Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. APMG-International
  5. AgilePM-Practitioner

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam Questions
Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner (Page 4 )

Updated On: 15-Feb-2026
Page 4 of 28
PDF with 134 Questions
View Related Case Study

Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.

Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

The objective of Solution Development Timebox B is to ensure that the front and east wings are finished and approved. The Project Manager has pointed out that acceptance criteria for this part of the solution need to be agreed.

Is this an appropriate action related to acceptance criteria?

  1. Yes, because this will allow the Solution Development Team to focus on the quality of the Solution Development Timebox's deliverable as a whole, in order to keep focus on the business need.
  2. Yes, because it will be easier to set acceptance criteria for the Solution Development Timebox as a whole, rather than setting specific acceptance criteria for each individual requirement.
  3. No, because the acceptance criteria for the Solution Development Timebox are just the amalgamation of the individual requirements' acceptance criteria, with nothing extra.
  4. No, because the Solution Development Timebox objective will change if any new requirements emerge or any lower priority requirements are de-scoped.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

A: Yes, because this will allow the Solution Development Team to focus on the quality of the Solution Development Timebox's deliverable as a whole, in order to keep focus on the business need.
Rationale:
Setting acceptance criteria for the overall deliverables of a timebox is a key practice in Agile to ensure that the work meets the business objectives and quality expectations. It helps the Solution Development Team to understand what is required for the deliverables to be considered complete and acceptable. This aligns with the Agile principle of delivering quality and maintaining a constant pace of development. It also ensures that all team members are aligned on the goals and can focus on delivering value in line with business needs.



View Related Case Study

HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not supported)

Using the Project Scenario, answer the following question about the activities in the Agile project lifecycle.

Lines 1 to 5 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies. Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.



Assertion:

1. The rooms and facilities must be deployed into live use at the end of each Timebox.

BECAUSE

Reason:

Evolutionary Development and Deployment must be combined in a Timebox where the integration of several teams is required.

2. The tasks associated with each Solution Development Timebox should be included in the Delivery Plan.

BECAUSE

Reason:

A typical Delivery Plan will provide a schedule of Timeboxes and any other high level activities for the imminent Project Increment.

3. The development approach should have been agreed during Foundations.

BECAUSE

Reason:

The Development Approach Definition must be created before Evolutionary Development can commence.

4. The resources from Timber Tigers and Earth Excavations should have been engaged before the start of Evolutionary Development.

BECAUSE

Reason:

Commitment to delivery is based on pre-agreed resource levels at the project level.

5. A final Deployment phase should be held after Timebox C has completed.

BECAUSE

Reason:

The Deployed Solution is assessed post-project to confirm whether the expected benefits have been achieved.



  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Agile Practitioner
For each line, here is the appropriate option from A to E that applies:
The rooms and facilities must be deployed into live use at the end of each Timebox.
D: False (Assertion) True (Reason)
Rationale: While Evolutionary Development and Deployment can be combined in a timebox, it is not necessary that the rooms and facilities must be deployed into live use at the end of each timebox. Deployment into live use typically occurs after several timeboxes when the product is ready for release.
The tasks associated with each Solution Development Timebox should be included in the Delivery Plan.
A: True (Assertion) True (Reason)
Rationale: The Delivery Plan should outline the schedule of timeboxes and include the high-level activities planned for the upcoming project increment, which encompasses the tasks for each Solution Development Timebox.
The development approach should have been agreed during Foundations.
A: True (Assertion) True (Reason)
Rationale: The development approach is indeed something that should be agreed upon during the Foundations phase, as the Development Approach Definition sets the stage for how Evolutionary Development will proceed.
The resources from Timber Tigers and Earth Excavations should have been engaged before the start of Evolutionary Development.
C: True (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: It is true that resources should be engaged before Evolutionary Development starts to ensure commitment and resource availability. However, the commitment is typically based on the detailed planning and agreements made during Foundations, not solely on pre-agreed resource levels at the project level.
A final Deployment phase should be held after Timebox C has completed.
E: False (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: Deployment phases are usually not a one-time, final phase but occur incrementally as part of the timeboxed development. Additionally, the assessment of whether the expected benefits have been achieved is part of the benefits realization process and not necessarily the sole reason to have a final Deployment phase post-Timebox C.



View Related Case Study

The project is now in the second week of Timebox C. This is the final Timebox of Project Increment 1 and is scheduled to take one month. The plan is to open Hoy Hall to the public at the end of this Increment. A Must Have requirement of Timebox C is the implementation of a hotel reservation system.

At the Daily Stand-up, the Software Developer working on the reservation system reported that the framework for the system is now complete and ready for content. However, this work cannot progress further due to a disagreement over the content. The Marketing Director insists the system is to hold professional photos and video tours of the facilities and grounds. These require a lot of storage space and regular updates. The IT Operations Manager insists the system is to take less than 5GB of storage space on the company server and require minimal maintenance.

The Team Leader has arranged a Facilitated Workshop to discuss the content and agree the way forward.

Remember to limit your answers to the number of selections requested in each question.

Which 2 individuals should the Facilitator invite to participate in the Workshop?

  1. Chief Executive (Steering Group)
  2. Representative for Earth Excavations (Solution Developer)
  3. Representative for Timber Tigers (Solution Developer)
  4. IT Operations Manager (Solution Development Team)
  5. Marketing Director (Business Visionary)

Answer(s): D,E

Explanation:

The Facilitator should invite the following two individuals to participate in the Workshop:
D: IT Operations Manager (Solution Development Team) E. Marketing Director (Business Visionary) The rationale for this selection is that the disagreement is between the Marketing Director, who wants the reservation system to have professional photos and video tours (which impacts how the system will be used by potential customers and affects marketing strategy), and the IT Operations

Manager, who is concerned with the system's technical limitations and maintenance. Both of these individuals are key to resolving the issue at hand, as they represent the conflicting requirements that need to be reconciled for the project to move forward.



View Related Case Study

Which 2 individuals would be suitable for the role of Workshop Facilitator?

  1. Team Leader
  2. IT Operations Manager
  3. Marketing Director
  4. Software Developer
  5. Project Manager

Answer(s): A,E

Explanation:

The two individuals most suitable for the role of Workshop Facilitator would be:
A: Team Leader E. Project Manager
The rationale for choosing these individuals is that both the Team Leader and the Project Manager are likely to have the necessary skills to facilitate a workshop effectively. They are typically trained to manage team dynamics, guide discussions, remain neutral, and drive towards a resolution. The IT Operations Manager and the Marketing Director are parties to the disagreement and thus would not be appropriate as facilitators due to the potential for bias. The Software Developer is likely to be more involved in the technical aspects rather than facilitation.



View Related Case Study

Which 2 actions should the Workshop Facilitator take when preparing for the workshop?

  1. Ask the Software Developer to provide an estimate of how much storage space would be required to hold photos and videos.
  2. Invite the Marketing Director to create a summary of the content they believe the system should hold and why.
  3. Assign ownership of the workshop to the Software Developer.
  4. Ask the IT Operations Manager to prepare the agenda for the workshop.
  5. Research other hotel reservation systems to form an opinion on what the content should be.

Answer(s): A,B

Explanation:

The two actions that the Workshop Facilitator should take when preparing for the workshop are:
· A. Ask the Software Developer to provide an estimate of how much storage space would be required to hold photos and videos. This will provide a factual basis for the discussion about the system's content and its storage requirements.
· B. Invite the Marketing Director to create a summary of the content they believe the system should hold and why. This will ensure that the Marketing Director's perspective and requirements are clearly understood by all participants in the workshop. Please note that while the IT Operations Manager, Software Developer, and the Facilitator themselves (options C, D, and E) could contribute valuable input to the workshop, these actions are not necessarily part of the Facilitator's role in preparing for the workshop. The Facilitator's role is to guide the discussion, not to assign ownership of the workshop, prepare the agenda, or form opinions on the content.






Post your Comments and Discuss APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner exam dumps with other Community members:

Join the AgilePM-Practitioner Discussion