Free CTFL-UK Exam Braindumps (page: 5)

The project situation after 11 months is:

- The first increment was released one week late but contained sufficient functionality to bedeclared fit for purpose'. However, there were 20 outstanding incidents deferred to increment two.
- The amount of voluntary overtime worked PV the test team has reduced the second Incrementslippage to just 3 weeks.
- There is talk of reducing the scope of requirements. The purpose of this is to first deliver theapplication with support for manual testing and then to provide a delivery * weeks later to resolve any remaining points and provide support for automated testing (i.e. the link to the capture-replay tool).
- Concerns have been expressed by a section of the user community, that in some places theusability is very poor.

The project situation after 11 months is:

- The first increment was released one week late but contained sufficient functionality to bedeclared fit for purpose'. However, there were 20 outstanding incidents deferred to increment two.
- The amount of voluntary overtime worked PV the test team has reduced the second Incrementslippage to just 3 weeks.
- There is talk of reducing the scope of requirements. The purpose of this is to first deliver theapplication with support for manual testing and then to provide a delivery * weeks later to resolve any remaining points and provide support for automated testing (i.e. the link to the capture-replay tool).
- Concerns have been expressed by a section of the user community, that in some places theusability is very poor.

The project situation after 11 months is:

- The first increment was released one week late but contained sufficient functionality to bedeclared fit for purpose'. However, there were 20 outstanding incidents deferred to increment two.
- The amount of voluntary overtime worked PV the test team has reduced the second Incrementslippage to just 3 weeks.
- There is talk of reducing the scope of requirements. The purpose of this is to first deliver theapplication with support for manual testing and then to provide a delivery * weeks later to resolve any remaining points and provide support for automated testing (i.e. the link to the capture-replay tool).
- Concerns have been expressed by a section of the user community, that in some places theusability is very poor.

The project situation after 11 months is:

- The first increment was released one week late but contained sufficient functionality to bedeclared fit for purpose'. However, there were 20 outstanding incidents deferred to increment two.
- The amount of voluntary overtime worked PV the test team has reduced the second Incrementslippage to just 3 weeks.
- There is talk of reducing the scope of requirements. The purpose of this is to first deliver theapplication with support for manual testing and then to provide a delivery * weeks later to resolve any remaining points and provide support for automated testing (i.e. the link to the capture-replay tool).
- Concerns have been expressed by a section of the user community, that in some places theusability is very poor.