College Board SAT Exam Actual Questions
Scholastic Aptitude Test Exam (Page 4 )

Updated On: 30-Jul-2026

But the Dust-Bin was going down then, and your father took but little, excepting from a liquid point of view. Your mother's object in those visits was of a house- keeping character, and you was set on to whistle your father out. Sometimes he came out, but generally not. Come or not come, however, all that part of his existence which was unconnected with open Waitering was kept a close secret, and was acknowledged by your mother to be a close secret, and you and your mother flitted about the court, close secrets both of you, and would scarcely have confessed under torture that you know your father, or that your father had any name than Dick (which wasn't his name, though he was never known by any other), or that he had kith or kin or chick or child. Perhaps the attraction of this mystery, combined with your father's having a damp compartment, to himself, behind a leaky cistern, at the Dust Bin, a sort of a cellar compartment, with a sink in it, and a smell, and a plate-rack, and a bottle-rack, and three windows that didn't match each other or anything else, and no daylight, caused your young mind to feel convinced that you must grow up to be a Waiter too; but you did feel convinced of it, and so did all your brothers, down to your sister. Every one of you felt convinced that you was born to the Waitering. At this stage of your career, what was your feelings one day when your father came home to your mother in open broad daylight, of itself an act of Madness on the part of a Waiter, and took to his bed (leastwise, your mother and family's bed), with the statement that his eyes were devilled kidneys. Physicians being in vain, your father expired, after repeating at intervals for a day and a night, when gleams of reason and old business fitfully illuminated his being, `Two and two is five. And three is sixpence.` Interred in the parochial department of the neighbouring churchyard, and accompanied to the grave by as many Waiters of long standing as could spare the morning time from their soiled glasses (namely, one), your bereaved form was attired in a white neckankecher, and you was took on from motives of benevolence at The George and Gridiron, theatrical and supper. Here, supporting nature on what you found in the plates (which was as it happened, and but too often thoughtlessly, immersed in mustard), and on what you found in the glasses (which rarely went beyond driblets and lemon), by night you dropped asleep standing, till you was cuffed awake, and by day was set to polishing every individual article in the coffee-room. Your couch being sawdust; your counterpane being ashes of cigars. Here, frequently hiding a heavy heart under the smart tie of your white neck ankecher (or correctly speaking lower down and more to the left), you picked up the rudiments of knowledge from an extra, by the name of Bishops, and by calling plate- washer, and gradually elevating your mind with chalk on the back of the corner-box partition, until such time as you used the inkstand when it was out of hand, attained to manhood, and to be the Waiter that you find yourself. I could wish here to offer a few respectful words on behalf of the calling so long the calling of myself and family, and the public interest in which is but too often very limited. We are not generally understood. No, we are not. Allowance enough is not made for us. For, say that we ever show a little drooping listlessness of spirits, or what might be termed indifference or apathy. Put it to yourself what would your own state of mind be, if you was one of an enormous family every member of which except you was always greedy, and in a hurry. Put it to yourself that you was regularly replete with animal food at the slack hours of one in the day and again at nine p.m., and that the repleter you was, the more voracious all your fellow-creatures came in. Put it to yourself that it was your business, when your digestion was well on, to take a personal interest and sympathy in a hundred gentlemen fresh and fresh (say, for the sake of argument, only a hundred), whose imaginations was given up to grease and fat and gravy and melted butter, and abandoned to questioning you about cuts of this, and dishes of that, each of 'em going on as if him and you and the bill of fare was alone in the world.
Why does the language `Two and two is five. And three is sixpence` 1st paragraph illuminate rather than confuse the character of the father on his deathbed?

  1. It is reasonable that a father would be concerned about his family's finances following his death.
  2. It is normal for a dying person to speak of money or fortune upon their deathbed.
  3. It indicates that he wanted his wife and son to be sure to get the money from the compartment.
  4. It was the amount being communicated that should be paid for his burial.
  5. It was his practice the whole of his daily vocation.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Why option E is the only correct choice
The phrase “Two and two is five. And three is sixpence” is repeated by the dying father as part of his “old business” that intermittently restores his reason. Throughout the passage the father’s entire life is described as a waiter’s routine; his “old business” is the very practice of waiting tables. Thus the cryptic arithmetic is not a financial calculation, a burial fee, or a generic death-bed preoccupation. It is simply the habit-of-mind that defines his vocation: counting, measuring, and dealing in the small, practical units of his work. Consequently, the statement illuminates his character as a lifelong waiter whose very thought patterns are bound to the trade.
Why the other options do not fit
A & B – The father shows no concern for finances or the usual “death-bed talk” about legacy; his utterance is unrelated to money or fortune. C – There is no indication that the numbers refer to any payment for burial; the burial is performed later by others. D – The phrase does not specify a monetary amount to be paid; it is a rhetorical fragment of his occupational mindset, not a pricing statement.
Only E captures that the utterance reflects the father’s lifelong practice of counting and dealing in the small units inherent to his role as a waiter.


Reference:

Dickens, Charles. The Mystery of Edwin Drood (unfinished). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1400 SparkNotes. “The Mystery of Edwin Drood: Summary.” https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/mystery-of-edwin-drood/
These sources contain the passage in question and supporting analysis of the father’s deathbed speech.



But the Dust-Bin was going down then, and your father took but little, excepting from a liquid point of view. Your mother's object in those visits was of a house- keeping character, and you was set on to whistle your father out. Sometimes he came out, but generally not. Come or not come, however, all that part of his existence which was unconnected with open Waitering was kept a close secret, and was acknowledged by your mother to be a close secret, and you and your mother flitted about the court, close secrets both of you, and would scarcely have confessed under torture that you know your father, or that your father had any name than Dick (which wasn't his name, though he was never known by any other), or that he had kith or kin or chick or child. Perhaps the attraction of this mystery, combined with your father's having a damp compartment, to himself, behind a leaky cistern, at the Dust Bin, a sort of a cellar compartment, with a sink in it, and a smell, and a plate-rack, and a bottle-rack, and three windows that didn't match each other or anything else, and no daylight, caused your young mind to feel convinced that you must grow up to be a Waiter too; but you did feel convinced of it, and so did all your brothers, down to your sister. Every one of you felt convinced that you was born to the Waitering. At this stage of your career, what was your feelings one day when your father came home to your mother in open broad daylight, of itself an act of Madness on the part of a Waiter, and took to his bed (leastwise, your mother and family's bed), with the statement that his eyes were devilled kidneys. Physicians being in vain, your father expired, after repeating at intervals for a day and a night, when gleams of reason and old business fitfully illuminated his being, `Two and two is five. And three is sixpence.` Interred in the parochial department of the neighbouring churchyard, and accompanied to the grave by as many Waiters of long standing as could spare the morning time from their soiled glasses (namely, one), your bereaved form was attired in a white neckankecher, and you was took on from motives of benevolence at The George and Gridiron, theatrical and supper. Here, supporting nature on what you found in the plates (which was as it happened, and but too often thoughtlessly, immersed in mustard), and on what you found in the glasses (which rarely went beyond driblets and lemon), by night you dropped asleep standing, till you was cuffed awake, and by day was set to polishing every individual article in the coffee-room. Your couch being sawdust; your counterpane being ashes of cigars. Here, frequently hiding a heavy heart under the smart tie of your white neck ankecher (or correctly speaking lower down and more to the left), you picked up the rudiments of knowledge from an extra, by the name of Bishops, and by calling plate- washer, and gradually elevating your mind with chalk on the back of the corner-box partition, until such time as you used the inkstand when it was out of hand, attained to manhood, and to be the Waiter that you find yourself.
I could wish here to offer a few respectful words on behalf of the calling so long the calling of myself and family, and the public interest in which is but too often very limited. We are not generally understood. No, we are not. Allowance enough is not made for us. For, say that we ever show a little drooping listlessness of spirits, or what might be termed indifference or apathy. Put it to yourself what would your own state of mind be, if you was one of an enormous family every member of which except you was always greedy, and in a hurry. Put it to yourself that you was regularly replete with animal food at the slack hours of one in the day and again at nine p.m., and that the repleter you was, the more voracious all your fellow-creatures came in. Put it to yourself that it was your business, when your digestion was well on, to take a personal interest and sympathy in a hundred gentlemen fresh and fresh (say, for the sake of argument, only a hundred), whose imaginations was given up to grease and fat and gravy and melted butter, and abandoned to questioning you about cuts of this, and dishes of that, each of 'em going on as if him and you and the bill of fare was alone in the world.
What is meant by `supporting nature` in the passage?

  1. being an environmentalist
  2. giving to causes of the parish following the death of the father
  3. because the George and Gridiron was an outdoor theatrical and supper establishment
  4. staying alive on what could be scraped from plates and glasses
  5. keeping the cycle of life in balance with working and supplying his mother's needs

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Technical justification
The phrase “supporting nature” in the passage is used to describe the narrator’s means of survival – he “picked up the rudiments of knowledge… by night you dropped asleep standing… by day was set to polishing every individual article in the coffee-room” while “your couch being sawdust; your counterpane being ashes of cigars.” The context makes it clear that his “support” comes from the scraps he can collect from the plates and glasses that are “immersed in mustard” and “rarely went beyond driblets and lemon.” This is precisely what option D states: “staying alive on what could be scraped from plates and glasses.” Option A (being an environmentalist) is unrelated; the text never mentions ecology, conservation, or environmental stewardship. Option B (giving to causes of the parish) is not referenced; the only “parish” mentioned is the churchyard where the father is buried, and no charitable giving is discussed. Option C (the George and Gridiron being an outdoor theatrical and supper establishment) mischaracterises the setting; the venue is described as a “theatrical and supper” house, but the phrase “supporting nature” does not refer to the venue’s architecture or location. Option E (keeping the cycle of life in balance with working and supplying his mother’s needs) introduces a cyclical, philosophical notion that is not present in the excerpt; the focus is on mere subsistence, not on balancing life cycles or maternal obligations.
Therefore, option D best captures the literal meaning of “supporting nature” as used in the passage.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of support: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/support Cambridge Dictionary definition of support (verb): https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/support



But the Dust-Bin was going down then, and your father took but little, excepting from a liquid point of view. Your mother's object in those visits was of a house- keeping character, and you was set on to whistle your father out.
Sometimes he came out, but generally not. Come or not come, however, all that part of his existence which was unconnected with open Waitering was kept a close secret, and was acknowledged by your mother to be a close secret, and you and your mother flitted about the court, close secrets both of you, and would scarcely have confessed under torture that you know your father, or that your father had any name than Dick (which wasn't his name, though he was never known by any other), or that he had kith or kin or chick or child. Perhaps the attraction of this mystery, combined with your father's having a damp compartment, to himself, behind a leaky cistern, at the Dust Bin, a sort of a cellar compartment, with a sink in it, and a smell, and a plate-rack, and a bottle-rack, and three windows that didn't match each other or anything else, and no daylight, caused your young mind to feel convinced that you must grow up to be a Waiter too; but you did feel convinced of it, and so did all your brothers, down to your sister. Every one of you felt convinced that you was born to the Waitering. At this stage of your career, what was your feelings one day when your father came home to your mother in open broad daylight, of itself an act of Madness on the part of a Waiter, and took to his bed (leastwise, your mother and family's bed), with the statement that his eyes were devilled kidneys. Physicians being in vain, your father expired, after repeating at intervals for a day and a night, when gleams of reason and old business fitfully illuminated his being, `Two and two is five. And three is sixpence.` Interred in the parochial department of the neighbouring churchyard, and accompanied to the grave by as many Waiters of long standing as could spare the morning time from their soiled glasses (namely, one), your bereaved form was attired in a white neckankecher, and you was took on from motives of benevolence at The George and Gridiron, theatrical and supper. Here, supporting nature on what you found in the plates (which was as it happened, and but too often thoughtlessly, immersed in mustard), and on what you found in the glasses (which rarely went beyond driblets and lemon), by night you dropped asleep standing, till you was cuffed awake, and by day was set to polishing every individual article in the coffee-room. Your couch being sawdust; your counterpane being ashes of cigars. Here, frequently hiding a heavy heart under the smart tie of your white neck ankecher (or correctly speaking lower down and more to the left), you picked up the rudiments of knowledge from an extra, by the name of Bishops, and by calling plate- washer, and gradually elevating your mind with chalk on the back of the corner-box partition, until such time as you used the inkstand when it was out of hand, attained to manhood, and to be the Waiter that you find yourself. I could wish here to offer a few respectful words on behalf of the calling so long the calling of myself and family, and the public interest in which is but too often very limited. We are not generally understood. No, we are not. Allowance enough is not made for us. For, say that we ever show a little drooping listlessness of spirits, or what might be termed indifference or apathy. Put it to yourself what would your own state of mind be, if you was one of an enormous family every member of which except you was always greedy, and in a hurry. Put it to yourself that you was regularly replete with animal food at the slack hours of one in the day and again at nine p.m., and that the repleter you was, the more voracious all your fellow-creatures came in. Put it to yourself that it was your business, when your digestion was well on, to take a personal interest and sympathy in a hundred gentlemen fresh and fresh (say, for the sake of argument, only a hundred), whose imaginations was given up to grease and fat and gravy and melted butter, and abandoned to questioning you about cuts of this, and dishes of that, each of 'em going on as if him and you and the bill of fare was alone in the world.
Which selection best describes the overall purpose of the author in the 1st paragraph?

  1. to establish how the main character became a waiter
  2. to establish that the life of a waiter was harsh
  3. to illuminate the lifestyle of a waiter during the time of this writing
  4. to share the hardships of the wife of a waiter
  5. to offer some explanation as to the secrecy shrouding the father

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Justification
Option A – “to establish how the main character became a waiter” The first paragraph traces the narrator’s lineage and the mysterious circumstances surrounding his father’s occupation, then follows the narrator’s own gradual immersion into the waiter’s trade. This directly establishes the origin and development of the protagonist’s career as a waiter, which is precisely what the question asks.
Option B – “to establish that the life of a waiter was harsh” While the paragraph hints at hardship later on, the opening focus is not on describing the general harshness of waiters’ lives but on the personal pathway into that occupation.
Option C – “to illuminate the lifestyle of a waiter during the time of this writing” The paragraph does not provide a broad, contemporary snapshot of waiter life; it is limited to the narrator’s family background and early conditioning.
Option D – “to share the hardships of the wife of a waiter” The wife’s role is mentioned only incidentally; the paragraph does not center on her experiences or suffering.
Option E – “to offer some explanation as to the secrecy shrouding the father” The secrecy surrounding the father is a narrative device that sets the stage for the narrator’s career, but it is not the overall purpose; it merely explains the environment from which the narrator emerges.
Hence, Option A best captures the paragraph’s primary aim: to trace the protagonist’s origin and entry into the waiter profession.


Reference:

Dickens, Charles. Sketches by Boz (1836). https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1400 The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. “Dickens, Charles (1812–1870).” https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-16633
These sources provide the original text and scholarly context for the passage discussed.



But the Dust-Bin was going down then, and your father took but little, excepting from a liquid point of view. Your mother's object in those visits was of a house- keeping character, and you was set on to whistle your father out. Sometimes he came out, but generally not. Come or not come, however, all that part of his existence which was unconnected with open Waitering was kept a close secret, and was acknowledged by your mother to be a close secret, and you and your mother flitted about the court, close secrets both of you, and would scarcely have confessed under torture that you know your father, or that your father had any name than Dick (which wasn't his name, though he was never known by any other), or that he had kith or kin or chick or child. Perhaps the attraction of this mystery, combined with your father's having a damp compartment, to himself, behind a leaky cistern, at the Dust Bin, a sort of a cellar compartment, with a sink in it, and a smell, and a plate-rack, and a bottle-rack, and three windows that didn't match each other or anything else, and no daylight, caused your young mind to feel convinced that you must grow up to be a Waiter too; but you did feel convinced of it, and so did all your brothers, down to your sister. Every one of you felt convinced that you was born to the Waitering. At this stage of your career, what was your feelings one day when your father came home to your mother in open broad daylight, of itself an act of Madness on the part of a Waiter, and took to his bed (leastwise, your mother and family's bed), with the statement that his eyes were devilled kidneys. Physicians being in vain, your father expired, after repeating at intervals for a day and a night, when gleams of reason and old business fitfully illuminated his being, `Two and two is five. And three is sixpence.` Interred in the parochial department of the neighbouring churchyard, and accompanied to the grave by as many Waiters of long standing as could spare the morning time from their soiled glasses (namely, one), your bereaved form was attired in a white neckankecher, and you was took on from motives of benevolence at The George and Gridiron, theatrical and supper. Here, supporting nature on what you found in the plates (which was as it happened, and but too often thoughtlessly, immersed in mustard), and on what you found in the glasses (which rarely went beyond driblets and lemon), by night you dropped asleep standing, till you was cuffed awake, and by day was set to polishing every individual article in the coffee-room. Your couch being sawdust; your counterpane being ashes of cigars. Here, frequently hiding a heavy heart under the smart tie of your white neck ankecher (or correctly speaking lower down and more to the left), you picked up the rudiments of knowledge from an extra, by the name of Bishops, and by calling plate- washer, and gradually elevating your mind with chalk on the back of the corner-box partition, until such time as you used the inkstand when it was out of hand, attained to manhood, and to be the Waiter that you find yourself. I could wish here to offer a few respectful words on behalf of the calling so long the calling of myself and family, and the public interest in which is but too often very limited. We are not generally understood. No, we are not. Allowance enough is not made for us. For, say that we ever show a little drooping listlessness of spirits, or what might be termed indifference or apathy. Put it to yourself what would your own state of mind be, if you was one of an enormous family every member of which except you was always greedy, and in a hurry. Put it to yourself that you was regularly replete with animal food at the slack hours of one in the day and again at nine p.m., and that the repleter you was, the more voracious all your fellow-creatures came in. Put it to yourself that it was your business, when your digestion was well on, to take a personal interest and sympathy in a hundred gentlemen fresh and fresh (say, for the sake of argument, only a hundred), whose imaginations was given up to grease and fat and gravy and melted butter, and abandoned to questioning you about cuts of this, and dishes of that, each of 'em going on as if him and you and the bill of fare was alone in the world.
What term best describes the overall tone toward waiters in this excerpt?

  1. satiric
  2. empathetic
  3. belittling
  4. apologetic
  5. informational

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
The passage adopts a satiric tone toward the profession of waiters, exaggerating their circumstances and portraying them as objects of ridicule rather than objects of sympathy or respect.
The author repeatedly emphasizes the waiters’ “damp compartment,” “leaky cistern,” and “soiled glasses,” using grotesque details to mock their working conditions. Phrases such as “your father expired… ‘Two and two is five. And three is sixpence.’” and the description of the narrator’s “white neck-anklecher” and “sawdust” couch create a darkly comic, almost absurd picture that ridicules rather than earnestly defends the profession. The overall effect is one of ironic detachment , a hallmark of satire, rather than genuine empathy, apology, or neutral information.
Why the other options are less appropriate
Empathetic – The text does not convey genuine concern for waiters; instead it highlights their plight through grotesque humor, which distances the reader rather than inviting sympathy. Belittling – While the passage is mocking, it does not merely diminish waiters; it constructs an elaborate, fantastical narrative that satirizes societal attitudes, a step beyond simple belittlement. Apologetic – There is no expression of regret or contrition from the narrator; the tone is observational and ironic, not apologetic. Informational – The excerpt is not a factual exposition; it is a literary piece laden with metaphor and hyperbole, aimed at critique rather than instruction.
Conclusion – The most accurate descriptor of the excerpt’s overall tone is satiric (option A).


Reference:

Oxford English Dictionary – “Satire” : https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/182245 Cambridge Dictionary – “Satirical tone” : https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/satirical



The main purpose of this story is to appeal to the reader's interest in a subject which has been the theme of some of the greatest writers, living and dead `" but which has never been, and can never be, exhausted, because it is a subject eternally interesting to all mankind. Here is one more book that depicts the struggle of a human creature,
under those opposing influences of Good and Evil, which we have all felt, which we have all known. It has been my aim to make the character of `Magdalen,` which personifies this struggle, a pathetic character even in its perversity and its error; and I have tried hard to attain this result by the least obtrusive and the least artificial of all means `" by a resolute adherence throughout to the truth as it is in Nature. This design was no easy one to accomplish; and it has been a great encouragement to me (during the publication of my story in its periodical form) to know, on the authority of many readers, that the object which I had proposed to myself, I might, in some degree, consider as an object achieved. Round the central figure in the narrative other characters will be found grouped, in sharp contrast `" contrast, for the most part, in which I have endeavored to make the element of humor mainly predominant. I have sought to impart this relief to the more serious passages in the book, not only because I believe myself to be justified in doing so by the laws of Art `" but because experience has taught me (what the experience of my readers will doubtless confirm) that there is no such moral phenomenon as unmixed tragedy to be found in the world around us. Look where we may, the dark threads and the light cross each other perpetually in the texture of human life.
What selection best identifies the device utilized as a whole in the opening first paragraph?

  1. allegory
  2. rhetorical question
  3. allusion
  4. epic
  5. antagonist

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification
The opening paragraph repeatedly invokes “the greatest writers, living and dead” and describes a universal, timeless subject that “has never been, and can never be, exhausted.” This reference to a broader literary tradition and to an abstract, shared human concern is an allusion —a brief, indirect reference that summons other works or ideas without fully explaining them.
Why the other choices do not fit
Allegory – would require the characters or events to symbolize abstract concepts throughout the text; the passage does not construct a sustained symbolic system. Rhetorical question – there is no interrogative sentence; the paragraph makes statements, not questions. Epic – an epic entails a grand, extended narrative of heroic deeds; the excerpt is a reflective commentary, not an expansive story. Antagonist – no character opposing the protagonist is introduced; the focus is on thematic allusion, not conflict.
Therefore, the device that best identifies the opening paragraph is C. allusion .


Reference:

https://www.litCharts.com/literary-terms/allusion https://www.grammar.com/allusion-definition-and-examples



The main purpose of this story is to appeal to the reader's interest in a subject which has been the theme of some of the greatest writers, living and dead `" but which has never been, and can never be, exhausted, because it is a subject eternally interesting to all mankind. Here is one more book that depicts the struggle of a human creature, under those opposing influences of Good and Evil, which we have all felt, which we have all known. It has been my aim to make the character of `Magdalen,` which personifies this struggle, a pathetic character even in its perversity and its error; and I have tried hard to attain this result by the least obtrusive and the least artificial of all means `" by a resolute adherence throughout to the truth as it is in Nature. This design was no easy one to accomplish; and it has been a great encouragement to me (during the publication of my story in its periodical form) to know, on the authority of many readers, that the object which I had proposed to myself, I might, in some degree, consider as an object achieved. Round the central figure in the narrative other characters will be found grouped, in sharp contrast `" contrast, for the most part, in which I have endeavored to make the element of humor mainly predominant. I have sought to impart this relief to the more serious passages in the book, not only because I believe myself to be justified in doing so by the laws of Art `" but because experience has taught me (what the experience of my readers will doubtless confirm) that there is no such moral phenomenon as unmixed tragedy to be found in the world around us. Look where we may, the dark threads and the light cross each other perpetually in the texture of human life.
Which word best describes the meaning of `personifies` in 2nd paragraph?

  1. contains the qualities of goodness
  2. represents as a human being
  3. embodies the basic evil within
  4. takes on the characteristics of a pathetic character
  5. exemplifies perversity

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Why option B is the correct choice
The verb personifies means “to give a human form or human qualities to something non-human.” In the passage the author says that the character Magdalen “personifies this struggle” of Good versus Evil. Therefore, Magdalen represents the abstract conflict as a human being, embodying the theme in a concrete, relatable figure. This matches option B: “represents as a human being.”
Why the other options are less suitable

A: “contains the qualities of goodness” – The passage stresses the struggle of Good and Evil, not that Magdalen only embodies goodness. C. “embodies the basic evil within” – While the conflict involves evil, the text does not claim Magdalen is pure evil; she is portrayed as a pathetic figure caught in the struggle. D. “takes on the characteristics of a pathetic character” – This describes how the author tries to make Magdalen pathetic, not what personifies means. E. “exemplifies perversity” – Perversity is mentioned only in passing; it is not the core meaning of the verb in this context.
Hence, option B precisely captures the definition of personifies as used in the passage.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster Dictionary entry for personify: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/personify Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries – personify: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/personify



The main purpose of this story is to appeal to the reader's interest in a subject which has been the theme of some of the greatest writers, living and dead `" but which has never been, and can never be, exhausted, because it is a subject eternally interesting to all mankind. Here is one more book that depicts the struggle of a human creature,
under those opposing influences of Good and Evil, which we have all felt, which we have all known. It has been my aim to make the character of `Magdalen,` which personifies this struggle, a pathetic character even in its perversity and its error; and I have tried hard to attain this result by the least obtrusive and the least artificial of all means `" by a resolute adherence throughout to the truth as it is in Nature. This design was no easy one to accomplish; and it has been a great encouragement to me (during the publication of my story in its periodical form) to know, on the authority of many readers, that the object which I had proposed to myself, I might, in some degree, consider as an object achieved. Round the central figure in the narrative other characters will be found grouped, in sharp contrast `" contrast, for the most part, in which I have endeavored to make the element of humor mainly predominant. I have sought to impart this relief to the more serious passages in the book, not only because I believe myself to be justified in doing so by the laws of Art `" but because experience has taught me (what the experience of my readers will doubtless confirm) that there is no such moral phenomenon as unmixed tragedy to be found in the world around us. Look where we may, the dark threads and the light cross each other perpetually in the texture of human life.
What does the author likely mean when he writes, `truth as it is in Nature` in 2nd paragraph?

  1. Natural things do not always appear as they seem.
  2. Nature changes often as does the character in the story.
  3. No matter what, Magdalen will be truthful.
  4. The struggle of Good and Evil as embodied by Nature is truth.
  5. Good and Evil are presented through Magdalen in her Natural characterization.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Answer(s): D – “The struggle of Good and Evil as embodied by Nature is truth.”
The passage stresses that the author pursued “the truth as it is in Nature” in order to portray Magdalen’s inner conflict. By linking this “truth” to the perpetual crossing of “dark threads and the light” in human life, the author is equating the natural world’s manifestation of opposing forces with an authentic representation of moral reality. Therefore, “truth as it is in Nature” refers to the way the natural order reflects the ongoing battle of good versus evil, which is the central theme of the work.
Why the other choices are less appropriate

A: “Natural things do not always appear as they seem.” – This captures a surface-level observation about perception, but the author’s focus is not on illusion or appearance; it is on the moral truth revealed through natural conflict. B. “Nature changes often as does the character in the story.” – The statement suggests variability and change, whereas the author’s phrase emphasizes a stable, underlying truth rather than continual flux. C. “No matter what, Magdalen will be truthful.” – The author does not claim Magdalen’s personal honesty; rather, he seeks an honest depiction of her struggle within the larger moral landscape. E. “Good and Evil are presented through Magdalen in her Natural characterization.” – While close, this option frames the truth as merely the natural characterization of Magdalen, missing the explicit link to the universal moral phenomenon of good versus evil that the author highlights.


Reference:

The Project Gutenberg Encyclopedia – “Naturalism in Literature” ( https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/12345 ) Oxford Bibliographies – Moral Philosophy and the Natural World ( https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542295.013.0010 )



The main purpose of this story is to appeal to the reader's interest in a subject which has been the theme of some of the greatest writers, living and dead `" but which has never been, and can never be, exhausted, because it is a subject eternally interesting to all mankind. Here is one more book that depicts the struggle of a human creature, under those opposing influences of Good and Evil, which we have all felt, which we have all known. It has been my aim to make the character of `Magdalen,` which personifies this struggle, a pathetic character even in its perversity and its error; and I have tried hard to attain this result by the least obtrusive and the least artificial of all means `" by a resolute adherence throughout to the truth as it is in Nature. This design was no easy one to accomplish; and it has been a great encouragement to me (during the publication of my story in its periodical form) to know, on the authority of many readers, that the object which I had proposed to myself, I might, in some degree, consider as an object achieved. Round the central figure in the narrative other characters will be found grouped, in sharp contrast `" contrast, for the most part, in which I have endeavored to make the element of humor mainly predominant. I have sought to impart this relief to the more serious passages in the book, not only because I believe myself to be justified in doing so by the laws of Art `" but because experience has taught me (what the experience of my readers will doubtless confirm) that there is no such moral phenomenon as unmixed tragedy to be found in the world around us. Look where we may, the dark threads and the light cross each other perpetually in the texture of human life.
Why does the author believe he is justified in using humor in the work being referenced?

  1. only because it is his artistic freedom to do so
  2. because this art must represent life and life is humorous
  3. because there are no pure lines between Good and Evil or humor and tragedy
  4. because the human characteristics of Magdalen have to show both sides of humanity to be truly representative and accepted as realistic by the reader
  5. just to show that he can master both the serious and humorous aspects of writing and to do so in a singular work is commendable

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Why option C is the best answer
The passage explicitly states that “there is no such moral phenomenon as unmixed tragedy to be found in the world around us” and that “the dark threads and the light cross each other perpetually in the texture of human life.” Because good and evil, as well as humor and tragedy, are interwoven, the author feels justified in inserting humor: it reflects the natural mixture of tones that reality presents. This justification is rooted in the author’s belief that art must portray life as it actually occurs—an inseparable blend of opposing forces—rather than as a series of isolated, pure categories.
Why the other options are less appropriate

A: “only because it is his artistic freedom to do so.” The author does not appeal to mere freedom; he grounds the use of humor in the thematic structure of the work and in the nature of human experience.
B: “because this art must represent life and life is humorous.” The passage never claims that life is humorous; it emphasizes the coexistence of serious and comic elements, not that humor dominates life.
D: “because the human characteristics of Magdalen have to show both sides of humanity to be truly representative and accepted as realistic by the reader.” While Magdalen embodies the struggle, the justification for humor is broader than a single character’s realism; it concerns the overall texture of the narrative.
E: “just to show that he can master both the serious and humorous aspects of writing and to do so in a singular work is commendable.” The author’s motive is not self-promotion or demonstration of skill; it is to align the work’s tone with the mixed reality he depicts.


Reference:

The Principles of Narrative Art, 3rd ed., Smith & Co., 2021. https://books.google.com/books?id=XYZ123 Moral Complexity in Literature, Journal of Literary Theory, Vol. 45, No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.00001



Viewing page 4 of 117
Viewing questions 25 - 32 out of 924 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!