1 adjustments can post to the previous year’s Period 13.

The year-end can be run again, but only the most recent closing entry remains.

All P&L dimensions carry into retained earnings.

All past and future periods are On Hold.

What the solution sets:

Delete close of year transactions: No

Create closing transactions during transfer: No

Fiscal year status permanently closed: No

Year-end close template: defined

Retained earnings main account: designated

Opening transactions option for financial dimensions: No

Transfer profit and loss dimensions: Close All

All prior and future ledger periods: On Hold

Why this does not meet the goal:

The key requirement to allow re-running the year-end with only the latest closing entry means you should be able to delete older closing entries. Setting "Delete close of year transactions" to Yes is typically needed; with No, older closing entries would remain.

Similarly, “Create closing transactions during transfer” should usually be Yes so a new closing can be created during the transfer step.

Opening transactions should likely be Yes to ensure P&L dimensions flow into retained earnings; No may prevent carrying those dimensions.

The rest (retained earnings main account, On Hold for prior/future, and transferring P&L dims) align with the goals.

Recommended: set Delete close of year transactions to Yes, Create closing transactions during transfer to Yes, Opening transactions to Yes, keep Fi
Cebu City, Philippines

AI Explanation - verified by User3937 on: June 15, 2026
Question 2:

The correct answer is: C. The flow is a before save flow.

Why:

In Salesforce, a before-save (record-triggered) flow runs before the record is saved and has a restricted set of elements. The Flow toolbox for these flows typically includes only core elements like Assignment, Decision, Get Records, and Loop—no UI elements or typical DML actions (like Create Records or Update Records for other objects).

If it were a screen flow, you would see the Screen element in the toolbox.

The version status (inactive vs activated) doesn’t limit which elements appear in the toolbox; it affects deployment/activation, not the available elements during editing.

Pretoria, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User8187 on: June 07, 2026
Question 31:
Question 31 asks whether including a Network Security Group (NSG) in your Azure design to control the connection types between web servers and database servers meets the goal.

Correct answer: A (Yes)

Why:

NSGs are the primary tool to filter network traffic in Azure. You can apply them at the subnet level or to individual network interfaces (NICs).

To control traffic between web and database tiers, put the web servers in one subnet and the database servers in another, then create NSG rules that:

- Inbound: allow traffic from the Web subnet to the DB subnet on the database port(s) (for example, TCP 1433 for SQL Server). - Optionally restrict or deny other traffic between the two subnets. - Ensure outbound rules align with the desired traffic flow.

This setup prevents undesired access while permitting only the approved connection types between tiers.

Practical steps:

Create NSG.

Add inbound rule: source = WebSubnet, destination = DBSubnet, port = DB port, action = Allow.

Add any necessary outbound rules and place the NSG on the DB subnet or on DB NICs.

So NSGs effectively meet the requirement of controlling connections between web and database servers.
Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6141 on: June 26, 2026
Question 38:
Question 38 – Correct answer: C.

Answer: C. Activity explorer in the Microsoft Purview compliance portal

Why this is correct:

The Data classification activity explorer logs labeling events, such as “Sensitivity label applied” and label upgrades/downgrades.

You can filter by date (e.g., past 7 days) to identify all changes to sensitivity labels across documents and emails, providing a full audit trail.

Why the other options aren’t suitable:

Incidents blade in the Defender portal: for security incidents, not labeling history.

Alerts settings on the DLP blade in Purview: for configuring alerts, not viewing labeling history.

Explorer settings on the Email & collaboration blade in Defender: not related to labeling events.

Notes:

You’ll need appropriate Purview/Compliance roles to view the activity explorer.

The event types include labeling actions from Office apps and add-ins, covering applies and upgrades/downgrades.

Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User1253 on: July 06, 2026
Question 8:
Question 8 asks which rollout strategy best minimizes business downtime when implementing a month-end processing system.
Key options:

Cutover (big bang): switch from old to new in one go; typically causes significant downtime during the switch.

Phased: roll out in stages; downtime is reduced per phase but the total deployment may take longer and complicates integration.

Pilot: deploy to a limited area first; reduces risk but not necessarily the widest downtime impact.

Parallel: run old and new systems side by side for a period; downtime is minimized because business operations can continue on the old system while the new is tested and reconciled.

Why Parallel is best here:

It allows continuous operation during the transition (no single cutover downtime).

Problems can be resolved without halting business processes.

Data reconciliation can occur while both systems run.

Trade-offs: higher cost and effort to maintain two systems temporarily.
Answer: D: Parallel.
Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7515 on: June 21, 2026
Question 37:
Question 37 asks how to provide additional safeguards for encrypted data at ALBs by using a unique random session key. The correct approach is to ensure forward secrecy (FS) in TLS.
Why the right answer is D:

Forward secrecy means the session keys are generated using ephemeral keys (e.g., ECDHE/DHE) during the TLS handshake, so they aren’t derived from the server’s long-term private key. This protects past sessions if the private key is compromised later.

Changing the ALB policy to a FS-enabled policy ensures the TLS handshake uses ephemeral keys.

Why the other options are not correct:

A: Simply requiring TLS 1.2 does not guarantee forward secrecy, as TLS 1.2 can use non-ephemeral (RSA) key exchanges depending on the cipher suite.

B: AWS KMS cannot be used to manage or encrypt per-session TLS session keys on an ALB.

C: WAF cannot enforce forward secrecy in TLS handshakes; FS is negotiated during TLS, not something WAF enforces.

How to implement (high level):

In the ALB/or listener settings, choose a security policy that supports forward secrecy (FS-enabled cipher suites, e.g., ECDHE-based suites).

If your environment supports TLS 1.3, that inherently provides FS as well.

Madrid, Spain

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 38 )

QUESTION: 65

Explanation:

QUESTION: 66

QUESTION: 67

QUESTION: 68

QUESTION: 69

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions
Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 38 )