CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
HP
Dell
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
Certiport
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. APMG-International
  5. AgilePM-Practitioner

Free AgilePM-Practitioner Exam Braindumps (page: 7)

Page 6 of 35
PDF with 134 Questions
View Related Case Study

How should the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B initially be dealt with?

  1. The Solution Development Team should revise the Timebox Plans for Timeboxes B and C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should commence understanding and delivering the new requirement.
  3. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
  4. The Project Manager should escalate the issue to the Marketing Director, who is in the role of Business Visionary.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:
C: The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It's important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co- ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.
While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.



View Related Case Study

What should be done to allow the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to be changed into a Must Have priority and moved into Timebox B?

  1. The Project Manager should extend the timescale of Timebox B and shorten Timebox C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should change a Must Have requirement into a Should Have in the Prioritised Requirements List.
  3. The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
  4. The Project Manager should move a Must Have requirement from Timebox B into Timebox C.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

C: The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
Rationale:
In Agile Project Management, priorities are often reassessed and reprioritized based on new information or changes in the project's context. The need for a secondary exit due to compliance with fire safety regulations would necessitate such a reassessment. The Business Visionary and Business Sponsor, who provide the vision and funding for the project, together with the Solution Development Team, who are responsible for implementing solutions, should collaboratively review the Prioritised Requirements List to reflect this new priority. This change must be agreed upon by these key stakeholders to ensure that it aligns with the business needs and project goals.



View Related Case Study

Who is responsible for approving that the change in priority of the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building accurately reflects the scope of the project in the Prioritised Requirements List?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Project Manager and Solution Development Team.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The Senior Management Team, which includes the roles of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors, and the Chief Executive, is typically responsible for steering the project and making decisions that reflect the overall scope and objectives of the project. They would be the appropriate body to approve changes in the project scope as represented in the Prioritised Requirements List, especially for a requirement that has legal and safety implications, such as a secondary fire exit. This team would ensure that such a change aligns with the strategic goals and compliance requirements of the project.



View Related Case Study

Once the change of priority has been approved, who is then responsible for including the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to the Timebox Plan for Timebox B?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Team Leader.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): B






Post your Comments and Discuss APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner exam with other Community members:

AgilePM-Practitioner Discussions & Posts