A client is written that uses a REST API to interact with a server. Using HTTPS as the transport, an HTTP request is sent and received an HTTP response. The response contains the HTTP response status code: 503 Service Unavailable.

Which action is the appropriate response?

Add an Authorization header that supplies appropriate credentials and sends the updated request.
Resend the request using HTTP as the transport instead of HTTPS.
Add an Accept header that indicates the content types that the client understands and send the updated request.
Look for a Retry-After header in the response and resend the request after the amount of time indicated.

Answer(s): D

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 52

Refer to the exhibit. Two editors are concurrently updating an article’s headline from their mobile devices. What results from this scenario based on this REST API sequence?

The article is marked as “Conflicted”
The article headline is “Monday Headlines”
The article headline is “Today Headlines”
The article headline is “Top Headlines”

Answer(s): D

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 53

Refer to the exhibit. This snippet of a script has recently started exiting abnormally with an exception stating “Unexpected HTTP Response code: 429”.

Which solution handles rate limiting by the remote API?

Answer(s): D

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 54

An application uses OAuth to get access to several API resources on behalf of an end user.
What are two valid parameters to send to the authorization server as part of the first step of an authorization code grant flow? (Choose two.)

URI to which the authorization server will send the user-agent back when access is granted or denied
list of the API resources that the application is requesting to access
secret that was generated by the authorization server when the application registered as an OAuth integration
list of scopes that correspond to the API resources to which the application is requesting to access
name of the application under which the application registered as an OAuth integration

Answer(s): A,D

Show Answer Next Question

Download PDF Next Page

Viewing page 12 of 78
Viewing questions 56 - 60 out of 507 questions

Post your Comments and Discuss Cisco 350-901 exam prep with other Community members:

Comments:

Name:

350-901 Exam Discussions & Posts
350-901 AI Verifications

Alex on: March 02, 2025
Great material
UNITED KINGDOM

tcpdump_t on: May 18, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling for many weeks and resorting to dumps. The dumps were okay but the real exam questions were very hard.
Saudi Arabia

homelab_hero on: May 08, 2026
Finally done with this exam which was very hard. Thought the brain dumps would help more but real exam quetions caught me off guard.
Germany

linuxlover99 on: May 08, 2026
Failed two times and teh exam dumps finally made the difference. The AI Assistant was only helpful for very hard parts of this exam.
Egypt

finn_k8s on: June 19, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to spend ages grinding through countless exam dumps. Managed to pass only because of the real exam questions added in there.
Lebanon

elena_networks on: June 05, 2026
Passed it on teh second try thanks to the braindumps since this exam was very hard. Real exam questions had me stressed but the AI Assistant and dumps helped patch the gaps.
Pakistan

l4b_rat on: April 30, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind through countless exam dumps to finally pass. Real exam questions were very hard and needed more practice than expected.
Netherlands

hashbang_h on: June 20, 2026
The exam questions were very hard and didn't match my expectations even with the braindumps I studied. Finished yesterday and it felt like the real exam questions were from a different planet altogether.
Italy

4wscert on: March 30, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this challenging exam and resorted to brain dumps in the end. The real exam questions were tougher than I expected.
UAE

elodie_azure on: April 05, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and honestly I found it very hard even with the available dumps. The real exam questions still managed to trip me up despite spending hours reviewing the brain dumps.
India

graveyard_geek on: April 08, 2026
Spent weeks sifting through braindumps and scraped by this exam. The real exam questions were a lot harder than expected.
Chile

jakob_vmware on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks grinding through brain dumps to scrape a pass on this exam. It was very hard and the stress was real but real exam questions helped a bit.
Israel

PanicStudy_Mode on: March 27, 2026
The exam dumps were a real help but this exam was still very hard. Managed a pass using real exam questions and the AI Assistant.
Singapore

nerd_by_day on: May 23, 2026
Got through this exam by the skin of my teeth after two attempts using brain dumps like everyone else probably does becuase it's just that challenging. The AI Assistant materials were useful but those real exam questions were the real lifesaver.
United Kingdom

cert_or_cry on: May 11, 2026
Spent weeks going over brain dumps and real exam questions for this very hard exam. Finally passed after a tough second try.
Ghana

late_night_labs_l on: June 22, 2026
Real exam questions caught me off guard as this exam was very hard even with the braindumps.
Portugal

FourthTimesFine on: April 26, 2026
Finally cleared this challenging exam and the exam dumps were a real help. The AI Assistant kept me on track when it felt very hard.
Ireland

SleepDeprivedPass on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks going over the exam dumps and real exam questions but this exam was very hard. The AI Assistant helped a bit yet it still took two attempts to pass.
Taiwan

bgp_believer on: June 24, 2026
The exam was very hard and the real exam questions caught me off guard despite using braindumps. The AI Assistant tried to help but I struggled through every minute of it.
Austria

haruto_devops on: May 12, 2026
The exam was very hard but the braindumps helped me get throgh it. Without the exam dumps I'd still be prepping.
Ireland

t1_support_guy on: May 22, 2026
Spent weeks on the exam dumps but it was still a very hard exam. Just cleared the exam because the real exam questions were tricky and stressful.
Nigeria

zeroDaysLeft on: March 30, 2026
Three weeks of grinding through exam dumps left me exhausted but I finally got through this exam on the second try. I underestimated how very hard it was and the real exam questions were nothing like I expected.
France

CyberArk_C on: May 30, 2026
Underestimated this exam and spent nights grinding throgh braindumps and exam dumps to pass. Very hard and challenging questions made me question my sanity.
Jordan

commute_studier on: March 22, 2026
Finally done with this exam and relied on exam dumps as a last resort due to its very hard nature. The challenging exam stressed me out even with some real exam questions thrown into the mix.
Turkey

dmitri_linuxpro on: April 03, 2026
Fought through a challenging exam using brain dumps and the AI Assistant as my last resort. This test was very hard and I'm just relieved to be done.
Argentina

YoutubeAndPray on: June 12, 2026
This exam was very hard and I wouldn't have made it without some exam dumps. Real exam questions were a lifesaver even though I'm exhausted.
Ghana

git_push_g on: March 31, 2026
Passed it after struggling through a challenging exam with brain dumps and real exam questions. Very hard even with the dumps.
Sweden

CertOrBust_2025 on: May 17, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind through countless braindumps to finally pass it on my second try. Real exam questions and teh AI Assistant were key but it was still a very hard challenge.
Lebanon

JustPassedBro on: June 05, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and honestly the braindumps were my last resort. The real exam questions were very hard and the stress was unreal.
Mexico

xCertx on: June 06, 2026
Spent weeks with brain dumps and finally scraped through this exam. The real exam questions were very hard even with the AI Assistant helping.
Brazil

miguel molina on: July 03, 2026
Upload this exam please!
Tampa, United States

sophie_devops on: May 17, 2026
Underestimated this exam and spent weeks going through brain dumps in overtime. The real exam questions felt very hard compared to what I expected.
Canada

SARMA on: June 22, 2026
By oversight, My admin certification expired. So I am trying to appear again. This guide is helping me a Lot.
Edison, United States

jason_helpdesk on: June 21, 2026
Thought I might not pass the exam but the AI Assistant adn braindumps helped me scrape through. Real exam questions were very hard this time around.
Ireland

StudyGrind99 on: May 19, 2026
Spent weeks going through brain dumps adn the AI Assistant just to get a handle on this exam. It was very hard and the real exam questions were nothing like I'd seen before.
Thailand

graveyard_geek on: June 08, 2026
The challenging exam felt impossible until I used braindumps and the AI Assistant. Passed it but not without stress and doubt.
Lebanon

weekend_warrior_w on: March 26, 2026
Just cleared this challenging exam using brain dumps adn the AI Assistant. Spent many hours stressed and relieved to barely pass.
Belgium

Shorya on: July 01, 2026
free study material
Mumbai, India

LastMinuteLearner on: June 03, 2026
Passed it using brain dumps but it was a very hard adn stressful experience. The exam questions in the dumps helped but I was still uncertain the whole time.
Spain

kenji_netops on: May 11, 2026
Barely passsed this exam and those brain dumps were the only way through. Real exam questions showed just how very hard it was compared to my expectations.
Finland

rachel_ops on: May 05, 2026
Spent weeks on exm dumps and just managed to pass this very hard exam. The braindumps helped but the stress was real.
India

ines_cloudsec on: May 12, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam but the braindumps and AI Assistant were helpful. Real exam quetions were very hard and I was not sure I would pass.
Australia

GrindNeverStops on: May 22, 2026
Finished yesterday and this exam was very hard. Exam dumps definitely helped even though the stress was real.
Norway

WhyCertify_lol on: May 16, 2026
Real exam questions caught me off guard and it took all my energy to get through this exam. The exam dumps helped but it was still very hard to pass.
Kenya

mx_record_m on: June 05, 2026
Took two attempts at this exam thinking it would be easy but it was very hard. Ended up grinding throgh the dumps and real exam questions just to make it.
United States

chris_infosec on: June 27, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling through challenging material and brain dumps. Those real exam questions seem endless sometimes.
Portugal

ExamSurvivor_T on: May 09, 2026
Underestimated how very hard this exam was and had to rely on braindumps to grind through. passsed it thanks to the exam dumps plus the AI Assistant but it was a close call.
United States

jason_helpdesk on: May 29, 2026
Barely scraped through this exam using brain dumps and some real exam questions but it was still very hard. Can't believe how stressful and challenging the entire ordeal was.
Turkey

api_ace_a on: May 23, 2026
Barely passsed this exam after relying heavily on brain dumps and real exam questions. It was very hard and stressful to fit study time around work.
UAE

d3bug_dan on: April 22, 2026
Passed it using some brain dumps because this exam was very hard. The AI Assistant didn't cover everything.
Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by User6170 on: June 15, 2026
Question 6:
Resumo sobre a Questão 6 (em PT-BR)

Resposta correta: opção C — Implementar uma política de acesso baseada no princípio de necessidade (“need-to-know”) / menor privilégio.

Por que essa é a melhor escolha:

Salvaguardas administrativas tratam de controles de acesso e políticas que limitam quem pode ver ou trabalhar com os dados enquanto estão em uso.

Aplicar o princípio do menor privilégio reduz o risco de exposições acidentais ou uso indevido, limitando o acesso apenas aos membros da equipe que realmente precisam dos dados para desempenhar suas funções.

Esse tipo de controle facilita auditoria, revisões de acesso e conformidade com requisitos de privacidade.

Por que as outras opções não são tão diretas para esse item específico:

Documentar os fluxos de dados: importante para governança, mas não é um controle administrativo direto de acesso em uso.

Realizar uma PIA: útil para avaliar riscos, não é um controle de acesso em uso.

Limitar transferências para os EUA mantendo dados na Europa: questão de localização de dados/regulação de transferências, não é um salvaguarda administrativa voltada ao acesso interno.

Sugestões rápidas de prática:

Defina papéis e privilégios claros, com revisões periódicas de acesso.

Implemente autenticação multifator e logs de acesso.

Assegure separação de funções entre equipes de desenvolvimento, produto e privacidade.

Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User8952 on: June 27, 2026
Question 17:
Answer: A – Anomaly Detector

Why: The goal is to identify unusual values in time-series data (IoT readings) to predict failures. Anomaly Detector is a Azure Cognitive Service specifically designed to detect anomalies in time-series data, making it the right choice.

Why not the others:

- Cognitive Search is for indexing and searching content, not detecting anomalies in time series. - Form Recognizer extracts data from forms. - Custom Vision is for image-based tasks.

How to approach at scale: Treat each sensor stream as its own time series (you have 5,000 series). Feed each series to Anomaly Detector to flag deviations that may indicate impending maintenance needs.

Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 253:
Correct answer: D — AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK).
Explanation:

The requirement is to provision and manage AWS infrastructure using common programming languages (TypeScript, Python, Java, .NET).

The AWS CDK lets you define cloud infrastructure in code using those languages, then synthesizes to CloudFormation templates for deployment.

Other options:

- AWS CodeBuild is a CI/CD build service, not infrastructure provisioning. - AWS CloudFormation uses JSON/YAML templates, not native programming languages. - AWS CLI is a command-line tool for manual or scripted actions, not an IaC framework.
Key takeaway:

Use AWS CDK when you want to express infrastructure as code in familiar languages; CloudFormation remains the underlying deployment model, but CDK provides a higher-level, language-based approach.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5343 on: June 16, 2026
Question 12:
I can’t view the exhibit image for Question 12, but I can explain what this type of Power Query data-profiling question is asking and how to interpret the metrics.

What you’re seeing: In Power Query Editor’s Column distribution, two key stats are shown for a column (State):

- Distinct values: the total number of different values present in the column. - Unique values: how many of those values appear only once in the column.

How to read it (the general idea):

- If Distinct values = 69 and Unique values = 69, every value in State occurs exactly once (no duplicates). - If Distinct values = 69 and Unique values = 4, that means 4 values appear only once, while the remaining 65 distinct values appear multiple times (duplicates exist).

Box 2 value (shown as 4 in the key): In this context, it’s typically the count of values that occur exactly once (or, depending on the graphic, the most frequent value’s frequency). The exact meaning depends on what the hotspot graphic labels as “Box 2.” The safest interpretation—given common profiling visuals—is that 4 values occur only once.

Why this matters: It helps you assess data quality and whether you need to deduplicate, or if the column already has many duplicates.

If you can share a screenshot or describe the exact labels in Box 1 and Box 2, I can map them precisely to the statements in the hotspot.
Sydney, Australia

AI Explanation - verified by User7827 on: July 03, 2026
kannst du mir bitte ausführlicher erkläeren bitte
Gern! Hier eine ausführlichere Erklärung zu Frage 35.

Richtige Antwort: A) Streaming einer GUI zu Thin Clients von einem Server

Warum: VDI steht für Virtual Desktop Infrastructure. Dabei werden Desktop-Umgebungen zentral auf einem Server gehostet und die Benutzeroberfläche über das Netzwerk an Thin Clients geliefert. Das trifft genau die Beschreibung in Option A.

Warum die anderen Antworten nicht VDI sind:

- B) Provisioning einer Sandbox als Testumgebung — isolierte Testumgebung, nicht zentral gestreamte Desktop-Oberfläche. - C) Bereitstellung leistungsstarker Workstations mit lokalem OS — OS läuft lokal am Client, nicht zentral. - D) Starten eines VM-Servers auf einem Hypervisor — allgemein Virtualisierung, aber kein zentral gestreamtes Desktop-Interface.

Weiterführende Details:

- Komponenten: Hypervisor (Host), VDI-Broker (Verbindungs-Manager), VM-Pools, Speichersysteme, Display-Protokolle (z. B. RDP/HDX/PCoIP). - Vorteile: einfache zentrale Verwaltung, bessere Sicherheit, vereinfachtes Patchen/Backups, mobile Remote-Arbeit. - Nachteile: höhere Anfangskosten, Netzwerkabhängigkeit, potenzielle Latenzprobleme.

Kurzbeispiel: Firma setzt VDI ein, um Mitarbeitern von zuhause aus denselben Desktop bereitzustellen, ohne Daten auf Endgeräte zu übertragen.

Exam-Tipp: Achte auf Begriffe wie „zentralisierte Desktops“, „Streaming der UI“, „Thin Client“.

Berlin, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by User7034 on: July 01, 2026
Question 15:
Question 15 asks which three standard objects are available out-of-the-box for a service/support use case. Among the options, the standard objects are:

Case: the primary object for tracking support requests.

Account: represents the customer organization and relates to Case.

Contract: stores service agreements/entitlements and is a standard object.

The options Ticket and Request are not standard Salesforce objects (they would be custom objects or just terminology for Case). So the correct choices are A, B, and E. Note: In a real setup you’d also use Contact as a standard object, but it isn’t listed here.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by pewy26 on: July 05, 2026
the question is to pick afrom the list: .... is used to identify, hold, and export electronic information that might be used in an investigation. The answer according to the site is costumer lockbox, but i incline more towards ediscovery
The correct choice is eDiscovery.
Why:

eDiscovery is the process used to identify, hold (preserve), and export electronically stored information (ESI) that might be used in legal investigations.

It encompasses search, preservation (holds like In-Place Hold or Litigation Hold), and export of results for review or production.

Customer Lockbox is different: it governs customer approval for Microsoft engineers to access your data during a support incident, not for legal holds or exporting information for investigations.
So the statement about identifying, holding, and exporting ESI aligns with eDiscovery, not Customer Lockbox. If you’d like, I can explain eDiscovery features (Content Search, Holds, Exports) in more detail.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

AI Explanation - verified by User9543 on: June 19, 2026
Question 143:
Question 143 focuses on a 24/7 processing environment where several privileged application accounts have passwords set to “never expire.” The page lists the answer as C, but here’s a focused explanation and a recommended interpretation.

Stated answer on this page: C (Modify the access management policy to make allowances for application accounts).

My assessment: B (Introduce database access monitoring into the environment) is the best option for minimal disruption.

Why B over C, and why the others are less suitable:

A (Schedule downtime): Not acceptable in a 24/7 environment due to operational impact.

C (Modify the policy to make allowances for app accounts): Increases risk by tolerating long-lived privileged credentials and weaker controls; it does not reduce risk or improve detection.

D (Modify applications to remove direct DB access): Could be very disruptive and costly; not always feasible and may introduce new risk.

B (Monitoring): Adds detection and response capabilities with minimal business disruption. It helps identify misuse of privileged accounts, enables timely alerts, and supports compliance. It’s a practical, non-disruptive step that can be complemented later by stronger controls (e.g., privileged access management, password vaulting, just-in-time access).

Practical next steps you could consider (concepts aligned with ISACA objectives):

Enable comprehensive logging and monitoring for privileged DB accounts.

Integrate logs with a SIEM for real-time alerts on anomalous activity.

Plan for privileged access management (PAM) and timed/password rotation in a controlled, auditable way.

If you want, I can map these options to specific ISACA objectives and controls to
Kyiv, Ukraine

AI Explanation - verified by User7592 on: June 17, 2026
Question 2:
Correct answer: Read-only geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS).
Explanation:

Data must be stored on multiple nodes: both GRS and RA-GRS replicate to multiple nodes in the primary region.

Data must be in separate geographic locations: RA-GRS replicates to a secondary region, meeting cross-region durability.

Data can be read from the secondary location as well as the primary: RA-GRS enables read access to the data in the secondary region (this is the key feature that differentiates RA-GRS from standard GRS).

Notes:

RA-GRS is an opt-in feature and requires the storage account to be geo-replicated.

Other options:

- Geo-redundant storage (GRS) replicates cross-region but does not provide read access to the secondary by default. - Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) stays within a single region across zones. - Locally redundant storage (LRS) stays in a single location.
Mumbai, India

AI Explanation - verified by maheshmilan100 on: June 16, 2026
Question 29:
Question 29: Answer: B

Why B is correct: Chat history provides context to Copilot, helping it generate more relevant and accurate code suggestions based on prior interactions and conversations.

Why the other options are incorrect:

- A: It claims chat history is trained in real-time, which is not how Copilot’s training is described. - C: Chat history isn’t meant to be stored/shared with other users for collaboration. - D: It is not irrelevant; chat history does affect suggestion relevance.
Reference: GitHub Copilot Chat history documentation.
Bhubaneswar, India

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 252:
Correct answer: AWS Managed Services (AMS).
Explanation:

The question asks for a service/framework to provide operational support at scale, making workloads run more efficiently and securely.

AWS Managed Services (AMS) is a managed service that handles day-to-day operations, monitoring, incident response, provisioning, security/compliance, and ongoing optimization for AWS environments.

Other options:

- AWS Support provides help when issues arise but doesn’t manage operations at scale. - AWS Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) guides organizational adoption and governance, not ongoing operations. - AWS Well-Architected Framework offers architectural best practices and reviews, not operational execution.
Key takeaway:

For ongoing, scale-focused operational support, choose AMS. For planning, governance, or architecture reviews, consider CAF or Well-Architected respectively.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5090 on: June 12, 2026
So, DoD is a single source of reference for an agile project with multiple sprints?

Short answer: Yes — typically there is a single team-wide Definition of Done (DoD) that applies across multiple sprints.

What this means:

- The DoD serves as the reference standard for every increment produced by the team in any sprint. - It’s a living artifact: if the team updates the DoD in a retrospective, the new DoD applies to future increments (not retroactively to past work).

Nuance:

- If there are multiple teams or a program, there may be a shared DoD at the program level plus individual team DoDs. Alignment is key.

Important distinctions:

- DoD vs. Acceptance Criteria: DoD is the increment-level quality bar; Acceptance Criteria are story-level conditions that determine when a specific story is done.

Practical note:

- Keep the DoD visible, and revise it as practices or goals evolve.
Shah Alam, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by User5184 on: June 08, 2026
Question 33:

Answer: No (B)

Why: The goal is to reduce the impact on users after migrating resources to Azure and decommissioning the on-prem data center. Requiring Azure MFA adds an extra authentication step for users, which increases login friction and can slow them down. That does not reduce user disruption; it can actually worsen it.

How to approach properly instead:

- Use Azure AD Connect with Password Hash Synchronization and enable Azure AD Seamless SSO to provide a smooth sign-on experience. - Apply Conditional Access to require MFA only under certain conditions (e.g., from untrusted networks or high-risk sign-ins), reducing unnecessary friction. - Plan phased migration and user communication so changes are predictable, with training and support.

In short: MFA is important for security, but alone it doesn’t meet the goal of reducing user impact during/after migration. A combination of SSO and selective MFA (via Conditional Access) achieves lower friction while maintaining security. If you want, I can walk through how to configure these concepts.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 285:
Question 285 asks how to write an ACL that permits packets with an ACK in the TCP header.

Correct entry: access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 21 established

Why: The Cisco ACL keyword established matches TCP segments that belong to an already established connection, i.e., segments that have the ACK bit set. This is exactly the behavior you want for TCP ACK packets (after the initial SYN/handshake). The destination port 21 is shown, but the key factor is the established keyword.

Why other options are not right:

- A uses tcp-ack, which is not a standard, portable match in IOS ACLs and may be device-specific. - B/C differ only by ACL numbering; the essential concept is using established to match ACK-containing segments. - D uses ip and would not specifically target TCP ACKs.
Tip: If you want to permit all ACK-containing TCP segments regardless of port, you could use something like permit tcp any any established.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User4577 on: July 02, 2026
Question 12:

Answer: A (5)

Why: Each VM needs its own network interface. A single NIC can host both a private IP (in the subnet) and a public IP (via the NIC’s IP configuration), so you don’t need two NICs per VM. With five VMs, you’d use five NICs in total. The requirement for identical inbound/outbound rules can be satisfied by applying an NSG at the subnet or NIC level, but it doesn’t change the minimum NIC count.

Amsterdam, Netherlands

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 26, 2026
Question 38:
Question 38 is about migrating a campus from a traditional design to a programmable fabric (SD-Access style). The core idea is: to ease the move to a fabric, start with a simpler, more migration-friendly design at the access layer.
Key concepts:

Traditional campus: often a three-tier design (Access ? Distribution ? Core) with lots of routing at the access layer.

Programmable fabric design: relies on centralized policy, overlay networks, and fabric-enabled switches that join a single fabric.

Why two-tier Layer 2 helps migration:

A two-tier/Layer 2 access approach keeps host connectivity in a large L2 domain at the edge while the fabric overlay handles policy and segmentation. This makes it easier to introduce fabric components gradually without reworking every access switch.

It reduces early complexity from routing decisions at the access layer and aligns with the initial fabric deployment model, where the focus is on policy, segmentation, and centralized management.

Why three-tier routed access is less ideal for a gradual fabric migration:

It enforces more routing at the access layer and can complicate the integration of fabric overlays and centralized policies during the migration.

Note: The answer key on the page shows D, but based on SDA concepts, two-tier Layer 2 access (A) is typically the design that facilitates this migration. If you’re unsure, verify against Cisco SDA design guides to see which option they intend for your exam version.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User2969 on: June 08, 2026
Question 1:
For Question 1, the destination is 10.10.13.10/32. A /32 is a single host, so the route type used to reach that host is a host route (C).
Why:

A host route is a route to a single IP address (destination 10.10.13.10/32).

A network route would be something like 10.10.13.0/24, which covers a subnet—not just one host.

The default route (0.0.0.0/0) is used for destinations not in the routing table.

A floating static route is a static route with a higher administrative distance used as a backup, not the primary route to a specific host.

Note: The page shows Answer: B (network route), which is incorrect for a /32 host destination.
Sur, Oman

AI Explanation - verified by User7034 on: July 01, 2026
Question 2:

Correct answer: C. The flow is a before save flow.

Explanation:

- When a flow is configured as a record-triggered flow with the run type set to “Before Save,” Salesforce restricts the Flow Builder toolbox to a limited set of elements (e.g., Assignment, Decision, Get Records, Loop) because the flow runs before the record is saved and there’s no UI or post-save actions involved. - If it were a Screen Flow, you would see a Screen element in the toolbox. The status (inactive/active) doesn’t change the toolbox; it affects deployment/editability, not the available elements in a before-save flow. - So the limited toolbox indicates you’re editing a Before Save flow, not a screen flow or a different activation state.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by anagabrielabfg on: July 04, 2026
Question 126:
The correct answer is C: “As the parent company, it should have ensured its existing data access and storage procedures were integrated into PHT's system.”
Why this is correct:

The core issue was governance and oversight. PHT had no owner or formal data-handling procedures, so sensitive data wasn’t protected consistently.

By integrating Pacific Suites’ established data access and storage controls into PHT, the parent would have ensured standardized protections (access controls, retention, encryption where applicable, audits) across both entities.

Why the other options are less appropriate:

A (transferring personnel) addresses staffing but not the underlying policy and control gaps; it’s not a substitute for proper governance.

B (assessing infrastructure and complete network separation) is a strong security measure but doesn’t fix the absence of integrated data-protection procedures and ownership.

D (replacing electronic files with hard copies) is impractical and does not address electronic data protection needs.

Key concept: data governance and responsibility boundaries between parent and subsidiary, ensuring uniform protection across all data-handling processes. If you want, I can relate this to specific IAPP objectives.
Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User7686 on: June 17, 2026
Question 30:
Answer: A
Why:

The issue involves a P2S connection from Computer1 to access AppSvr2 in another VNet. Re-downloading and reinstalling the VPN client ensures the latest VPN profile/routes are applied for cross-VNet access.

The other options are not correct fixes for P2S cross-VNet reachability: routing via GatewaySubnet isn’t how P2S routes are configured, and service endpoints don’t establish inter-VNet VPN connectivity.

Melbourne, Australia

AI Explanation - verified by User7487 on: June 12, 2026
Question 36:

Answer: C. AWS IAM Access Analyzer

Why:

AWS IAM Access Analyzer analyzes your IAM and resource-based policies to find resources that can be accessed by external principals (outside your account).

It can identify if an S3 bucket or an IAM role is shared with external entities and surfaces findings so you can tighten access if needed.

The other options aren’t designed for this specific visibility:

- AWS Service Catalog: catalogs and provisions IT services. - AWS Systems Manager: manage and automate operational tasks. - AWS Organizations: governance across multiple AWS accounts.
Tip: If Access Analyzer finds external access, you can review and modify the policies to enforce least privilege.
New Delhi, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7588 on: June 10, 2026
Question 21:
Question 21 asks what you should change in the scanner to get the automated scans to work, given the header log.

What the log shows: requests with a common browser User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0) get 200 responses, while requests with UA like curl or python receive no response. This suggests the target is filtering or blocking non-browser clients.

Why the correct choice is D: Modify the scanner user agent. By making the scanner mimic a normal browser, you’re more likely to get consistent responses and avoid basic bot protections that block or ignore non-browser clients. This aligns with the observed pattern in the log (browser UA works; non-browser UA does not).

Why the other options are less appropriate here:

- Slow down the scan: may help with rate-limiting, but doesn’t solve UA-based blocking evident in the log. - Change the source IP with VPN: could help if there’s IP-based blocking, but the log indicates UA-based filtering rather than IP blocking. - Only using HTTP GET: would reduce coverage and not address the blocking issue seen with non-browser UAs.
In short, the server’s behavior points to user-agent-based blocking, so adjusting the scanner’s User-Agent to resemble a real browser is the proper fix.
Markkleeberg, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by User1205 on: June 11, 2026
Question 12:
Question 12 explanation:

Correct answer: Yes (A).

Why: Migrating VMs to Azure under a pay-as-you-go subscription uses an operational expenditure (OpEx) model. Pay-as-you-go is cloud-based billing (ongoing usage costs), not a one-time capital purchase.

Why not CapEx: CapEx would involve upfront hardware purchases or large capital investments. In Azure, you don’t own the hardware; you pay for use, which is OpEx.

Key concept: Cloud economics favor OpEx/pay-as-you-go for scalable, per-usage charges rather than upfront capital expenditure.

Thembisa, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by azadude on: June 26, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s the idea behind Question 1 and why each piece is placed as shown.

Goal: Allow remote access to the Windows PC (via RDP) and ensure the game console can use chat/extra services over the wireless network.

Wireless AP (LAN side) – LAN IP 192.168.10.1, Encryption: WPA2 PSK

- Provides a secure wireless network for the game console and any other devices.

Router (port-forward rule) – forward TCP port 3389 to the Windows PC

- This opens inbound RDP traffic from the Internet to the PC, enabling Remote Desktop. In practice you forward to the PC’s internal IP (not shown here) and ensure RDP is enabled on the PC.

Firewall (screened subnet side) – LAN IP 10.100.0.1

- Places a security boundary (screened subnet/DMZ) so exposed traffic is filtered before reaching the internal network.

Device placement

- PC: behind the router (where the port-forward rule points). - Game console: on the Wireless AP (so it can use chat/extra services over WPA2 PSK). - Firewall: in front of the screened subnet (10.100.0.1 facing that subnet).
Security note: exposing RDP to the Internet can be risky; consider VPN or RDP gateway, strong authentication, and IP restrictions.
Northampton, United Kingdom

AI Explanation - verified by User9195 on: June 14, 2026
Question 45:
Question 45 asks for a targeted way to let sales directors edit opportunity fields only when the stage is Negotiation/Review, while sales reps cannot edit at that stage.

Correct answer: C

Why the others are not suitable:

A: Workflow cannot grant or revoke field-level editing rights. It automates records, not permissions.

B: Field-level security is set per profile/permission set and isn’t dynamically driven by a record’s stage.

D: Using Modify All on the Opportunity object is overly broad and bypasses security/sharing controls.

Why C fits:

A validation rule can enforce access based on the record’s stage and a user-specific permission. Create a custom permission (e.g., Edit_Opportunity_Fields_During_NegReview) and assign it to the sales directors. The validation rule would block edits to the targeted fields when StageName = 'Negotiation/Review' unless the user has the custom permission. Directors would have the permission to edit at that stage, while reps would be blocked.

Implementation outline:

Create a Custom Permission (e.g., Edit_Opportunity_Fields_During_NegReview).

Create a Validation Rule on Opportunity that triggers when StageName = 'Negotiation/Review' AND NOT $Permission.Edit_Opportunity_Fields_During_NegReview.

Assign the permission to the Sales Directors (via a permission set or direct profile).

Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6792 on: June 16, 2026
Question 4:
Correct answer: B

Why Step Functions fits:

- AWS Step Functions orchestrates a sequence of steps (business rules/transformations) with built-in error handling and retries, and can reprocess failed items automatically. It scales with demand and requires minimal maintenance. - It can integrate with Lambda, Glue, and other services to implement the workflow.

Why the others aren’t as suitable:

- AWS Batch: designed for batch compute jobs, not for long-running, stateful workflow orchestration. - AWS Glue: ETL-focused; good for data transformation but not ideal for general multi-step orchestration with custom retry logic. - AWS Lambda alone: stateless and limited execution duration; would require additional components to manage workflow state and retries.

Quick outline:

- Define a Step Functions state machine where each state is a rule/transform. - Add Retry and Catch blocks for error handling and reprocessing. - Connect states to compute/transform services as needed (Lambda, Glue, etc.).
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7840 on: June 28, 2026
Question 148:
Question 148 asks which migration strategy is best to modernize and convert a monolithic application into microservices and move it to AWS.

Correct answer: Refactor (D)

Why: Refactoring involves re-architecting the application to decompose it into independent microservices. This aligns with the goal of moving from a monolith to microservices, enabling independent deployment, scaling, and maintenance.

Why others aren’t correct for this goal:

- Rehost (lift-and-shift): moves the app with minimal changes, preserving the monolithic architecture. - Replatform: makes some cloud optimizations but still keeps a monolith. - Repurchase: replaces the app with a different product (often SaaS), not microservices.
High-level AWS approach after refactoring (conceptual):

Decompose into services with clear boundaries.

Deploy per-service using containers or serverless (e.g., ECS/EKS/Fargate or Lambda).

Use API Gateway for service exposure and potentially a service mesh like App Mesh for communication.

Implement per-service data stores and resilient communication, with CI/CD pipelines (CodePipeline, CodeBuild).

If you want, I can walk through how to apply this with a sample monolith-to-microservices decomposition.
Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by User3321 on: June 23, 2026
Question 3:
The correct answer is D. Data integrity.

Why: When two users modify the same record at the same time, the primary risk is that the data becomes inconsistent or incorrect (lost updates, write conflicts). This directly threatens data integrity.

Why not the others:

- Entity integrity concerns uniqueness of primary keys, not concurrent edits. - Referential integrity concerns valid relationships between records, not concurrent modification of a single record. - The term availability integrity isn’t a standard focus in this context; the issue here is ensuring the data remains accurate and consistent.

How to mitigate: use transactions with ACID properties, appropriate isolation levels (e.g., serializable or repeatable reads), and locking strategies or optimistic concurrency controls to prevent conflicting updates.

If you’d like, I can walk through a concrete lost-update example.
Washington, United States

AI Explanation - verified by giri2685 on: June 06, 2026
Question 308:
Correct answers: C and D

Why: To allow a role to SELECT from all current tables in a schema, you grant:

- GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA DB1.SCHEMA TO ROLE MYROLE;

To cover future tables created in that schema, you grant:

- GRANT SELECT ON FUTURE TABLES IN SCHEMA DB1.SCHEMA TO ROLE MYROLE;

Why the others are incorrect:

- A/B try to grant USAGE on tables (not a valid privilege for tables—USAGE is used at schema/warehouse level, not on table objects). - E/F target the entire database, not just the schema, which isn’t what the question asks.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 355:
I can’t see the image in question 355, but here’s the idea and why A is the right choice.

Goal: Use an EEM applet to shut down a router interface when IP SLA indicates a problem, and bring it back up when the SLA recovers.

Why option A is correct:

- “event track 10 state down” triggers the EEM applet when the IP SLA track (track 10) goes down (i.e., SLA failure). - In the applet you would issue a CLI to shut the target interface. You’d typically also add a second trigger for state up to issue “no shutdown” when the SLA recovers.

Why the other options are less appropriate:

- “state unreachable” might be used for different tracking contexts; IP SLA failure is commonly represented as track going down, not “unreachable.” - “event sla 10 state …” is another style, but the standard approach shown in many examples is to use the track-based trigger.
Example pattern you’d implement:

event track 10 state down -> shutdown interface

event track 10 state up -> no shutdown

In short: question 355 tests using an EEM applet triggered by a IP SLA track’s down state to shut an interface, with a complementary up state to restore it.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User1833 on: July 04, 2026
Question 12:
I can’t view the image, but here’s the conceptual reasoning behind question 12 and why answer B is correct.

In FortiGate SD-WAN, there are two main zones: Underlay (the physical transport links) and Overlay (the logical paths/tunnels). The Underlay zone is where you place the physical WAN interfaces that provide connectivity.

If the exhibit shows the Underlay zone with no members, that means no physical interfaces have been assigned to Underlay yet. This matches the statement: “The Underlay zone contains no member.”

Why the other options are less accurate:

A: The Underlay zone being “the zone by default” is not a fixed rule; the presence of members depends on configuration, so you can have an Underlay with members or empty.

C: If Underlay is empty, port2 and port3 would either be unassigned or placed into a different context; this statement isn’t reliably inferred from the exhibit.

D: The virtual-wan-link and overlay zones are fundamental parts of SD-WAN and typically cannot be deleted; this option is generally false.

Key concept: Underlay holds physical WAN interfaces; Overlay contains the logical paths and VPNs. If Underlay has no members, that’s exactly what option B describes.
Parabiago, Italy

AI Explanation - verified by User6170 on: June 15, 2026
Question 5:
Resposta correta: B.
Por quê: O cenário mostra que Jacob, o responsável pela privacidade, precisava revisar os requisitos de privacidade junto à equipe de produto, mas não participou do processo de desenvolvimento. No framework de privacidade por design (privacy by design/default), questões de privacidade devem ser consideradas desde as primeiras fases do ciclo de vida do sistema (SDLC). Ao não incluir esse passo de colaboração precoce com a equipe de privacidade, os requisitos legais e de proteção de dados podem ficar inadequadamente incorporados ou ausentes.
Observação útil:

Embora o usuário tenha que marcar um consentimento de marketing para usar o app (ou seja, A), isso não demonstra que as práticas de privacidade foram integradas no desenvolvimento.

As opções C e D não refletem etapas-chave do SDLC de privacidade; C refere-se a um marco desatualizado (Privacy Shield), e D sugere uma funcionalidade específica, não uma etapa de desenvolvimento.

Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343 on: June 27, 2026
Question 10:
Question 10 asks how to enable active learning for a natural language model (LUIS).
Correct answer: C — Add log=true to the prediction endpoint query.
Why:

Active learning relies on collecting real user utterances to improve the model. The log parameter, when set to true, enables logging of user queries from the prediction endpoint so you can review and label them for retraining.

The other options don’t enable active learning:

- A) show-all-intents=true is about displaying intents in results, not collecting training data. - B) Speech priming is unrelated to active learning. - D) Sentiment analysis is a separate capability and not needed to enable active learning.
Practical note:

This is based on the guidance to “log user queries to enable active learning” in the LUIS docs. Ensure you have the proper permissions and review/logged utterances can be used to periodically retrain and improve accuracy.

Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6833 on: June 07, 2026
Question 3:
I can’t view the hotspot image in Question 3, but I can explain how to approach it and what the scoring is looking for.
How to approach a network infection hotspot:

Collect and review all logs from hosts and the firewall (timestamps, destinations, ports, process names, user logins).

Sort by time to find the earliest suspicious event. The origin host is typically the first system that shows a foothold or initiates activity toward others.

Look for indicators of compromise across hosts that share the same IoCs (malware hash, C2 domains/IPs, beacon patterns, or suspicious executables).

Determine each remaining host’s status:

- Infected: shows matching IoCs, lateral movement activity, or persistence artifacts. - Clean: no matching IoCs and no anomalous activity after isolating the suspected origin.

Document findings and containment steps (isolate infected hosts, reset credentials, block C2 IPs).

If you can describe or paste key log entries (timestamps, src/dst IPs, ports, event types, or any malware indicators), I can help pinpoint the origin and classify hosts more precisely.
Thabazimbi, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User9846 on: June 25, 2026
Question 365:
Respuesta:

Box 1: Turn on Live Response

Box 2: Network assessment jobs

Explicación:

Turn on Live Response: Live Response permite acceso remoto de shell a un dispositivo desde el portal de Defender, ideal para investigar y responder de forma rápida con el principio de mínimo privilegio al otorgar este acceso solo a roles autorizados.

Network assessment jobs: estos trabajos permiten escanear regularmente dispositivos de red y agregarlos al inventario de dispositivos, ayudando a mantener un inventario actualizado y facilitar la gestión y respuesta.

Medellín, Colombia

AI Explanation - verified by User1533 on: June 16, 2026
Question 2:
Question 2: The LEAST overhead approach is to use Athena directly with S3 (option C).
Why:

Athena is serverless and runs SQL on demand directly against data in S3, so you don’t need ETL, data loading, or managing a cluster.

It supports JSON data in S3 and lets you query logs without moving or transforming them first.

This minimizes operational overhead compared with:

- A: Redshift requires loading data, setting up clusters, and ongoing maintenance. - B: CloudWatch Logs isn’t designed for ad-hoc SQL querying on existing S3 JSON logs. - D: Glue catalog + EMR involves metadata management, ETL, and cluster overhead. - E: EMR-based approaches also require managing clusters and processing jobs.
Tip: You can start with Athena and, if you want structured querying and better performance, add a Glue Data Catalog or convert JSON to Parquet for cost-efficient queries. If you want, I can outline the steps to set up Athena for your JSON logs.
Cairo, Egypt

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 27, 2026
Question 126:
Answer: D
Reasoning:

SW3 has all access ports in VLAN 50, so it has no ports in VLAN 60.

VTP pruning removes traffic for VLANs that have no active ports on downstream switches. If pruning is enabled in the VTP domain (and SW1 is the VTP server), VLAN 60 traffic will be pruned from trunks toward SW3.

Therefore, SW3 will only receive frames from VLAN 50.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

A: SW1(config)#vtp mode transparent — makes SW1 ignore VTP updates; pruning won’t function domain-wide.

B: SW3(config)#vtp mode transparent — SW3 would not participate properly in VTP domain traffic, defeating pruning.

C: SW2(config)#vtp pruning — pruning needs to be active in the VTP domain (server/clients); pruning on SW2 alone may not propagate as needed.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by singh_y2k on: June 11, 2026
Question 10:

Answer: No.

Why:

- The scenario describes migrating VMs to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription. This is an example of an operational expenditure (Opex) model, because you pay for resources as you use them. - The term “elastic expenditure model” is not a standard Azure cost model. Elasticity is a scalability characteristic (adjusting resources up/down), not a recognized expenditure category. The exam material is likely testing knowledge of Opex vs Capex, not elasticity. - Therefore recommending the “elastic expenditure model” does not meet the goal; the correct approach is to use an Opex/pay-as-you-go model (with options like reserved instances later for optimization).
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 338:
Question 338 asks about the Cisco DNA Center Intent API. The two correct characteristics are:

northbound API

business outcome oriented

Rationale:

The Intent API is exposed to higher-level applications (northbound) to drive business outcomes, not device-level details.

It is not device-oriented, not southbound, and it is intent-based (not procedural).

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User8896 on: June 16, 2026
Question 14:
Question 14: The correct answer is A (Fairness).
Why:

The sentence emphasizes fairness as a core ethical principle in AI.

Fairness aims to prevent discriminatory or biased decisions based on attributes like gender, race, sexual orientation, or religion.

What this means in practice:

Ensure AI decisions are non-discriminatory and treat people equitably.

Use bias checks, diverse and representative data, and regular audits to detect and mitigate unfair outcomes.

Align with trusted AI guidance by incorporating fairness into design, testing, and monitoring processes.

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

AI Explanation - verified by User8307 on: June 14, 2026
Question 15:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 15.
What it’s testing

How Windows Autopilot deployment profile assignments work with device OS versions and group membership, and when MDM enrollment happens.

Box 1 (Device1)

Device: Windows 8.1, registered but not joined; in Group1.

Profile: Profile1 assigned to Group1.

Why the answer is No: Autopilot supports Windows 10/11 devices. Windows 8.1 isn’t eligible for Autopilot enrollment, so it won’t receive MDM via Autopilot.

Box 2 (Device2)

Device: Windows 10, joined; in Group2, and Group2 is in Group1; Profile1 assigned to Group1.

Why the answer is No: Autopilot profile assignments typically apply to devices directly in the target group. If Group2 is nested inside Group1, Device2 may not receive the profile unless Group2 is also directly targeted or the grouping is set up to include nested groups. So there may be no MDM enrollment for Device2 under this assignment.

Box 3 (Device3)

Device: Windows 10, joined; in Group1; Profile1 assigned to Group1.

Why the answer is Yes: Device3 meets OS requirements, is in the target group, and the profile is assigned to that group. After joining Azure AD, Autopilot will enroll the device in MDM (e.g., Intune) automatically.

Bottom line

Yes for Device3; No for Device1; No for Device2 (likely due to OS support and/or group nesting behavior). Autopilot enrollment triggers MDM enrollment after Azure AD join.

Durban, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User8249 on: June 14, 2026
Question 1:

Correct answer: C — Databricks web application

Why: In the classic Databricks architecture, the control plane hosts the management and user-facing components, including the Databricks web application (the UI you use in a browser). The data plane runs the actual compute and storage for notebooks and jobs (i.e., the driver node and worker nodes). Other options are tied to the data plane or external systems:

- Worker node and Driver node are compute resources in the data plane. - JDBC data source is an external data source or connector, not a control-plane service. - Databricks Filesystem (DBFS) relies on underlying storage and interacts with the data plane.

Quick takeaway: The web UI is a control-plane service; compute and storage components reside in the data plane.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5656 on: June 23, 2026
Question 7:
The correct choice is B: Facilitate communication and team building.
Why this is correct:

If individual performance is fine but the team isn’t performing well, the issue is typically team dynamics—communication gaps, misaligned expectations, and lack of trust. Improving how the team works together addresses the root cause, not just individual skills.

Key points to address:

Establish clear communication channels and norms (overlaps for time zones, agreed response times, where decisions are documented).

Implement team-building activities and cross-functional collaboration to build trust and a shared mental model.

Create a team charter with shared goals, roles, and ground rules; ensure everyone understands how the team will work together.

Use structured rituals (regular stand-ups, retrospectives focused on collaboration, cross-team syncs) and suitable collaboration tools.

Why not the other options:

A (review/reassign team assignments) may disrupt harmony and doesn’t fix underlying communication issues.

C (negotiate for new team members) addresses headcount, not the teamwork problem.

D (update the communications management plan) helps, but without active team-building and improved collaboration, the team may still underperform.

In short, to lift overall team performance in a distributed setting, prioritizing communication and team-building activities is the most effective initial action.
Subang Jaya, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna on: June 27, 2026
Question 396:
Question 396 scenario: A hybrid project (predictive for the bridge, agile for the software) faces delays due to lack of information. The best action is B: Make work visible using Kanban boards.
Why: Kanban boards visualize work items, status, and bottlenecks, making information gaps visible and helping the team manage flow. This supports both the predictive and agile parts of the project by signaling what’s blocked and where decisions or information are needed.
Why the other options are weaker here:

A. Increasing retrospectives helps process improvement but doesn’t directly address the immediate information gaps causing delays.

C. Incorporating small batches is useful in agile but doesn’t specifically surface or manage the information bottlenecks.

D. Lean manufacturing isn’t appropriate for software development and doesn’t target information flow issues.

If you want, I can walk through how to set up a Kanban board for this project and what metrics to track.
Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User6391 on: June 24, 2026
no, its a different question, its regarding resolving performance issues
You're right—Question 8 is about resolving performance issues. Here’s the explanation.

Correct answer: B) Increase the capacity

Why: The warehouse DW1 is using an MD5-hashed surrogate key and Direct Lake with a F32 capacity. The table grew from 200 million to 500 million rows, and Direct Lake on F32 supports up to about 300 million rows. The performance issue is driven by hitting the capacity/scale limit, so upgrading to a larger capacity (F64) provides the biggest, most direct boost to query performance.

Why the other options are weaker:

Change MD5 to SHA256: Hash algorithm choice has negligible impact on performance for large scans; it won’t address the scale limit.

Enable V-Order: Could improve certain scans, but it doesn’t solve the underlying capacity/scale bottleneck and may not yield as big a performance gain as more capacity.

Modify surrogate keys to a different data type: Could reduce row width, but this is invasive, risky, and doesn’t address the core problem of overall data volume and capacity limits.

Create views: Views don’t improve underlying data access speed for large tables in Direct Lake; they’re not a primary performance fix.

So increasing capacity directly targets the bottleneck and yields the best performance improvement for the scenario.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 26, 2026
Question 98:
For question 98, the correct choice is C.
Why C works:

The interface must be bound to the same VRF as the destination network. Here, the server 172.16.0.1 sits in VRF Bank, so the R1 interface should be in vrf forwarding bank.

The OSPF process that runs for that VRF must also be in VRF Bank: router ospf 44 vrf bank.

Use a network statement that covers 172.16.0.0/16 inside that VRF: network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0. The wildcard mask 0.0.255.255 matches 172.16.0.0–172.16.255.255, aligning with the /16 subnet you’re using (255.255.0.0 on the interface).

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: The interface isn’t bound to VRF Bank, so OSPF in VRF Bank wouldn’t see it.

B and D: Bind the interface or OSPF to a different VRF (Hotel), which would prevent reachability to the bank’s server.

The combination in C ensures the interface is in VRF Bank and advertises the 172.16.0.0/16 route within that VRF.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by madhavi.chilla09 on: June 10, 2026
Question 75:
Question 75 asks how to meet the need for daily impression counts by campaign and site_name for the last year while keeping the data model small. The two best actions are:

A. Create one-to-many relationships between the tables.

- Why: Proper relationships between the fact (impressions) and dimension tables (campaign, site, date) ensure correct cross-filtering and accurate totals in visuals.

B. Group the Impressions query in Power Query by Ad_id, Site_name, and Impression_date. Aggregate by using CountRows.

- Why: Pre-aggregating the large Impressions data reduces model size (fewer rows) and gives you a compact fact with the necessary granularity (day, campaign, site) for last-year analytics. You can then use a simple COUNTROWS to get the counts.
Why not C or D:

C (calculated table of Ad_id, Site_name, Impression_date) would still require aggregation to produce counts and may not minimize model size as effectively.

D (calculated measure using COUNTROWS) doesn’t reduce the underlying data volume in the model and won’t help with performance the way pre-aggregation does.

Key takeaways: A and B align with minimizing model size while preserving correct filtering and granularity.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User8952 on: June 27, 2026
Question 1:
For Question 1, the correct choice is A: use the AddPhraseListAsync method with a PhraselistCreateObject.
Why:

You want to update the same phrases across many models. A shared phrase list can be created once and reused by multiple models, which is exactly what a phrase list (Phraselist) with IsExchangeable set to true enables.

What the code shows:

Box 1 uses AddPhraseListAsync(appId, versionId, new PhraselistCreateObject { ... }) to create the phrase list.

Box 2 uses the PhraselistCreateObject type to supply the details: EnabledForAllModels = false, IsExchangeable = true, Name = "QuantityPhraselist", and the Phrases (e.g., "few,more,extra").

Result:

A single phrase list is created that can be shared (exchanged) across the language models within the app version, allowing you to apply the new phrases to all 100 chatbots efficiently.

Anonymous

AI Explanation - verified by User6841 on: June 16, 2026
Question 8:
C? hai chu?i d?u là MAC address h?p l?.

Ð?nh d?ng: xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx (6 octet hex).

Ð?u tiên: 0xB8 và 0x1A.

Gi?i thích bit trên octet d?u:

LSB (bit th?p nh?t) c?a octet d?u d? xác d?nh unicast/multicast. C? hai d?u có LSB = 0, nên là unicast.

Bit th? hai t? ph?i sang trái (bit U/L) xác d?nh thu?c s? h?u toàn c?u hay do d?a phuong c?p phát.

- 0xB8 = binary 1011 1000 ? hai bit th?p nh?t là 00: global (toàn c?u), t?c MAC h?p l? do nhà s?n xu?t c?p. - 0x1A = binary 0001 1010 ? hai bit th?p nh?t là 10: locally administered (du?c c?p phát d?a phuong).
K?t lu?n:

C? hai d?u là MAC address.

0xB8-76-3F-7C-57-DF: unicast, globally unique.

0x1A-76-3F-7C-57-DF: unicast, locally administered.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

AI Explanation - verified by User1618 on: June 11, 2026
Question 17:

Short answer: No. The solution does not meet the goal.

Why: management groups are a governance construct used to organize subscriptions and apply policies/RBAC across them. They do not by themselves deploy or create resources.

What you should use to achieve automatic provisioning:

- ARM templates (or Azure Resource Manager templates) to define the identical resources once and deploy them consistently. - Or Azure Blueprints to define a standard set of resources, policies, and role assignments that can be assigned across subscriptions.

How they fit together:

- Use a management group to scope the deployment (so all relevant subscriptions get the same blueprint or template). - Use the template/blueprint to actually create the resources automatically.

Key terms:

- management groups: governance scope across subscriptions - ARM templates: declarative resource deployment - Azure Blueprints: reusable collection of resources, policies, and RBAC across subscriptions
Boydton, United States

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 12 )

QUESTION: 50

QUESTION: 51

QUESTION: 52

QUESTION: 53

QUESTION: 54

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions
Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 12 )