Free GFMC Exam Braindumps
Examination 3: Governmental Financial Management and Control (GFMC) Questions 31–35 (page: 8)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

How may a city parks and recreation director meaningfully assess the performance of the department's grounds maintenance division?

  1. use a single measure of citizen satisfaction with parks and recreation
  2. evaluate funds spent on grounds maintenance
  3. analyze grounds maintenance staffing levels
  4. compare cost per acre maintained to cost per acre maintained in another jurisdiction

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Why Is This the Best Measure for Performance?
Comparing the cost per acre maintained to that of another jurisdiction provides a meaningful benchmark for performance evaluation. It allows the director to assess how efficiently the department is operating relative to similar organizations. This comparison ensures that the department is managing resources effectively and identifies potential areas for improvement.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A . Use a single measure of citizen satisfaction: While citizen satisfaction is important, it is subjective and does not provide insight into operational efficiency. B . Evaluate funds spent on grounds maintenance: Total spending does not measure efficiency or productivity; it merely reflects the amount allocated.
C . Analyze staffing levels: Staffing levels do not directly measure performance; they are only one factor in determining efficiency.
Reference and Documents:
Governmental Performance Reporting (AGA): Recommends using comparative benchmarks for evaluating efficiency in service delivery.
Performance Management Framework by GAO: Highlights cost-effectiveness metrics such as cost per acre maintained.



A local government is reviewing the performance of a contractor that is collecting trash for the county. Performance can be measured based upon the cost

  1. per mile travelled.
  2. per ton of trash collected.
  3. comparison with closest comparable jurisdiction.
  4. per employee.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Why Measure Performance Based on Cost per Ton of Trash Collected? Cost per ton of trash collected is a direct, objective, and quantifiable measure of the contractor's performance. It reflects how efficiently the contractor is operating relative to the amount of trash being managed.
This measure aligns with the principle of output-based performance evaluation, which focuses on results (e.g., tons of trash collected) rather than inputs or unrelated factors.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A . Per mile traveled: Mileage is not directly tied to performance; it depends on the route structure and geography, not the quantity of trash collected.
C . Comparison with closest comparable jurisdiction: While this may provide context, it is not a specific performance measure.

D . Per employee: Employee count does not directly measure performance or efficiency in trash collection operations.
Reference and Documents:
GAO Guide on Contract Performance Evaluation: Recommends using measurable and outcome- based metrics like cost per ton collected for performance reviews. Best Practices in Local Government Contracting (AGA): Highlights output-based measures for evaluating contractor performance.



Management shoulg consider the cost of internal controls in relationship to

  1. the available budget.
  2. inherent risks.
  3. benefits provided.
  4. risk of collusion.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Why Should Management Consider the Cost of Internal Controls in Relation to Benefits? The cost-benefit principle states that the cost of implementing and maintaining internal controls should not exceed the benefits derived from those controls. Effective internal controls help mitigate risks, improve efficiency, and ensure compliance, but their implementation comes with costs (e.g., time, resources, systems).
Management must evaluate whether the benefits of preventing or detecting potential issues (e.g., fraud, errors) justify the associated costs.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A . The available budget: While the budget is important, internal controls are not solely dictated by budget constraints; their effectiveness and benefit-to-cost ratio are key considerations. B . Inherent risks: While inherent risks are a factor in determining control needs, the relationship between cost and benefit remains the primary consideration. D . Risk of collusion: Controls address collusion risks, but management does not prioritize collusion specifically when assessing cost versus benefit.
Reference and Documents:
COSO Internal Control Framework: Highlights the cost-benefit principle when implementing controls. GAO Standards for Internal Control (Green Book): Emphasizes balancing costs with benefits when designing internal control systems.



In a performance aygit, due professional care is used to

  1. obtain sufficient and competent evidence.
  2. determine scope.
  3. set materiality of financial statements.
  4. present the findings in accordance with GAAP.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Performance Audit Overview:
A performance audit focuses on evaluating the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of government programs or activities.
Due professional care is a requirement in Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book), ensuring auditors perform their duties responsibly and with professional judgment.
Key Requirement: Sufficient and Competent Evidence:
Auditors must collect sufficient and reliable evidence to support their findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This is the cornerstone of "due professional care."

Explanation of Answer Choices:
A . Obtain sufficient and competent evidence: Correct. This ensures audit findings are supported by reliable, documented evidence.
B . Determine scope: While part of audit planning, it is not directly related to due professional care. C . Set materiality of financial statements: This applies to financial audits, not performance audits. D . Present the findings in accordance with GAAP: GAAP is not a requirement for performance audits.


Reference:

GAO, Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).
Association of Government Accountants (AGA), Performance Auditing Practices.



A governmental attestation engagement may include a requirement to

  1. monitor a subgrantee for compliance to the grant restrictions.
  2. establish a policy concerning fraud prevention.
  3. monitor purchasing card charges for compliance with travel policies.
  4. review the revenue coverage requirements on outstanding bonds.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Governmental Attestation Engagements:
These engagements involve providing assurance on specific elements of financial or non-financial information, such as compliance with laws, contracts, or bond covenants. Reviewing revenue coverage requirements for outstanding bonds fits the scope of attestation engagements, which focus on confirming adherence to specific requirements.
Explanation of Answer Choices:
A . Monitor a subgrantee for compliance to the grant restrictions: Monitoring is a management responsibility, not typically part of an attestation engagement. B . Establish a policy concerning fraud prevention: Establishing policies is a management duty, not a task for auditors.
C . Monitor purchasing card charges for compliance with travel policies: Monitoring is operational, not attestation-related.
D . Review the revenue coverage requirements on outstanding bonds: Correct. This falls within the scope of attestation engagements.


Reference:

GAO, Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).

AICPA, Attestation Standards for Government Engagements.



Viewing page 8 of 24
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 115 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Financial GFMC exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!