Free MCAT Test Exam Braindumps (page: 13)

Page 13 of 203

"Bebop lives!" cries the newest generation of jazz players. During the 1980s, musicians like Wynton Marsalis revived public interest in bebop, the speedy, angular music that first bubbled up out of Harlem in the early 1940s, changing the face of jazz. That Marsalis and others thought of themselves as celebrating and preserving a noble tradition is, in one sense, inevitable. After the excesses of experimental or "free" jazz in the 1960s and the electronic jazz-rock "fusion" of the 70s, it is hardly surprising that people should hearken back to a time when jazz was "purer," perhaps even at the apex of its development. But the recent enthusiasm for bebop is also ironic in light of the music's initial public reception.
In its infancy, during the first two decades of the 20th century, jazz was played by small groups of musicians improvising variations on blues tunes and popular songs. Most of the musicians were unable to read music, and their improvisations were fairly rudimentary. Nevertheless, jazz attained international recognition in the 1920s. Two of the people most responsible for its rise in popularity were Louis Armstrong, the first great jazz soloist, and Fletcher Henderson, leader of the first great jazz band. Armstrong, with his buoyant personality and virtuosic technical skills, greatly expanded the creative range and importance of the soloist in jazz. Henderson, a pianist with extensive training in music theory, foresaw the orchestral possibilities of jazz played by a larger band. He wrote out arrangements of songs for his band members that preserved the spirit of jazz, while at the same time giving soloists a more structured musical background upon which to shape their solo improvisations. In the 1930s, jazz moved further into the mainstream with the advent of the Swing Era. Big bands in the Henderson mold, led by musicians like Benny Goodman, Count Basie and Duke Ellington, achieved unprecedented popularity with jazz-oriented "swing" music that was eminently danceable.
Against this musical backdrop, bebop arrived on the scene. Like other modernist movements in art and literature, bebop music represented a departure from tradition in both form and content, and was met with initial hostility. Bebop tempos were unusually fast, with the soloist often playing at double time to the backing musicians. The rhythms were tricky and complex, the melodies intricate and frequently dissonant, involving chord changes and notes not previously heard in jazz. Before bebop, jazz players had improvised on popular songs such as those produced by Tin-Pan Alley, but bebop tunes were often originals with which jazz audiences were unfamiliar.
Played mainly by small combos rather than big bands, bebop was not danceable; it demanded intellectual concentration. Soon, jazz began to lose its hold on the popular audience, which found the new music disconcerting. Compounding public alienation was the fact that bebop seemed to have arrived on the scene in a completely mature state of development, without that early phase of experimentation that typifies so many movements in the course of Western music. This was as much the result of an accident of history as anything else. The early development of bebop occurred during a three-year ban on recording in this country made necessary by the petrol and vinyl shortages of World War II). By the time the ban was lifted, and the first bebop records were made, the new music seemed to have sprung fully-formed like Athena from the forehead of Zeus. And though a small core of enthusiasts would continue to worship bebop pioneers like Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, many bebop musicians were never able to gain acceptance with any audience and went on to lead lives of obscurity and deprivation.
According to the passage, which of the following is true about the jazz of the 1920s?

  1. It resembled the jazz played during the first two decades of the century.
  2. It placed greater demands on the improvisatory skills of its soloists.
  3. Its fast tempos foreshadowed those of bebop in the 1940s.
  4. It was primarily dance music.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

This seeks a specific, true statement about jazz of the 1920s. The 1920s are covered in paragraph 2 (lines 14-
31). The correct answer, choice B, is taken from the fifth sentence of that paragraph, where the author says that Louis Armstrong, one of the two musicians "most responsible for" jazz's rise in popularity, "greatly expanded the creative range and importance of the soloist in jazz." In other words, Armstrong raised the stakes for jazz soloists. They had to improve, to rise above the "fairly rudimentary" improvisations that had been played
during the first two decades of the century. So choice B is the correct answer. Regarding choice A, it's clear from paragraph 2 that, in the 1920s, the innovations of people like Armstrong and Henderson really changed jazz, making it more sophisticated and expansive. Choice A says that 1920s' jazz resembled earlier jazz, and this goes against the grain of the author's argument; 1920s jazz was clearly different. Choice (C) is wrong because the author never specifies what kind of tempos were typical of 1920s jazz. The passage never indicates if they were fast or slow, so there's no support for choice (C). And choice D describes jazz music of the Swing Era in the 1930s, not the jazz of the 1920s.



"Bebop lives!" cries the newest generation of jazz players. During the 1980s, musicians like Wynton Marsalis revived public interest in bebop, the speedy, angular music that first bubbled up out of Harlem in the early 1940s, changing the face of jazz. That Marsalis and others thought of themselves as celebrating and preserving a noble tradition is, in one sense, inevitable. After the excesses of experimental or "free" jazz in the 1960s and the electronic jazz-rock "fusion" of the 70s, it is hardly surprising that people should hearken back to a time when jazz was "purer," perhaps even at the apex of its development. But the recent enthusiasm for bebop is also ironic in light of the music's initial public reception.
In its infancy, during the first two decades of the 20th century, jazz was played by small groups of musicians improvising variations on blues tunes and popular songs. Most of the musicians were unable to read music, and their improvisations were fairly rudimentary. Nevertheless, jazz attained international recognition in the 1920s. Two of the people most responsible for its rise in popularity were Louis Armstrong, the first great jazz soloist, and Fletcher Henderson, leader of the first great jazz band. Armstrong, with his buoyant personality and virtuosic technical skills, greatly expanded the creative range and importance of the soloist in jazz. Henderson, a pianist with extensive training in music theory, foresaw the orchestral possibilities of jazz played by a larger band. He wrote out arrangements of songs for his band members that preserved the spirit of jazz, while at the same time giving soloists a more structured musical background upon which to shape their solo improvisations. In the 1930s, jazz moved further into the mainstream with the advent of the Swing Era. Big bands in the Henderson mold, led by musicians like Benny Goodman, Count Basie and Duke Ellington, achieved unprecedented popularity with jazz-oriented "swing" music that was eminently danceable.
Against this musical backdrop, bebop arrived on the scene. Like other modernist movements in art and literature, bebop music represented a departure from tradition in both form and content, and was met with initial hostility. Bebop tempos were unusually fast, with the soloist often playing at double time to the backing musicians. The rhythms were tricky and complex, the melodies intricate and frequently dissonant, involving chord changes and notes not previously heard in jazz. Before bebop, jazz players had improvised on popular songs such as those produced by Tin-Pan Alley, but bebop tunes were often originals with which jazz audiences were unfamiliar.
Played mainly by small combos rather than big bands, bebop was not danceable; it demanded intellectual concentration. Soon, jazz began to lose its hold on the popular audience, which found the new music disconcerting. Compounding public alienation was the fact that bebop seemed to have arrived on the scene in a completely mature state of development, without that early phase of experimentation that typifies so many movements in the course of Western music. This was as much the result of an accident of history as anything else. The early development of bebop occurred during a three-year ban on recording in this country made necessary by the petrol and vinyl shortages of World War II). By the time the ban was lifted, and the first bebop records were made, the new music seemed to have sprung fully-formed like Athena from the forehead of Zeus. And though a small core of enthusiasts would continue to worship bebop pioneers like Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, many bebop musicians were never able to gain acceptance with any audience and went on to lead lives of obscurity and deprivation.
Based on the information in the passage comparing bebop to other movements in the history of Western music, it is reasonable to conclude that:
I). most movements in music history passed through a stage of experimentation before reaching mature expression.
II). World War II prevented bebop from reaching a more appreciative audience.
III). bebop did not go through a developmental stage before reaching mature expression.

  1. I only
  2. III only
  3. I and II only
  4. II and III only

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

This is in Roman Numeral format. It asks one to draw a reasonable conclusion from information in the passage "comparing bebop to other movements in the history of Western music". That phrase "Western music" appears only once in the passage. It's in the third sentence of the final paragraph. That's where the author compares bebop to "other movements in the course of Western music." The author says there that public alienation or estrangement toward bebop was intense because bebop seemed to have arrived "in a completely mature state of development, without that early phase of experimentation that typifies so many movements in the course of Western music". This not only indicates something about bebop, it educates about most movements in the course of Western music ­ namely, that they go through at least two phases: an early, experimental phase, and a later, more mature, more fully developed phase. This is the substance of Roman Numeral statement I, which is a reasonable conclusion and therefore will be part of the correct answer. Notice that choices (B) and (D) do not include Roman Numeral Statement I; thus, they can be eliminated. Since either choice (A), which offers statement I only, or choice (C), which offers statements I and II, must be the correct answer. One can review only statement II to determine the right answer. Statement II says that W.W.II prevented bebop from reaching a more appreciative audience. This is a distortion of the fifth sentence of the final paragraph, which says that a petrol shortage during World War II necessitated a three-year ban on the making of records. But, according to the author, it was not the recording ban that prevented bebop from reaching a more appreciative audience.
Instead, the recording ban was responsible for making it seem to audiences as if bebop had bypassed that early, experimental stage and instantly achieved mature development. It was the radical elements of bebop itself that prevented the music from appealing to a wider audience. So statement II is false, and choice (A), statement I only, is the correct answer. Statement III says that bebop did not go through a developmental stage before reaching mature expression. This is not true. Bebop did go through a developmental stage, and it is discussed in the middle of the last paragraph. The key point here is that few people heard the music during this phase because of the ban on recording. Statement III is false.



"Bebop lives!" cries the newest generation of jazz players. During the 1980s, musicians like Wynton Marsalis revived public interest in bebop, the speedy, angular music that first bubbled up out of Harlem in the early 1940s, changing the face of jazz. That Marsalis and others thought of themselves as celebrating and preserving a noble tradition is, in one sense, inevitable. After the excesses of experimental or "free" jazz in the 1960s and the electronic jazz-rock "fusion" of the 70s, it is hardly surprising that people should hearken back to a time when jazz was "purer", perhaps even at the apex of its development. But the recent enthusiasm for bebop is also ironic in light of the music's initial public reception.
In its infancy, during the first two decades of the 20th century, jazz was played by small groups of musicians improvising variations on blues tunes and popular songs. Most of the musicians were unable to read music, and their improvisations were fairly rudimentary. Nevertheless, jazz attained international recognition in the 1920s. Two of the people most responsible for its rise in popularity were Louis Armstrong, the first great jazz soloist, and Fletcher Henderson, leader of the first great jazz band. Armstrong, with his buoyant personality and virtuosic technical skills, greatly expanded the creative range and importance of the soloist in jazz. Henderson, a pianist with extensive training in music theory, foresaw the orchestral possibilities of jazz played by a larger band. He wrote out arrangements of songs for his band members that preserved the spirit of jazz, while at the same time giving soloists a more structured musical background upon which to shape their solo improvisations. In the 1930s, jazz moved further into the mainstream with the advent of the Swing Era. Big bands in the Henderson mold, led by musicians like Benny Goodman, Count Basie and Duke Ellington, achieved unprecedented popularity with jazz-oriented "swing" music that was eminently danceable.
Against this musical backdrop, bebop arrived on the scene. Like other modernist movements in art and literature, bebop music represented a departure from tradition in both form and content, and was met with initial hostility. Bebop tempos were unusually fast, with the soloist often playing at double time to the backing musicians. The rhythms were tricky and complex, the melodies intricate and frequently dissonant, involving chord changes and notes not previously heard in jazz. Before bebop, jazz players had improvised on popular songs such as those produced by Tin-Pan Alley, but bebop tunes were often originals with which jazz audiences were unfamiliar.
Played mainly by small combos rather than big bands, bebop was not danceable; it demanded intellectual concentration. Soon, jazz began to lose its hold on the popular audience, which found the new music disconcerting. Compounding public alienation was the fact that bebop seemed to have arrived on the scene in a completely mature state of development, without that early phase of experimentation that typifies so many movements in the course of Western music. This was as much the result of an accident of history as anything else. The early development of bebop occurred during a three-year ban on recording in this country made necessary by the petrol and vinyl shortages of World War II). By the time the ban was lifted, and the first bebop records were made, the new music seemed to have sprung fully-formed like Athena from the forehead of Zeus. And though a small core of enthusiasts would continue to worship bebop pioneers like Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, many bebop musicians were never able to gain acceptance with any audience and went on to lead lives of obscurity and deprivation.
It can be inferred from the passage that the innovations of Fletcher Henderson (lines 27-34) were inspired primarily by:

  1. his admiration for Louis Armstrong.
  2. a hunger for international recognition.
  3. the realization that the public favored large bands over small combos.
  4. a desire to go beyond the structural limitations of early jazz music.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

This is an inference question about the innovations of Fletcher Henderson, a key figure in jazz during the 1920s. Henderson's innovations are discussed in the sixth and seventh sentences of the second paragraph.
Remember that the question stem seeks something that inspired Henderson. Sentence six says that Henderson, unlike many jazz musicians before him, had extensive training in music theory, and that he saw the creative possibilities in jazz played by a larger band. Sentence 7 says that Henderson's song arrangements gave jazz soloists "a more structured musical background upon which to shape their solo improvisations". We know from the second sentence of that same paragraph that most jazz prior to the 1920s was played by musicians who couldn't read music, and who consequently had to keep their improvisations fairly simple. That is, the structure of early jazz was simple, but in Henderson's arrangements the structure was raised to a grander scale and more sophisticated levels of complexity and structure. It can therefore be inferred that Henderson was inspired by the desire to go beyond the simple structure of early jazz, to go beyond its structural limitations. Therefore, choice (D) is correct. Choice (A) is a strong distracter. Armstrong is mentioned in the passage as the other key figure in jazz of the 1920s. But whether Henderson admired Armstrong or not is never discussed, so you can't infer that Henderson's innovations were inspired by his admiration for Armstrong.
Choice (B) reflects the author's remark, in the third sentence of paragraph 2, that jazz attained international recognition in the 1920s. This choice distorts that point in suggesting that Henderson hungered for international recognition. There's simply no evidence for this in the passage, so (B) is wrong. Choice (C) is correct in suggesting that one of Henderson's innovations was in the application of jazz to the big band setting. A problem with choice C is that the public's preference for big bands over small combos did not become apparent until a decade after Henderson's contribution ­ in the 1930s, during the Swing Era. Another problem with this choice is the implication that Henderson merely exploited the realization that the public liked the big band sound. The author gives only one reason why Henderson was drawn to large bands ­ this is in the sixth sentence of paragraph 2: Henderson was drawn to large bands because, with his training in music theory, he "foresaw the orchestral possibilities of jazz played by a larger band."



"Bebop lives!" cries the newest generation of jazz players. During the 1980s, musicians like Wynton Marsalis revived public interest in bebop, the speedy, angular music that first bubbled up out of Harlem in the early 1940s, changing the face of jazz. That Marsalis and others thought of themselves as celebrating and preserving a noble tradition is, in one sense, inevitable. After the excesses of experimental or "free" jazz in the 1960s and the electronic jazz-rock "fusion" of the 70s, it is hardly surprising that people should hearken back to a time when jazz was "purer", perhaps even at the apex of its development. But the recent enthusiasm for bebop is also ironic in light of the music's initial public reception.
In its infancy, during the first two decades of the 20th century, jazz was played by small groups of musicians improvising variations on blues tunes and popular songs. Most of the musicians were unable to read music, and their improvisations were fairly rudimentary. Nevertheless, jazz attained international recognition in the 1920s. Two of the people most responsible for its rise in popularity were Louis Armstrong, the first great jazz soloist, and Fletcher Henderson, leader of the first great jazz band. Armstrong, with his buoyant personality and virtuosic technical skills, greatly expanded the creative range and importance of the soloist in jazz. Henderson, a pianist with extensive training in music theory, foresaw the orchestral possibilities of jazz played by a larger band. He wrote out arrangements of songs for his band members that preserved the spirit of jazz, while at the same time giving soloists a more structured musical background upon which to shape their solo improvisations. In the 1930s, jazz moved further into the mainstream with the advent of the Swing Era. Big bands in the Henderson mold, led by musicians like Benny Goodman, Count Basie and Duke Ellington, achieved unprecedented popularity with jazz-oriented "swing" music that was eminently danceable.
Against this musical backdrop, bebop arrived on the scene. Like other modernist movements in art and literature, bebop music represented a departure from tradition in both form and content, and was met with initial hostility. Bebop tempos were unusually fast, with the soloist often playing at double time to the backing musicians. The rhythms were tricky and complex, the melodies intricate and frequently dissonant, involving chord changes and notes not previously heard in jazz. Before bebop, jazz players had improvised on popular songs such as those produced by Tin-Pan Alley, but bebop tunes were often originals with which jazz audiences were unfamiliar.
Played mainly by small combos rather than big bands, bebop was not danceable; it demanded intellectual concentration. Soon, jazz began to lose its hold on the popular audience, which found the new music disconcerting. Compounding public alienation was the fact that bebop seemed to have arrived on the scene in a completely mature state of development, without that early phase of experimentation that typifies so many movements in the course of Western music. This was as much the result of an accident of history as anything else. The early development of bebop occurred during a three-year ban on recording in this country made necessary by the petrol and vinyl shortages of World War II). By the time the ban was lifted, and the first bebop records were made, the new music seemed to have sprung fully-formed like Athena from the forehead of Zeus. And though a small core of enthusiasts would continue to worship bebop pioneers like Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, many bebop musicians were never able to gain acceptance with any audience and went on to lead lives of obscurity and deprivation.
According to the passage, all of the following are characteristic of bebop music EXCEPT:

  1. eminently danceable tunes.
  2. dissonant melodies.
  3. complex rhythms.
  4. intellectual complexity.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

This is a detail question. The correct answer, then, will be an item that the passage did not describe as a characteristic of bebop. Choices (B) and (C), complex rhythms and dissonant melodies, are mentioned in the fourth sentence of paragraph 3 as characteristics of bebop, so they can be eliminated. Choice (D), intellectual complexity, is referred to as a characteristic of bebop in the first sentence of paragraph 4. Remaining is choice (A) as the correct answer. And indeed, the author never states that bebop "was eminently danceable". On the
contrary, in the first sentence of the last paragraph the author states that bebop was not danceable. This choice confuses one of the author's comments regarding swing music. In the last sentence of the second paragraph, the author says that swing was eminently danceable. So choice (A) is characteristic of swing but is certainly not characteristic of bebop, making choice (A) correct.



Page 13 of 203



Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep MCAT Test exam with other Community members:

Priya commented on December 01, 2024
Help before exam good practice questions
INDIA
upvote

Priya commented on December 01, 2024
Very useful
INDIA
upvote

Sheffie commented on December 01, 2024
Helping me get used to the exam style
UNITED STATES
upvote

Sheffie commented on December 01, 2024
Helps me get used to the type of questions
UNITED STATES
upvote

African-Amazigh commented on December 01, 2024
is this Exam the real NCM-MCI 6.5 Exam ? is it valide ?
Anonymous
upvote

SPH commented on December 01, 2024
super helpful questions
UNITED STATES
upvote

Shean commented on November 30, 2024
Great deal of Friday deal of 50% off. Got my 3 exams and download the PDF files.
NETHERLANDS
upvote

Babu commented on November 30, 2024
I did this exam this past Friday. All went great. Passed with 94%.
India
upvote

Elimu commented on November 30, 2024
A good way to practice
Anonymous
upvote

Sobhash commented on November 30, 2024
To those who are going for this exam and wondering if any passed. I wrote this exam. The exam is extremely hard and tricky. Luckily I prepared well and bought the full version of this exam dump which included most of the exam questions. However some answers were incomplete. But overall a fantastic resource well worth the money.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Juan Alvarez commented on November 29, 2024
Good content
Anonymous
upvote

Chela commented on November 29, 2024
Great for Exam preparation! Did it in Nov and Passed the first attempt.
Anonymous
upvote

nahdus commented on November 29, 2024
all comments are original?
Anonymous
upvote

Sanjay Dinda commented on November 29, 2024
So far all good
UNITED KINGDOM
upvote

Naveen Ahlam commented on November 29, 2024
Great stuff
Anonymous
upvote

nancy commented on November 29, 2024
Very helpful
Anonymous
upvote

M commented on November 29, 2024
Is this still valid ?
SLOVAKIA (Slovak Republic)
upvote

Mira commented on November 29, 2024
Great tool and questions!
Anonymous
upvote

Joaquin commented on November 29, 2024
These are good questions.
Anonymous
upvote

Joaquin commented on November 29, 2024
Good questions.
Anonymous
upvote

naveen naveen commented on November 29, 2024
Very useful
Anonymous
upvote

Kadeer commented on November 29, 2024
Very professional support. I sent an email about the full version of this exam I purchased and they replied within 5 minutes and setup everything for me. I ended up passing my exam with this dump. I highly recommend.
Singapore
upvote

hello commented on November 28, 2024
Great collection of the questions covering all aspects
INDONESIA
upvote

Chaminda commented on November 28, 2024
great papers
Anonymous
upvote

mihir commented on November 28, 2024
Valid dumps
INDIA
upvote

AK commented on November 28, 2024
Are these enough?
UNITED STATES
upvote

Nacho commented on November 28, 2024
What a great week. Passed this freaking exam...at last. Now I can enjoy the Thanks Giving. Happy Thanks Giving to all.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Aman commented on November 28, 2024
Passed this exam and got 93%. Valid exam dump.
France
upvote

Traveller69 commented on November 28, 2024
I sat for this exam today. The questions are - I would say around 85% to 90% the same. I got 87% with just 2 weeks of studying from the PDF full version of this exam.
Canada
upvote

AD AD commented on November 28, 2024
thanks for the exact solution
Anonymous
upvote

Lee commented on November 27, 2024
So far so good
UNITED STATES
upvote

Hernandoz commented on November 27, 2024
I am happy to say that I managed to clear this exam. Thanks to this website and great exam content and questions in this dump.
Mexico
upvote

Sakshay commented on November 27, 2024
Not sure if I am the only one who finds this exam super tricky and hard. Looking at these questions I can recall that most of these questions were in the exam. But last time I did not know about these questions so I failed. I think I am going to be okay this time to pass. These questions looks very promising.
INDIA
upvote

Ramparsat commented on November 27, 2024
The full PDF version has way more questions than this free version. I believe if you a good knowledge and understanding of the certification exam then you should be able to pass it using the free version. Otherwise, go with full version and don't take any chance.
Australia
upvote