Free NSE7_EFW-7.0 Exam Braindumps
Fortinet NSE 7 - Enterprise Firewall 7.0 Questions 31–35 (page: 8)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

An administrator has created a VPN community within VPN Manager on FortiManager. They also added gateways to the VPN community and are now trying to create firewall policies to permit traffic over the tunnel; however, the VPN interfaces are not listed as available options.
What step must the administrator take to resolve this issue?

  1. Install the VPN community and gateway configuration to the FortiGate devices, in order for the interfaces to be displayed within Policy & Objects on FortiManager
  2. Set up all of the phase 1 settings in the VPN community that they neglected to set up initially. The interfaces will be automatically generated after the administrator configures all of the required settings.
  3. Refresh the device status from the Device Manager so that FortiGate will populate the IPsec interfaces.
  4. Create interface mappings for the IPsec VPN interfaces, before they can be used in a policy.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

1- Create a VPN Community
2- Install VPN Configuration
3- Add IPsec Firewall Policies
4- Install the Policies



Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a diagnose command.



What can be concluded about the debug output in this scenario?

  1. Servers with a negative TZ value are less preferred for rating requests.
  2. There is a natural correlation between the value in the Packets field and the value in the Weight field.
  3. FortiGate used 64.26.151.37 as the initial server to validate its contract.
  4. The first server provided to FortiGate when it performed a DNS query looking for a list of rating servers, was 121.111.236.179.

Answer(s): B



Refer to the exhibit, which shows a central management configuration.



Which server will FortiGate choose for web filter rating requests, if 10.0.1.240 is experiencing an outage?

  1. Public FortiGuard servers
  2. 10.0.1.243
  3. 10.0.1.242
  4. 10.0.1.244

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

by default,( include-default-servers ) enabled .this allows fortigate to communicate with the public fortiguard servers , if the fortimanger devices (configured in server-list) are unavailable .



Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of diagnose sys session list.



If the HA ID for the primary device is 0, what will happen if the primary fails and the secondary becomes the primary?

  1. Traffic for this session continues to be permitted on the new primary device after failover, without requiring the client to restart the session with the server.
  2. The secondary device has this session synchronized; however, because application control is applied, the session will be marked dirty and have to be re-evaluated after failover.
  3. The session state will be preserved but the kernel will need to re-evaluate the session due to NAT being applied.
  4. The session will be removed from the session table of the secondary device due to the presence of allowed error packets, which will force the client to restart the session with the server.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Note-How-to-see-if-a-session-is-synced-in- HA/ta-p/194185



Refer to the exhibit, which contains partial output from an IKE real-time debug.



Why did the tunnel not come up?

  1. The local gateway has configured less secure encryption and hashing algorithms compared to the remote gateway.
  2. The Diffie-Hellman group does not match on the local and remote gateways.
  3. The proposal ID does not match between local and remote gateways.
  4. The encapsulation method for phase 2 is set to none on local and remote gateways.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

local gateway: encryption AES-128, hash SHA remote gateway: encryption AES-256, hash SHA-256 So local gateway has less secure settings



Viewing page 8 of 34
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 163 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.0 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!