Nutanix NCP-BC Exam Prep
Nutanix Certified Professional - Business Continuity v7.5 (Page 7 )

Updated On: 27-Aug-2026

The Disaster Recovery dashboard in Prism Central shows that the protection domain is out of sync and new recovery points are no longer being created at the recovery site. No recent changes were made to the protection policy configuration or RPO settings.
During initial troubleshooting, an administrator has observed the following:
Production VMs are running normally at the primary site.
The recovery cluster is reachable from Prism Central.
No storage capacity alerts are seen on either cluster.
A recent network change was implemented to enable network segmentation between clusters.
New firewall rules were introduced recently as part of a security hardening effort.
Which action should the administrator take first when evaluating this issue?

  1. Delete and recreate the protection policy immediately.
  2. Verify if network segmentation was enabled while replication was running.
  3. Manually trigger a failover to re-establish replication.
  4. Increase the RPO frequency setting in order to generate additional recovery points.

Answer(s): B



An administrator needs to provide the QA team with a VM state from four days ago to test an older browser version. However, the current production VM contains new application code and security patches that must not be deleted or overwritten.
Which restore operation should the administrator perform to meet this requirement?

  1. Disk-level Attach from Snapshot
  2. Self-Service Restore (SSR)
  3. In-place Restore (Revert)
  4. Out-of-place Restore (Clone)

Answer(s): B



An organization uses Nutanix Disaster Recovery with automatic virtual network creation in the Nutanix Cloud AZ.
After a successful failback operation from the Nutanix Cloud AZ to the on-premises site, what is the expected behavior regarding the dynamically created virtual networks at the recovery site?

  1. Converted into production networks for use in the future
  2. Automatically cleaned up when no longer required
  3. Must be manually deleted by the administrator
  4. Remain active until the billing cycle ends

Answer(s): B



An administrator is testing the failover scenarios from a source availability zone (AZ1) to a destination availability zone (AZ2).
The administrator successfully performs an unplanned failover from AZ1 to AZ2. The administrator then immediately tries to use the unplanned failover option to fail the VM back to AZ1, but does not see the VM listed under Recovery Plan.
What could be the cause?

  1. Recovery Plan is not bi-directional.
  2. Replication is not yet successful from AZ2 to AZ1.
  3. Clean up of Entities is needed to perform failback.
  4. Unplanned failover cannot be used to failback VMs.

Answer(s): C



An administrator has set up asynchronous replication between the Marseille and Paris clusters for the VMs in the FIN-PROD storage container. After a planned production failover from Paris to Marseille, the administrator noticed that the VMs were scattered across all the storage containers in the Marseille cluster.
Which statement is true regarding this scenario?

  1. The recovery plan did not contain a valid network mapping.
  2. The recovery plan did not contain a valid storage mapping.
  3. The FIN-PROD storage container does not exist on Marseille cluster.
  4. A storage policy is setup on the Paris cluster and missing on the Marseille cluster.

Answer(s): D



Viewing page 7 of 23
Viewing questions 31 - 35 out of 109 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Nutanix NCP-BC exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!