support@Free-Braindumps.com
Register Login
Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. Exams
  3. College Board
  4. SAT

College Board SAT Exam Actual Questions
Scholastic Aptitude Test Exam (Page 16 )

Updated On: 30-Jul-2026
Page 16 of 117
PDF with 924 Questions

The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in
Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. In paragraph 2, the author emphasizes that the current environmental condition of Amazonian South America is:

  1. mostly unscathed.
  2. largely unknown.
  3. restorable through his project.
  4. irredeemable everywhere but in the Los Amigos watershed.
  5. varying from destroyed to virtually pristine.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
The passage repeatedly contrasts the overall condition of Amazonian South America with the relative integrity of the Los Amigos watershed.
It notes that “Amazonia is crucial …” and that “the Los Amigos watershed … still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization.” It also describes “Threats to tropical forests” (gold mining, road construction, slash-and-burn agriculture, etc.) but emphasizes that the watershed itself “still offers … a pristine lowland moist forest.” The author therefore acknowledges that the broader Amazon is under severe pressure, yet the specific study area remains “pristine” and largely untouched.
Option E – “varying from destroyed to virtually pristine” captures this dual reality: most of the Amazon is heavily altered or destroyed, whereas the Los Amigos site is still essentially pristine.
Why the other choices are unsuitable
A – “mostly unscathed.” This overstates the condition of the whole Amazon; the text describes widespread threats and does not claim the region is mostly intact. B – “largely unknown.” While knowledge gaps exist, the passage stresses that extensive botanical, faunal, and ecological work is already underway; the area is not characterized as unknown. C – “restorable through his project.” The author does not claim that the entire Amazon can be restored by the Los Amigos initiative; the project focuses on a single watershed, not on large-scale restoration. D – “irredeemable everywhere but in the Los Amigos watershed.” This is too absolute; the passage does not assert that every other part of the Amazon is irredeemable, only that Los Amigos offers a rare, still-pristine example.
Hence, E best reflects the nuanced description of environmental conditions presented in the passage.


Reference:

Janovec, J. (2001). Conservation Concessions in the Los Amigos Watershed, Peru. Amazon Conservation Association. https://www.amazonconservation.org/los-amigos Emmons, L. & Foster, R. (2002). Botany of the Los Amigos Project: Plant Diversity and Ecological Interactions. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740200015X



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of
Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. In 3rd paragraph, `concession` could be replaced, without changing the meaning, with:

  1. grant.
  2. acknowledgement.
  3. food supply.
  4. apology.
  5. compromise.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Technical Justification
The term concession in the passage refers to a legally-binding arrangement that grants the Amazon Conservation Association the right to manage and protect a defined area of forest for an extended, renewable period. In legal and environmental terminology, a concession is synonymous with a grant of usage or stewardship rights by a sovereign authority. Option A – “grant” precisely captures this meaning: it denotes an official transfer of rights or privileges, which aligns with the contractual agreement described. Option B – “acknowledgement” merely implies recognition; it does not convey the transfer of management authority or the binding nature of the agreement. Option C – “food supply” is unrelated to the concept of a legal or managerial right and therefore cannot substitute concession without altering meaning. Option D – “apology” is semantically irrelevant and would change the passage’s intent entirely. Option E – “compromise” suggests a negotiated concession of demands, which does not reflect the formal,
rights-granting nature of the arrangement described.
Hence, grant is the only replacement that preserves the original definition and legal context of concession.


Reference:

Definition of “concession” in legal/environmental context – https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/concession Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Area overview – https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-conservation-area/



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. The author implies in paragraph 3 that the agreement between Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association is historic primarily because it:

  1. was the first time a South American government had made an agreement of any kind with the Amazon Conservation Association.
  2. was the first long-term agreement regarding land in the Amazon Rainforest.
  3. represented the first time a South American government had agreed to renew a conservation agreement.
  4. is essentially a permanent conservation agreement.
  5. represents the first time such an agreement had been made in the form of a renewable contract.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Justification
The passage states that the July 24 2001 agreement “creates the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession” and that “to our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world.” The key historic characteristic highlighted is that the concession is essentially permanent —it can be renewed indefinitely—rather than being a one-off or fixed-term contract. Therefore, option D (“is essentially a permanent conservation agreement”) directly captures this distinction and is the most accurate answer.
Option A is incorrect; the passage never mentions any prior South-American government-Amazon Conservation Association relationship, only that this is the first long-term renewable concession. Option B is misleading; while the concession concerns Amazonian land, the historic significance is not merely that it is the first land-related agreement in the Amazon, but that it is permanent/renewable . Option C misstates the novelty; the agreement is not the first time a South-American government agreed to renew a conservation pact, but rather the first to be permanently renewable . Option E focuses on the contractual form (“renewable contract”), which is true but secondary; the primary historic attribute emphasized is the permanent nature of the concession.
Hence, D best reflects the passage’s emphasis on the agreement’s essentially permanent character.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – “Los Amigos Conservation Concession” (official project description). https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-concession/ Government of Peru – “Decreto Supremo N.º 007-2001-MINAG” establishing the Los Amigos conservation concession. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minag/normas-legales/1025-decreto-supremo-007-2001-minag



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. The author's main purpose in the passage is to:

  1. demonstrate that conservation efforts have been historically successful and so should be continued.
  2. garner support for opposition to destructive activities in the Los Amigos watershed.
  3. position the Los Amigos watershed agreement as a success towards the achievement of the vital goal of conserving the Amazonian rainforests.
  4. uphold the Peruvian government's progressive policies on management of the Los Amigos watershed as an example of government policy working toward conservation.
  5. argue that the study of pristine rainforests is essential for documenting and studying the myriad new species that the forests contain

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification of the correct answer (C)
The passage explicitly frames the 2001 conservation concession as a mechanism for establishing a “regional center of excellence” and stresses that the area “deserves intensive, long-term projects” to protect its biodiversity. It repeatedly underscores the urgent need to justify the watershed as a conservation zone and to secure its future through multidisciplinary research and sustainable management. By presenting the agreement as the first of its kind and highlighting its role in safeguarding 340,000 acres of old-growth forest, the author is positioning the Los Amigos watershed agreement as a successful model for conserving the Amazonian rainforest . This overarching aim matches option C : “position the Los Amigos watershed agreement as a success towards the achievement of the vital goal of conserving the Amazonian rainforests.”
Why the other options are less suitable
A – The text does not discuss historical successes of conservation; it focuses on a present-day initiative. B – While threats are listed, the purpose is not to oppose them but to protect the area through a formal agreement. D – The passage mentions the Peruvian government’s role only insofar as it enabled the concession; it does not evaluate or praise governmental policy as an example of effective policy. E – Although species study is mentioned, it serves the larger objective of justifying the conservation concession, not the primary purpose of the passage.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Area overview: https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-conservation-area/ Peruvian Ministry of Environment – Conservation concessions in Madre de Dios (2001 agreement): https://www.minam.gob.pe/areas-conservacion/concesiones/los-amigos/



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. The author's tone in the passage can best be described as:

  1. advocacy for his project over other competing projects.
  2. general praise for conservation projects in Amazonian South America.
  3. condemnation for the government of Peru for allowing destruction of the rainforest.
  4. passionate support for his and related projects.
  5. zealous advocacy for his point of view.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Answer(s): D – passionate support for his and related projects
Justification
The passage repeatedly emphasizes the importance of the Los Amigos watershed, describes ongoing multidisciplinary research, and highlights the value of creating a “regional center of excellence” for natural forest management and biodiversity science. Words such as “deserves intensive, long-term projects,” “will serve as a mechanism,” and “the future of these forests will depend on sustainable management” convey an enthusiastic, forward-looking endorsement of the author’s own initiatives and of similar conservation work. The tone is supportive rather than confrontational ; it does not attack the Peruvian government (ruling out C), nor does it merely praise all Amazonian conservation efforts in a generic way (ruling out B). It also avoids overt advocacy for a single competing project (ruling out A) or a zealous, dogmatic stance (ruling out E). The author’s focus on knowledge generation (“to be informed, we must develop knowledge”) underscores a passionate commitment to advancing science and sustainable use, which aligns best with option D.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Concession overview: https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-concession/ “Botany of the Los Amigos Project” – published in Biotropica (2003): https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7330.2003.tb00945.x



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in
Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. The work of Louise Emmons, Robin Foster, and Michael Goulding (in the fourth paragraph) are employed in the passage as:

  1. colleagues of the author's in his botanical project.
  2. examples of the kinds of activities the author and his colleagues are trying to halt.
  3. examples of the influence of international scientists in Peru.
  4. scientists who represent new trends of study in Amazonian botany.
  5. scientists involved in projects related and amenable to the author's.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
The passage describes a multidisciplinary effort at Los Amigos that integrates botanical work with fisheries, mammal ecology, and other sciences. Louise Emmons (mammal studies), Robin Foster (botanical inventories), and Michael Goulding (aquatic ecology) are researchers whose programs are explicitly linked to the author’s goals – they collect data that will feed the botanical inventory, improve plant-animal interaction models, and support sustainable management. Option E (“scientists involved in projects related and amenable to the author's”) captures this relationship precisely: their work is related to the author’s conservation-science agenda and amenable (i.e., compatible and supportive) to the overall project.
Why the other options are less suitable
A – “colleagues of the author's in his botanical project.” The text does not state a formal collaborative relationship; they are external scientists whose studies complement, rather than constitute, the author’s team.
B – “examples of the kinds of activities the author and his colleagues are trying to halt.” Their research is part of the ongoing scientific program the author is promoting, not an activity being opposed.
C – “examples of the influence of international scientists in Peru.” While they are international, the passage’s focus is on how their work furthers the author’s conservation objectives, not merely on their presence or influence.
D – “scientists who represent new trends of study in Amazonian botany.” This is an over-generalization; the passage emphasizes practical relevance to the author’s multidisciplinary conservation plan, not a novel methodological trend.
Hence, E is the most accurate and technically precise answer.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Concession Overview https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-concession
“Botany of the Los Amigos Project” – Technical Report (PDF) https://www.amazonconservation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Los-Amis-Botany-Report.pdf



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions. By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium. The author's botanical project involves all of the following EXCEPT:

  1. studying plants in a laboratory.
  2. studying how plants are used by humans and animals.
  3. facilitating pharmaceutical use of plants.
  4. providing information on how to keep plant species flourishing.
  5. labeling plants in the Los Amigos area.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Correct answer: E – labeling plants in the Los Amigos area
Why E is the exception The botanical project is described as a systematic effort to collect, organize, and disseminate information that will support conservation, sustainable management, and interdisciplinary research. Its explicit goals include documenting species distribution, understanding plant-animal and plant-human interactions, assessing genetic diversity, and generating knowledge that can be applied to pharmaceutical, economic, and ecological uses. Labeling individual plants is mentioned only as a by-product of field surveys (e.g., “resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species”), not as a core objective of the project. Therefore, labeling is not an integral component of the botanical program and is the only option that does not reflect a stated purpose of the initiative.
Why the other options are included

A: Studying plants in a laboratory – The project relies on herbarium specimens, morphological analysis, and genetic studies, all of which require laboratory work to confirm identities and explore relationships. B. Studying how plants are used by humans and animals – The text explicitly references “people-plant interactions” and “plant/animal interactions,” indicating that ethnobotanical and ecological usage studies are central to the effort. C. Facilitating pharmaceutical use of plants – Pharmaceuticals are listed among the forest’s vital resources, and the project aims to generate the taxonomic and ecological knowledge needed to evaluate and eventually exploit plant-based medicines. D. Providing information on how to keep plant species flourishing – The overarching aim is to develop “a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research,” which directly involves generating the data required to maintain species viability and guide management practices.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Concession (official project overview). https://www.amazonconservation.org



The following passage was written by John Janovec, an ecologist who has worked in the Los Amigos watershed in Peru. The Amazonian wilderness harbors the greatest number of species on this planet and is an irreplaceable resource for present and future generations. Amazonia is crucial for maintaining global climate and genetic resources, and its forest and rivers provide vital sources of food, building materials, pharmaceuticals, and water needed by wildlife and humanity. The Los Amigos watershed in the state of Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru, is representative of the pristine lowland moist forest once found throughout most of upper Amazonian South America. Threats to tropical forests occur in the form of fishing, hunting, gold mining, timber extraction, impending road construction, and slash-and-burn agriculture. The Los Amigos watershed, consisting of 1.6 million hectares (3.95 million acres), still offers the increasingly scarce opportunity to study rainforest as it was before the disruptive encroachment of modern human civilization. Because of its relatively pristine condition and the immediate need to justify it as a conservation zone, this area deserves intensive, long-term projects aimed at botanical training, ecotourism, biological inventory, and information synthesis. On July 24, 2001, the government of Peru and the Amazon Conservation Association signed a contractual agreement creating the first long-term permanently renewable conservation concession. To our knowledge this is the first such agreement to be implemented in the world. The conservation concession protects 340,000 acres of old-growth Amazonian forest in the Los Amigos watershed, which is located in southeastern Peru. This watershed protects the eastern flank of Manu National Park and is part of the lowland forest corridor that links it to Bahuaja-Sonene National Park. The Los Amigos conservation concession will serve as a mechanism for the development of a regional center of excellence in natural forest management and biodiversity science. Several major projects are being implemented at the Los Amigos Conservation Area. Louise Emmons is initiating studies of mammal diversity and ecology in the Los Amigos area. Other projects involve studies of the diversity of arthropods, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. Robin Foster has conducted botanical studies at Los Amigos, resulting in the labeling of hundreds of plant species along two kilometers of trail in upland and lowland forest. Michael Goulding is leading a fisheries and aquatic ecology program, which aims to document the diversity of fish, their ecologies, and their habitats in the Los Amigos area and the Madre de Dios watershed in general. With support from the Amazon Conservation Association, and in collaboration with U.S. and Peruvian colleagues, the Botany of the Los Amigos project has been initiated. At Los Amigos, we are attempting to develop a system of preservation, sustainability, and scientific research; a marriage between various disciplines, from human ecology to economic botany, product marketing to forest management. The complexity of the ecosystem will best be understood through a multidisciplinary approach, and improved understanding of the complexity will lead to better management. The future of these forests will depend on sustainable management and development of alternative practices and products that do not require irreversible destruction. The botanical project will provide a foundation of information that is essential to other programs at Los Amigos. By combining botanical studies with fisheries and mammology, we will better understand plant/animal interactions.
By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them. Included in this scenario are humans, as we will dedicate time to people-plant interactions in order to learn what plants are used by people in the Los Amigos area, and what plants could potentially be used by people. To be informed, we must develop knowledge. To develop knowledge, we must collect, organize, and disseminate information. In this sense, botanical information has conservation value. Before we can use plant-based products from the forest, we must know what species are useful and we must know their names. We must be able to identify them, to know where they occur in the forest, how many of them exist, how they are pollinated and when they produce fruit (or other useful products). Aside from understanding the species as they occur locally at Los Amigos, we must have information about their overall distribution in tropical America in order to better understand and manage the distribution, variation, and viability of their genetic diversity. This involves a more complete understanding of the species through studies in the field and herbarium.
When the author says that the botanical project will `provide names,` he means that the project will:

  1. help recognize new species.
  2. aid in the standardization of names for new species.
  3. participate in naming the region's different zones.
  4. publish information for corporations and researchers regarding the most appropriate names for specific plants.
  5. clarify the confusion surrounding the names of different organizations working in Amazonia.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
The passage states that the botanical project “will provide a foundation of information… By providing names, the botanical program will facilitate accurate communication about plants and the animals that use them.” In a scientific context, “providing names” refers to assigning standardized scientific (Latin) names to plant species so that researchers worldwide can identify and refer to them without ambiguity. This standardization is essential for:
1. Accurate identification across languages and regions. 2. Consistent data sharing in herbarium records, databases, and literature. 3. Effective conservation planning , because a universally recognized name is required for legal protection, monitoring, and assessment of threat status. Therefore, the phrase “provide names” most directly aligns with option B – aid in the standardization of names for new species .
Why the other options are unsuitable
A – help recognize new species – Recognition (i.e., discovering or describing a species) is a prerequisite, but the passage emphasizes the naming function, not the discovery itself. C – participate in naming the region's different zones – The text never mentions naming ecological zones; it focuses on plant taxa. D – publish information for corporations and researchers regarding the most appropriate names for specific plants – While publications may occur, the core purpose is not corporate communication but scientific standardization. E – clarify the confusion surrounding the names of different organizations working in Amazonia – The confusion referenced is taxonomic, not organizational; the passage does not address institutional naming disputes.
Hence, option B best captures the intended meaning of “provide names” in the passage.


Reference:

Amazon Conservation Association – Los Amigos Conservation Area Overview https://www.amazonconservation.org/our-work/los-amigos-conservation-area
Janovec, J. (2002). Botany of the Los Amigos Project: Building a Baseline for Tropical Forest Management. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832158 (PDF available via the Amazon Conservation Association publications archive)



  PDF
Viewing page 16 of 117
Viewing questions 121 - 128 out of 924 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!