Free MB-820 Exam Braindumps
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Developer Questions 6–10 (page: 3)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026
View Related Case Study

HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not supported)
You need to select the appropriate page types to solve the reporting requirements.
Which page types should you use? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE; Each correct selection is worth one point.

  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

For the requirements provided, the appropriate page types should be selected as follows:
Display relevant insights in the Housekeeping Role Center: HeadlinePart Display the additional information for the Room table: FactBox Configure the first installation: StandardDialog
Comprehensive Detailed Explanation
In the context of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, page types are crucial for determining how information is presented to the user.
HeadlinePart: This page type is designed to display key data and insights in a concise and visually appealing manner, often used in Role Centers to highlight important information. It is suitable for the Housekeeping Role Center to display relevant insights. FactBox: This page type is used to display supplementary information related to a selected record in the main part of the page. It's often used to show additional details about a record in a list, card, or document page. In this scenario, it is suitable for showing additional information about a specific Room when viewing the Room table.
StandardDialog: This is a page type that provides a modal dialog for user interaction, commonly used for setup wizards, confirmations, and input forms that require user action before proceeding. This is appropriate for configuring the first installation, where a step-by-step guided interaction is necessary.



View Related Case Study

DRAG DROP (Drag and Drop is not supported)
You need to handle the removal of the Description field and the Clone procedure without breaking other extensions.
Which three actions should you perform in sequence? To answer, move the appropriate actions from the list of actions to the answer area and arrange them in the correct order.
NOTE: More than one order of answer choices is correct. You will receive credit for any of the correct orders you select.

  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

In Business Central, when you need to handle the removal of fields and procedures to ensure that other extensions are not affected by these changes, you typically follow a two-step deprecation process. This allows other developers and users to adapt to the changes before they are fully enforced. Here are the steps to handle the removal:
Mark as Obsolete: In the first version where the decision to remove the field or procedure is made, you set the ObsoleteState to Pending and provide an ObsoleteReason. This doesn't remove the feature but indicates to users and developers that it will be removed in the future. This step is crucial for backward compatibility.
Removal: In a subsequent version, after users have had time to adapt to the deprecation warning, you can then remove the field or procedure or set the ObsoleteState to Removed. Based on these guidelines, here are the three actions you should perform in sequence:
Set the Description field as ObsoleteState = Pending and ObsoleteReason = 'Not in use' in version 2.0.0.0.
Set the Clone procedure as ObsoleteState = Pending and ObsoleteReason = 'Not in use' in version 2.0.0.0.
Remove the Description field from the Issue table in version 2.0.0.1.

These steps will ensure that anyone using the Description field or Clone procedure will receive a warning about the pending deprecation before it is actually removed, thereby minimizing the impact on other extensions and providing a clear path for migration.

When handling the removal of fields and procedures in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, the process should be carried out in a way that allows other extensions or dependent features to adapt to the changes without causing immediate failures.
Set Obsolete State and Reason for Description Field (Version 2.0.0.0): The first step involves marking the Description field as obsolete by setting the ObsoleteState to 'Pending'. This is a non-breaking change, signaling to other developers and users that the field is planned for removal in a future version. An ObsoleteReason should also be provided to explain why the field is being deprecated. Set Obsolete State and Reason for Clone Procedure (Version 2.0.0.0): Similarly, the Clone procedure should be marked as obsolete with the ObsoleteState set to 'Pending'. This indicates that the procedure is no longer in use and will be removed in the future. Providing an ObsoleteReason is best practice as it explains the rationale behind the decision. Remove the Description Field (Version 2.0.0.1): In the subsequent version, after the developers and users have been given time to adapt to the deprecation notice, the Description field can be safely removed from the Issue table. This is considered a breaking change, hence it is done after the field has been marked as obsolete in a previous version.
The reason for not removing the Description field and Clone procedure immediately in version 2.0.0.0 is to avoid causing runtime errors for any extensions or integrations that may depend on these components. By following this sequence, you provide a clear deprecation path that helps maintain the stability of the overall system while evolving the schema.



View Related Case Study

You need to determine If you have unwanted incoming web service calls in your tenant during the last seven days.
Which two KQL queries should you use? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
Note: Each correct selection is worth one point.






Answer(s): A,C

Explanation:

The task is to identify unwanted incoming web service calls during the last seven days. To do this, we need to look at KQL (Kusto Query Language) queries that would filter out web service calls based on the timestamp (to ensure the calls are within the last seven days) and by certain characteristics that would indicate they are unwanted, such as the wrong type of protocol (SOAP in this case, as XyzCom Ltd. plans to dismiss using it).
Looking at the options:
Option A: This query selects all traces where the timestamp is within the last 7 days and where the custom dimension has a value of 'RT0008', and where the category is either 'ODataV4', 'ODataV3', or 'Api'. This query would show all API calls except SOAP, so it does not directly answer the question about unwanted calls.
Option B: This query filters for traces with a timestamp within the last 7 days, where 'RT0008' is present, and specifically looks for the category 'SOAP'. This query is correct because it directly targets SOAP calls, which are the unwanted calls according to XyzCom Ltd.'s plans. Option C: Similar to option B, this query filters for traces within the last 7 days and looks for 'RT0008' but uses the equality operator for the category 'SOAP'. This would also correctly return the unwanted SOAP calls.
Option D: This query also filters for traces within the last 7 days, but it excludes the 'ODataV4' category, which doesn't necessarily target the unwanted SOAP calls. Option E: This query selects traces where the timestamp is within the last 7 days and the custom dimension has 'RT0008'. However, it filters out categories 'ODataV4' and 'Api', which does not directly help in identifying the unwanted SOAP calls.
Therefore, the queries that should be used to determine if there are unwanted incoming web service calls (SOAP calls) in the tenant during the last seven days are Options B and C. These queries are specific to identifying SOAP protocol usage, which is what XyzCom Ltd. considers unwanted.



View Related Case Study

You need to call the Issue API action from the mobile application.
Which action should you use?

  1. POST/issues (88122e0e-5796-ec11-bb87-000d3a392eb5yMicrosoit.NAV.copy
  2. PATCH /issues {88122 eOe-5796-ed 1 -bb87-000d3a392eb5)/Mkrosotl.NAV.Copy
  3. POST /issues (88122e0e-5796-ec11 -bb87-000d3a392eb5)/Copy
  4. POST /issues (88122e0e-5796-ec11 -bb87-000d3a392eb5)/copy
  5. POST/issues(88122e0e-5796-ec11-bb87-000d3a392eb5)/MicrosoftNAV.Copy

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

In the context provided by the case study, when calling an API action from a mobile application, the correct format for a POST request to an action in Business Central typically involves specifying the entity (/issues), the ID of the entity (88122e0e-5796-ec11-bb87-000d3a392eb5), and the action to be called (/Copy). The action name should match the exact name as defined in the AL code, which is case-sensitive.
Option A is incorrect because it uses a non-standard format for the action call. Option B uses the PATCH method, which is generally used for update operations, not for calling actions.
Option C is correct as it uses the POST method, which is appropriate for calling actions, and correctly specifies the entity, ID, and action name.
Option D is incorrect because the action name /copy is in lowercase, while AL is case-sensitive, and it should match the case exactly as defined in the code.
Option E incorrectly adds 'MicrosoftNAV' before the action name, which is not standard for calling actions in Business Central APIs.
Hence, the correct action to use when calling the Issue API action from the mobile application is given in Option C.



View Related Case Study

You need to determine why the extension does not appear in the tenant.
What are two possible reasons for the disappearance? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
Note: Each correct selection is worth one point.

  1. The extension was published as a DEV extension.
  2. The extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification.
  3. The extension was published as PTE. and the Platform parameter was not updated in the application file.
  4. The extension was published as PTE. and the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file.
  5. The extension was not compatible with the new version within 90 days of the first notification.

Answer(s): B,D

Explanation:

In the context of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, an extension may not appear in the tenant for several reasons, particularly after an upgrade to a new major version. Option A suggests that the extension was published as a DEV extension, which typically would not cause it to disappear after an upgrade because DEV extensions are intended for development and testing within sandbox environments.
Option B indicates that the extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification. This is a likely reason because Microsoft enforces compatibility rules, and extensions that are not made compatible within the specified timeframe might be removed or disabled.
Option C refers to the extension being published as a PTE (Per-Tenant Extension) and mentions the Platform parameter not being updated. This could cause issues, but not specifically the disappearance of the extension after an upgrade.
Option D expands on Option C by adding that both the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file. This is a critical aspect because if these parameters are not correctly set to indicate compatibility with the new version of Business Central, the extension could be disabled or removed.
Option E is similar to Option B but mentions a 90-day period. This option does not align with standard Business Central practices for version compatibility requirements. Therefore, the two possible reasons for the disappearance of the extension in the tenant after an upgrade are that the extension was not compatible with the new version within the required timeframe (Option B) and that the extension was published as a PTE without the Platform and Runtime parameters being updated (Option D).



Viewing page 3 of 13
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 131 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Microsoft MB-820 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!