QUESTION: 41

The ABC company has an Anypoint Runtime Fabric on VMs/Bare Metal (RTF-VM) appliance installed

on its own customer-hosted AWS infrastructure.

Mule applications are deployed to this RTF-VM appliance. As part of the company standards, the Mule application logs must be forwarded to an external log management tool (LMT).

Given the company's current setup and requirements, what is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way to send Mule application logs to the external LMT?

In RTF-VM, install and configure the external LTM's log-forwarding agent
In RTF-VM, edit the pod configuration to automatically install and configure an Anypoint Monitoring agent
In each Mule application, configure custom Log4j settings
In RTF-VM. configure the out-of-the-box external log forwarder

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Reference:

https://help.mulesoft.com/s/article/Enable-external-log-forwarding-for-Mule
applications-deployed-in-RTF

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 42

An organization is designing an integration Mule application to process orders by submitting them to a back-end system for offline processing. Each order will be received by the Mule application through an HTTPS POST and must be acknowledged immediately. Once acknowledged, the order will be submitted to a back-end system. Orders that cannot be successfully submitted due to rejections from the back-end system will need to be processed manually (outside the back-end system).

The Mule application will be deployed to a customer-hosted runtime and is able to use an existing ActiveMQ broker if needed. The ActiveMQ broker is located inside the organization's firewall. The back-end system has a track record of unreliability due to both minor network connectivity issues and longer outages.

What idiomatic (used for their intended purposes) combination of Mule application components and ActiveMQ queues are required to ensure automatic submission of orders to the back-end system while supporting but minimizing manual order processing?

An Until Successful scope to call the back-end system
One or more ActiveMQ long-retry queues
One or more ActiveMQ dead-letter queues for manual processing
One or more On Error scopes to assist calling the back-end system An Until Successful scope containing VM components for long retries A persistent dead-letter VM queue configured in CloudHub
One or more On Error scopes to assist calling the back-end system One or more ActiveMQ long-retry queues
A persistent dead-letter object store configured in the CloudHub Object Store service
A Batch Job scope to call the back-end system
An Until Successful scope containing Object Store components for long retries

A dead-letter object store configured in the Mule application

Answer(s): A

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 43

A Mule application is running on a customer-hosted Mule runtime in an organization's network. The Mule application acts as a producer of asynchronous Mule events. Each Mule event must be broadcast to all interested external consumers outside the Mule application. The Mule events should be published in a way that is guaranteed in normal situations and also minimizes duplicate delivery in less frequent failure scenarios.

The organizational firewall is configured to only allow outbound traffic on ports 80 and 443. Some external event consumers are within the organizational network, while others are located outside the firewall.

What Anypoint Platform service is most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) for publishing these Mule events to all external consumers while addressing the desired reliability goals?

CloudHub VM queues
Anypoint MQ
Anypoint Exchange
CloudHub Shared Load Balancer

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Set the Anypoint MQ connector operation to publish or consume messages, or to accept (ACK) or not accept (NACK) a message.

Reference:

https://docs.mulesoft.com/mq/

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 44

A Mule application uses APIkit for SOAP to implement a SOAP web service. The Mule application has been deployed to a CloudHub worker in a testing environment.

The integration testing team wants to use a SOAP client to perform Integration testing. To carry out the integration tests, the integration team must obtain the interface definition for the SOAP web service.

What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way for the integration testing team to obtain the interface definition for the deployed SOAP web service in order to perform integration testing with the SOAP client?

Retrieve the OpenAPI Specification file(s) from API Manager
Retrieve the WSDL file(s) from the deployed Mule application
Retrieve the RAML file(s) from the deployed Mule application
Retrieve the XML file(s) from Runtime Manager

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Reference:

https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/4.2.x/spring-framework
reference/html/integration-testing.html

Reveal Solution Next Question

Free MCIA-LEVEL-1-MAINTENANCE Exam Braindumps (page: 11)

QUESTION: 41

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 42

QUESTION: 43

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 44

Explanation:

Reference: