Cisco®
CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. UiPath
  5. UiAAAv1

Free UiPath UiAAAv1 Exam Questions (page: 4)

Page 4 of 37
PDF with 176 Questions

An analyst opens Autopilot for Everyone inside Assistant Web in a browser and types, "Run the InvoiceReconciler process and compile the latest vendor invoices", all without installing any desktop software.
Which distinctive feature enables this workflow?

  1. The ability to run any UiPath automation from any device with absolutely no prerequisites
  2. Natural-language execution of cross-platform automations on a serverless machine, directly in the browser, removing the need for Assistant or Robot installation
  3. Built-in document-understanding models that silently install the Robot service in the background
  4. Browser access that lets users view automation logs but still requires a locally installed Robot to execute workflows

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

This workflow is enabled by natural-language execution of automations on a serverless machine directly in the browser. It removes the need for installing UiPath Assistant or Robot locally, allowing users to trigger processes seamlessly.



You need to pass a DateTime to an agent tool.
What is the correct way to handle this?

  1. Pass the date directly as a DateTime object, as it is natively supported.
  2. Send the date as a CRON expression for easier scheduling interpretation.
  3. Convert the DateTime to String and parse it inside the agent tool.
  4. Convert the date to an integer representing the number of days since 01/01/0001.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Agent tools do not natively accept DateTime objects. The correct approach is to convert the DateTime into a string and then parse it inside the agent tool for proper handling.



A solution architect is tasked with building a structured prompt for an agent that extracts key phrases from legal documents. Upon testing, they find that the agent frequently misses extraction patterns. How can the architect enhance the effectiveness of the few-shot prompt structure?

  1. Add clearly labeled examples demonstrating correct extraction for both simple and complex patterns.
  2. Remove extraction examples from the prompt to test the agent without guidance.
  3. Increase the word count of the legal document examples included in the prompt.
  4. Replace detailed phrases with shorter, random content to improve performance.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The architect should include clearly labeled examples showing correct extraction for both simple and complex patterns. This strengthens the few-shot prompt by guiding the agent on how to handle varied scenarios accurately.



A project manager drafts a vague prompt for an LLM to analyze customer feedback and generate insights.
While the response seems generic, some key details appear unrelated to the feedback provided.
What could explain this behavior, and how should the manager proceed?

  1. The LLM failed to generate accurate insights because it requires external validation from another AI model before producing relevant outputs, suggesting the manager should integrate multiple AI systems for better results.
  2. The LLM response depends entirely on its learned patterns and token analysis, and adding more detailed customer feedback won't significantly alter the result.
  3. The lack of specificity in the prompt caused the LLM to fall back on general knowledge or assumptions, requiring the manager to refine the prompt by including precise context or related references for accuracy.
  4. The LLM breaks the input into tokens but misinterprets individual words, meaning the issue arises from tokenization granularity rather than the structure of the prompt itself.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Because the prompt was vague, the LLM defaulted to generic outputs and assumptions. To fix this, the manager should refine the prompt with precise context and relevant details, ensuring the model generates accurate, feedback-based insights.



Which characteristic primarily differentiates zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting from basic zero-shot prompting?

  1. It supplies a single worked example plus a step-by-step explanation so the model can imitate both format and logic.
  2. It links the output of one prompt to the input of the next, creating a multi-stage workflow for complex tasks.
  3. The prompt explicitly instructs the model to reason step-by-step, causing it to generate intermediate reasoning before the final answer.
  4. It prevents the model from giving any final answer, requiring only the reasoning steps to be produced.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting differs from basic zero-shot prompting because it explicitly instructs the model to reason step by step, leading it to generate intermediate reasoning before producing the final answer.



Viewing page 4 of 37
Viewing questions 16 - 20 out of 176 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss UiPath UiAAAv1 exam prep with other Community members:

UiAAAv1 Exam Discussions & Posts