Free PT0-003 Exam Braindumps (page: 4)

Page 4 of 61

[Reporting and Communication]
A tester completed a report for a new client. Prior to sharing the report with the client, which of the following should the tester request to complete a review?

  1. A generative AI assistant
  2. The customer's designated contact
  3. A cybersecurity industry peer
  4. A team member

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Before sharing a report with a client, it is crucial to have it reviewed to ensure accuracy, clarity, and completeness. The best choice for this review is a team member. Here's why:
Internal Peer Review:
Familiarity with the Project: A team member who worked on the project or is familiar with the methodologies used can provide a detailed and context-aware review. Quality Assurance: This review helps catch any errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in the report before it reaches the client.
Alternative Review Options:
A Generative AI Assistant: While useful for drafting and checking for language issues, it may not fully understand the context and technical details of the penetration test. The Customer's Designated Contact: Typically, the client reviews the report after the internal review to provide their perspective and request clarifications or additional details. A Cybersecurity Industry Peer: Although valuable, this option might not be practical due to confidentiality concerns and the peer's lack of specific context regarding the engagement. In summary, an internal team member is the most suitable choice for a thorough and contextually accurate review before sharing the report with the client.



[Attacks and Exploits]
During an assessment, a penetration tester exploits an SQLi vulnerability.
Which of the following commands would allow the penetration tester to enumerate password hashes?

  1. sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --search -T user
  2. sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --dump -D accounts -T users -C cred
  3. sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --tables -D accounts
  4. sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --schema --current-user --current-db

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

To enumerate password hashes using an SQL injection vulnerability, the penetration tester needs to extract specific columns from the database that typically contain password hashes. The --dump command in sqlmap is used to dump the contents of the specified database table. Here's a breakdown of the options:
Option A: sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --search -T user The --search option is used to search for columns and not to dump data. This would not enumerate password hashes.

Option B: sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --dump -D accounts -T users -C cred This command uses --dump to extract data from the specified database accounts, table users, and column cred. This is the correct option to enumerate password hashes, assuming cred is the column containing the password hashes.
Option C: sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --tables -D accounts The --tables option lists all tables in the specified database but does not extract data. Option D: sqlmap -u www.example.com/?id=1 --schema --current-user --current-db The --schema option provides the database schema information, and --current-user and --current-db provide information about the current user and database but do not dump data.
Reference from Pentest:
Writeup HTB: Demonstrates using sqlmap to dump data from specific tables to retrieve sensitive information, including password hashes.

Luke HTB: Shows the process of exploiting SQL injection to extract user credentials and hashes by dumping specific columns from the database.



[Tools and Code Analysis]
During an assessment, a penetration tester obtains an NTLM hash from a legacy Windows machine.
Which of the following tools should the penetration tester use to continue the attack?

  1. Responder
  2. Hydra
  3. BloodHound
  4. CrackMapExec

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

When a penetration tester obtains an NTLM hash from a legacy Windows machine, they need to use a tool that can leverage this hash for further attacks, such as pass-the-hash attacks, or for cracking the hash. Here's a breakdown of the options:
Option A: Responder
Responder is primarily used for poisoning LLMNR, NBT-NS, and MDNS to capture hashes, but not for leveraging NTLM hashes obtained post-exploitation.
Option B: Hydra
Hydra is a password-cracking tool but not specifically designed for NTLM hashes or pass-the-hash attacks.
Option C: BloodHound
BloodHound is used for mapping out Active Directory relationships and identifying potential attack paths but not for using NTLM hashes directly.
Option D: CrackMapExec
CrackMapExec is a versatile tool that can perform pass-the-hash attacks, execute commands, and more using NTLM hashes. It is designed for post-exploitation scenarios involving NTLM hashes.
Reference from Pentest:
Forge HTB: Demonstrates the use of CrackMapExec for leveraging NTLM hashes to gain further access within a network.
Horizontall HTB: Shows how CrackMapExec can be used for various post-exploitation activities, including using NTLM hashes to authenticate and execute commands.
Conclusion:
Option D, CrackMapExec, is the most suitable tool for continuing the attack using an NTLM hash. It supports pass-the-hash techniques and other operations that can leverage NTLM hashes effectively.



[Attacks and Exploits]
A penetration tester needs to collect information over the network for further steps in an internal assessment.
Which of the following would most likely accomplish this goal?

  1. ntlmrelayx.py -t 192.168.1.0/24 -1 1234
  2. nc -tulpn 1234 192.168.1.2
  3. responder.py -I eth0 -wP
  4. crackmapexec smb 192.168.1.0/24

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

To collect information over the network, especially during an internal assessment, tools that can capture and analyze network traffic are essential. Responder is specifically designed for this purpose, and it can capture NTLM hashes and other credentials by poisoning various network protocols.
Here's a breakdown of the options:
Option A: ntlmrelayx.py -t 192.168.1.0/24 -1 1234
ntlmrelayx.py is used for relaying NTLM authentication but not for broad network information collection.
Option B: nc -tulpn 1234 192.168.1.2
Netcat (nc) is a network utility for reading from and writing to network connections using TCP or UDP but is not specifically designed for comprehensive information collection over a network.
Option C: responder.py -I eth0 -wP
Responder is a tool for LLMNR, NBT-NS, and MDNS poisoning. The -I eth0 option specifies the network interface, and -wP enables WPAD rogue server which is effective for capturing network credentials and other information.
Option D: crackmapexec smb 192.168.1.0/24
CrackMapExec is useful for SMB-related enumeration and attacks but not specifically for broad network information collection.
Reference from Pentest:
Anubis HTB: Highlights the use of Responder to capture network credentials and hashes during internal assessments.
Horizontall HTB: Demonstrates the effectiveness of Responder in capturing and analyzing network traffic for further exploitation.






Post your Comments and Discuss CompTIA PT0-003 exam with other Community members: