support@Free-Braindumps.com
Register Login
Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
CrowdStrike
Anthropic
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. Exams
  3. Financial
  4. CIA-II

Free CIA-II Exam Braindumps
Certified Internal Auditor Questions 131–135 (page: 28)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026
Page 28 of 103
PDF with 508 Questions

When interrogating an individual who is suspected of fraud, it is appropriate to:

  1. Tell the individual that any information disclosed in the interrogation will not be disclosed outside of the company.
  2. Start the interview with questions to which the interviewer already knows the answer.
  3. Discontinue questioning once the individual has confessed to the fraud.
  4. Prepare a list of questions prior to the interrogation and strictly adhere to the list.

Answer(s): B



Questions used to interrogate individuals suspected of fraud should:

  1. Adhere to a predetermined order.
  2. Cover more than one subject or topic.
  3. Move from general to specific.
  4. Direct the individual to a desired answer.

Answer(s): C



A chief audit executive (CAE) suspects that several employees have used desktop computers for personal gain. In conducting an investigation, the primary reason that the CAE would choose to engage a forensic information systems auditor rather than using the organization's information systems auditor is that a forensic information systems auditor would possess:

  1. Knowledge of the computing system that would enable a more comprehensive assessment of the computer use and abuse.
  2. Knowledge of what constitutes evidence acceptable in a court of law.
  3. Superior analytical skills that would facilitate the identification of computer abuse.
  4. Superior documentation and organization skills that would facilitate in the presentation of findings to senior management and the board.

Answer(s): B



While conducting a payroll audit, an internal auditor in a large government organization found inadequate segregation in the duties assigned to the assistant director of personnel. When the auditor explained the risk of fraud, the assistant director became upset, terminated the interview, and threatened to sue the organization for defamation of character if the audit engagement was not curtailed. The auditor discussed the situation with the chief audit executive (CAE). The CAE should then:

  1. Curtail the audit engagement to avoid potential legal action.
  2. Provide a report to senior management recommending a fraud investigation.
  3. Continue the original engagement program as planned but include a comment about the assistant director's reaction in the engagement final communication.
  4. Add additional testing to determine whether other indicators of fraud exist.

Answer(s): D



Which of the following is the most appropriate step for the chief audit executive to take in order to avoid defamation of character of the principal suspect in a fraud investigation?

  1. Restrict the use of potentially damaging words to privileged reports or discussions.
  2. Label all workpapers, reports, and correspondence of the internal audit activity as private.
  3. Restrict discussions of the fraud to members of management who express an interest in the investigation.
  4. Destroy all investigation workpapers and reports if the fraud cannot be proven.

Answer(s): A



  PDF
Viewing page 28 of 103
Viewing questions 136 - 140 out of 508 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Financial CIA-II exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!