Free CIPT Exam Braindumps (page: 23)

Page 22 of 54

SCENARIO

WebTracker Limited is a cloud-based online marketing service located in London. Last year, WebTracker migrated its IT infrastructure to the cloud provider AmaZure, which provides SQL Databases and Artificial Intelligence services to WebTracker. The roles and responsibilities between the two companies have been formalized in a standard contract, which includes allocating the role of data controller to WebTracker.

The CEO of WebTracker, Mr. Bond, would like to assess the effectiveness of AmaZure's privacy controls, and he recently decided to hire you as an independent auditor. The scope of the engagement is limited only to the marketing services provided by WebTracker, you will not be evaluating any internal data processing activity, such as HR or Payroll.

This ad-hoc audit was triggered due to a future partnership between WebTracker and SmartHome -- a partnership that will not require any data sharing. SmartHome is based in the USA, and most recently has dedicated substantial resources to developing smart refrigerators that can suggest the recommended daily calorie intake based on DNA information. This and other personal data is collected by WebTracker.

To get an idea of the scope of work involved, you have decided to start reviewing the company's documentation and interviewing key staff to understand potential privacy risks.

The results of this initial work include the following notes:

There are several typos in the current privacy notice of WebTracker, and you were not able to find the privacy notice for SmartHome.
You were unable to identify all the sub-processors working for SmartHome. No subcontractor is indicated in the cloud agreement with AmaZure, which is responsible for the support and maintenance of the cloud infrastructure.
There are data flows representing personal data being collected from the internal employees of WebTracker, including an interface from the HR system. Part of the DNA data collected by WebTracker was from employees, as this was a prototype approved by the CEO of WebTracker.
All the WebTracker and SmartHome customers are based in USA and Canada.

Which of the following issues is most likely to require an investigation by the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) of WebTracker?

  1. Data flows use encryption for data at rest, as defined by the IT manager.
  2. AmaZure sends newsletter to WebTracker customers, as approved by the Marketing Manager.
  3. Employees' personal data are being stored in a cloud HR system, as approved by the HR Manager.
  4. File Integrity Monitoring is being deployed in SQL servers, as indicated by the IT Architect Manager.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Sending marketing communications such as newsletters to customers involves processing their personal data. It is important for WebTracker's CPO to investigate whether this processing is being done in compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations. This may include verifying that customers have given their consent to receive these communications or that another lawful basis for processing their personal data exists.



SCENARIO
Tom looked forward to starting his new position with a U.S --based automobile leasing company (New Company), now operating in 32 states. New Company was recently formed through the merger of two prominent players, one from the eastern region (East Company) and one from the western region (West Company). Tom, a Certified Information Privacy Technologist (CIPT), is New Company's first Information Privacy and Security Officer. He met today with Dick from East Company, and Harry, from West Company. Dick and Harry are veteran senior information privacy and security professionals at their respective companies, and continue to lead the east and west divisions of New

Company. The purpose of the meeting was to conduct a SWOT (strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats) analysis for New Company. Their SWOT analysis conclusions are summarized below.

Dick was enthusiastic about an opportunity for the New Company to reduce costs and increase computing power and flexibility through cloud services. East Company had been contemplating moving to the cloud, but West Company already had a vendor that was providing it with software-as- a-service (SaaS). Dick was looking forward to extending this service to the eastern region. Harry noted that this was a threat as well, because West Company had to rely on the third party to protect its data.

Tom mentioned that neither of the legacy companies had sufficient data storage space to meet the projected growth of New Company, which he saw as a weakness. Tom stated that one of the team's first projects would be to construct a consolidated New Company data warehouse. Tom would personally lead this project and would be held accountable if information was modified during transmission to or during storage in the new data warehouse.

Tom, Dick and Harry agreed that employee network access could be considered both a strength and a weakness. East Company and West Company had strong performance records in this regard; both had robust network access controls that were working as designed. However, during a projected year-long transition period, New Company employees would need to be able to connect to a New Company network while retaining access to the East Company and West Company networks.

Which statement is correct about addressing New Company stakeholders' expectations for privacy?

  1. New Company should expect consumers to read the company's privacy policy.
  2. New Company should manage stakeholder expectations for privacy even when the stakeholders` data is not held by New Company.
  3. New Company would best meet consumer expectations for privacy by adhering to legal requirements.
  4. New Company's commitment to stakeholders ends when the stakeholders' data leaves New Company.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Adhering to legal requirements for data protection and privacy is an important way for New Company to meet its stakeholders' expectations for privacy. This includes complying with applicable data protection laws and regulations and implementing appropriate measures to protect personal data.



SCENARIO

Tom looked forward to starting his new position with a U.S --based automobile leasing company (New Company), now operating in 32 states. New Company was recently formed through the merger of two prominent players, one from the eastern region (East Company) and one from the western region (West Company). Tom, a Certified Information Privacy Technologist (CIPT), is New Company's first Information Privacy and Security Officer. He met today with Dick from East Company, and Harry, from West Company. Dick and Harry are veteran senior information privacy and security professionals at their respective companies, and continue to lead the east and west divisions of New Company. The purpose of the meeting was to conduct a SWOT (strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats) analysis for New Company. Their SWOT analysis conclusions are summarized below.

Dick was enthusiastic about an opportunity for the New Company to reduce costs and increase computing power and flexibility through cloud services. East Company had been contemplating moving to the cloud, but West Company already had a vendor that was providing it with software-as-

a-service (SaaS). Dick was looking forward to extending this service to the eastern region. Harry noted that this was a threat as well, because West Company had to rely on the third party to protect its data.

Tom mentioned that neither of the legacy companies had sufficient data storage space to meet the projected growth of New Company, which he saw as a weakness. Tom stated that one of the team's first projects would be to construct a consolidated New Company data warehouse. Tom would personally lead this project and would be held accountable if information was modified during transmission to or during storage in the new data warehouse.

Tom, Dick and Harry agreed that employee network access could be considered both a strength and a weakness. East Company and West Company had strong performance records in this regard; both had robust network access controls that were working as designed. However, during a projected year-long transition period, New Company employees would need to be able to connect to a New Company network while retaining access to the East Company and West Company networks.

When employees are working remotely, they usually connect to a Wi-Fi network.
What should Harry advise for maintaining company security in this situation?

  1. Hiding wireless service set identifiers (SSID).
  2. Retaining the password assigned by the network.
  3. Employing Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) encryption.
  4. Using tokens sent through HTTP sites to verify user identity.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Instead, Harry should advise employees to use strong passwords or other forms of secure authentication such as multi-factor authentication when connecting to Wi-Fi networks. He should also advise them to use secure methods of encryption such as WPA2 or WPA3 when transmitting sensitive company data over Wi-Fi.



SCENARIO

Looking back at your first two years as the Director of Personal Information Protection and Compliance for the Berry Country Regional Medical Center in Thorn Bay, Ontario, Canada, you see a parade of accomplishments, from developing state-of-the-art simulation based training for employees on privacy protection to establishing an interactive medical records system that is accessible by patients as well as by the medical personnel. Now, however, a question you have put off looms large: how do we manage all the data-not only records produced recently, but those still on hand from years ago? A data flow diagram generated last year shows multiple servers, databases, and work stations, many of which hold files that have not yet been incorporated into the new records system.
While most of this data is encrypted, its persistence may pose security and compliance concerns. The situation is further complicated by several long-term studies being conducted by the medical staff using patient information. Having recently reviewed the major Canadian privacy regulations, you want to make certain that the medical center is observing them.

You also recall a recent visit to the Records Storage Section, often termed "The Dungeon" in the basement of the old hospital next to the modern facility, where you noticed a multitude of paper records. Some of these were in crates marked by years, medical condition or alphabetically by patient name, while others were in undifferentiated bundles on shelves and on the floor. The back shelves of the section housed data tapes and old hard drives that were often unlabeled but appeared to be years old. On your way out of the dungeon, you noticed just ahead of you a small man in a lab coat who you did not recognize. He carried a batch of folders under his arm, apparently records he had removed from storage.

Which regulation most likely applies to the data stored by Berry Country Regional Medical Center?

  1. Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
  2. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
  3. The Health Records Act 2001
  4. The European Union Directive 95/46/EC

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Berry Country Regional Medical Center is located in Ontario, Canada. PIPEDA is a Canadian federal law that sets out rules for how private sector organizations must handle personal information in the course of commercial activities. Since Berry Country Regional Medical Center is a private sector organization that handles personal information in the course of its commercial activities, it would be subject to PIPEDA.






Post your Comments and Discuss IAPP CIPT exam with other Community members:

CIPT Discussions & Posts