Cisco®
CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. HashiCorp
  5. HCVA0-003

Free HashiCorp HCVA0-003 Exam Questions (page: 9)

Page 9 of 73
PDF with 285 Questions

During a service outage, you must ensure all current tokens and leases are copied to another Vault cluster for failover so applications don't need to authenticate. How can you accomplish this?

  1. Have Vault write all the tokens and leases to a file so you have a second copy of them
  2. Configure all applications to use the auto-auth feature of the Vault Agent
  3. Configure Disaster Recovery replication and promote the secondary cluster during an outage
  4. Replicate to another cluster using Performance Replication and promote the secondary cluster during an outage

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
A: Insecure and manual; not a Vault feature. Incorrect.
B: Auto-auth doesn't replicate tokens/leases. Incorrect.
C: DR replication mirrors tokens and leases; promotion enables failover. Correct.
D: Performance replication doesn't replicate tokens fully. Incorrect.
Overall Explanation from Vault Docs:
"Disaster Recovery replication mirrors tokens and leases... Promote the secondary during an outage."


Reference:

https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/enterprise/replication#replicated-data



You logged into the Vault CLI and attempted to enable an auth method, but you received this error message.
What can you do to resolve the error and configure Vault? (Error: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:8200: connect: connection refused)

  1. Restart the Vault service on this node
  2. Ask an admin to grant you permission to enable the userpass auth method
  3. Change 'userpass' to 'username and password'
  4. Set the VAULT_ADDR environment variable to HTTP

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
A: Connection refused isn't a service issue here. Incorrect.
B: Permissions don't cause connection errors. Incorrect.
C: Invalid syntax change. Incorrect.
D: Default VAULT_ADDR is HTTPS; if TLS is off, set to http://127.0.0.1:8200. Correct.
Overall Explanation from Vault Docs:
"If TLS is disabled, set VAULT_ADDR to http://127.0.0.1:8200 to avoid connection errors..."


Reference:

https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands#vault_addr



Jason has enabled the userpass auth method at the path users/.
What path would Jason and other Vault operators use to interact with this new auth method?

  1. users/auth/
  2. authentication/users
  3. auth/users
  4. users/

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
In HashiCorp Vault, authentication methods (auth methods) are mechanisms that allow users or machines to authenticate and obtain a token.
When an auth method like userpass is enabled, it is mounted at a specific path in Vault's namespace, and this path determines where operators interact with it--e.g., to log in, configure, or manage it.
The userpass auth method is enabled with the command vault auth enable -path=users userpass, meaning it's explicitly mounted at the users/ path. However, Vault's authentication system has a standard convention: all auth methods are accessed under the auth/ prefix, followed by the mount path. This prefix is a logical namespace separating authentication endpoints from secrets engines or system endpoints.
Option A: users/auth/
This reverses the expected order. The auth/ prefix comes first, followed by the mount path (users/), not the other way around. This path would not correspond to any valid Vault endpoint for interacting with the userpass auth method. Incorrect.

Option B: authentication/users
Vault does not use authentication/ as a prefix; it uses auth/. The term "authentication" is not part of Vault's path structure--it's a conceptual term, not a literal endpoint. This makes the path invalid and unusable in Vault's API or CLI. Incorrect.
Option C: auth/users
This follows Vault's standard convention: auth/ (the authentication namespace) followed by users (the custom mount path specified when enabling the auth method). For example, to log in using the userpass method mounted at users/, the command would be vault login -method=userpass - path=users username=<user>. The API endpoint would be /v1/auth/users/login. This is the correct path for operators to interact with the auth method, whether via CLI, UI, or API. Correct.
Option D: users/
While users/ is the mount path, omitting the auth/ prefix breaks Vault's structure. Directly accessing users/ would imply it's a secrets engine or other mount type, not an auth method. Auth methods always require the auth/ prefix for interaction. Incorrect.
Detailed Mechanics:
When an auth method is enabled, Vault creates a backend at the specified path under auth/. The userpass method, for instance, supports endpoints like /login (for authentication) and /users/<username> (for managing users). If mounted at users/, these become auth/users/login and auth/users/users/<username>. This structure ensures isolation and clarity in Vault's routing system. The ability to customize the path (e.g., users/ instead of the default userpass/) allows flexibility for organizations with multiple auth instances, but the auth/ prefix remains mandatory.
Overall Explanation from Vault Docs:
"When enabled, auth methods are mounted within the Vault mount table under the auth/ prefix... For example, enabling userpass at users/ allows interaction at auth/users." This convention ensures operators can consistently locate and manage auth methods, regardless of custom paths.


Reference:

https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth#enabling-disabling-auth-methods



You want to integrate a third-party application to retrieve credentials from the HashiCorp Vault API. How can you accomplish this without having direct access to the source code?

  1. You cannot integrate a third-party application with Vault without being able to modify the source code
  2. Put in a request to the third-party application vendor
  3. Instead of the API, have the application use the Vault CLI to retrieve credentials
  4. Use the Vault Agent to obtain secrets and provide them to the application

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
Integrating a third-party application with Vault without modifying its source code requires a solution that handles authentication and secret retrieval externally, then delivers secrets in a way the application can consume (e.g., files or environment variables). Let's break this down:
Option A: You cannot integrate a third-party application with Vault without being able to modify the source code

This is overly restrictive and incorrect. Vault provides tools like the Vault Agent, which can authenticate and fetch secrets on behalf of an application without requiring code changes. The agent can render secrets into a format (e.g., a file) that the application reads naturally. This option ignores Vault's flexibility for such scenarios. Incorrect.
Option B: Put in a request to the third-party application vendor While this might eventually lead to native Vault support, it's impractical, slow, and depends on the vendor's willingness and timeline. It doesn't address the immediate need to integrate without source code access. This is a passive approach, not a technical solution within Vault's capabilities.
Incorrect.
Option C: Instead of the API, have the application use the Vault CLI to retrieve credentials The Vault CLI is designed for human operators or scripts, not seamless application integration. Third- party applications without source code modification can't invoke the CLI programmatically unless they're scripted to do so, which still requires external orchestration and isn't a clean solution. This approach is clunky, error-prone, and not suited for real-time secret retrieval in production. Incorrect. Option D: Use the Vault Agent to obtain secrets and provide them to the application The Vault Agent is a lightweight daemon that authenticates to Vault, retrieves secrets, and renders them into a consumable format (e.g., a file or environment variables) for the application. For example, if the application reads a config file, the agent can write secrets into that file using a template. This requires no changes to the application's code--just configuration of the agent and the application's environment. It's a standard, scalable solution for such use cases. Correct.
Detailed Mechanics:
The Vault Agent operates in two modes: authentication (to obtain a token) and secret rendering (via templates). For a third-party app, you'd configure the agent with an auth method (e.g., AppRole), a template (e.g., {{ with secret "secret/data/my-secret" }}{{ .Data.data.key }}{{ end }}), and a sink (e.g., /path/to/app/config). The agent runs alongside the app (e.g., as a sidecar in Kubernetes or a daemon on a VM), polls Vault for updates, and refreshes secrets as needed. The app remains oblivious to Vault, reading secrets as if they were static configs. This decoupling is key to integrating unmodified applications.
Real-World Example:
Imagine a legacy app that reads an API key from /etc/app/key.txt. The Vault Agent authenticates with Vault, fetches the key from secret/data/api, and writes it to /etc/app/key.txt. The app starts, reads the file, and operates normally--no code changes required.
Overall Explanation from Vault Docs:
"Vault Agent... provides a simpler way for applications to integrate with Vault without requiring changes to application code... It renders templates containing secrets required by your application." This is ideal for third-party or legacy apps where source code access is unavailable.


Reference:

https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/agent-and-proxy/agent



Viewing page 9 of 73
Viewing questions 33 - 36 out of 285 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss HashiCorp HCVA0-003 exam prep with other Community members:

HCVA0-003 Exam Discussions & Posts