Cyber AB CMMC-CCA Exam Actual Questions
Certified CMMC Assessor (CCA) (Page 13 )

• The two correct options are:

• The two incorrect options:

• Basic: billing/subscription support only; no technical support requests can be opened.
• Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, and Premier: include technical support and allow opening new support requests.

• If option A corresponds to “Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, Premier,” that is the correct choice.
• If the option text is really “Premier only,” that would be incorrect per current Azure docs.

• Numerical flexibility: Adjusting the number of employees, such as using temporary, part-time or contract staff.
• Temporal flexibility: Varying when employees work, such as through flexitime, overtime or different working hours.
• Shift system flexibility: Changing work patterns or shift arrangements; it is not specifically about moving between tasks.

• In Microsoft Teams Phone System, a single Auto Attendant can handle multiple time-based greetings by using separate schedules for office hours, after hours, weekends, and holidays.
• You can configure one Auto Attendant with four distinct greetings mapped to:

• Open the Teams admin center > Voice > Auto attendants, edit or create an Auto Attendant.
• Under Time-based routing, define four rules:

• Create a Holiday schedule with the relevant dates (e.g., Easter, Christmas) and assign the Holiday greeting.
• Save the configuration.

• If your environment cannot separate weekend from after-hours within a single Auto Attendant, you might technically need more than one Auto Attendant.

• Business
• People
• Governance
• Platform
• Security
• Operations

• Program and project management
• Risk management
• Cloud financial management
• Data governance
• Portfolio management

• Sustainability
• Performance efficiency
• Reliability

• Answer: D) Shadow IT

• Why: Shadow IT is when employees use unsanctioned tools or bypass IT controls (like the VPN) to access services, often without IT oversight. It’s an internal behavior, not an external attacker’s activity.

• Not these:

• Quick note: This creates risk due to lack of visibility and control. Mitigations include a defined approved-tools list, enforcing VPN usage, device management, and continuous monitoring.

• Correct answer: D – Do not enable default administrative accounts to ensure accountability.

• A – Do not use encryption methods … backups and sensitive information: Encryption helps protect data; not using it increases risk, not reduces insider threats.
• B – Do not allow administrators to use unique accounts during installation: We actually want unique admin accounts, not the opposite.
• C – Do not control the access to administrators and privileged users: Failing to control access directly enables misuse.

• The problem describes the class updating field-level security on some profiles. To prevent updating fields that are not updateable for the current user, you should check each field’s updateability before making changes. Use DescribeFieldResult.isUpdateable() (e.g., via Field.describe() on each field) to guard updates.

• A and D (With Sharing): Running a class with Sharing affects record visibility, not whether a field can be updated by a user. It doesn’t prevent updates to fields the user shouldn’t modify.
• C (WITH SECURITY_ENFORCED in SOQL): This enforces FLS/FRC during queries, but it doesn’t control whether the Apex code updates fields or modifies permissions. It’s not addressing the update behavior directly.

• IKE: Negotiates security parameters for IPsec VPNs; it does not identify switch ports.
• VLAN: A logical network segmentation method, not a discovery protocol.
• netstat: Displays local network connections and listening services, but cannot identify the physical switch or port.

• In Azure, the typical cost approach for pay-as-you-go VMs is an Operational Expenditure (OPEX) model. You’re billed for actual usage each month.
• The term “elastic expenditure model” isn’t a standard Azure cost category. Elasticity describes scaling capacity, not the billing category itself.
• So recommending the elastic expenditure model is not correct for this goal.

• The solution does not meet the goal. Answer: No (B).

• Pay-as-you-go aligns with OPEX because costs vary with usage.
• Elasticity is about scaling resources, which affects performance and capacity, not the fundamental cost model.

• Review iteration length: Changing duration does not resolve unclear requirements.
• Limit work in progress: Useful when excessive multitasking is the problem, but it does not directly clarify requirements.
• Review individual performance: The issue is a process and backlog-quality problem, not necessarily an individual performance problem.

• Context: You’ve enabled auditing in Dataverse and need to trim audit data to free storage. The question asks which deletion options you can use.

• What the options typically mean:

• About the provided answer (A, C, D): The list includes “by column,” which isn’t a typical or supported way to purge audit data. The more plausible trio is A (by record), B (date range), and C (by table older than date). If the exam expects A, C, D, that seems incorrect or mis-stated in the source.

• Practical takeaway: To reduce audit storage, use per-record deletions, per-table purge by date, and/or date-range deletions as supported by the environment’s audit management UI or admin docs.

• Sustainability is not a CAF perspective (it's not one of the CAF perspectives).
• Performance efficiency and Reliability are pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework, not CAF.

• Goal: Guests should not use cameras, but company users can.
• Correct configuration: Guest access settings in the Org-wide settings.

• External access: Controls external-domain communication, not guest capabilities inside Teams.
• Teams settings in Org-wide settings: Too generic; doesn’t specifically target guest capabilities.
• Audio & Video in the default Meeting Policy: Would affect everyone assigned to that policy. To meet the requirement without impacting internal users, you’d need separate policies or guest-specific settings; the exam focuses on the guest-access policy.

• Transact-SQL (T-SQL) is used to query relational data in Azure SQL Database, not telemetry data from monitoring services.
• To analyze monitoring data from Azure SQL Database Intelligent Insights and Azure Application Insights, you should use the Kusto Query Language (KQL) in Azure Monitor Logs/Log Analytics (and in Application Insights Analytics).
• Using KQL lets you query telemetry tables such as requests, dependencies, pageViews, and customEvents (from App Insights) and any integrated monitoring data you’ve ingested into Log Analytics.

• Ensure Intelligent Insights and Application Insights data is available in a Log Analytics workspace or accessible via Application Insights Analytics.
• Go to Azure Monitor > Logs (or Application Insights > Analytics) and write KQL queries, e.g.:

Why B works

• AWS KMS keys are Regional resources. A normal customer managed key in Region A cannot be used directly in Region B.
• A customer managed multi-Region KMS key (MRK) has related key replicas in both Regions. The replicas share key material and key ID, although each has a Regional ARN.
• With client-side encryption, the application encrypts the data before storing it in S3. Cross-Region replication then copies already-encrypted objects, so S3 does not need to decrypt and re-encrypt them with a different Regional key.

Why the other choices are weaker

• A and C: SSE-S3 uses Amazon-managed S3 keys, not the required customer managed KMS key.
• D: SSE-KMS can work only if the solution creates and configures the appropriate KMS key or multi-Region key replica in each Region. As written, it says to create a customer managed KMS key in each Region, which implies separate keys—not the same KMS key. Replication also requires additional KMS permissions and destination encryption configuration.

• Pull: Downloads changes from the central repository and updates the local repository.
• Push: Sends local commits to the central repository.
• Commit: Records local changes in the repository’s history.
• Merge: Combines changes from different branches.
• Clone: Creates a new local copy of a repository.

kusto 
Event | where EventType == "error"

• == is the KQL equality operator.
• -eq is a PowerShell operator, not KQL.
• is is not the correct equality operator in this context.

text 
Event | where EventType –eq "error"

• Event | search "error" — valid, broad search.
• search in (Event) "error" — valid, broad search.
• Event | where EventType == "error" — valid, targeted filter.

• Basic: Self-help only; no technical support or design assessment.
• Developer/Standard: Technical support, but generally not the full proactive architecture guidance required here.
• Professional Direct: Includes proactive guidance and architecture recommendations.
• Premier: Also supports this, but is not the minimum-cost option.

• The correct answer is “Think and work holistically” (Option B).

• Focus on value: ensures outcomes matter to stakeholders, but isn’t specifically about end-to-end delivery.
• Optimize and automate: about efficiency and performance, not the holistic view.
• Collaborate and promote visibility: about teamwork and sharing information, not the end-to-end scope.

• Review the risk register.
• Use the previously defined risk response plan, such as assigning a backup resource, reprioritizing work, or using another qualified engineer.
• Implement the response promptly because the task is on the critical path.

• B: Revising the schedule without first applying the planned response may be premature.
• C: Excluding a required task could compromise the project’s objectives and requirements.
• D: Updating the risk and lessons learned records is appropriate, but it should happen after managing the immediate issue, not as the next primary action.

• D. Provide public endpoints to store and retrieve data

• E. Manage the infrastructure layer and the operating system

• Classifying data
• Configuring access permissions, such as IAM policies
• Selecting or configuring available encryption options, depending on the requirement

• Answer: D) Out-of-band management

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options aren’t suitable here:

• Why: The data is unlabeled, so you can’t train a model with known input-output pairs. Unsupervised learning discovers structure in the data by grouping similar customers into clusters or tiers without labels.
• What it does: Clustering and segmentation (e.g., k-means, hierarchical clustering, DBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures) to form meaningful groups.
• Why the other options aren’t as suitable:

• Answer: D: Making business cases for improvement action

• Continual Improvement focuses on identifying and planning improvements and ensuring they’re funded and prioritized. Creating a business case for an improvement action is part of justifying and obtaining support/resources to implement improvements.
• A (Identifying the cause of incidents) aligns with Problem Management.
• B (Authorizing changes) aligns with Change Enablement.
• C (Logging/managing incidents that result in improvement opportunities) aligns with Incident Management, not Continual Improvement.

• Box 1: Azure Lighthouse — ??? ??????? ? ?????????? ????????? ? ?????????? Entra tenants. ??? ??????????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ? VM ? ?????? ?????????/????????.
• Box 2: Azure Monitor Agent ? ?????????????? Data Collection Rules (DCR) — AMA ???????? ??????? Windows (????????, Security Logs) ? DCR ??????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ? ???? ?????????? (? ?????? Log Analytics workspace).

• The requirement: the support plan must allow opening new support requests (technical support incidents).
• Azure’s Basic plan does not include technical support incidents—only billing/subscription support and access to community support.
• Therefore, you must choose a paid plan to open new technical support requests: Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, or Premier.

• CAPWAP (Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points) creates a tunnel between the AP and the Wireless LAN Controller over the IP network. The AP and WLC communicate via this CAPWAP tunnel, which can traverse Layer 2 or Layer 3 networks.
• The AP does not have to be on the same switch as the WLC. It can connect to any switch in the network, as long as there is IP reachability between the AP and the WLC. This is why option D is correct.
• The other options are incorrect:

• Correct answer: S3 Versioning

• Why the other options aren’t suitable for this protection:

• Quick tip: For enhanced protection, enable Versioning (and consider related features like Object Lock for write-once scenarios in specific compliance cases).

• VMs without NGT: Not clearly a migration blocker on its own; NGT (Nutanix Guest Tools) status isn’t the typical gating factor for live migration during maintenance.
• VMs marked as an Agent: Not a standard, widely-known migration blocker; agents aren’t the typical reason a VM can’t be migrated.
• Memory Overcommitted VMs: While memory pressure can affect placement, memory overcommitment isn’t a fundamental reason a VM would be labeled non-migratable during maintenance.
• VMs with attached Volume Groups: This is the strongest candidate. A Volume Group is a set of volumes bound to a VM; moving the VM would entail relocating and reattaching those volumes, which can complicate or block live migration during maintenance.

• Correct choices: A and D.

• Why not B, C, or E?

• Question 142: Security governance is MOST associated with which IT infrastructure component? Network / Application / Platform / Process
• Answer: D. Process

• Security governance is about how decisions are made, accountability, and oversight to ensure security objectives align with business goals. These are implemented through governance processes (policy development, risk management, assurance, monitoring, escalation, etc.).
• The other options (Network, Application, Platform) are concrete IT components; governance affects them, but it’s exercised primarily through the processes that govern how those components are managed and controlled.

• In governance-related questions, focus on the decision-making, accountability, and control processes rather than the underlying technology components.

1. Create a new AMI or copy the existing AMI while specifying EBS encryption and an appropriate AWS KMS key.
2. This creates an encrypted AMI backed by encrypted EBS snapshots.
3. Copy the encrypted AMI to the destination Region, using a KMS key available there.
4. Launch the application stack from the encrypted AMI.

• B: AWS KMS does not encrypt an existing unencrypted AMI in place. You must create an encrypted copy.
• C: AWS Certificate Manager manages TLS certificates, not EBS or AMI encryption.
• D: Enabling encryption by default affects newly created EBS volumes and snapshots; it does not encrypt an existing unencrypted AMI during copying.

• A) MTU mismatch: OSPF neighbors must exchange Hello packets with a compatible MTU. If MTUs differ, the neighbor conversation fails and the adjacency cannot become Full.

• B) Incorrect subnet mask: Routers must be in the same IP subnet on the connected link to form a neighbor relationship. A subnet mismatch prevents Hello packets from being considered valid on the same network.

• D) Area ID not the same: Neighbors must share the same Area ID. A mismatch stops adjacency from forming beyond the 2-Way state.

• E) Different metric set on each end of the link: Cost differences do not prevent OSPF adjacency; they affect routing decisions, not neighbor formation.
• F) Router ID not defined: OSPF can auto-choose a router ID; an undefined ID is not a prerequisite for adjacency to reach Full.

• A. IDS attack signatures: An IDS primarily detects suspicious network activity and usually alerts rather than directly scanning and blocking uploaded files.
• C. Load balancer: Distributes traffic among servers but does not inspect files for malware.
• D. WAF: Protects web applications from attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and some malicious requests. It is not primarily a PDF-malware scanning solution.

• Answer: C – netstat -an

• netstat -an lists all active connections and listening ports with numeric addresses, without resolving names. This lets you spot DoS patterns such as a flood of connections to a specific port or many connections from a single or few IPs.
• The other options don’t help as directly:

• Windows: netstat -an and look for numerous ESTABLISHED connections to a service or many SYNs to a port.
• Filter by port, e.g., netstat -an | findstr :80, or on Linux: ss -tunap | grep ':80'.

• Netstat provides a snapshot. DoS detection often benefits from continuous monitoring, flow data, and IDS/IPS logs.

• Coordinate and manage the assessment team
• Assign assessment activities
• Direct interviews, examinations, and tests
• Ensure the assessment follows the CAP

• Answer key: Lead Assessor — likely wrong
• CAP-based answer: C3PAO

• ProductSearchModel.getProductSearchHits() — option C
• ProductSearchHit.getRepresentedProducts() — option B

• ProductMgr.queryAllSiteProducts() (A) queries every product in the site, which is heavy and not scalable for large catalogs.
• Category.getProducts() (D) retrieves all products in a category; this can be slow for large categories.
• Using the search model and hits (B and C) leverages the search index, supports paging, and avoids scanning the entire catalog, making it more scalable.

• Answer: A) Clear the Windows event logs

• Windows event logs (System, Security, Application) are key forensic artifacts. If an attacker clears these logs, there’s no built-in local record of actions taken, making it harder for investigators to trace what happened.

• Modify the system time: may misalign timestamps but does not erase past events and can be easily detected.
• Alter log permissions: could prevent new log entries, but it doesn’t remove existing ones and can raise alarms due to permission changes.
• Reduce log retention settings: affects only future logs; it doesn’t wipe already recorded activity.

• In real environments, defenders mitigate this risk with tamper-evident, centralized logging (remote SIEM, write-once storage, log integrity checks) to preserve evidence even if a host is compromised.

• Correct answer: A) Hashing

• Why: Hashing produces a fixed-size digest of the software. If the final build is altered in any way, the hash will change, enabling you to detect tampering by comparing the stored digest with a freshly computed one.

• Why not the others:

python 
import azure.cognitiveservices.speech as speechsdk 


speech_config = speechsdk.SpeechConfig( 
    subscription="YOUR_KEY", 
    region="YOUR_REGION" 
)

Important Azure Speech SDK classes

• SpeechConfig

• AudioConfig

python 
  audio_config = speechsdk.audio.AudioConfig( 
      use_default_microphone=True 
  )

• SpeechRecognizer

python 
  recognizer = speechsdk.SpeechRecognizer( 
      speech_config=speech_config, 
      audio_config=audio_config 
  )

• SpeechSynthesizer

• AudioOutputConfig

 Bogotá, Colombia