A company already has an Aruba wireless network. The network currently consists of:
* oneMM-HW-1k
* two 7210 MCs in the network core
* two 721GMCsintheDMZ
* 200 AP-515S in Building 1 and Building 5
100 AP-515S each In Building 2r Building 3, and Building 4
The customer now wants to assess if it needs local Mobility controllers (MC) for any buildings:
- Building 1 is the main office building for the campus. It supports the highest number of APs. It connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
* Building 2 is further away from the Building 1. and no roaming is provided between it and the other buildings its access layer connects to the network cone with a pair of Aruba CX 6300M aggregation switches.
* Building 3 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
The Guest SSID traffic should be tunneled to the DMZ controllers’ Building 4 has its own local datacenter and Internet connection. The company would like it to be able to operate
completely autonomously if its aggregation layer loses connectivity with the core.
* Building 5 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
This building has been assigned to a partner that would like to manage a dedicated SS1D using the shared AP infrastructure.
In which two buildings should the network architect plan local mobility controllers (MCs)? (Select two)
- Building 1
- Building 4
- Building 5
- Building 3
- Building 2
Reveal Solution Next Question