Free Lead Implementer 42001 Exam Braindumps
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer Questions 41–45 (page: 10)

Updated On: 27-Oct-2026

Under the EU AI Act, which category of AI systems is subject to specific transparency requirements determined by their risk level?

  1. High risk AI systems
  2. Low risk AI systems
  3. Minimal risk AI systems

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Under the EU AI Act, low-risk AI systems that interact with humans or generate/manipulate content are subject to specific transparency obligations, such as informing users that they are interacting with AI or that content has been artificially generated or modified.



What is the primary function of an Artificial Intelligence Management System?

  1. Aligning AI projects with organizational strategy
  2. Ensuring ethical adherence in AI operations
  3. Managing risks associated with AI implementation
  4. Providing guidelines for AI policy establishment

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

An AIMS integrates the development and use of AI with the organization’s objectives, governance, policies, and processes. Risk management and ethical controls support this broader strategic alignment.



An effective order for ensuring your AIMS requirements meet the organizational needs would be

  1. Evaluate, context, planning, operations
  2. Planning, context, operations, evaluate
  3. Planning, operations, evaluate, context
  4. Context, planning, operations, evaluate

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

An effective sequence is to first understand the organization’s context, then plan the AIMS, operate the planned processes, and finally evaluate performance and effectiveness.



When implementing ISO/IEC 42001, what must be in place before claiming conformity?

  1. To have an AI system impact assessment planned
  2. To have a documented AI system impact procedure and results of assessment
  3. To have a documented AI system impact process and results of assessment
  4. To have an AI impact assessment manager in place

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

ISO/IEC 42001 requires the organization to establish and document an AI system impact assessment process and retain documented information on the assessment results before claiming conformity.



WeltArt is a tech company headquartered in Paris, France, renowned for its artistic work in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). WeltArt’s mission is pushing the boundaries of creative innovation by leveraging advanced algorithms, machine learning techniques, and neural networks to explore the limitless possibilities of AI, redefining the landscape of visual and sound arts. Recently, the company decided to review its artificial intelligence management system AIMS to evaluate its compliance with ISO/IEC 42001, ensuring the effective management of its AI processes and systems.
Although WeltArt conducted risk assessments for its AI systems in the past, it fell short in incorporating the results into defining a clear AI risk treatment process.
While some risks were identified, there was no systematic approach to selecting appropriate risk treatment options or determining necessary controls. As a result, a lack of alignment between identified risks and implemented controls was evident, leaving the company vulnerable to potential AI-related risks.
The company considered factors such as business strategy, interested party impact, legal requirements, and its risk tolerance for AI systems development and usage. It also evaluated the risk posed by AI systems and the company's risk environment. In addition, the company’s AI policy took considered AI resources and assets. AI system impact assessments, and AI system development. Regarding its AI policy review, the company conducted periodic reviews and assigned the responsibility on an ad hoc basis to various team members.
Furthermore, WeltArt verified and validated its AI system with automated unit tests, human-in-the-loop testing, and a detailed evaluation plan addressing performance, ethics, and social impacts while setting a regular system assessments schedule. It implemented mechanisms to address performance challenges and processes to manage deficiencies. However, the system still failed to consistently meet accuracy and reliability expectations in real-world deployment, affecting its overall effectiveness.
In order to implement and control the processes needed to address actions determined by clause 6 of ISO/IEC 42001, WeltArt established the necessary criteria for the processes and implemented controls for the processes. It also monitored the effectiveness of these controls, took corrective actions when needed, and maintained documented evidence to confirm processes were carried out as planned.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which ISO/IEC 42001 clause did WeltArt address in the last paragraph?

  1. Clause 8.1 Operational planning and control
  2. Clause 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  3. Clause 10.1 Continual improvement

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The last paragraph describes establishing criteria for processes, implementing and controlling processes, monitoring controls, taking corrective actions when necessary, and retaining documented information to demonstrate that processes were carried out as planned. These activities correspond to clause 8.1 Operational planning and control of ISO/IEC 42001.



Viewing page 10 of 25
Viewing questions 46 - 50 out of 120 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss PECB Lead Implementer 42001 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!