Free F5CAB1 Exam Braindumps
BIG-IP Administration Install, Initial Configuration, and Upgrade Questions 6–10 (page: 3)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

An F5 VE has been deployed into a VMware environment via an OVF file.

An administrator wants to configure the management IP address so the VE can be accessed for further setup.

Which two are valid methods for configuring the management-ip address? (Choose two.)

  1. Log into the remote console and configure the management IP by running the config executable.
  2. Log into the remote console and configure the management IP through TMSH using:
    create sys management-ip <ip address>/<mask>
  3. Log into the remote console and configure the management IP through TMSH using:
    create ltm management-ip <ip address>/<mask>
  4. Log into the remote console and configure the management IP by running the setup command.

Answer(s): A,B

Explanation:

A newly deployed BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) in VMware requires initial configuration of its management-ip address so it can be accessed over the network. F5 provides several valid mechanisms during initial console access:

A . Running the config utility

The config script is available on new BIG-IP installations and VE deployments.

It launches a guided text-based wizard allowing configuration of:

Management IP

Netmask

Default route

This is a standard and recommended method during first-time setup.

B . Using TMSH with create sys management-ip

Administrators can enter TMSH directly from the console and run:

create sys management-ip <ip>/<mask>

The management-ip object resides under sys, not under ltm or any other module.

This is the correct tmsh method for defining the management interface address.

Why the other options are incorrect:

C . create ltm management-ip

There is no such object under /ltm.

LTM handles traffic objects (virtual servers, pools), not system management interfaces.

D . Running the setup command

The setup command is used for general system configuration but does not configure the management-ip.

It is not the supported method for initial management IP assignment on VE deployments.

Therefore, the valid methods are running the config utility and using the sys management-ip command within TMSH.



The BIG-IP Administrator needs to update access to the Configuration Utility to include the 172.28.31.0/24 and 172.28.65.0/24 networks.

From the TMOS Shell (tmsh), which command should the BIG-IP Administrator use to complete this task?

  1. modify /sys httpd allow add { 172.28.31.0/255.255.255.0 172.28.65.0/255.255.255.0 }
  2. modify /sys httpd allow add { 172.28.31.0 172.28.65.0 }
  3. modify /sys httpd permit add { 172.28.31.0/255.255.255.0 172.28.65.0/255.255.255.0 }

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Access to the BIG-IP Configuration Utility (TMUI) is controlled through the /sys httpd allow list.

This list defines which IP addresses or subnets are allowed to connect to the management web interface.

To allow two new subnets--172.28.31.0/24 and 172.28.65.0/24--the administrator must add both subnets to the existing list without removing current entries.

In tmsh, subnet entries must be specified in network/netmask format, for example:

172.28.31.0/255.255.255.0

The correct tmsh command to append these networks is:

modify /sys httpd allow add { 172.28.31.0/255.255.255.0 172.28.65.0/255.255.255.0 }

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option B:

IPs are listed without masks, which is invalid for subnet-based access control.

The system requires network/netmask format.

Option C:

The command uses permit instead of allow, which is not a valid attribute of /sys httpd.

The correct keyword must be allow.

Thus, only Option A correctly adds both permitted subnets in the proper tmsh format.



A BIG-IP Administrator is responsible for deploying a new software image on an F5 BIG-IP HA pair and has scheduled a one-hour maintenance window.

With a focus on minimizing service disruption, which of the following strategies is the most appropriate?

  1. Update the active node first, reboot to the newly updated boot location and verify functionality, then push the update from the active to the standby node and reboot the standby node.
  2. Reset the Device Trust, apply the update to each node separately, reboot both nodes, then re- establish the Device Trust.
  3. Update the standby node first and reboot it to the newly updated boot location, failover to the newly updated node and verify functionality. Repeat the upgrade procedures on the next node, which is now in standby mode.
  4. Update both nodes in the HA pair, then reboot both nodes simultaneously to ensure they run the same software version.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

For BIG-IP high-availability (HA) pairs, F5's recommended upgrade workflow prioritizes service continuity, predictable failover, and minimal downtime. The established best-practice sequence is:

Upgrade the standby unit first

Because the standby device is not passing traffic, upgrading and rebooting it does not impact production.

Boot the standby unit into the newly installed version

Once online, the administrator verifies basic health, device sync status, cluster communication, and module functionality.

Perform a controlled failover to the upgraded unit

Traffic shifts to the newly upgraded device, allowing validation of the configuration and operational behavior under real traffic loads.

Upgrade the second device (now standby)

The previously active device becomes standby after failover, allowing it to be safely upgraded and rebooted without interruption.

This phased approach ensures only one device is unavailable at a time, allowing continuous traffic flow throughout the upgrade process.

Why the Correct Answer is C

Option C exactly matches F5's documented production-safe upgrade method:

Upgrade the standby node first

Reboot into new image

Failover to upgraded device

Validate

Upgrade the remaining (now-standby) device

This procedure minimizes risk and traffic disruption.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A . Upgrade the active node first

Upgrading the active device requires removing it from service and failing over abruptly. This is not recommended and increases service disruption risk.

B . Resetting device trust

Resetting trust is unnecessary and can disrupt configuration sync, peer communication, and cluster operation. It is not part of any standard upgrade workflow.

D . Upgrading and rebooting both nodes simultaneously

This would cause total outage, because both HA members would be unavailable at the same time.



What are the two options for securing a BIG-IP's management interface?

(Choose two.)

  1. Limiting network access through the management interface to a trusted/secured network VLAN.
  2. Block all management-interface administrative HTTPS and SSH service ports to prevent access.
  3. Use the BIG-IP's Self-IP addresses for administrative access rather than the management interface.
  4. Restrict administrative HTTPS and SSH access to specific IP addresses or IP ranges.

Answer(s): A,D

Explanation:

Securing the BIG-IP management interface is a fundamental administrative responsibility. F5 best practices emphasize restricting who can reach the management port and ensuring that only authorized systems are allowed access.

A . Limiting management access to trusted network segments

F5 recommends placing the management interface on a dedicated, isolated, and secured management network or VLAN, rather than exposing it to production or untrusted networks.

This reduces the attack surface by ensuring only trusted segments have visibility to administrative interfaces.

D . Restricting management access by IP or subnet

F5 BIG-IP uses the /sys httpd allow list (for HTTPS) and configuration options in sshd (for SSH) to control which IP addresses or subnets can access the device.

By specifying only known administrative IPs or ranges, unauthorized users cannot reach the login services.

Why the other options are incorrect

B . Blocking all management HTTPS/SSH ports

This would prevent any administrative access and is not a viable security practice.

C . Using Self-IP addresses for administrative access

F5 explicitly warns against using Self-IPs for management access unless strictly necessary.

Self-IPs are exposed to the data plane and should not be used as the primary administrative interface.



Which port is an exception to the Port Lockdown function of Self-IPs if a device-group synchronization cluster is configured?

  1. TCP 443
  2. TCP 4353
  3. UDP 53

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Self-IPs implement a security feature known as Port Lockdown, which limits which services are reachable on a Self-IP.

However, certain services required for BIG-IP device-to-device communication bypass Port Lockdown to ensure cluster and HA functionality.

TCP 4353

TCP port 4353 is used by Device Service Clustering (DSC) for:

Device trust establishment

Configuration synchronization

Failover communication

Because BIG-IP devices must always be able to communicate for HA functions to remain operational, port 4353 is exempt from Port Lockdown rules.

Why the other options are incorrect

A . TCP 443

Not required for device trust or synchronization.

HTTPS access is fully controlled by Port Lockdown.

C . UDP 53

DNS traffic is not required for synchronization and has no exemption under Port Lockdown.



Viewing page 3 of 10
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 46 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss F5 F5CAB1 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!