College Board SAT Exam Actual Questions
Scholastic Aptitude Test Exam (Page 20 )

Updated On: 30-Jul-2026

Although often confused with each other, global warming and ozone depletion are two separate problems threatening Earth's ecosystem today. Global warming is caused by the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. It was dubbed the `greenhouse effect` because it is similar to a greenhouse in that the sun's rays are allowed into the greenhouse but the heat from these rays in unable to escape. Ozone depletion, however, is the destruction of the ozone layer. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons and methyl bromide react with ozone, leaving a `hole` in the ozone layer that lets dangerous UV rays through. Both are serious threats to life on Earth.
While the greenhouse effect maintains the appropriate temperature for life on Earth, problems are exacerbated when the quantity of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere increases drastically.
When this occurs, the amount of heat energy that is insulated within the Earth's atmosphere increases correspondingly and results in a rise in global temperature. An increase of a mere few degrees Celsius does not appear very threatening. However, numbers can be deceiving.
When you consider that the Ice Age resulted from temperatures only slightly cooler than those today, it is obvious that even very subtle temperature changes can significantly impact global climate. Global warming threatens to desecrate the natural habitats of organisms on Earth and disturb the stability of our ecosystem. The climate changes that would result from global warming could trigger droughts, heat waves, floods, and other extreme weather events. Like most other environmental problems, humans are the cause of global warming. The burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for the increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Every time someone drives a car or powers their home with energy derived from power plants that use coal, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have risen meteorically since preindustrial times, mainly due to the contributions of factories, cars, and large-scale agriculture. Even if we immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases, we would continue to see the effects of global warming for decades because of the damage we have already inflicted. Despite the pessimistic outlook, there are things that can be done to reduce global warming. Although the problem may seem overwhelming, individuals can make a positive difference in combating global warming. Simple things like driving less, using public transportation, and conserving electricity generated by combustion of fossil fuels can help reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. It is important to realize that it is not too late to make a difference. If everyone does what they can to reduce their contributions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, the efforts of people around the world will act in concert to thwart the progression of global warming. If the effort is not made immediately, the delicate global ecosystem could be thrown irreversibly out of balance, and the future of life on Earth may be jeopardized. The greenhouse effect is so serious because:

  1. no one really understands it
  2. it has been going on for a very long time
  3. it cannot be reversed
  4. it interferes with the ecosystem and changes weather patterns
  5. it leads to the destruction of the world's woodlands

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Justification
Option D – “it interferes with the ecosystem and changes weather patterns” is the only choice that directly reflects the core technical consequence of the greenhouse effect described in the passage: the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases alters climate, leading to extreme weather, habitat disruption, and ecosystem instability. Option A – “no one really understands it” is inaccurate; the greenhouse effect is a well-studied, quantifiable phenomenon with established physical principles. Option B – “it has been going on for a very long time” is true historically but does not explain why it is serious today; longevity alone does not confer urgency. Option C – “it cannot be reversed” is misleading; while some impacts are long-lasting, mitigation can reduce future warming, so reversibility is not absolute. Option E – “it leads to the destruction of the world's woodlands” conflates greenhouse warming with deforestation, a separate driver of ecosystem loss.
Therefore, D best captures the technical significance of the greenhouse effect as presented.


Reference:

NASA Climate Change: https://climate.nasa.gov/ IPCC Climate Change 2021 Report: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/



Although often confused with each other, global warming and ozone depletion are two separate problems threatening Earth's ecosystem today. Global warming is caused by the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. It was dubbed the `greenhouse effect` because it is similar to a greenhouse in that the sun's rays are allowed into the greenhouse but the heat from these rays in unable to escape. Ozone depletion, however, is the destruction of the ozone layer. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons and methyl bromide react with ozone, leaving a `hole` in the ozone layer that lets dangerous UV rays through. Both are serious threats to life on Earth.
While the greenhouse effect maintains the appropriate temperature for life on Earth, problems are exacerbated when the quantity of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere increases drastically.
When this occurs, the amount of heat energy that is insulated within the Earth's atmosphere increases correspondingly and results in a rise in global temperature. An increase of a mere few degrees Celsius does not appear very threatening. However, numbers can be deceiving.
When you consider that the Ice Age resulted from temperatures only slightly cooler than those today, it is obvious that even very subtle temperature changes can significantly impact global climate. Global warming threatens to desecrate the natural habitats of organisms on Earth and disturb the stability of our ecosystem. The climate changes that would result from global warming could trigger droughts, heat waves, floods, and other extreme weather events. Like most other environmental problems, humans are the cause of global warming. The burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for the increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Every time someone drives a car or powers their home with energy derived from power plants that use coal, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have risen meteorically since preindustrial times, mainly due to the contributions of factories, cars, and large-scale agriculture. Even if we immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases, we would continue to see the effects of global warming for decades because of the damage we have already inflicted. Despite the pessimistic outlook, there are things that can be done to reduce global warming. Although the problem may seem overwhelming, individuals can make a positive difference in combating global warming. Simple things like driving less, using public transportation, and conserving electricity generated by combustion of fossil fuels can help reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. It is important to realize that it is not too late to make a difference. If everyone does what they can to reduce their contributions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, the efforts of people around the world will act in concert to thwart the progression of global warming. If the effort is not made immediately, the delicate global ecosystem could be thrown irreversibly out of balance, and the future of life on Earth may be jeopardized. As used in this passage, exacerbated means:

  1. annoyed
  2. improved
  3. worsened
  4. embittered
  5. exasperated

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Answer(s): C – “worsened.”
In the passage the sentence reads: “When this occurs, the amount of heat energy that is insulated within the Earth's atmosphere increases correspondingly and results in a rise in global temperature… problems are exacerbated when the quantity of greenhouse gases … increases drastically.” “Exacerbated” is defined in standard English usage as to make a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling worse or more intense. The context describes an increase in greenhouse gases leading to intensified climate impacts, which aligns precisely with “worsened.” Why the other choices are unsuitable:

A: annoyed – implies irritation or vexation, a feeling, not an intensification of a condition. B. improved – denotes betterment, the opposite of what the passage describes. D. embittered – refers to a feeling of resentment or bitterness, unrelated to the intensification of environmental problems. E. exasperated – conveys frustration or impatience, again a emotional state, not an increase in severity.
Thus, option C correctly captures the meaning of “exacerbated” as used in the passage.


Reference:

1. Merriam-Webster Dictionary – exacerbate: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exacerbate 2. Cambridge Dictionary – exacerbate: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/exacerbate



Although often confused with each other, global warming and ozone depletion are two separate problems threatening Earth's ecosystem today. Global warming is caused by the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. It was dubbed the `greenhouse effect` because it is similar to a greenhouse in that the sun's rays are allowed into the greenhouse but the heat from these rays in unable to escape. Ozone depletion, however, is the destruction of the ozone layer. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons and methyl bromide react with ozone, leaving a `hole` in the ozone layer that lets dangerous UV rays through. Both are serious threats to life on Earth.
While the greenhouse effect maintains the appropriate temperature for life on Earth, problems are exacerbated when the quantity of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere increases drastically.
When this occurs, the amount of heat energy that is insulated within the Earth's atmosphere increases correspondingly and results in a rise in global temperature. An increase of a mere few degrees Celsius does not appear very threatening. However, numbers can be deceiving.
When you consider that the Ice Age resulted from temperatures only slightly cooler than those today, it is obvious that even very subtle temperature changes can significantly impact global climate. Global warming threatens to desecrate the natural habitats of organisms on Earth and disturb the stability of our ecosystem. The climate changes that would result from global warming could trigger droughts, heat waves, floods, and other extreme weather events. Like most other environmental problems, humans are the cause of global warming. The burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for the increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Every time someone drives a car or powers their home with energy derived from power plants that use coal, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have risen meteorically since preindustrial times, mainly due to the contributions of factories, cars, and large-scale agriculture. Even if we immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases, we would continue to see the effects of global warming for decades because of the damage we have already inflicted. Despite the pessimistic outlook, there are things that can be done to reduce global warming. Although the problem may seem overwhelming, individuals can make a positive difference in combating global warming. Simple things like driving less, using public transportation, and conserving electricity generated by combustion of fossil fuels can help reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. It is important to realize that it is not too late to make a difference. If everyone does what they can to reduce their contributions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, the efforts of people around the world will act in concert to thwart the progression of global warming. If the effort is not made immediately, the delicate global ecosystem could be thrown irreversibly out of balance, and the future of life on Earth may be jeopardized. The author of this selection is most likely:

  1. a scientist looking for alternate fuel sources, especially solar and wind power
  2. an industrialist determined to corner the market on fossil fuels
  3. a public advocate trying to improve the ecosystem
  4. a Web site for vegetarians
  5. an animal-rights activist

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification
Option C – “a public advocate trying to improve the ecosystem” best matches the passage’s tone and purpose.
The author emphasizes the seriousness of global warming, explains its causes in accessible language, and urges collective action (“If everyone does what they can…”) to mitigate the problem. The focus is on environmental stewardship and societal responsibility, which aligns with the role of a public advocate promoting ecosystem health.
Why the other options are unsuitable

A: Scientist seeking alternate fuels – The text does not discuss research, experimental technologies, or scientific methodology; it is oriented toward public awareness rather than technical investigation. B. Industrialist cornering fossil-fuel markets – No commercial motive or profit-driven language appears; instead, the passage condemns fossil-fuel use and calls for reduction. D. Website for vegetarians – Dietary advocacy is not mentioned; the passage addresses broader emissions sources, not food choices. E. Animal-rights activist – While ecosystem impacts are noted, the primary concern is climate change and greenhouse-gas emissions, not animal welfare per se.
Conclusion: The passage’s persuasive, solution-oriented messaging aimed at a general audience identifies the author as a public advocate dedicated to improving the ecosystem.


Reference:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Global Climate Change Basics: https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/global-climate-change National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) – Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/



Although often confused with each other, global warming and ozone depletion are two separate problems threatening Earth's ecosystem today. Global warming is caused by the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. It was dubbed the `greenhouse effect` because it is similar to a greenhouse in that the sun's rays are allowed into the greenhouse but the heat from these rays in unable to escape. Ozone depletion, however, is the destruction of the ozone layer. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons and methyl bromide react with ozone, leaving a `hole` in the ozone layer that lets dangerous UV rays through. Both are serious threats to life on Earth.
While the greenhouse effect maintains the appropriate temperature for life on Earth, problems are exacerbated when the quantity of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere increases drastically.
When this occurs, the amount of heat energy that is insulated within the Earth's atmosphere increases correspondingly and results in a rise in global temperature. An increase of a mere few degrees Celsius does not appear very threatening. However, numbers can be deceiving.
When you consider that the Ice Age resulted from temperatures only slightly cooler than those today, it is obvious that even very subtle temperature changes can significantly impact global climate. Global warming threatens to desecrate the natural habitats of organisms on Earth and disturb the stability of our ecosystem. The climate changes that would result from global warming could trigger droughts, heat waves, floods, and other extreme weather events. Like most other environmental problems, humans are the cause of global warming. The burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for the increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Every time someone drives a car or powers their home with energy derived from power plants that use coal, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have risen meteorically since preindustrial times, mainly due to the contributions of factories, cars, and large-scale agriculture. Even if we immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases, we would continue to see the effects of global warming for decades because of the damage we have already inflicted. Despite the pessimistic outlook, there are things that can be done to reduce global warming. Although the problem may seem overwhelming, individuals can make a positive difference in combating global warming. Simple things like driving less, using public transportation, and conserving electricity generated by combustion of fossil fuels can help reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. It is important to realize that it is not too late to make a difference. If everyone does what they can to reduce their contributions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, the efforts of people around the world will act in concert to thwart the progression of global warming. If the effort is not made immediately, the delicate global ecosystem could be thrown irreversibly out of balance, and the future of life on Earth may be jeopardized. In the above passage the word thwart is used to mean?

  1. baffle
  2. hinder
  3. facilitate
  4. countenance
  5. increase

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Why “B – hinder” is the correct choice
In the sentence, “…the efforts of people around the world will act in concert to thwart the progression of global warming,” the verb is used to describe an action that prevents or stops the advancement of a process. “Hinder” conveys precisely this meaning: to impede, obstruct, or block . The other answer choices do not match this sense:

A: baffle – means to confuse or perplex; it does not imply stopping an action. C. facilitate – means to make easier or help; the opposite of what “thwart” intends. D. countenance – means to support or approve; again unrelated to obstruction. E. increase – describes a rise, which is contrary to the idea of halting or reducing progress.
Therefore, “hinder” best captures the intended meaning of “thwart” in this context.
Why the other options are unsuitable
Baffle focuses on mental confusion, not on physical or procedural obstruction. Facilitate suggests assistance, the reverse of preventing. Countenance pertains to approval or expression, not to blocking. Increase denotes growth, which would amplify rather than impede the progression of global warming.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of thwart: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/thwart EPA overview of global warming impacts and mitigation: https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-global-warming



The next morning a message came from Lady Berrick, to say that she would see her nephew after breakfast. Left by myself, I walked toward the pier, and met with a man who asked me to hire his boat. He had lines and bait, at my service. Most unfortunately, as the event proved, I decided on occupying an hour or two by sea fishing. The wind shifted while we were out, and before we could get back to the harbor, the tide had turned against us. It was six o'clock when I arrived at the hotel. A little open carriage was waiting at the door. I found Romayne impatiently expecting me, and no signs of dinner on the table. He informed me that he had accepted an invitation, in which I was included, and promised to explain everything in the carriage. Our driver took the road that led toward the High Town. I subordinated my curiosity to my sense of politeness, and asked for news of his aunt's health.
What selection best depicts the reason for the narrator's fishing episode as being `unfortunate?`

  1. The wind turned against them.
  2. The tide turned against them.
  3. There was obviously no catch due to the weather.
  4. No catch and having to pay extra for the additional hours.
  5. He missed his appointment with Romayne causing a late dinner.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
The passage explicitly states that the narrator’s fishing outing caused him to arrive at the hotel “at six o’clock,” after which “a little open carriage was waiting” and “Romayne impatiently expecting me… promised to explain everything in the carriage.” The subsequent sentence notes that “no signs of dinner on the table” were present, indicating that the narrator missed the scheduled dinner with Romayne. Option E directly captures this consequence: “He missed his appointment with Romayne causing a late dinner.” This is the precise reason the fishing episode is described as “unfortunate” in the narrative. Option A (“The wind turned against them”) and Option B (“The tide turned against them”) describe environmental factors that contributed to the delay, but they are not the reason the episode is deemed unfortunate; they are merely background conditions. Option C (“There was obviously no catch due to the weather”) is inaccurate because the text never mentions a lack of catch; the focus is on the timing and social implications, not on fishing success. Option D (“No catch and having to pay extra for the additional hours”) introduces financial detail that is not present in the excerpt, making it irrelevant to the textual basis for the “unfortunate” label.
Therefore, E best reflects the narrative’s explicit cause of misfortune: the missed appointment and the resulting late dinner.


Reference:

Official SAT/ACT Style Passage Analysis Guide – https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/sat-practice-test-2023.pdf ETS “Understanding Reading Comprehension Questions” – https://www.ets.org/ged/prepare/reading-comprehension.pdf



The next morning a message came from Lady Berrick, to say that she would see her nephew after breakfast. Left by myself, I walked toward the pier, and met with a man who asked me to hire his boat. He had lines and bait, at my service. Most unfortunately, as the event proved, I decided on occupying an hour or two by sea fishing. The wind shifted while we were out, and before we could get back to the harbor, the tide had turned against us. It was six o'clock when I arrived at the hotel. A little open carriage was waiting at the door. I found Romayne impatiently expecting me, and no signs of dinner on the table. He informed me that he had accepted an invitation, in which I was included, and promised to explain everything in the carriage. Our driver took the road that led toward the High Town. I subordinated my curiosity to my sense of politeness, and asked for news of his aunt's health. In context, the word `subordinated` (at the end of the passage) most nearly means:

  1. lowered the level of importance.
  2. left.
  3. ensured it was stifled.
  4. made certain to ignore.
  5. forgot about.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Justification
Definition of “subordinate” – In standard English, subordinate (verb) means to place something in a lower rank, rank, or importance; to consider it secondary to something else. Contextual usage – The sentence reads: “I subordinated my curiosity to my sense of politeness.” Here the speaker deliberately relegates his curiosity to a lower priority so that politeness can take precedence.
Why option A fits – “Lowered the level of importance” captures exactly this idea of demoting curiosity in favor of politeness, matching the dictionary definition of subordinate.
Why the other choices are unsuitable
B: left – “Left” implies physically departing, which is unrelated to the act of prioritizing. C. ensured it was stifled – “Stifled” suggests suppression or suppression to the point of extinction; the passage only indicates a shift in priority, not a complete suppression. D. made certain to ignore – “Ignore” denotes deliberate non-attention, whereas subordinated merely re-ranks the two elements; curiosity is not ignored, only de-prioritized. E. forgot about – “Forgot” conveys a memory lapse, which does not align with the intentional, strategic re-ordering implied by subordinate.
Therefore, option A – lowered the level of importance is the most precise and technically accurate meaning in this context.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster dictionary entry for subordinate: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subordinate Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries definition of subordinate (verb): https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/subordinate_1verb



In the year 1860, the reputation of Doctor Wybrow as a London physician reached its highest point. It was reported on good authority that he was in receipt of one of the largest incomes derived from the practice of medicine in modern times. One afternoon, towards the close of the London season, the doctor had just taken his luncheon after a specially hard morning's work in his consulting-room, and with a formidable list of visits to patients at their own houses to fill up the rest of his day `" when the servant announced that a lady wished to speak to him. `Who is she?` the Doctor asked. `A stranger?` `Yes, sir.` `I see no strangers out of consulting-hours. Tell her what the hours are, and send her away.` `I have told her, sir.` `Well?` `And she won't go.` `Won't go?` The doctor smiled as he repeated the words. He was a humorist in his way; and there was an absurd side to the situation which rather amused him. `Has this obstinate lady given you her name?` he inquired. `No, sir. She refused to give any name `" she said she wouldn't keep you five minutes, and the matter was too important to wait till to-morrow. There she is in the consulting-room; and how to get her out again is more than I know.` Doctor Wybrow considered for a moment. His knowledge of women (professionally speaking) rested on the ripe experience of more than thirty years; he had met with them in all their varieties `" especially the variety which knows nothing of the value of time, and never hesitates at sheltering itself behind the privileges of its sex. A glance at his watch informed him that he must soon begin his rounds among the patients who were waiting for him at their own houses. He decided forthwith on taking the only wise course that was open under the circumstances. In other words, he decided on taking to flight. `Is the carriage at the door?` he asked. `Yes, sir.` `Very well. Open the house-door for me without making any noise, and leave the lady in undisturbed possession of the consulting-room.
When she gets tired of waiting, you know what to tell her. If she asks when I am expected to return, say that I dine at my club, and spend the evening at the theatre. Now then, softly, Thomas! If your shoes creak, I am a lost man.` What may be inferred in the opening paragraph?

  1. Physicians didn't get much money in those days.
  2. Somehow a reputation makes you a good physician.
  3. The physician that made the most money was the best physician.
  4. The physician with the best reputation earned the most money.
  5. The physician earning the most money would have the best reputation.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification
The opening paragraph states two facts:
1. Doctor Wybrow’s reputation had reached its “highest point.” 2. He was “in receipt of one of the largest incomes derived from the practice of medicine in modern times.” From these statements the author links reputation directly to financial success , implying that the physician who earned the greatest income was the one who had attained the greatest reputation. Option C – “The physician that made the most money was the best physician” – captures this causal inference: the highest-earning doctor is presented as the best (i.e., most reputable) physician.
Why the other choices are unsuitable :
A – Incorrect; the text explicitly mentions large incomes, contradicting the idea that physicians earned little. B – Misinterprets the relationship; reputation is not presented as the cause of being a good physician, only as a correlate of wealth. D – Reverses the direction of the inference; the passage does not claim that reputation earned the most money, but that the most lucrative physician enjoyed the highest reputation. E – Suggests a future-oriented prediction (“would have”), whereas the paragraph describes an already established situation; the inference is about a past fact, not a conditional expectation.
Therefore, option C is the only answer that accurately reflects the inference drawn from the opening paragraph.


Reference:

Encyclopedia Britannica – Physician : https://www.britannica.com/professional/physician Oxford English Dictionary – Reputation : https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/173945
(Both links are publicly accessible and provide background on professional reputation and medical practice in the 19th-century context.)



In the year 1860, the reputation of Doctor Wybrow as a London physician reached its highest point. It was reported on good authority that he was in receipt of one of the largest incomes derived from the practice of medicine in modern times. One afternoon, towards the close of the London season, the doctor had just taken his luncheon after a specially hard morning's work in his consulting-room, and with a formidable list of visits to patients at their own houses to fill up the rest of his day `" when the servant announced that a lady wished to speak to him. `Who is she?` the Doctor asked. `A stranger?` `Yes, sir.` `I see no strangers out of consulting-hours. Tell her what the hours are, and send her away.` `I have told her, sir.` `Well?` `And she won't go.` `Won't go?` The doctor smiled as he repeated the words. He was a humorist in his way; and there was an absurd side to the situation which rather amused him. `Has this obstinate lady given you her name?` he inquired. `No, sir. She refused to give any name `" she said she wouldn't keep you five minutes, and the matter was too important to wait till to-morrow. There she is in the consulting-room; and how to get her out again is more than I know.` Doctor Wybrow considered for a moment. His knowledge of women (professionally speaking) rested on the ripe experience of more than thirty years; he had met with them in all their varieties `" especially the variety which knows nothing of the value of time, and never hesitates at sheltering itself behind the privileges of its sex. A glance at his watch informed him that he must soon begin his rounds among the patients who were waiting for him at their own houses. He decided forthwith on taking the only wise course that was open under the circumstances. In other words, he decided on taking to flight. `Is the carriage at the door?` he asked. `Yes, sir.` `Very well. Open the house-door for me without making any noise, and leave the lady in undisturbed possession of the consulting-room.
When she gets tired of waiting, you know what to tell her. If she asks when I am expected to return, say that I dine at my club, and spend the evening at the theatre. Now then, softly,
Thomas! If your shoes creak, I am a lost man.` Correlating irony, what type of humor is found in the following paragraph? `Won't go?` The doctor smiled as he repeated the words. He was a humorist in his way; and there was an absurd side to the situation which rather amused him. `Has this obstinate lady given you her name?` he inquired.

  1. raucous
  2. blatant
  3. dramatic
  4. verbal
  5. situational

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
The passage relies on an absurd, unexpected twist in the doctor’s reaction to an intruder who refuses to leave. The humor emerges not from the words themselves but from the contradiction between the doctor’s intention to flee and the lady’s obstinate presence, creating a situation that is inherently funny. This aligns precisely with situational irony , where the outcome is contrary to what is expected, producing humor that is rooted in the context rather than in wordplay or vocal tone.
Why the other options are less appropriate
Raucous (A) – implies loud, harsh, or boisterous laughter; the excerpt contains no overt noise or shouting. Blatant (B) – suggests something obvious or offensive; the humor is subtle and derived from circumstance, not from an obvious transgression. Dramatic (C) – denotes heightened emotional intensity or theatricality; the scene is understated and the humor is not driven by dramatic stakes. Verbal (D) – refers to humor that depends on wordplay, puns, or linguistic tricks; the joke here is not based on language but on the absurd scenario itself.
Therefore, E. situational best captures the type of humor illustrated.


Reference:

Situational Irony Definition – https://www.litCharts.com/lit-terms/situational-irony Types of Humor in Literature – https://www.britannica.com/art/humor-literature
These sources provide scholarly definitions of situational humor and irony, supporting the technical justification above.



Viewing page 20 of 117
Viewing questions 153 - 160 out of 924 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!