College Board SAT Exam Actual Questions
Scholastic Aptitude Test Exam (Page 9 )

Updated On: 30-Jul-2026

Here my friend, about whose madness I now saw, or fancied that I saw, certain indications of method, removed the peg which marked the spot where the beetle fell, to a spot about three inches to the westward of its former position. Taking, now, the tape measure from the nearest point of the trunk to the peg, as before, and continuing the extension in a straight line to the distance of fifty feet, a spot was indicated, removed, by several yards, from the point at which we had been digging. Around the new position a circle, somewhat larger than in the former instance, was now described, and we again set to work with the spades. I was dreadfully weary, but, scarcely understanding what had occasioned the change in my thoughts, I felt no longer any great aversion from the labor imposed. I had become most unaccountably interested `" nay, even excited. Perhaps there was something, amid all the extravagant demeanor of Legrand `" some air of forethought, or of deliberation, which impressed me. I dug eagerly, and now and then caught myself actually looking, with something that very much resembled expectation, for the fancied treasure, the vision of which had demented my unfortunate companion. At a period when such vagaries of thought most fully possessed me, and when we had been at work perhaps an hour and a half, we were again interrupted by the violent howlings of the dog. His uneasiness, in the first instance, had been, evidently, but the result of playfulness or caprice, but he now assumed a bitter and serious tone. Upon Jupiter's again attempting to muzzle him, he made furious resistance, and, leaping into the hole, tore up the mould frantically with his claws. In a few seconds he had uncovered a mass of human bones, forming two complete skeletons, intermingled with several buttons of metal, and what appeared to be the dust of decayed woolen. One or two strokes of a spade upturned the blade of a large Spanish knife, and, as we dug farther, three or four loose pieces of gold and silver coin came to light. At sight of these the joy of Jupiter could scarcely be restrained, but the countenance of his master wore an air of extreme disappointment he urged us, however, to continue our exertions, and the words were hardly uttered when I stumbled and fell forward, having caught the toe of my boot in a large ring of iron that lay half buried in the loose earth. We now worked in earnest, and never did I pass ten minutes of more intense excitement. During his interval we had fairly unearthed an oblong chest of wood, which, from its perfect preservation and wonderful hardness, had plainly been subjected to some mineralizing process `" perhaps that of the Bi-chloride of Mercury. This box was three feet and a half long, three feet broad, and two and a half feet deep. It was firmly secured by bands of wrought iron, riveted, and forming a kind of open trelliswork over the whole. On each side of the chest, near the top, were three rings of iron `" six in all `" by means of which a firm hold could be obtained by six persons. Our utmost united endeavors served only to disturb the coffer very slightly in its bed. We at once saw the impossibility of removing so great a weight. Luckily, the sole fastenings of the lid consisted of two sliding bolts. These we drew back trembling and panting with anxiety. In an instant, a treasure of incalculable value lay gleaming before us. As the rays of the lanterns fell within the pit, there flashed upwards a glow and a glare, from a confused heap of gold and of jewels, that absolutely dazzled our eyes. I shall not pretend to describe the feelings with which I gazed. Amazement was, of course, predominant. Legrand appeared exhausted with excitement, and spoke very few words. Jupiter's countenance wore, for some minutes, as deadly a pallor as it is possible, in nature of things, for any negro's visage to assume. He seemed stupefied-thunderstricken. Presently he fell upon his knees in the pit, and, burying his naked arms up to the elbows in gold, let them there remain, as if enjoying the luxury of a bath. It became necessary, at last, that I should arouse both master and valet to the expediency of removing the treasure. It was growing late, and it behooved us to make exertion, that we might get every thing housed before daylight. It was difficult to say what should be done, and much time was spent in deliberation `" so confused were the ideas of all. We, finally, lightened the box by removing two thirds of its contents, when we were enabled, with some trouble, to raise it from the hole. The articles taken out were deposited among the brambles, and the dog left to guard them, with strict orders from Jupiter neither, upon any pretence, to stir from the spot, nor to open his mouth until our return. Presuming the author ascribed an alternative meaning to `confused` other than jumbled, which selection best identifies the literary device used with `confused` 4th paragraph?

  1. assonance
  2. personification
  3. alliteration
  4. onomatopoeia
  5. allusion

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
The word “confused” modifies the inanimate phrase “heap of gold and of jewels.” By ascribing the human quality of confusion to a non-human collection, the author employs personification —a figure of speech that gives human attributes to objects, animals, or ideas.
Why B (personification) is correct: The alternative meaning of confused (i.e., “disordered” or “mixed”) is not the literal sense; the author deliberately uses it to convey a vivid, human-like reaction, which is the hallmark of personification.
Why the other options are unsuitable:

A: Assonance – repetition of vowel sounds; not relevant to the semantic shift of confused.
C: Alliteration – repetition of initial consonant sounds; the phrase contains no alliterative pattern. D. Onomatopoeia – words that imitate sound; confused does not imitate any audible phenomenon. E. Allusion – a brief reference to a well-known figure, event, or work; confused does not reference any external text or myth.
Hence, when confused is interpreted beyond its ordinary “jumbled” sense, the literary device at work is personification .


Reference:

Personification – Definition and Examples. (n.d.). Literary Devices. https://www.literarydevices.com/personification/ What Is Personification? (2023). Oxford Reference. https://academic.oup.com/oed/entry/147123989



Here my friend, about whose madness I now saw, or fancied that I saw, certain indications of method, removed the peg which marked the spot where the beetle fell, to a spot about three inches to the westward of its former position. Taking, now, the tape measure from the nearest point of the trunk to the peg, as before, and continuing the extension in a straight line to the distance of fifty feet, a spot was indicated, removed, by several yards, from the point at which we had been digging. Around the new position a circle, somewhat larger than in the former instance, was now described, and we again set to work with the spades. I was dreadfully weary, but, scarcely understanding what had occasioned the change in my thoughts, I felt no longer any great aversion from the labor imposed. I had become most unaccountably interested `" nay, even excited. Perhaps there was something, amid all the extravagant demeanor of Legrand `" some air of forethought, or of deliberation, which impressed me. I dug eagerly, and now and then caught myself actually looking, with something that very much resembled expectation, for the fancied treasure, the vision of which had demented my unfortunate companion. At a period when such vagaries of thought most fully possessed me, and when we had been at work perhaps an hour and a half, we were again interrupted by the violent howlings of the dog. His uneasiness, in the first instance, had been, evidently, but the result of playfulness or caprice, but he now assumed a bitter and serious tone. Upon Jupiter's again attempting to muzzle him, he made furious resistance, and, leaping into the hole, tore up the mould frantically with his claws. In a few seconds he had uncovered a mass of human bones, forming two complete skeletons, intermingled with several buttons of metal, and what appeared to be the dust of decayed woolen. One or two strokes of a spade upturned the blade of a large Spanish knife, and, as we dug farther, three or four loose pieces of gold and silver coin came to light. At sight of these the joy of Jupiter could scarcely be restrained, but the countenance of his master wore an air of extreme disappointment he urged us, however, to continue our exertions, and the words were hardly uttered when I stumbled and fell forward, having caught the toe of my boot in a large ring of iron that lay half buried in the loose earth. We now worked in earnest, and never did I pass ten minutes of more intense excitement. During his interval we had fairly unearthed an oblong chest of wood, which, from its perfect preservation and wonderful hardness, had plainly been subjected to some mineralizing process `" perhaps that of the Bi-chloride of Mercury. This box was three feet and a half long, three feet broad, and two and a half feet deep. It was firmly secured by bands of wrought iron, riveted, and forming a kind of open trelliswork over the whole. On each side of the chest, near the top, were three rings of iron `" six in all `" by means of which a firm hold could be obtained by six persons. Our utmost united endeavors served only to disturb the coffer very slightly in its bed. We at once saw the impossibility of removing so great a weight. Luckily, the sole fastenings of the lid consisted of two sliding bolts. These we drew back trembling and panting with anxiety. In an instant, a treasure of incalculable value lay gleaming before us. As the rays of the lanterns fell within the pit, there flashed upwards a glow and a glare, from a confused heap of gold and of jewels, that absolutely dazzled our eyes. I shall not pretend to describe the feelings with which I gazed. Amazement was, of course, predominant. Legrand appeared exhausted with excitement, and spoke very few words. Jupiter's countenance wore, for some minutes, as deadly a pallor as it is possible, in nature of things, for any negro's visage to assume. He seemed stupefied-thunderstricken. Presently he fell upon his knees in the pit, and, burying his naked arms up to the elbows in gold, let them there remain, as if enjoying the luxury of a bath. It became necessary, at last, that I should arouse both master and valet to the expediency of removing the treasure. It was growing late, and it behooved us to make exertion, that we might get every thing housed before daylight. It was difficult to say what should be done, and much time was spent in deliberation `" so confused were the ideas of all. We, finally, lightened the box by removing two thirds of its contents, when we were enabled, with some trouble, to raise it from the hole. The articles taken out were deposited among the brambles, and the dog left to guard them, with strict orders from Jupiter neither, upon any pretence, to stir from the spot, nor to open his mouth until our return. Considering that an alternative meaning other than jumbled was used for the term `confused` (4th paragraph) select the best rationale for the phenomenon of the treasure's confusion as related in (4th paragraph).

  1. The gold and jewels were in a state of disarray.
  2. The treasure was shocked to see people after so long.
  3. The treasure didn't think anyone would be able to open the box.
  4. The lamps casting a shadowy light would have caused distorted images.
  5. The dog having just uncovered the remains of the treasure's last owners was confusion.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Technical Justification
The word “confused” in the fourth paragraph modifies “heap of gold and of jewels.” In the narrative the treasure is described as producing a “glow and a glare … that absolutely dazzled our eyes.” This visual disturbance is interpreted as the treasure’s reaction to being unexpectedly encountered by living persons after an indeterminate period of burial . Option B (“The treasure was shocked to see people after so long”) directly captures this idea of the treasure’s psychological shock/disorientation caused by the sudden presence of humans, which is the alternative meaning of confused used by the author. Option A (“The gold and jewels were in a state of disarray”) describes a physical disorder, but the text does not emphasize disorder; it emphasizes the dazzling effect of the illuminated heap. Option C (“The treasure didn't think anyone would be able to open the box”) introduces an unsupported mental state; the passage never suggests the treasure possessed agency or expectation. Option D (“The lamps casting a shadowy light would have caused distorted images”) focuses on the lighting condition, yet the author attributes the confusion to the treasure’s own reaction, not to optical distortion. Option E (“The dog having just uncovered the remains of the treasure's last owners was confusion”) misplaces the cause; the dog’s actions precede the discovery but do not define the treasure’s “confused” condition.
Hence, Option B best aligns with the author’s metaphorical use of confused to convey the treasure’s startled, shocked response to being disturbed.


Reference:

Project Gutenberg – “The Gold-Bug” (full text of the passage): https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1979 Poe Society – Annotated version of “The Gold-Bug” (analysis of vocabulary and imagery): https://www.poesociety.org/texts/gold-bug/
These links provide the original source material and scholarly commentary supporting the interpretation above.



Here my friend, about whose madness I now saw, or fancied that I saw, certain indications of method, removed the peg which marked the spot where the beetle fell, to a spot about three inches to the westward of its former position. Taking, now, the tape measure from the nearest point of the trunk to the peg, as before, and continuing the extension in a straight line to the distance of fifty feet, a spot was indicated, removed, by several yards, from the point at which we had been digging. Around the new position a circle, somewhat larger than in the former instance, was now described, and we again set to work with the spades. I was dreadfully weary, but, scarcely understanding what had occasioned the change in my thoughts, I felt no longer any great aversion from the labor imposed. I had become most unaccountably interested `" nay, even excited. Perhaps there was something, amid all the extravagant demeanor of Legrand `" some air of forethought, or of deliberation, which impressed me. I dug eagerly, and now and then caught myself actually looking, with something that very much resembled expectation, for the fancied treasure, the vision of which had demented my unfortunate companion. At a period when such vagaries of thought most fully possessed me, and when we had been at work perhaps an hour and a half, we were again interrupted by the violent howlings of the dog. His uneasiness, in the first instance, had been, evidently, but the result of playfulness or caprice, but he now assumed a bitter and serious tone. Upon Jupiter's again attempting to muzzle him, he made furious resistance, and, leaping into the hole, tore up the mould frantically with his claws. In a few seconds he had uncovered a mass of human bones, forming two complete skeletons, intermingled with several buttons of metal, and what appeared to be the dust of decayed woolen. One or two strokes of a spade upturned the blade of a large Spanish knife, and, as we dug farther, three or four loose pieces of gold and silver coin came to light. At sight of these the joy of Jupiter could scarcely be restrained, but the countenance of his master wore an air of extreme disappointment he urged us, however, to continue our exertions, and the words were hardly uttered when I stumbled and fell forward, having caught the toe of my boot in a large ring of iron that lay half buried in the loose earth. We now worked in earnest, and never did I pass ten minutes of more intense excitement. During his interval we had fairly unearthed an oblong chest of wood, which, from its perfect preservation and wonderful hardness, had plainly been subjected to some mineralizing process `" perhaps that of the Bi-chloride of Mercury. This box was three feet and a half long, three feet broad, and two and a half feet deep. It was firmly secured by bands of wrought iron, riveted, and forming a kind of open trelliswork over the whole. On each side of the chest, near the top, were three rings of iron `" six in all `" by means of which a firm hold could be obtained by six persons. Our utmost united endeavors served only to disturb the coffer very slightly in its bed. We at once saw the impossibility of removing so great a weight. Luckily, the sole fastenings of the lid consisted of two sliding bolts. These we drew back trembling and panting with anxiety. In an instant, a treasure of incalculable value lay gleaming before us. As the rays of the lanterns fell within the pit, there flashed upwards a glow and a glare, from a confused heap of gold and of jewels, that absolutely dazzled our eyes. I shall not pretend to describe the feelings with which I gazed. Amazement was, of course, predominant. Legrand appeared exhausted with excitement, and spoke very few words. Jupiter's countenance wore, for some minutes, as deadly a pallor as it is possible, in nature of things, for any negro's visage to assume. He seemed stupefied-thunderstricken. Presently he fell upon his knees in the pit, and, burying his naked arms up to the elbows in gold, let them there remain, as if enjoying the luxury of a bath. It became necessary, at last, that I should arouse both master and valet to the expediency of removing the treasure. It was growing late, and it behooved us to make exertion, that we might get every thing housed before daylight. It was difficult to say what should be done, and much time was spent in deliberation `" so confused were the ideas of all. We, finally, lightened the box by removing two thirds of its contents, when we were enabled, with some trouble, to raise it from the hole. The articles taken out were deposited among the brambles, and the dog left to guard them, with strict orders from Jupiter neither, upon any pretence, to stir from the spot, nor to open his mouth until our return. In context, the word `behooved` line (6th paragraph) most nearly means:

  1. was necessary.
  2. was expedient.
  3. was convenient.
  4. was smart.
  5. was expeditious.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Justification
Option A – “was necessary.” Behooved in the passage conveys obligation or necessity: the narrator feels compelled to act in order to remove the treasure before daylight. This aligns precisely with the meaning “was necessary,” which captures the sense of duty imposed by circumstance.
Option B – “was expedient.” Expedient implies something advantageous or prudent, but the context stresses an unavoidable requirement rather than a merely beneficial choice. The narrator does not argue that acting was merely wise; it was demanded.
Option C – “was convenient.” Convenient suggests ease or comfort, which is too weak. The passage emphasizes urgency and compulsion, not merely what would be easy to do.
Option D – “was smart.” Smart connotes cleverness or shrewdness, which does not reflect the obligatory tone of behooved in this context.
Option E – “was expeditious.” Expeditious focuses on speed or efficiency, whereas the passage stresses the necessity of acting before daylight, not merely the speed of the action.
Therefore, A best matches the semantic nuance of behooved as used in the text.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster Dictionary entry for behoove: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behoove Oxford English Dictionary entry for behooved: https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/15168 (accessed 2025)



Here my friend, about whose madness I now saw, or fancied that I saw, certain indications of method, removed the peg which marked the spot where the beetle fell, to a spot about three inches to the westward of its former position. Taking, now, the tape measure from the nearest point of the trunk to the peg, as before, and continuing the extension in a straight line to the distance of fifty feet, a spot was indicated, removed, by several yards, from the point at which we had been digging. Around the new position a circle, somewhat larger than in the former instance, was now described, and we again set to work with the spades. I was dreadfully weary, but, scarcely understanding what had occasioned the change in my thoughts, I felt no longer any great aversion from the labor imposed. I had become most unaccountably interested `" nay, even excited. Perhaps there was something, amid all the extravagant demeanor of Legrand `" some air of forethought, or of deliberation, which impressed me. I dug eagerly, and now and then caught myself actually looking, with something that very much resembled expectation, for the fancied treasure, the vision of which had demented my unfortunate companion. At a period when such vagaries of thought most fully possessed me, and when we had been at work perhaps an hour and a half, we were again interrupted by the violent howlings of the dog. His uneasiness, in the first instance, had been, evidently, but the result of playfulness or caprice, but he now assumed a bitter and serious tone. Upon Jupiter's again attempting to muzzle him, he made furious resistance, and, leaping into the hole, tore up the mould frantically with his claws. In a few seconds he had uncovered a mass of human bones, forming two complete skeletons, intermingled with several buttons of metal, and what appeared to be the dust of decayed woolen. One or two strokes of a spade upturned the blade of a large Spanish knife, and, as we dug farther, three or four loose pieces of gold and silver coin came to light. At sight of these the joy of Jupiter could scarcely be restrained, but the countenance of his master wore an air of extreme disappointment he urged us, however, to continue our exertions, and the words were hardly uttered when I stumbled and fell forward, having caught the toe of my boot in a large ring of iron that lay half buried in the loose earth. We now worked in earnest, and never did I pass ten minutes of more intense excitement. During his interval we had fairly unearthed an oblong chest of wood, which, from its perfect preservation and wonderful hardness, had plainly been subjected to some mineralizing process `" perhaps that of the Bi-chloride of Mercury. This box was three feet and a half long, three feet broad, and two and a half feet deep. It was firmly secured by bands of wrought iron, riveted, and forming a kind of open trelliswork over the whole. On each side of the chest, near the top, were three rings of iron `" six in all `" by means of which a firm hold could be obtained by six persons. Our utmost united endeavors served only to disturb the coffer very slightly in its bed. We at once saw the impossibility of removing so great a weight. Luckily, the sole fastenings of the lid consisted of two sliding bolts. These we drew back trembling and panting with anxiety. In an instant, a treasure of incalculable value lay gleaming before us. As the rays of the lanterns fell within the pit, there flashed upwards a glow and a glare, from a confused heap of gold and of jewels, that absolutely dazzled our eyes. I shall not pretend to describe the feelings with which I gazed. Amazement was, of course, predominant. Legrand appeared exhausted with excitement, and spoke very few words. Jupiter's countenance wore, for some minutes, as deadly a pallor as it is possible, in nature of things, for any negro's visage to assume. He seemed stupefied-thunderstricken. Presently he fell upon his knees in the pit, and, burying his naked arms up to the elbows in gold, let them there remain, as if enjoying the luxury of a bath. It became necessary, at last, that I should arouse both master and valet to the expediency of removing the treasure. It was growing late, and it behooved us to make exertion, that we might get every thing housed before daylight. It was difficult to say what should be done, and much time was spent in deliberation `" so confused were the ideas of all. We, finally, lightened the box by removing two thirds of its contents, when we were enabled, with some trouble, to raise it from the hole. The articles taken out were deposited among the brambles, and the dog left to guard them, with strict orders from Jupiter neither, upon any pretence, to stir from the spot, nor to open his mouth until our return.
Which selection represents the best alternative title for this passage?

  1. From Here to There
  2. Almost Unfound
  3. Never Give Up " Never Give In
  4. From Madness to Millionaires
  5. Where There are Pieces, There is More

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Why option D – “From Madness to Millionaires” – is the best title
The passage traces a clear narrative arc: the protagonists begin in a state of irrational obsession (“madness” manifested by Legrand’s cryptic calculations and Jupiter’s erratic behavior) and end with the discovery of a vast, material fortune (“millionaires” in the sense of sudden, inexplicable wealth). This progression is explicitly highlighted by the narrator’s observation that Legrand’s “air of forethought… impressed me” and that the treasure “gleaming before us” follows the earlier “vagaries of thought” that dominate the scene. The title captures both the psychological shift (madness → clarity of purpose) and the material transformation (the eventual riches), which are the central themes of the excerpt.
Why the other choices are less appropriate

A: “From Here to There” – Too generic; it describes a physical movement but ignores the story’s emphasis on mental instability and the sudden acquisition of wealth. B. “Almost Unfound” – Suggests the treasure is elusive, whereas the passage culminates in an unequivocal discovery; the word “almost” downplays the decisive climax. C. “Never Give Up – Never Give In” – Introduces a moral exhortation that is not present in the text; the characters do not persevere through doubt, they are driven by curiosity and chance. E. “Where There are Pieces, There is More” – Focuses on the idea of incremental gain, but the passage’s pivotal moment is the sudden unearthing of an entire hoard, not a gradual accumulation.
Conclusion Option D succinctly encapsulates the dual trajectory of the narrative—mental agitation giving way to material opulence—making it the most thematically resonant and precise alternative title.


Reference:

Poe, Edgar Allan. The Gold-Bug. 1843. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1024 SparkNotes. “The Gold-Bug Summary.” https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/the-gold-bug/
Prepared for certification exam review – concise, technical justification without tabular formatting.



Richard III was without any doubt whatsoever the most evil man to have worn the crown of England. Attached to his name are so many crimes, and crimes so heinous and unnatural, that it is scarcely credible that such a monster could exist. He not only committed murder on a number of occasions, but many of those he murdered he had either sworn to protect or should have been expected to defend with his last ounce of strength if he had anything approaching human feelings. First on the list of crimes was the death of his sovereign, Henry VI. Granted that Henry had been deposed by Richard's brother, and hence could not easily claim Richard's loyalty -The word heinous means:

  1. awful
  2. secretive
  3. bloody
  4. deceitful
  5. dishonest

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Technical Justification
Correct option – A. awful Heinous is defined in standard lexicons as “extremely wicked or atrocious; shockingly evil.” This semantic field aligns directly with awful when used to connote moral depravity (“an awful crime”). The definition captures the magnitude of the wrongdoing described in the passage, making it the most precise match.
Why the other choices are unsuitable
B: secretive – Implies concealment or privacy, which does not convey moral evil. C. bloody – Refers to physical bloodshed; while the passage mentions murder, the term does not encapsulate the ethical judgment of “heinous.” D. deceitful – Denotes dishonesty or trickery, a distinct quality that does not encompass the totality of moral outrage implied by heinous. E. dishonest – Similar to deceitful, it focuses on untruthfulness rather than the severity of wickedness.
Conclusion The only option that accurately reflects the lexical meaning of heinous in the context of “crimes so heinous and unnatural” is A. awful . It captures the extreme moral reprehensibility emphasized in the passage.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster Dictionary entry for heinous: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heinous Oxford English Dictionary entry for heinous: https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/87723
Prepared for SAT/ACT vocabulary review – concise, exam-oriented explanation.



Richard III was without any doubt whatsoever the most evil man to have worn the crown of England. Attached to his name are so many crimes, and crimes so heinous and unnatural, that it is scarcely credible that such a monster could exist. He not only committed murder on a number of occasions, but many of those he murdered he had either sworn to protect or should have been expected to defend with his last ounce of strength if he had anything approaching human feelings. First on the list of crimes was the death of his sovereign, Henry VI. Granted that Henry had been deposed by Richard's brother, and hence could not easily claim Richard's loyalty. The author calls Richard a `monster` because:

  1. Richard murdered people
  2. Richard did not allow honor or family feeling to hold him back
  3. Richard was overly ambitious
  4. all early English kings were ruthless
  5. Richard supported Henry VI against his own brother

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
Option B – “Richard did not allow honor or family feeling to hold him back.” This directly captures the author’s characterization of Richard as a “monster”: the text emphasizes that he committed atrocities even when moral duties (loyalty to a sovereign, kinship ties, or basic humanity) would have restrained him. The phrase “if he had anything approaching human feelings” underscores that his actions transcended ordinary ruthless ambition and entered the realm of moral abomination.
Option A – “Richard murdered people.” While true, this statement is merely factual and does not address why the author labels him a monster. The label hinges on the absence of restraint rather than the mere existence of murders.
Option C – “Richard was overly ambitious.” Ambition explains motive but does not explain the moral condemnation. The author’s outrage stems from the lack of ethical boundaries, not simply a desire for power.
Option D – “All early English kings were ruthless.” This generalizes the criticism and removes the specific moral judgment applied to Richard. The passage singles him out precisely because his behavior exceeded the typical ruthlessness of his contemporaries.
Option E – “Richard supported Henry VI against his own brother.” This is historically inaccurate; Richard usurped the throne from his brother Edward IV and was not a supporter of Henry VI’s claim. Hence it does not align with the textual justification.
Conclusion The author’s description of Richard as a “monster” is rooted in his flagrant violation of honor and familial obligations, making Option B the most precise and text-supported answer.


Reference:

Britannica. “Richard III.” Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-III Bryson, Bill. The Shakespeare Book: Big Ideas Simply Explained. DK, 2016. (Chapter on Richard III) https://books.google.com/books?id=K6c9DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA45#v=onepage&q&f=false



For the last hour I have been watching President Lincoln and General McClellan as they sat together in earnest conversation on the deck of a steamer closer to us. I am thankful, I am happy, that the President has come `" has sprung across the dreadful intervening Washington, and come to see and hear and judge for his own wise and noble self.
While we were at dinner someone said, `Why, there's the President!` and he proved to be just arriving on the Ariel, at the end of the wharf. I stationed myself at once to watch for the coming of McClellan. The President stood on deck with a glass, with which, after a time, he inspected our boat, waving his handkerchief to us. My eyes and soul were in the direction of the general headquarters, over which the great balloon was slowly descending.
What does the author mean by `the dreadful intervening Washington`?

  1. Politics are always interfering with the war.
  2. Lincoln's office stands in the way of his leadership.
  3. Lincoln has crossed Washington to come to the narrator's home.
  4. The fame of the previous president keeps Lincoln in the shadows.
  5. Washington is mediating between the North and South.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification
The phrase “the dreadful intervening Washington” refers to the physical and symbolic barrier that the capital (Washington) represented between the narrator’s location and the President’s arrival. In the passage the narrator notes that the President has “sprung across … Washington” to reach the narrator’s home, implying that crossing the capital was a notable, even burdensome, act.
Option C – “Lincoln has crossed Washington to come to the narrator's home.” – directly captures this meaning: the President literally traveled past or through Washington to get to the narrator. Option A – “Politics are always interfering with the war.” – introduces a political-war theme that is not expressed in the quoted phrase. Option B – “Lincoln's office stands in the way of his leadership.” – suggests an institutional obstruction, which the text does not describe. Option D – “The fame of the previous president keeps Lincoln in the shadows.” – misinterprets the phrase as a metaphor for reputation, which is unrelated. Option E – “Washington is mediating between the North and South.” – adds a diplomatic role that the passage never mentions.
Therefore, C is the only answer that aligns with the literal sense of “crossing … Washington” as used by the author.


Reference:

Library of Congress – The Civil War Diary of a Union Soldier (digital copy). https://www.loc.gov/item/2004672749/ National Archives – American Memory: Civil War Letters and Diaries. https://www.archives.gov/research/military/civil-war/letters-diaries.html



For the last hour I have been watching President Lincoln and General McClellan as they sat together in earnest conversation on the deck of a steamer closer to us. I am thankful, I am happy, that the President has come `" has sprung across the dreadful intervening Washington, and come to see and hear and judge for his own wise and noble self.
While we were at dinner someone said, `Why, there's the President!` and he proved to be just arriving on the Ariel, at the end of the wharf. I stationed myself at once to watch for the coming of McClellan. The President stood on deck with a glass, with which, after a time, he inspected our boat, waving his handkerchief to us. My eyes and soul were in the direction of the general headquarters, over which the great balloon was slowly descending. How does the author feel toward Lincoln?

  1. She admires him and trusts his judgment.
  2. She dislikes him and suspects his motives.
  3. She regrets his arrival.
  4. She finds him undistinguished in person.
  5. She has no opinion.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Justification
The narrator repeatedly emphasizes Lincoln’s “wise and noble self,” “sprung across the dreadful intervening Washington,” and the “great balloon” descending over headquarters, all of which convey reverence and confidence in his leadership. Phrases such as “I am thankful, I am happy” and the attentive observation of Lincoln’s actions (inspecting the boat with a glass, waving his handkerchief) reflect a positive, admiring attitude rather than suspicion, regret, or indifference. Option A (“She admires him and trusts his judgment”) directly matches this tone of admiration and trust. B is contradicted by the lack of any negative language; there is no indication of dislike or suspicion. C is unsupported because the narrator expresses happiness, not regret, about Lincoln’s arrival. D is inaccurate; the description highlights Lincoln’s dignified presence and the narrator’s focus on his “wise and noble” qualities, not an assessment of his physical distinction. E is false because the narrator’s feelings are clearly expressed through enthusiastic and reverent language.


Reference:

SparkNotes: The Civil War Era – Lincoln and McClellan – https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/antebellum-eras/lincoln-mcclellan/ LitCharts: The Civil War – Lincoln’s Leadership – https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-civil-war/lincoln/



Viewing page 9 of 117
Viewing questions 65 - 72 out of 924 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!