Free ISEB-SWT2 Exam Braindumps
ISTQB-ISEB Certified Tester Foundation Level Questions 154–158 (page: 21)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026
View Related Case Study

For which of the following activities in the fundamental test process would an incident management tool be most useful?

  1. Test planning and control
  2. Test analysis and design
  3. Test implementation and execution
  4. Evaluating exit criteria and reporting

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Incident management tools are most useful during test implementation and execution as this is the stage at which the tool is used to raise, manage, retest and close incidents. The data collected during the defect life cycle can then be manipulated into information that is useful for other activities within the fundamental test process. Information on numbers of defects outstanding may be useful for evaluating exit criteria (option (D)). This information could also be used for planning future testing and for taking control (option (A)). Incident management tools can also assist in test analysis and design (option (B)) as information about defects found when testing the previous release of the system could be used when analyzing the type of testing required for the next enhancement.



View Related Case Study

Which of the following defects is most likely to be found by a test harness?

  1. Variance from programming standards.
  2. A defect in middleware.
  3. Memory leaks.
  4. Regression defects.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Variance from programming standards defects (option (A)) are found during the review or static testing process. Therefore a test harness is unlikely to find a defect in programming standards. Memory leak defects (option (C)) could potentially be found by a test harness designed to run many test cases.
Regression defects (option (D)) could be found using many types of test tool. Defects in middleware (option (B)) are generally more likely to be found by a test harness or a dynamic analysis tool than by any other type of tool.



View Related Case Study

A test management tool is most likely to integrate with which of the following tools?

  1. Performance testing tool
  2. Test data preparation tool
  3. Static analysis tool
  4. Requirements management tool

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Requirements management tools (option (D)) often have interfaces with test management tools. In some cases they will be sold as a package or in other cases a test management tool may have its own requirements module. The use of such interfaces or integrated packages aids traceability from requirements through to test scripts and defects.
Performance management tools (option (A)), test data preparation tools (option (B)) and static analysis tools (option (C)) are unlikely to have an interface or be integrated with a test management tool. They serve different purposes and therefore there is little need for such interfaces.



View Related Case Study

Which of the following are aids to good communication, and which hinder it?

i). Try to understand how the other person feels.
ii). Communicate personal feelings, concentrating upon individuals.
iii). Confirm the other person has understood what you have said and vice versa.
iv). Emphasize the common goal of better quality.

  1. Each discussion is a battle to be won.
  2. (i), (ii) and (iii) aid, (iv) and (v) hinder.
  3. (iii), (iv) and (v) aid, (i) and (ii) hinder.
  4. (i), (iii) and (iv) aid, (ii) and (v) hinder.
  5. (ii), (iii) and (iv) aid, (i) and (v) hinder.

Answer(s): C



View Related Case Study

Which pair of definitions is correct?

  1. Regression testing is checking that the reported defect has been fixed; retesting is testing that there are no additional problems in previously tested software.
  2. Regression testing is checking there are no additional problems in previously tested software; retesting enables developers to isolate the problem.
  3. Regression testing involves running all tests that have been run before; retesting runs new tests.
  4. Regression testing is checking that there are no additional problems in previously tested software, retesting is demonstrating that the reported defect has been fixed.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Regression testing is testing that nothing has regressed. Retesting (or confirmation testing) confirms the fix is correct by running the same test after the fix has been made. No other option has both of these as true.



Viewing page 21 of 69
Viewing questions 101 - 105 out of 338 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ITIL ISEB-SWT2 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!