Free NSE7_FSN_AR-7.6 Exam Braindumps
Fortinet NSE 7 - Secure Networking 7.6 Architect Questions 71–75 (page: 16)

Updated On: 30-Sep-2026

Refer to the exhibit, which shows the partial output of a real-time OSPF debug.

Why are the two FortiGate devices unable to form an adjacency?

  1. The Hello packet is being sent from an OSPF router with ID 0.0.0.112.
  2. The two FortiGate devices attempting adjacency are in area 0.0.0.0.
  3. One FortiGate device is configured to require authentication, while the other is not.
  4. The passwords on the FortiGate devices do not match.

Answer(s): C



FILL IN THE BLANK
You are troubleshooting an SD-WAN deployment where branches are successfully connecting to the hub but SD-WAN rules are not being applied to local-out traffic (traffic originating from the FortiGate itself, such as DNS queries or NTP sync). You have verified that SD-WAN members are healthy and standard traffic steering is working correctly.
Which setting must be explicitly enabled in the FortiGate CLI to enable SD-WAN rule evaluation for local-out traffic?

  1. set local-out enabled

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

By default, SD-WAN rules do not apply to traffic originating from the FortiGate device itself (local-out traffic). To enable SD-WAN rule evaluation for local-out traffic such as DNS queries, NTP synchronization, or management traffic, you must explicitly configure the local-out setting in the SD-WAN interface. The command is: config system sdwan followed by set local-out enabled .
This is a common troubleshooting scenario in SD-WAN deployments because administrators expect SD-WAN rules to apply uniformly, but the default behavior restricts SD-WAN rule evaluation to data-plane traffic (traffic passing through the device) rather than control-plane traffic (traffic generated by the device itself). Enabling local-out ensures that DNS queries and other device-generated traffic also benefit from SD-WAN member selection and steering policies.



Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of the command get router info bgp neighbors 100.64.2.254 advertised-routes.

What can you conclude from the output?

  1. The BGP state of the two BGP participants is OpenConfirm.
  2. The router ID of the neighbor is 100.64.2.254.
  3. The BGP neighbor is advertising the 10.20.30.40/24 network to the local router.
  4. The local router is advertising the 10.20.30.40/24 network to its BGP neighbor.

Answer(s): D



Refer to the exhibit.
The exhibit shows the output from using the command diagnose debug application samld -1 to diagnose a SAML connection.

Based on this output, what can you conclude?

  1. Active Directory is used for authentication.
  2. The authentication request is for an SSL VPN connection.
  3. The IdP IP address is 10.1.10.254.
  4. The IdP IP address is 10.1.10.2.

Answer(s): D



Refer to the exhibit, which shows the modified output of the routing kernel.

Which statement is true?

  1. The egress interface associated with static route 8.8.8.8/32 is administratively up.
  2. The default static route through 10.200.1.254 is not in the forwarding information base.
  3. The default static route through port2 is in the forwarding information base.
  4. The BGP route to 10.0.4.0/24 is not in the forwarding information base.

Answer(s): D



Viewing page 16 of 34
Viewing questions 76 - 80 out of 164 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Fortinet NSE7_FSN_AR-7.6 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!