Free AgilePM-Practitioner Exam Braindumps
Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner Questions 21–25 (page: 6)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026
View Related Case Study

How should the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B initially be dealt with?

  1. The Solution Development Team should revise the Timebox Plans for Timeboxes B and C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should commence understanding and delivering the new requirement.
  3. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
  4. The Project Manager should escalate the issue to the Marketing Director, who is in the role of Business Visionary.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:
C: The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It's important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co- ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.
While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.



View Related Case Study

What should be done to allow the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to be changed into a Must Have priority and moved into Timebox B?

  1. The Project Manager should extend the timescale of Timebox B and shorten Timebox C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should change a Must Have requirement into a Should Have in the Prioritised Requirements List.
  3. The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
  4. The Project Manager should move a Must Have requirement from Timebox B into Timebox C.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

C: The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
Rationale:
In Agile Project Management, priorities are often reassessed and reprioritized based on new information or changes in the project's context. The need for a secondary exit due to compliance with fire safety regulations would necessitate such a reassessment. The Business Visionary and Business Sponsor, who provide the vision and funding for the project, together with the Solution Development Team, who are responsible for implementing solutions, should collaboratively review the Prioritised Requirements List to reflect this new priority. This change must be agreed upon by these key stakeholders to ensure that it aligns with the business needs and project goals.



View Related Case Study

Who is responsible for approving that the change in priority of the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building accurately reflects the scope of the project in the Prioritised Requirements List?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Project Manager and Solution Development Team.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The Senior Management Team, which includes the roles of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors, and the Chief Executive, is typically responsible for steering the project and making decisions that reflect the overall scope and objectives of the project. They would be the appropriate body to approve changes in the project scope as represented in the Prioritised Requirements List, especially for a requirement that has legal and safety implications, such as a secondary fire exit. This team would ensure that such a change aligns with the strategic goals and compliance requirements of the project.



View Related Case Study

Once the change of priority has been approved, who is then responsible for including the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to the Timebox Plan for Timebox B?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Team Leader.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): B



View Related Case Study

HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not supported)

Using the project timeline given in the Project Scenario, answer the following question about application of Timeboxing on the Hoy Hall project.

Lines 1 to 5 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies. Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.



Assertion :

1. All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.

BECAUSE

The Investigation step within each Structured Timebox requires everyone working within the team to jointly agree how the requirements of the Timebox will be met.

2. Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off

BECAUSE

The aim of the Investigation step within each Timebox is to complete as much of the development work as possible.

3. It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.

BECAUSE

Each Timebox should comprise an Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase.

4. It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.

BECAUSE

A typical Timebox Plan should provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment.

5. It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.

Reason

BECAUSE

The Solution Development Team is responsible for planning the detail of all the work of each Timebox.



  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

For each line, here is the appropriate option from A to E that applies:
All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.
E. False (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: It is not practical or in line with Agile principles to consolidate all internal works into one Structured Timebox, as the work will likely need to be spread over multiple Timeboxes. Additionally, the Investigation step involves agreeing on how to meet the requirements of the Timebox, not necessarily consolidating all work into one.
Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off
B: True (Assertion) True (Reason) BUT the reason does not explain the assertion Rationale: While it is true that acceptance criteria should be agreed upon during the Timebox Kick- Off, the reason given is incorrect because the aim of the Investigation step is not necessarily to complete as much development work as possible but to plan and understand the work that will be carried out.
It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.
A: True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion Rationale: Each Timebox should indeed include both Evolutionary Development and a Deployment phase. This assertion and reason correctly align with the concept of Timeboxing in Agile. It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.

A: True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion Rationale: The typical Timebox Plan does provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment, which would include planning for deployment. It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.
C: True (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: While it is true that Earth Excavations should create a detailed plan for their activities in Timebox C, the reason is incorrect as the Solution Development Team is not solely responsible for planning all work details within a Timebox. This task would typically be a collaborative effort involving all relevant parties.



Viewing page 6 of 28
Viewing questions 26 - 30 out of 184 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss APMG International AgilePM-Practitioner exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!