Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. ISACA
  5. COBIT-Design-and-Implementation

ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam Questions
ISACA COBIT Design and Implementation Certificate (Page 4 )

Updated On: 21-Feb-2026
Page 4 of 25
PDF with 120 Questions

Which of the following needs to be resolved when finalizing the initial governance design?

  1. Misaligned enterprise and IT goals
  2. Budgeted versus actual resources
  3. Objectives exceeding enterprise appetite
  4. Conflicting inputs and priorities

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The initial governance design process involves gathering inputs from various stakeholders, including business units, IT, and external partners. These inputs can sometimes conflict, and it is crucial to resolve these conflicts to create a unified governance system that supports enterprise objectives.

Key Steps:

Stakeholder Alignment: Ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page regarding priorities and objectives.

Conflict Resolution: Addressing and resolving any discrepancies or conflicts in inputs to ensure a consistent and aligned governance system.

Prioritization: Establishing clear priorities to guide decision-making and resource allocation.

COBIT 2019 Framework


Reference:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: Discusses the importance of resolving conflicting inputs and establishing a cohesive governance framework that aligns with enterprise priorities.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for alignment between IT and enterprise goals, requiring the resolution of any conflicting priorities.

Resolving conflicting inputs and priorities ensures that the governance system is well-aligned and effective in achieving enterprise goals.



Who would be identified as an external stakeholder when soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations?

  1. Implementation team
  2. Staff utilizing the solution
  3. IT audit committee
  4. Current IT service vendor

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

When soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations, the current IT service vendor would be identified as an external stakeholder. External stakeholders are those outside the organization who can influence or be influenced by the outcomes of the project.

In the context of COBIT 2019, external stakeholders are those who are not part of the enterprise but have a vested interest in the success of IT initiatives. The current IT service vendor plays a critical role in providing feedback on the feasibility, implementation challenges, and potential impact of the new system upgrade.

COBIT 2019 Framework


Reference:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7: Highlights the importance of engaging external stakeholders, including vendors, to gain valuable insights and feedback.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement, including both internal and external parties, to ensure comprehensive feedback and alignment with requirements.

Engaging the current IT service vendor as an external stakeholder ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered, enhancing the quality and feasibility of the business case.



At which stage of the governance system design flow are design factors translated into governance and management priorities?

  1. Concluding the governance system design
  2. Understanding the enterprise strategy
  3. Determining the initial scope
  4. Refining the scope

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

In the COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow, design factors are essential elements that influence the tailoring and implementation of a governance system. These design factors include elements such as enterprise strategy, goals, risk profile, compliance requirements, and more. The stage where these design factors are translated into specific governance and management priorities is during the "Refining the Scope" phase.

Detailed Explanation with


Reference:

Concluding the Governance System Design (Option A):

This stage involves finalizing and approving the design of the governance system. By this point, the design factors have already been considered and translated into actionable priorities.

Understanding the Enterprise Strategy (Option B):

At this stage, the focus is on understanding the enterprise's strategic direction and objectives.
While it is crucial to gather this understanding to inform the governance system design, the actual translation of design factors into governance and management priorities occurs later.

Determining the Initial Scope (Option C):

This stage involves setting the preliminary boundaries and focus areas for the governance system. It identifies the broad areas that need governance attention but does not yet translate specific design factors into detailed priorities.

Refining the Scope (Option D):

During this phase, the initial scope is refined based on a deeper analysis of the design factors. It is at this stage that the design factors are critically analyzed and translated into specific governance and management priorities. This phase ensures that the governance system is tailored to the unique needs of the enterprise and aligns with its strategic goals, risk profile, and other key considerations.

According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, refining the scope involves using the identified design factors to make informed decisions about where to focus governance efforts and how to prioritize various governance and management activities. This ensures a targeted and effective governance system.

Conclusion: The correct answer is D. Refining the scope. In this phase, design factors are systematically translated into specific governance and management priorities, ensuring that the governance system is precisely aligned with the enterprise's needs and objectives.


ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.

ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.



Which of the following situations is MOST likely the root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT implementation program plan?

  1. Enterprise training does not include business and management skill development.
  2. Business staff are too often involved in IT processes that affect business processes and procedures.
  3. The enterprise relies too heavily on the use of COBIT as its EG IT framework.
  4. IT staff are too often focused on the achievement of business value.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The most likely root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan is that enterprise training does not include business and management skill development. Effective EGIT implementation requires a blend of technical, business, and management skills.

Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO07 (Managed Human Resources): This objective emphasizes the importance of developing skills and competencies, including business and management skills, for successful governance and management of enterprise IT.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter outlines the need for comprehensive training programs that address not only technical skills but also business and management capabilities to ensure successful implementation of governance frameworks.

Without proper training that includes business and management skills, staff may be ill-prepared to handle the complexities of EGIT implementation, leading to skill gaps and competency issues.



Which of the following should be used when translating design factor values into governance and management priorities?

  1. Weighted average
  2. Matrix calculation
  3. Weighted calculation
  4. Pareto analysis

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

When translating design factor values into governance and management priorities, a weighted calculation should be used. This method allows for the consideration of various factors according to their relative importance and impact on the governance system.

Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: This chapter explains the process of translating design factor values into actionable governance and management priorities, emphasizing the use of weighted calculations to reflect the importance of different design factors.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter highlights how weighted calculations can help prioritize governance and management activities based on the enterprise's specific context and needs.

Using weighted calculations ensures a balanced and proportionate approach to prioritizing governance and management objectives, leading to a more effective and tailored governance system.






Post your Comments and Discuss ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam dumps with other Community members:

Join the COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Discussion