CIA-II Exam Discussions & Posts
Ehsan
on: February 26, 2025
@ET,
Did you use these questions and failed? Or you did not use any of these exam dumps and took the test? Because I used this exam dumps questions and I was able to pass with no problem.
Anonymous
AI Explanation - verified by Thandimhlanga173
on: June 21, 2026
Question 9:
The intended answer is A (Standard).
Here's why in brief:
- Two instances: Free/Shared typically don’t support reliable scaling to multiple instances for production-grade apps; you need a tier that supports multi-instance hosting, which is Standard or higher.
- SSL support: Custom SSL for a domain like miami.weyland.com requires a paid App Service plan. Free/Shared don’t provide proper SSL options for a custom domain.
- Storage: You need about 12 GB. Free/Shared plans have very limited storage, and Basic may fall short on storage capacity depending on the region; Standard provides enough storage to meet/exceed 12 GB.
- Cost minimization: Among tiers that satisfy all three constraints (2 instances, SSL, sufficient storage), Standard is the lowest-cost viable option.
So, Standard is the minimum tier that meets all requirements while keeping costs down. If you’d like, I can compare the exact storage quotas and instance limits from the latest Azure docs to confirm.
Johannesburg, South Africa
AI Explanation - verified by User4939
on: June 21, 2026
Question 24:
Question 24 explanation
- Command:
sourcetype=access_combined | transaction JSESSIONID
- What it does: It groups events by the value of JSESSIONID so events with the same JSESSIONID are combined into a single transaction (one output event per JSESSIONID).
Correct statements:
- A: An additional field named maxspan is created. (Yes)
- B: An additional field named duration is created. (Yes)
- C: An additional field named eventcount is created. (Yes)
- D: Events with the same JSESSIONID will be grouped together into a single event. (Yes)
Thus, all four descriptions are true. The provided answer (B, C, D) is missing A, so it appears to be incorrect. The transaction command typically adds eventcount, duration, and maxspan fields and collapses events with the same grouping field into one transaction event.
Mumbai, India
AI Explanation - verified by User4939
on: June 21, 2026
Question 16:
Question 16 asks: A data model consists of which three types of datasets?
- Answer: The three dataset types are Event datasets, Transaction datasets, and Search datasets. The page lists “Events, searches, transactions” (B), which corresponds to those three types (order doesn’t matter).
Why these are correct:
- Event datasets: contain individual events and define which fields/attributes apply to those events.
- Transaction datasets: group related events into a single logical transaction based on start/end conditions or a transaction ID.
- Search datasets: derived from the results of a saved search or query, used when you want to build a dataset from a specific search.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: “Constraint, field, value” describes attributes or components, not dataset types.
- C: “Field extraction, regex, delimited” are field extraction methods, not dataset types.
- D: “Transaction, session ID, metadata” mixes a dataset type with metadata concepts, not the three dataset types.
If you want, I can walk through how each dataset type is used in building a data model.
Mumbai, India
AI Explanation - verified by User4939
on: June 21, 2026
Question 15:
Question 15 asks which delimiters the Field Extractor (FX) can detect. The Field Extractor supports delimited field extractions using common separators, including:
So the correct set is Tabs, Pipes, Spaces, and Commas (A,B,C,D). The provided answer (A,B,C) is incomplete—the FX can also detect commas as a delimiter.
Notes:
- Use the delimited extraction when your log lines are structured with a consistent separator.
- If values contain the delimiter or spaces within fields, you may need a regex-based extraction or quoting to avoid incorrect splits.
Mumbai, India
AI Explanation - verified by User4939
on: June 21, 2026
Question 5:
Question 5 asks which delimiters the Field Extractor (FX) can use. The answer key here lists Tabs and Pipes (A and B), but FX actually supports all four: Tabs, Pipes, Colons, and Spaces.
Why: FX creates field extractions by splitting an event on a chosen delimiter. Those four delimiters cover common log formats:
- Tabs:
field1\tfield2
- Pipes:
field1|field2
- Colons:
key:value style splits
- Spaces:
field1 field2 (but watch for multiple spaces or spaces within values)
Caveats:
- Spaces can be tricky if values contain spaces; you may need quoting or a different extraction approach (e.g., regex).
- After selecting a delimiter, verify by testing with sample events to confirm the correct fields are created.
In short: correct choices are A, B, C, and D (all four delimiters). The key you provided omits Colons and Spaces, which are also supported.
Mumbai, India
AI Explanation - verified by User4259
on: June 21, 2026
Question 6:
- The correct answer is C: Evaluating stakeholder needs to determine enterprise objectives.
- Why: In COBIT 2019, governance comprises three interrelated activities: evaluate stakeholder needs to determine objectives, set direction through prioritization and decision making, and monitor performance and compliance against the agreed direction and objectives. This reflects the stakeholder-value principle—governance should ensure stakeholder needs are evaluated to establish balanced objectives.
- Why the other options are not the governance element highlighted here:
- A (Building plans to align with the direction set by the governance body) is more about translating governance direction into plans, which is typically a management activity, not a governance objective by itself.
- B (Monitoring activities designed to achieve enterprise objectives) describes monitoring, which is part of governance in COBIT, but the exam question identifies the core governance element as evaluating stakeholder needs (C).
If you want, I can walk through how these concepts fit into the COBIT 2019 governance vs. management roles.
Seville, Spain
AI Explanation - verified by ramncwanaayanda
on: June 21, 2026
Question 1:
You're right: Android cannot be Azure Entra joined. Entra join is Windows-only; Android and iOS are joined via Entra registered (BYOD).
In Question 173, the typical setup shown is:
- Device1 and Device2 are Windows devices.
- Device3 is Android.
- Device4 is iOS.
Based on that:
- Azure Entra joined: Device1 and Device2 (both Windows).
- Azure Entra registered: Device1, Device2, Device3, Device4 (any OS can be registered for BYOD).
So your claim that only Device1 can be joined would be correct only if Device2 were not Windows. If you can confirm Device2’s OS, I can tailor the answer precisely. If not, the standard interpretation (as shown in the explanation) is: Device1 and Device2 join; all four devices can be registered.
Johannesburg, South Africa
AI Explanation - verified by User2294
on: June 21, 2026
Question 10:
Question 10 asks: From the User menu, which actions can a user select? (Choose three.)
- Log Out (B) — standard option to sign out of the account.
- Elevate Roles (C) — temporarily grants higher permissions to perform tasks that require more access.
- Impersonate Users (D) — allows an admin to act as another user for troubleshooting.
The other options are not typically in the User menu:
- Send Notifications (A) — usually part of Notification settings or event-driven actions.
- Order from Service Catalog (E) — accessed via the Catalog, not the User menu.
- Approve Records (F) — part of workflow approvals, not a User menu action.
So the three correct choices are B, C, and D.
Patna, India
AI Explanation - verified by jjnanthakumar17
on: June 21, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s how to think about Question 1 and why startup scripts via GPO (option C) is the better fit.
- Goal: Ensure the automation scripts run on every newly created VM in the on-prem Hyper-V environment.
- A) SetupComplete.cmd in %windir%\setup\scripts
- Pros: Runs as Windows is being set up.
- Cons: Only reliably executes during the OS deployment/setup phase. If you’re cloning or deploying from existing images, SetupComplete.cmd may not run consistently. Not the most flexible for ongoing provisioning.
- Pros: Easy to assign per-user.
- Cons: Requires a user to log on. If the VM is used as a server or started before any user logs in, the scripts won’t run.
- Pros: Runs at computer startup under the Local SYSTEM context, independent of user logon. Ensures the scripts execute on new VMs as soon as they boot (and on subsequent boots if needed). This is normally the simplest and most reliable method for automated VM configuration in an AD environment.
- D) Place scripts in a VHD
- Not automatic; nothing to trigger execution.
Bottom line: The most robust choice to guarantee the scripts run on new VMs without user interaction is option C, the startup script GPO. Note: the provided explanation in the question mentions a Azure-specific Custom Script extension, which isn’t applicable to on-prem Hyper-V.
Bengaluru, India
AI Explanation - verified by User8719
on: June 21, 2026
Question 82:
Question 82: The correct answer is A (Fuzzing).
- Fuzzing automatically feeds malformed or unexpected inputs to an application to test how it handles them, helping identify input validation weaknesses and runtime vulnerabilities.
- It directly validates resilience against bad inputs, which static analysis or reviews may miss.
- Why the others are less suitable: Continuous deployment focuses on rapid delivery, not vulnerability assessment; Static code analysis checks code quality but may miss runtime input handling; Manual peer review is useful but less systematic for ensuring input resilience.
Lagos, Nigeria
AI Explanation - verified by User3296
on: June 21, 2026
Question 42:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 42.
What the question asks
- You plan to deploy an Azure NAT gateway (Gateway1) to Vnet1.
- VM1 and VM2 will access the internet via their own public IPs.
- You want to minimize administrative effort.
- You’re asked: what is the minimum number of subnets that Vnet1 must have to support this deployment?
Key Azure NAT Gateway requirements
- The NAT gateway itself must be deployed in a dedicated subnet named GatewaySubnet. This is mandatory.
- If you have an Azure Firewall in the same VNet, it must reside in its own subnet named AzureFirewallSubnet. This is also mandatory.
- The NAT gateway is used to provide outbound internet access for subnets that you attach to it. If VM1 and VM2 live in one subnet, you only need that one subnet to be NAT-enabled; if they reside in multiple subnets, you’d attach NAT to each of those subnets.
Minimum-subnet reasoning
- GatewaySubnet (for Gateway1)
- AzureFirewallSubnet (for FW1)
- The VM subnet(s) that will use NAT (one subnet suffices if VM1 and VM2 share a subnet)
So, the typical minimum is 3 subnets (GatewaySubnet, AzureFirewallSubnet, and at least one VM subnet). If VM1 and VM2 sit in two separate subnets that both require NAT, you’d have 4 subnets.
Note on the answer key
- The provided answer in the material shows 4 (option C). That would be correct if there are two separate VM subnets needing NAT. If VM1 and VM2 share a single subnet, 3 subnets is the minimum. If you want, I can help map the exact subnet layout you have and confirm which minimum applies.
Buffalo, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User2146
on: June 21, 2026
Question 37:
Question 37 asks how to run two Docker containers in Azure Container Instances (ACI) with shared, persistent storage, non-root users, and YAML-based deployment.
Key concepts to meet the requirements:
- Put both containers in a single container group so they share lifecycle, resources, and the local network.
- Use a shared, persistent storage volume backed by Azure File share (azureFile) so data survives container crashes and container restarts.
- Mount the same volume into both containers (volumeMounts) so they can share data and state.
- Ensure containers do not run as root (set non-root user in each container, typically via securityContext with runAsNonRoot: true and runAsUser: <non-root UID>).
Why azureFile?
- Ephemeral volumes (like emptyDir) disappear when containers crash or stop.
- Azure File shares persist independently of container lifecycle, satisfying the persistence and restart requirements.
Example approach (high level):
- Create a container group with two containers.
- Define a volume named, for example, sharedvolume, of type azureFile (provide shareName, storageAccountName, and access details).
- In both containers, mount sharedvolume at the same path (e.g., /data).
- For each container, set securityContext to runAsNonRoot and a non-root runAsUser.
Sample (conceptual):
- containers: [ container1, container2 ]
- volumeMounts: [ { name: sharedvolume, mountPath: /data } ]
- volumes: [ { name: sharedvolume, azureFile: { shareName: "myshare", storageAccountName: "mystorage", storageAccountKey: "...", readOnly: false } } ]
- securityContext for each container: runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser: 1000
By using a single cont
Bengaluru, India
AI Explanation - verified by User7515
on: June 21, 2026
Question 37:
Question 37 asks how to provide additional safeguards for encrypted data at ALBs by using a unique random session key. The correct approach is to ensure forward secrecy (FS) in TLS.
Why the right answer is D:
- Forward secrecy means the session keys are generated using ephemeral keys (e.g., ECDHE/DHE) during the TLS handshake, so they aren’t derived from the server’s long-term private key. This protects past sessions if the private key is compromised later.
- Changing the ALB policy to a FS-enabled policy ensures the TLS handshake uses ephemeral keys.
Why the other options are not correct:
- A: Simply requiring TLS 1.2 does not guarantee forward secrecy, as TLS 1.2 can use non-ephemeral (RSA) key exchanges depending on the cipher suite.
- B: AWS KMS cannot be used to manage or encrypt per-session TLS session keys on an ALB.
- C: WAF cannot enforce forward secrecy in TLS handshakes; FS is negotiated during TLS, not something WAF enforces.
How to implement (high level):
- In the ALB/or listener settings, choose a security policy that supports forward secrecy (FS-enabled cipher suites, e.g., ECDHE-based suites).
- If your environment supports TLS 1.3, that inherently provides FS as well.
Madrid, Spain
AI Explanation - verified by User1114
on: June 21, 2026
Question 21:
Question 21 asks what to use to transform and visualize a large JSON dataset (1B items) in OneLake, with requirements for parallel processing, minimal data duplication, and fast loading, while performing time-series analysis, anomaly detection, and sharing insights.
Correct answer: PySpark library in a Fabric notebook.
Why PySpark fits:
- Parallel processing: Spark distributes work across a cluster, ideal for 1B items and time-series operations.
- Data handling at scale: PySpark DataFrames/SQL can transform, windowing, and aggregate efficiently without duplicating data.
- Anomaly detection: Spark MLlib provides scalable ML algorithms to perform anomaly detection on large datasets.
- Visualization pathway: In a Fabric notebook, you can surface aggregated results or sample data for plotting with Python visualization libraries, or export results to a BI tool.
Why the other options are less suitable:
- Pandas in a Fabric notebook: memory-bound, not designed for trillion-row-scale workloads; would struggle with 1B items.
- Power BI with core visuals: excellent for consumption and sharing visuals, but not a scalable compute engine for transforming and anomaly-detecting on huge datasets. Visualization alone doesn’t meet the parallel processing and large-scale processing requirements.
So for the stated goals, PySpark in a Fabric notebook best meets the needs of parallel processing, minimal data duplication, and faster load/processing times.
Adelaide, Australia
AI Explanation - verified by harshahari774
on: June 21, 2026
Question 36:
The correct answer is C) GitHub Copilot Enterprise.
Why:
- Copilot Enterprise is designed for organizations needing enterprise-grade identity management. It supports integration with identity providers (IdPs) like Okta, enabling SSO and SCIM provisioning to add/remove users automatically.
- This centralized user management is the most cost-effective option for large teams, since admin overhead and licensing can scale more efficiently with an IdP rather than managing many individual accounts.
- Other plans (Individual, Team/Business) don’t offer the same level of enterprise identity provisioning and centralized admin features, making Enterprise the best fit when you’re migrating from Bitbucket and require seamless IdP-based user management.
Kakinada, India
AI Explanation - verified by User6635
on: June 21, 2026
Question 3:
?????3?????????????????
- ?????: AWS Organizations ???????????????????????? S3 ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
- A: ????????? aws:PrincipalOrgID ????????????????? ID ???????????????????????????????
- B: aws:PrincipalOrgPaths ? OU ???????????????????????????? overhead ?????
- C: CloudTrail ???????????????????????????????????????????
- D: aws:PrincipalTag ???????????????????????????????????????
- ??: A ???????????????????????
??: aws:PrincipalOrgID ? Organization ???????????????????????????????????????? OU ?????????????
Minato, Japan
AI Explanation - verified by monsubaka2
on: June 21, 2026
Question 198:
For Question 198, the recommended checks are B, C, and E.
- B. The IAM roles created for the federated users' or federated groups' trust policy have set the SAML provider as the principal.
- Why: The role’s trust policy must explicitly trust the SAML provider. Without this, AWS will not allow the SAML assertion to assume the role.
- C. Test users are not in the AWSFederatedUsers group in the company's IdP.
- Why: Federated users must be mapped through the IdP group to the corresponding IAM role. If the user isn’t in the correct IdP group, the assertion won’t map to a role.
- E. The on-premises IdP's DNS hostname is reachable from the AWS environment VPCs.
- Why: The federation flow relies on reaching the IdP (for authentication and metadata). DNS reachability and network access are essential for the IdP to participate in the login flow.
Notes:
- A and D describe aspects of the flow but aren’t checkpoints for proper federation configuration.
- F is important in practice ( IdP-to-IAM mappings ), but the question’s highlighted checks are B, C, E. If you want, I can walk through how to verify these in IAM and your IdP.
Ichikawa-Minami, Japan
AI Explanation - verified by User6465
on: June 21, 2026
Question 24:
Yes. The correct mapping for Question 24 is:
- Box 1: Dataset
- Box 2: Linked service
- Box 3: Pipeline
Why:
- Dataset: represents data accessible by ADF, defined from paths in datastores or URLs.
- Linked service: stores the connection information needed for ADF to connect to external resources.
- Pipeline: a logical grouping of activities that together perform a task.
If you want, I can walk through a sample data factory workflow to see how these fit together.
Brampton, Canada
AI Explanation - verified by kncheche77
on: June 21, 2026
Question 132:
Question 132: Which measure is NOT affected by the transfer price for the division that transfers its output to other divisions?
- Transfer price affects the selling division’s:
- Operating profit (revenue from the transfer minus COGS on the transfer).
- Return on investment (ROI) (ROI changes with the profit level).
- Sales revenue (the division records revenue from the interdivisional sale).
- It does not affect the selling division’s item: Cost of components purchased, which is a cost for the buying division, not the selling division.
Therefore, the correct answer is C: Cost of components purchased.
Maseru, Lesotho
AI Explanation - verified by kncheche77
on: June 21, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s a concise explanation of Question 1 about Direct Product Profitability (DPP).
What is DPP?
- DPP focuses on the profitability of each product by tracing direct costs to the product and allocating only the overhead costs that are caused by that product. Non-product-specific costs are not tied to a single product in the same way. The goal is to help managers decide on which products to stock, price, or discontinue.
Evaluation of statements:
- A. DPP should result in improved management of storage space.
- Yes. By revealing product-level profitability, you can prioritize space for the more profitable items and reduce space for the less profitable ones.
- B. DPP should result in improved supplier relationships.
- Plausible but not direct. DPP focuses on product profitability; it can influence supplier negotiations (e.g., for key, profitable SKUs) but is not a guaranteed or primary outcome.
- C. DPP should result in improved pricing decisions.
- Yes. Knowing the true profitability of each product supports more informed pricing strategies.
- D. DPP requires non product-specific costs to be apportioned rather than allocated.
- Not a clear, universal rule. DPP typically emphasizes tracing direct costs and using only product-caused overheads; how non-product-specific costs are handled varies by method.
- E. DPP provides summary information on the profitability of each customer group.
- No. DPP is product-focused, not customer-group profitability.
The exam key here lists A, B, C as correct, with D and E not being core DPP outcomes.
Maseru, Lesotho
AI Explanation - verified by User6418
on: June 20, 2026
Question 9:
- True Positive (TP): A real security threat occurs and the monitoring system correctly detects it and raises an alert.
- False Negative (FN): A real security threat occurs but the detection system misses it, so no alert is generated.
Example: If an unauthorized USB exfiltration happens and no alert is triggered, that’s a false negative. If the system detects the unauthorized USB and raises an alert, that’s a true positive.
Why it matters:
- False negatives are dangerous because they allow breaches to go undetected.
- True positives enable timely incident response.
How to reduce FN vs TP gaps:
- Improve detection coverage (EDR/UEBA, DLP, SIEM tuning).
- Regularly test detection rules and perform red-team/blue-team exercises.
- Ensure comprehensive logging and cross-domain visibility so multi-source signals can be correlated.
'Ewa Beach, United States
YoutubeAndPray
on: June 12, 2026
This exam was very hard and I wouldn't have made it without some exam dumps. Real exam questions were a lifesaver even though I'm exhausted.
Ghana
DevOps_Rach
on: June 11, 2026
The AI Assistant and braindumps were the only things keeping me afloat in this challenging exam. Without them passing would have been a doubtful prospect.
Ireland
it_dad_of_3
on: June 09, 2026
Sustainable-Investing was very hard but the exam dumps made a big difference. Wouldn't have got through this exam without them.
UAE
9to5_and_study
on: May 31, 2026
Real exam questions were a nightmare but teh braindumps helped make sense of them. The AI Assistant was useful to avoid getting stuck too long on the challenging exam parts.
Austria
OneMoreRetake
on: May 31, 2026
Passed it but this exam was harder than I thought and teh real exam questions were nothing like the dumps I used.
Greece
SecOpsGuy
on: May 29, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind hard through the exam dumps and real exam questions to finally pass. The AI Assistant didn't make it much easier.
Philippines
always_learning_a
on: May 27, 2026
teh exam was very hard and even with real exam questions and brain dumps it caught me off guard. Had to rely on the AI Assistant more than I anticipated.
Romania
GrindNeverStops
on: May 22, 2026
Finished yesterday and this exam was very hard. Exam dumps definitely helped even though the stress was real.
Norway
layla_it_uae
on: May 21, 2026
Took two attempts but the exam dumps helped with those very hard sections that kept tripping me up. Real exam quetions were spot on although the AI Assistant was not much help.
Saudi Arabia
ahmed_certkings
on: May 19, 2026
Underestimated this exam adn the AI Assistant didn’t help much. Had to grind through exam dumps to finally get through it.
Ireland
mark_passed_aws
on: May 16, 2026
Spent weeks on the exam dumps only to find the real exam questions were very hard and unexpected. The AI Assistant was helpful but this exam was still a serious challenge.
Turkey
ines_cloudsec
on: May 12, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam but the braindumps and AI Assistant were helpful. Real exam quetions were very hard and I was not sure I would pass.
Australia
AlmostGaveUp_J
on: May 11, 2026
The AI Assistant was a help since real exm questions were very hard and the braindumps made it bearable enough to get through this exam.
Indonesia
SnowflakeSteve
on: May 10, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling throgh the real exam questions and sifting endless brain dumps. Very hard to get through but those dumps were my only advantage.
Netherlands
sam_azure_guy
on: May 09, 2026
This exm was very hard but the exam dumps helped me focus on the right areas. Finally done with all the stress.
New Zealand
zt_zealot
on: May 08, 2026
Three weeks of intense study and the brain dumps still couldn't prepare me for how very hard this exam turned out to be. Real exam quetions were unlike what I encountered in practice tests and surprised me with unexpected twists.
Hong Kong
SkippedTheBook
on: May 06, 2026
Passed it on my second try after using the exam dumps. This exam was very hard to study for.
United States
mark_passed_aws
on: April 26, 2026
Took two attempts but managed to pass this exam with the help of new exam dumps and reviewing lots of real exam questions.
Indonesia
amara_itpro
on: April 23, 2026
Passed it on the second try using exam dumps because this was a very hard exam. The real exam questions matched what I practiced with.
Poland
liam_secops
on: April 23, 2026
The real exam questions in this exam caught me off guard and the dumps didn't help much with the unexpected twists. The challenging exam content made me question my prep but the AI Assistant offered some clarity in the end.
Belgium
PaloAlto_Pat
on: April 22, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam with the help of exam dumps as a last resort after finding the real exam quetions very hard to comprehend.
Kenya
OneMoreRetake
on: April 19, 2026
Took two attempts and still found this exam very hard since even with brain dumps you never know what real exam questions you'll face. The AI Assistant was helpful to understand some tricky topics but stress levels were real.
Saudi Arabia
SecOpsGuy
on: April 19, 2026
Spent several nights going over exam dumps and real exam questions yet this exam was very hard and stressful to get through.
Czech Republic
night_study_guy
on: April 19, 2026
Tackled the exam and those brain dumps were only partially helpful. The real exam quetions caught me off guard with unexpected depth making it a very hard test.
Turkey
LastMinuteLearner
on: April 15, 2026
Underestimated this exam adn had to grind through several brain dumps just to make it through. It was very hard but the real exam questions I studied helped a lot.
Luxembourg
CertOrBust_2025
on: March 28, 2026
Spent weeks trying to understand this exam but the brain dumps really helped. The real exam questions were very hard even with the AI Assistant.
Vietnam
RetakeKing2025
on: March 27, 2026
The braindumps and AI Assistant were key but this exam was very hard. I wasn't sure I'd pass but they helped with the real exam questions.
Spain
OneMoreRetake
on: March 25, 2026
Finally done with this exam and it was very hard despite using exam dumps and the AI Assistant. I felt drained but honestly the brain dumps were a necessary last resort for me to pass.
United Kingdom
pivot_to_cloud_p
on: March 23, 2026
Spent weeks on this exm and resorted to braindumps in the end due to how very hard it was. The AI Assistant helped with real exam questions though the whole process was still draining.
France