Free LSAT Test Exam Braindumps
Law School Admission Test: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Analytical Reasoning Questions 192–196 (page: 40)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

The judgment that an artist is great always rests on assessments of the work the artist has produced. A series of great works is the only indicator of greatness. Therefore, to say that an artist is great is just to summarize the quality of his or her known works, and the artist's greatness can provide no basis for predicting the quality of the artist's unknown or future works.

Which one of the following contains questionable reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?

  1. The only way of knowing whether someone has a cold is to observe symptoms. Thus, when a person is said to have a cold, this means only that he or she has displayed the symptoms of a cold, and no prediction about the patient's future symptoms is justified.
  2. Although colds are very common, there are some people who never or only very rarely catch colds. Clearly these people must be in some way physiologically different from people who catch colds frequently.
  3. Someone who has a cold is infected by a cold virus. No one can be infected by the same cold virus twice, but there are indefinitely many different cold viruses. Therefore, it is not possible to predict from a person's history of infection how susceptible he or she will be in the future.
  4. The viruses that cause colds are not all the same, and they differ in their effects. Therefore, although it may be certain that a person has a cold, it is impossible to predict how the cold will progress.
  5. Unless a person displays cold symptoms, it cannot properly be said that the person has a cold. But each of the symptoms of a cold is also the symptom of some other disease. Therefore, one can never be certain that a person has a cold.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The length of the stimulus and choices may be daunting, and so may their format, but if you seek to reduce everything to essentials, the right answer is right around the corner. The stimulus asserts, in two sentences that work as one, that a necessary condition of an artist's greatness is the knowledge of a series of great works.
From that assertion, the stimulus draws a two-part conclusion, to wit, that: (1) "greatness" is merely an assessment based on an artist's works that are known, and hence that (2) one cannot predict the quality of unknown or future work based on the artist's "greatness. "Whether or not this seems reasonable to you (and it shouldn't, since the stem does identify the logic as "questionable"), we need to seek a two-part conclusion, part of which is a prediction.



Four boys -- Fred, Juan, Marc, and Paul -- and three girls-- Nita, Rachel, and Trisha -- will be assigned to a row of five adjacent lockers, numbered consecutively 1 through 5, arranged along a straight wall. The following conditions govern the assignment of lockers to the seven children:

Each locker must be assigned to either one or two children, and each child must be assigned to exactly one locker.
Each shared locker must be assigned to one girl and one boy.
Juan must share a locker, but Rachel cannot share a locker.
Nita's locker cannot be adjacent to Trisha's locker. Fred must be assigned to locker 3.

Which one of the following is a complete and accurate list of the children who must be among those assigned to shared lockers?

  1. Fred, Juan
  2. Juan, Paul
  3. Juan, Marc, Paul
  4. Juan, Marc, Trisha
  5. Juan, Nita, Trisha

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Piece of cake given our initial deductive work. Among those for-sure paired up are Juan (Rule 3), as well as Nita and Trisha (since we need two girls for the two sharings, and according to Rule 3, it ain't gonna be Rachel).
Who is the other boy for a shared locker? No way to tell.



Four boys -- Fred, Juan, Marc, and Paul -- and three girls -- Nita, Rachel, and Trisha -- will be assigned to a row of five adjacent lockers, numbered consecutively 1 through 5, arranged along a straight wall. The following conditions govern the assignment of lockers to the seven children:

Each locker must be assigned to either one or two children, and each child must be assigned to exactly one locker.
Each shared locker must be assigned to one girl and one boy.
Juan must share a locker, but Rachel cannot share a locker.
Nita's locker cannot be adjacent to Trisha's locker. Fred must be assigned to locker 3.

If Trisha is assigned to locker 3 and Marc alone is assigned to locker 1, then which one of the following must be true?

  1. Juan is assigned to locker 4.
  2. Juan is assigned to locker 5.
  3. Paul is assigned to locker 2.
  4. Rachel is assigned to locker 2.
  5. Rachel is assigned to locker 5.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

As soon as you see that we're given new information -- and two pieces, yet! -- you should think to set up a little sketch for the purpose of this question, adding what you already know to what you're told. We see that one of the shared lockers must be #3.



Four boys -- Fred, Juan, Marc, and Paul -- and three girls -- Nita, Rachel, and Trisha -- will be assigned to a row of five adjacent lockers, numbered consecutively 1 through 5, arranged along a straight wall. The following conditions govern the assignment of lockers to the seven children:

Each locker must be assigned to either one or two children, and each child must be assigned to exactly one locker.
Each shared locker must be assigned to one girl and one boy.
Juan must share a locker, but Rachel cannot share a locker.
Nita's locker cannot be adjacent to Trisha's locker. Fred must be assigned to locker 3.

If the four boys are assigned to consecutively numbered lockers and Juan is assigned to locker 5, then which one of the following is a complete and accurate list of lockers each of which CANNOT be a shared locker?

  1. locker 2
  2. locker 4
  3. locker I,locker 2
  4. locker 1,locker 4
  5. locker 2,locker 4

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

If all of our boys are occupying consecutive lockers and Juan takes locker 5, then clearly 2 through 5 will be assigned to boys--meaning (lest we forget) that Rachel is forced to take locker 1. (Remember, she has a locker to herself.) Fred's always got locker 3, so Marc and Paul will take lockers 2 and 4, in either order. Don't forget Juan's locker partner.



Four boys -- Fred, Juan, Marc, and Paul -- and three girls -- Nita, Rachel, and Trisha -- will be assigned to a row of five adjacent lockers, numbered consecutively 1 through 5, arranged along a straight wall. The following conditions govern the assignment of lockers to the seven children:

Each locker must be assigned to either one or two children, and each child must be assigned to exactly one locker.
Each shared locker must be assigned to one girl and one boy.
Juan must share a locker, but Rachel cannot share a locker.
Nita's locker cannot be adjacent to Trisha's locker. Fred must be assigned to locker 3

Once Rachel has been assigned to a locker, what is the maximum number of different lockers each of which could be the locker to which Juan is assigned?

  1. one
  2. two
  3. three
  4. four
  5. five

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

This question has a slightly more theoretical bent; maybe it'll help to do some sketching, maybe not. Once Rachel gets her locker assignment -- and it doesn't say which, so we have to assume that the location is irrelevant -- there will be a maximum number of possibilities for Juan.
What is it? Well, suppose we give Rachel locker 1. We would have to give Juan and his partner either locker 2, 4, or 5. (Fred, remember, is always the occupant of locker 3). It looks like the number we want is three. And indeed, no matter which locker is Rachel's, three possibilities exist for Juan and his locker partner. C.is correct.



Viewing page 40 of 188
Viewing questions 196 - 200 out of 934 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep LSAT Test exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!