Refer to the exhibit. The application follows a containerized microservices architecture that has one container per microservice. The microservices communicate with each other by using REST APIs. The double-headed arrows in the diagram display chains of synchronous HTTP calls needed for a single user request.

Which action ensures the resilience of the application in the scope of a single user request?

Implement retries with exponential backoff during HTTP API calls.
Set up multiple instances of each microservice in active/active mode by using the Orchestrator.
Redesign the application to be separated into these three layers: Presentation, API, and Data.
Create two virtual machines that each host an instance of the application and set up a cluster.

Answer(s): A

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 62

DRAG DROP (Drag and Drop is not supported)
Drag and drop the steps on the left into the order on the right for an end-user to access an OAuth2 protectedresource using the 'Authorization Code Grant' flow.

Select and Place:

See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 63

In the three-legged OAuth2 authorization workflow, which entity grants access to a protected resource?

resource owner
client
resource server
authorization server

Answer(s): A

Reference:

https://developer.orange.com/tech_guide/3-legged-oauth/

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 64

What are two steps in the OAuth2 protocol flow? (Choose two.)

The user is authenticated by the authorization server and granted an access token.
The user’s original credentials are validated by the resource server and authorization is granted.
The user indirectly requests authorization through the authorization server.
The user requests an access token by authentication and authorization grant presentation.
The user requests the protected resource from the resource server using the original credentials.

Answer(s): C,E

Reference:

https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/an-introduction-to-oauth-2

Show Answer Next Question

Download PDF Next Page

Viewing page 14 of 78
Viewing questions 66 - 70 out of 507 questions

Post your Comments and Discuss Cisco 350-901 exam prep with other Community members:

Comments:

Name:

350-901 Exam Discussions & Posts
350-901 AI Verifications

Alex on: March 02, 2025
Great material
UNITED KINGDOM

DevOps_Rach on: May 27, 2026
This exam was brutal with many real exam questions catching me off guard. The brain dumps barely covered the breadth of the material.
Ghana

LastMinuteLearner on: June 03, 2026
Passed it using brain dumps but it was a very hard adn stressful experience. The exam questions in the dumps helped but I was still uncertain the whole time.
Spain

PowerShell_Pete on: June 18, 2026
Very hard exam adn I barely passed after stress-packed days. Brain dumps and real exam questions were essential to make it through.
Luxembourg

hashbang_h on: May 07, 2026
Took two attempts but finally passed this exam using brain dumps which helped a bit with some real exam questions. Very hard and stressful for sure.
Germany

JuniperJeff on: May 26, 2026
Just cleared this exam after two stressful months relying on brain dumps and the AI Assistant for help. Very hard test but scraping through feels like a relief.
United States

CiscoFan_J on: June 04, 2026
Real exam questions threw me off despite weeks of studying and the braindumps I found were not much help.
Belgium

hashbang_h on: June 20, 2026
The exam questions were very hard and didn't match my expectations even with the braindumps I studied. Finished yesterday and it felt like the real exam questions were from a different planet altogether.
Italy

pkttracer_m on: June 01, 2026
teh exam dumps did not prepare me for how very hard the real exam questions were. Even with the AI Assistant I found this exam extremely challenging.
Chile

priya_devops on: May 14, 2026
Three weeks of brain dumps didn't cut it as the exam questions were very hard and the AI Assistant didn't cover everything.
South Korea

PassOrFail_Lol on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks on brain dumps adn needed every bit of it for this exam which was very hard. Just barely passed and the real exam questions were a real struggle.
Norway

l4b_rat on: June 12, 2026
Spent weeks going through braindumps and using the AI Assistant to finally pass this exam. It was very hard and I wasn't sure if I would make it.
Canada

TestDayJitters on: June 08, 2026
Exam dumps made a difference after struggling with this very hard exam. teh AI Assistant was also a helpful guide though it took a lot of effort to finally pass.
Canada

SkippedTheBook on: June 12, 2026
Barely passed this exm by using brain dumps but it was still very hard. The stress got intense as even the real exam questions seemed unfamiliar.
Indonesia

GCPengineer_T on: May 08, 2026
Spent weeks digging through brain dumps and finally squeaked by this exam but it was very hard and stressful.
France

StudyGrind99 on: May 19, 2026
Spent weeks going through brain dumps adn the AI Assistant just to get a handle on this exam. It was very hard and the real exam questions were nothing like I'd seen before.
Thailand

layla_it_uae on: May 21, 2026
Took two attempts but the exam dumps helped with those very hard sections that kept tripping me up. Real exam quetions were spot on although the AI Assistant was not much help.
Saudi Arabia

zeroDaysLeft on: April 28, 2026
Took two attempts to get through this exam as the first was a nightmare. Exam dumps finally helped along with real exam questions when the stress was overwhelming.
Oman

NightOwlCerts on: April 15, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam since it was very hard and even the braindumps I found didn't cover everything. The real exam questions felt different from the dumps but the AI Assistant helped with some tricky parts.
Bangladesh

SecOpsGuy on: April 19, 2026
Spent several nights going over exam dumps and real exam questions yet this exam was very hard and stressful to get through.
Czech Republic

graveyard_geek on: April 08, 2026
Spent weeks sifting through braindumps and scraped by this exam. The real exam questions were a lot harder than expected.
Chile

TheCertMachine on: April 19, 2026
Underestimated this exm and had to grind through endless braindumps just to stand a chance. The AI Assistant was a help but the real exam questions were very hard.
Nigeria

WhosJohnAcronym on: May 09, 2026
Barely made it through this exam with brain dumps but it was very hard and gave me quite the headache.
New Zealand

lunch_break_labs on: June 18, 2026
Three weeks of intense studying and endless brain dumps left me exhausted but I finally passed this exam. It was very hard and I had to rely on the AI Assistant and real exam questions to make it through.
Australia

laid_off_leveled on: May 12, 2026
Spent weeks on this exam as it was very hard and finally turned to exam dumps for some help. Real exam questions were similar enough but I needed every resource to get throgh it.
Germany

PaloAlto_Pat on: April 22, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam with the help of exam dumps as a last resort after finding the real exam quetions very hard to comprehend.
Kenya

OracleCert_V on: June 05, 2026
Thought I could wing this exam but it was very hard so I ended up using exam dumps to finally get through it.
Kenya

haruto_devops on: May 12, 2026
The exam was very hard but the braindumps helped me get throgh it. Without the exam dumps I'd still be prepping.
Ireland

scripts_and_certs on: May 17, 2026
Barely passed this exam after multiple nights using brain dumps. Very hard but the real exam questions were surprisingly similar.
Netherlands

JustPassedBro on: June 06, 2026
Barely passed this exam after days of stress and using tons of brain dumps. Very hard to keep everything straight even with the AI Assistant pointing things out.
Oman

KemTech on: June 26, 2026
Question 64 has a wrong answer. It says Serveless API (D) when should be option A (Virtual Machunes)
London, United Kingdom

homelab_hero on: June 01, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam using all the dumps adn braindumps at my disposal and it was still very hard. The AI Assistant helped somewhat but memorizing the real exam questions made the difference.
Israel

dmitri_linuxpro on: April 10, 2026
Spent weeks going over brain dumps and still found myself unprepared for this exam. Stressed throughout but barely passed in the end.
Romania

dockerdave on: April 16, 2026
Passed it but it took me by surprise how very hard it was even with braindumps adn the AI Assistant.
India

Shorya on: July 01, 2026
free study material
Mumbai, India

LinuxPlus_Len on: June 03, 2026
Passed it after weeks of stress and hours with brain dumps. Real exam questions were tough and the AI Assistant was helpful but the exam was still very hard.
Kenya

3rdTimeCharm_IT on: April 24, 2026
After weeks of frustration the exm dumps finally helped me scrape through this challenging exam. Those brain dumps were tricky to navigate but crucial for facing the real exam questions.
Norway

two_jobs_no_sleep on: June 11, 2026
Barely passed this challenging exam and the brain dumps were essential for prep. The AI Assistant helped with the more complicated concepts but it was still a stressful process.
Belgium

NightOwlCerts on: April 07, 2026
Took two attempts but finally passed this challenging exm with the help of braindumps and the AI Assistant. Very hard questions kept tripping me up until I practiced repeatedly.
Germany

RetakeKing2025 on: June 21, 2026
Took two attempts throgh this challenging exam and the AI Assistant provided real exam questions that counted when I needed them most. Had to rely on braindumps because the stress was unreal.
Spain

YoutubeAndPray on: April 08, 2026
The AI Assistant and the braindumps were essential for tackling this exam since I wasn't sure about passing. Those real exam questions were challenging and made the whole process feel endless.
Australia

anya_cloudarch on: June 17, 2026
Three weeks of grinding through brain dumps and I finally managed to pass this exam. The real exam questions were tough and the stress was intense.
Egypt

flashcard_fanatic on: March 31, 2026
The exam dumps felt outdated and the real exam questions caught me off guard. Was tougher than I anticipated even with all the prep material.
Czech Republic

bgp_believer on: June 24, 2026
The exam was very hard and the real exam questions caught me off guard despite using braindumps. The AI Assistant tried to help but I struggled through every minute of it.
Austria

upskill_or_bust on: April 06, 2026
The exam was very hard and I wouldn’t have made it through without exam dumps. I had to use real exam questions to make sure I was ready.
United States

remote_and_certified on: April 17, 2026
Underestimated this exam so spent countless nights going throgh brain dumps and real exam questions. Finally got through on the second try but it was very hard and exhausting.
Mexico

CyberArk_C on: May 30, 2026
Underestimated this exam and spent nights grinding throgh braindumps and exam dumps to pass. Very hard and challenging questions made me question my sanity.
Jordan

TerraformTom on: April 02, 2026
This exam was very hard so I leaned heavily on the dumps to make it through. It was no walk in the park even with all that prep.
South Africa

commute_studier on: March 22, 2026
Finally done with this exam and relied on exam dumps as a last resort due to its very hard nature. The challenging exam stressed me out even with some real exam questions thrown into the mix.
Turkey

DoneWithExams_D on: May 09, 2026
Spent weeks preparing for this exam and thankfully teh braindumps and the AI Assistant helped me make it through. Very hard exam but at least it's over now.
Lebanon

AI Explanation - verified by User3757 on: June 28, 2026
Question 5:
Question 5 asks how Access Policies relate to Application Segments and Application Segment Groups.

Correct answer: C — "When a condition is met, an Access Policy can either allow or block access to Application Segments and Application Segment Groups."

Explanation: Access Policies apply the same allow-or-block decision to both individual Application Segments and to Application Segment Groups when their rule conditions are met. This means one policy can govern access for both objects, and the resulting action (allow or block) applies to whichever objects match the policy conditions.

San José, Costa Rica

AI Explanation - verified by singh_y2k on: June 11, 2026
Question 10:

Answer: No.

Why:

- The scenario describes migrating VMs to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription. This is an example of an operational expenditure (Opex) model, because you pay for resources as you use them. - The term “elastic expenditure model” is not a standard Azure cost model. Elasticity is a scalability characteristic (adjusting resources up/down), not a recognized expenditure category. The exam material is likely testing knowledge of Opex vs Capex, not elasticity. - Therefore recommending the “elastic expenditure model” does not meet the goal; the correct approach is to use an Opex/pay-as-you-go model (with options like reserved instances later for optimization).
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by User2231 on: June 18, 2026
Note: The question is included in a number of questions that depicts the identical set-up. However, every question has a distinctive result. Establish if the solution satisfies the requirements. You have been informed by your superiors of the company’s intentions to automate server deployment to Azure. There is, however, some concern that administrative credentials could be uncovered during this process. You are required to make sure that during the deployment, the administrative credentials are encrypted using a suitable Azure solution. Solution: You recommend the use of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). Does the solution meet the goal?
No. MFA does not meet the goal.

MFA is for authenticating users, not for encrypting or securely managing credentials used during deployment.

To protect admin credentials in automation, use Azure Key Vault to securely store secrets, and configure the deployment process to fetch secrets at runtime (e.g., via a managed identity or service principal). Consider using Managed Identities to avoid embedding credentials, and optionally Azure AD Privileged Identity Management for just-in-time access.

Jabalpur, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7619 on: June 09, 2026
Question 2:
??: B) Amazon Inspector
??:

??: Amazon Inspector? EC2 ????? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????, ?????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ? ?????.

??? ?? ??:

- A Trusted Advisor: ?? ?? ?? ??? ?????, ??? ???? ??? ??? ????. - C AWS Config: ?? ???? ?? ??? ?????, ?? ??? ??? ???? ????. - D AWS GuardDuty: ?? ?? ???? ????? ??? ?????, ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ? ??? ????.
?? ?:

??? Inspector? ???? Inspector2? ?? ?????. ???? Inspector/Inspector2 ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????.

Guri-Si, South Korea

AI Explanation - verified by User1786 on: July 01, 2026
Question 405:

Answer: D

Why: Question 405 asks which statement about Python is incorrect. The first three statements are accurate: Python has many third-party libraries, is open source, and is used for automation, AI, data science, etc. The fourth statement, “Python has a clear grammatical structure, is simple and easy to learn, and runs efficiently,” is problematic. Python is indeed known for clear syntax and ease of learning, but it’s an interpreted language and generally not as fast as compiled languages. “Runs efficiently” is not universally true for Python performance, so statement D is the incorrect one.

São Paulo, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343 on: June 27, 2026
Question 27:
The correct choice is raw image binary.
Why:

Form Recognizer accepts image data in the request body as raw binary (bytes). This sends the image directly to the API without wrapping it in JSON or encoding, helping satisfy the “do not store in the cloud” requirement.

The other formats are not how you upload image data to Form Recognizer:

- “form” isn’t a valid upload format. - “URL encoded” is not used for binary image data. - “JSON” would require base64-encoding the image and isn’t the standard upload method.
Tips:

Send the image bytes in the POST body with an appropriate Content-Type (e.g., image/jpeg or image/png).

If you used a URL, the service would fetch the image, which may not align with strict non-storage requirements.

If you want, I can outline a quick example snippet for sending a JPEG image as binary to the endpoint.
Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by pewy26 on: July 05, 2026
the question is to pick afrom the list: .... is used to identify, hold, and export electronic information that might be used in an investigation. The answer according to the site is costumer lockbox, but i incline more towards ediscovery
The correct choice is eDiscovery.
Why:

eDiscovery is the process used to identify, hold (preserve), and export electronically stored information (ESI) that might be used in legal investigations.

It encompasses search, preservation (holds like In-Place Hold or Litigation Hold), and export of results for review or production.

Customer Lockbox is different: it governs customer approval for Microsoft engineers to access your data during a support incident, not for legal holds or exporting information for investigations.
So the statement about identifying, holding, and exporting ESI aligns with eDiscovery, not Customer Lockbox. If you’d like, I can explain eDiscovery features (Content Search, Holds, Exports) in more detail.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

AI Explanation - verified by User8707 on: June 11, 2026
Question 2:
The correct answer is Risk register.

Why this is correct: A risk register is the formal document used to list risks, assign responsible parties (owners), and define thresholds or criteria for when risk treatment actions should be taken. It’s the central artifact for tracking risk ownership and action plans.

Why the others are not correct:

- Risk tolerance: reflects the organization’s overall appetite for risk, not a ledger of risks or owners. - Risk transfer: is a treatment option (e.g., insurance) that shifts financial impact, not a documentation artifact. - Risk analysis: assesses likelihood and impact, but doesn’t establish ownership or formal thresholds in a register.
Typical contents of a risk register include risk ID, description, likelihood, impact, risk owner, risk score, thresholds for action, and planned mitigations. This aligns with risk-management practices covered by the exam.
Jacksonville, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User2294 on: June 21, 2026
Question 10:
Question 10 asks: From the User menu, which actions can a user select? (Choose three.)

Log Out (B) — standard option to sign out of the account.

Elevate Roles (C) — temporarily grants higher permissions to perform tasks that require more access.

Impersonate Users (D) — allows an admin to act as another user for troubleshooting.

The other options are not typically in the User menu:

Send Notifications (A) — usually part of Notification settings or event-driven actions.

Order from Service Catalog (E) — accessed via the Catalog, not the User menu.

Approve Records (F) — part of workflow approvals, not a User menu action.

So the three correct choices are B, C, and D.
Patna, India

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 344:
Here’s how to understand Question 344.

What the task asks: Create an Cisco IOS EEM applet that sends a syslog message when there’s a change caused by an OSPF problem.

How EEM works (at a high level):

- You define an applet with a name using event manager applet <name>. - You specify a trigger with an event line (e.g., a certain syslog pattern or routing event). - You specify actions to take when the event fires. To generate a syslog message, you use a syslog action.

The key point for this question: to actually send a syslog message, you use the action

- action 1 syslog msg "<your text>"
For example: action 1 syslog msg "OSPF ROUTING ERROR"

Why the other choices are not correct:

- The option that starts with event manager applet LogMessage defines the applet name, not the particular syslog action. It’s part of the setup, not the action that sends the log. - The other variants like syslog send, syslog pattern, or syslog write don’t match the proper EEM action syntax for sending a syslog message.
Bottom line: The correct action to generate the syslog message is the one that uses action 1 syslog msg "OSPF ROUTING ERROR".
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User2489 on: July 04, 2026
Question 19:
??? A ???D ????????????????

D ???????????

- Glacier Deep Archive ?????? storage class ??????????????????????????????( retrieval ????????????????)??????????????????????????????????·????????????????? - S3 website hosting ???????????????????????????????????VPN???????????????????????????????? website hosting ??????????? - Glacier Deep Archive ?????????? website hosting ????????????????????????????????????????

A ??????????

- S3 One Zone-IA ?????????????????????????????????????????? - S3 interface endpoint(VPC ??????????????)??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? - ???????????????????????????? S3 ?????????????????????
??: D ????????????????????? hosting ?????????????????·????????????
Tokyo, Japan

AI Explanation - verified by User1427 on: June 30, 2026
Question 6:
Answer: A
Explanation:

TCP is a connection-oriented protocol that establishes a session using a three-way handshake (SYN, SYN-ACK, ACK) before data transfer.

UDP is connectionless and provides no built-in mechanism for delivery guarantees (no handshake, no acknowledgment or retransmission).

The other options are incorrect: B misstates UDP behavior; C reverses reliability and connection type; D incorrectly assigns TCP/UDP header flag usage.

Makati City, Philippines

AI Explanation - verified by User7240 on: June 13, 2026
Question 3:
Question 3 asks if subscribing to the Premier support plan would let Microsoft provide an assessment of your Azure environment’s design.

The stated solution: Premier plan.

Answer: No (B).

Reasoning:

A basic support plan does not include architectural assessments.

Premier is the top support tier, but an official “assessment of Azure environment’s design” is typically a separate engagement (an architecture/design review) that isn’t automatically granted just by having Premier.

In practice, you’d likely need a paid architectural review/consulting engagement in addition to or outside the standard support plan to get that kind of design assessment.

So while Premier offers more extensive support, it does not by itself guarantee the Microsoft-design review you’re seeking, hence the answer is No.
Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by User8756 on: June 16, 2026
Question 32:
No. The solution does not meet the goal.
Why:

A local network gateway represents an on-premises VPN device for site-to-site or VNet-to-VNet connections. It’s used to connect Azure to external networks, not to control traffic inside Azure between resources.

To control connection types between web servers and database servers in Azure, you should use Network Security Groups (NSGs). Apply NSGs to the appropriate scope (subnets or NICs) and configure inbound/outbound rules to permit only the required traffic (e.g., allow SQL port from web subnet to the DB subnet, and deny everything else).

Helpful alternative concepts:

Use NSGs to implement port/protocol restrictions between the web and database tiers.

For more advanced filtering, consider Azure Firewall or private endpoints/service endpoints to further restrict access to databases.

Singapore, Singapore

AI Explanation - verified by User6833 on: June 07, 2026
Question 3:
I can’t view the hotspot image in Question 3, but I can explain how to approach it and what the scoring is looking for.
How to approach a network infection hotspot:

Collect and review all logs from hosts and the firewall (timestamps, destinations, ports, process names, user logins).

Sort by time to find the earliest suspicious event. The origin host is typically the first system that shows a foothold or initiates activity toward others.

Look for indicators of compromise across hosts that share the same IoCs (malware hash, C2 domains/IPs, beacon patterns, or suspicious executables).

Determine each remaining host’s status:

- Infected: shows matching IoCs, lateral movement activity, or persistence artifacts. - Clean: no matching IoCs and no anomalous activity after isolating the suspected origin.

Document findings and containment steps (isolate infected hosts, reset credentials, block C2 IPs).

If you can describe or paste key log entries (timestamps, src/dst IPs, ports, event types, or any malware indicators), I can help pinpoint the origin and classify hosts more precisely.
Thabazimbi, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User9195 on: June 14, 2026
Question 38:
Question 38 tests how Salesforce “Social Accounts and Contacts” visibility works.

Correct reasoning: The information shown from social profiles is visible based on the sales rep’s own social connection with the contact. If the rep isn’t connected to the contact’s social data, the profile details won’t appear.

Why the other options aren’t right:

- AppExchange package isn’t required to access public profile info. - Missing fields on the contact page layout wouldn’t block social data from appearing. - No admin password is needed to access a social profile; access is controlled by social connections and permissions.
Takeaway: With Social Accounts and Contacts, what a user can see from a contact’s social profiles depends on that user’s social connection to the contact (and related permissions), not on admin password or layout configurations.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9389 on: June 08, 2026
Question 136:
The correct answer is B: Evaluate and understand the cause of the conflict.
Why:

The situation involves a boundary dispute about which scope items belong to global vs local teams. The first step is to understand why this conflict is happening (root cause) before taking action.

How to proceed:

Talk with both local and global team representatives to gather facts.

Review the project’s scope management plan, especially the boundary definitions and the RACI (roles and responsibilities).

Check backlog ownership and any recent change requests that might have shifted ownership.

Facilitate a brief discussion to re-clarify boundaries and agree on who handles which items; use change control if scope ownership needs adjustment.

What the other options miss:

A (Assess capacity) doesn’t address why the delegation requests are occurring.

C (Escalate to sponsor) is premature if the root cause can be resolved at the team level.

D (Reject workload to global team) ignores the underlying cause and friction.

Bottom line: Understanding the root cause aligns teams with defined scope ownership and prevents repeating the conflict. If you’d like, I can outline a quick root-cause checklist you can use in the next meeting.
Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by petrakenesey on: June 23, 2026
Question 35:

Correct answer: D

Why: In Check Point, a VPN Gateway can participate in multiple VPN communities as long as all gateways involved are managed by the same Security Management Server. This ensures the management database can coordinate policies, encryption domains, and tunnel configurations consistently across all communities. If gateways are managed by different Security Management servers, coordinating multiple communities becomes complex or unsupported.

Quick contrasts:

- A) No — not true; gateways can be in more than one community. - B) Modifying vpn_route.conf on each gateway is not the standard, centralized way to enable multi-community participation. - C) The ability isn’t limited by “doesn’t pair with another gateway” but by whether the gateways share the same management server.
Budapest, Hungary

AI Explanation - verified by User2320 on: June 04, 2026
Question 26:
Question 26 explanation:

Correct answer: B (port 80)

Why:

The server must have all connections encrypted. Port 80 is HTTP, which is unencrypted. Disabling port 80 prevents plaintext web traffic.

Ports 443 (HTTPS) is already encrypted and should remain enabled to allow secure connections.

Port 22 (SSH) is encrypted by default and can stay if you still need remote administration (ideally with strong hardening and access control).

Port 587 is for SMTP submission and can be left open only if mail is needed; it can also be secured with TLS.

Practical approach:

Block or close port 80 so HTTP is not served.

Prefer redirecting HTTP requests on 80 to HTTPS (port 443) to maintain user experience while ensuring encryption.

Review other open services (SSH, SMTP) for proper security controls and only enable them if necessary.

Moorestown, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User9195 on: June 14, 2026
Question 39:
Question 39 asks how to verify that the large set of accounts and contacts in NTO are still accurate and still at their respective companies.

Correct answer: A — Use a data enrichment tool to verify account and contact data is up-to-date.

Why this is correct:

Data enrichment tools automatically refresh core fields (company, address, phone, etc.) from authoritative sources and flag records that are stale or misaligned. This scales well to 20,000+ accounts and 75,000+ contacts.

Why the other options are less suitable:

B: Mass emailing contacts to capture bounces tests deliverability, not whether the contact is still with the company or whether core data is accurate.

C: A workflow for owners to manually confirm data is not scalable for such a large dataset and relies on human effort.

D: Stay-in-Touch (Data.com) Emailing contacts can help maintain relationships, but it doesn’t inherently ensure data accuracy across all fields and can be less scalable; enrichment provides a more reliable, automated refresh of data.

Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by maheshmilan100 on: June 16, 2026
Question 29:
Question 29: Answer: B

Why B is correct: Chat history provides context to Copilot, helping it generate more relevant and accurate code suggestions based on prior interactions and conversations.

Why the other options are incorrect:

- A: It claims chat history is trained in real-time, which is not how Copilot’s training is described. - C: Chat history isn’t meant to be stored/shared with other users for collaboration. - D: It is not irrelevant; chat history does affect suggestion relevance.
Reference: GitHub Copilot Chat history documentation.
Bhubaneswar, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9484 on: June 20, 2026
Question 64:
Question 64 explanation:

Scenario: 2,500 users have Office 365 Enterprise E3 licenses assigned individually. You assigned E5 to a group containing all users and need to remove E3 with minimal effort.

Why B is correct: Use Set-MsolUserLicense to remove the E3 licenses from all users (e.g., via -RemoveLicenses "O365_E3"), effectively revoking the old license while preserving the new E5 license from group licensing. This directly handles license removal at scale.

Why the other options aren’t ideal:

- A: The Administrative Units blade controls admin scope, not license removal. - C: The Groups blade is for assigning licenses to a group, not for removing licenses from users. - D: Set-WindowsProductKey is irrelevant to Office 365 licensing.

Quick note: In practice you’d script the removal for all users (often with a Get-MsolUser pipe into Set-MsolUserLicense) to remove E3 while keeping E5 from the group.

Johannesburg, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User2146 on: June 21, 2026
Question 37:
Question 37 asks how to run two Docker containers in Azure Container Instances (ACI) with shared, persistent storage, non-root users, and YAML-based deployment.
Key concepts to meet the requirements:

Put both containers in a single container group so they share lifecycle, resources, and the local network.

Use a shared, persistent storage volume backed by Azure File share (azureFile) so data survives container crashes and container restarts.

Mount the same volume into both containers (volumeMounts) so they can share data and state.

Ensure containers do not run as root (set non-root user in each container, typically via securityContext with runAsNonRoot: true and runAsUser: <non-root UID>).

Why azureFile?

Ephemeral volumes (like emptyDir) disappear when containers crash or stop.

Azure File shares persist independently of container lifecycle, satisfying the persistence and restart requirements.

Example approach (high level):

Create a container group with two containers.

Define a volume named, for example, sharedvolume, of type azureFile (provide shareName, storageAccountName, and access details).

In both containers, mount sharedvolume at the same path (e.g., /data).

For each container, set securityContext to runAsNonRoot and a non-root runAsUser.

Sample (conceptual):

containers: [ container1, container2 ]

volumeMounts: [ { name: sharedvolume, mountPath: /data } ]

volumes: [ { name: sharedvolume, azureFile: { shareName: "myshare", storageAccountName: "mystorage", storageAccountKey: "...", readOnly: false } } ]

securityContext for each container: runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser: 1000

By using a single cont
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5260 on: June 24, 2026
Question 36:
Question 36 asks which items can be customized via the Basic Configuration UI 16 module. Based on how UI16 is used for branding and basic UI layout, the three that can be customized are:

Banner Image: Branding/banner shown in the UI.

Browser Tab Title: Text shown in the browser tab.

Form Header Size: Size/height of the header on forms.

Why the others aren’t correct:

Record Number Format: Typically configured under numbering/record-creation settings, not UI16.

System Date Format: A localization/date-format setting, usually handled outside UI16.

So the correct choices are: Banner Image, Browser Tab Title, and Form Header Size.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User4164 on: June 22, 2026
Question 1:
I can’t see the exhibit image, but here’s the concept behind Question 1.

The destination is 10.10.13.10/32. A single-host IP like this is matched by a host route (prefix length /32).

A network route would cover a subnet, e.g., 10.10.13.0/24 or 10.10.0.0/16. It routes traffic to all hosts in that network, not just one host.

A default route (0.0.0.0/0) is used only when no other more specific route exists.

A floating static route is a static route with a higher administrative distance, used as a backup if a more preferred route fails.

Because the destination is a specific host address (/32), the technically correct type is a host route. The route would win over any longer-prefix network route due to the longest-prefix match rule.
If the exam key shows B (network route), that contradicts the standard interpretation. It could be due to the exhibit suggesting traffic to a network containing the host, or an error in the key. In standard Cisco routing practice, you’d use a host route for 10.10.13.10/32.
Dunn, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User9195 on: June 14, 2026
Question 28:

Answer: D

Explanation:

- The lead sharing rule (Lead object) does not automatically grant access to converted records on the target objects (Account, Contact, Opportunity). After conversion, those records have their own sharing model. - In a scenario where Account/Contact/Opportunity use private sharing and there are no sharing rules for those objects, access is limited to the record owner and anyone above the owner in the role hierarchy. - Therefore, the converted records will be accessible to the lead’s owner (or the converter, depending on your org settings) and to users above them in the role hierarchy. The public group “Sales team” from the Lead rule does not automatically gain access to the converted records. - This makes option D the correct choice; options A, B, and C do not align with how cross-object sharing works on conversion under a private sharing model.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by tjgalti on: July 05, 2026
Question 30:

Correct concept: Use a packet-filter to block traffic from the offending IP to the configuration utility, without impacting other users.

Why D (Packet Filter) is appropriate:

- Packet filters can block traffic based on source IP, destination port, and protocol. - You can drop only the admin/configuration access path (e.g., management port on the Self IP) for that one IP, leaving all other admin/users untouched.

Why not the others:

- SSH: Not targeted to the config utility specifically and would affect SSH access broadly. - IP allow list: Forcing an allow-list would restrict access to many legitimate admins and is not scalable for just one bad IP. - Port lockdown: Global port control, not IP-specific; could disrupt legitimate admin traffic. - Device trust: Not a mechanism for blocking by source IP.

Quick approach (conceptual):

- Identify the unwanted source IP. - Create a Packet Filter that matches src IP = bad IP (and the management port/protocol) and set action to drop. - Attach/apply it so only management traffic from that IP is blocked, preserving access for others.
Thalwil, Switzerland

AI Explanation - verified by anagabrielabfg on: July 04, 2026
Question 126:
The correct answer is C: “As the parent company, it should have ensured its existing data access and storage procedures were integrated into PHT's system.”
Why this is correct:

The core issue was governance and oversight. PHT had no owner or formal data-handling procedures, so sensitive data wasn’t protected consistently.

By integrating Pacific Suites’ established data access and storage controls into PHT, the parent would have ensured standardized protections (access controls, retention, encryption where applicable, audits) across both entities.

Why the other options are less appropriate:

A (transferring personnel) addresses staffing but not the underlying policy and control gaps; it’s not a substitute for proper governance.

B (assessing infrastructure and complete network separation) is a strong security measure but doesn’t fix the absence of integrated data-protection procedures and ownership.

D (replacing electronic files with hard copies) is impractical and does not address electronic data protection needs.

Key concept: data governance and responsibility boundaries between parent and subsidiary, ensuring uniform protection across all data-handling processes. If you want, I can relate this to specific IAPP objectives.
Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User8187 on: June 07, 2026
Question 31:
Question 31 asks whether including a Network Security Group (NSG) in your Azure design to control the connection types between web servers and database servers meets the goal.

Correct answer: A (Yes)

Why:

NSGs are the primary tool to filter network traffic in Azure. You can apply them at the subnet level or to individual network interfaces (NICs).

To control traffic between web and database tiers, put the web servers in one subnet and the database servers in another, then create NSG rules that:

- Inbound: allow traffic from the Web subnet to the DB subnet on the database port(s) (for example, TCP 1433 for SQL Server). - Optionally restrict or deny other traffic between the two subnets. - Ensure outbound rules align with the desired traffic flow.

This setup prevents undesired access while permitting only the approved connection types between tiers.

Practical steps:

Create NSG.

Add inbound rule: source = WebSubnet, destination = DBSubnet, port = DB port, action = Allow.

Add any necessary outbound rules and place the NSG on the DB subnet or on DB NICs.

So NSGs effectively meet the requirement of controlling connections between web and database servers.
Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9933 on: June 22, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s the explanation for Question 1.

Correct answer: A

Why:

The Snowball Edge appliance is provided for a defined rental window, and the use of the device for the initial period (commonly up to 10 days) is included at no additional cost as part of the job.

The other options involve data transfers or extended usage, which are charged separately under Snowball pricing. Specifically:

- Transferring data to the device (data movement into the Snowball) and transferring data from the device to Amazon S3 are billed according to Snowball data transfer pricing. - Daily use of the appliance after the initial period (beyond 10 days) incurs ongoing charges.
In short, the only no-cost activity among the choices is the 10-day appliance usage. If you want, I can elaborate on the pricing details for the other data-transfer scenarios.
Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by User5486 on: June 22, 2026
Question 1:

Correct options: C and D — Support Group and Owned by Group.

Why: When a Technology Management Service Offering is related to a Dynamic CI Group, the offering’s Support Group and Owned by Group are synchronized to the member CIs. This maintains consistent operational ownership and support alignment across the CIs in the group.

Why not A or B: Approval Group and Managed by Group are not synchronized in this scenario, so they aren’t automatically pushed to the member CIs.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5232 on: July 05, 2026
Question 57:
Question 57 asks which two tools are best to analyze an agile team’s performance when momentum is dropping. The recommended answers are A and C: Burndown chart and Cumulative flow diagram of completed features.

Burndown chart (A): Tracks remaining work over time within a sprint or release. If momentum is waning, the line may flatten or slope less steeply, signaling the team isn’t finishing planned work as quickly. It helps the team spot trends and adjust scope or commitments early.

Cumulative flow diagram (C): Shows how work items move through states (e.g., To Do, In Progress, Done) over time. It highlights bottlenecks (e.g., a growing In Progress band) and overall flow stability. It’s useful for diagnosing why momentum is fading—whether work is getting stuck or cycle times are increasing.

Why not the others:

Product backlog burnup (B) focuses on completed work vs. total scope, not immediate team momentum within iterations.

WBS (D) and Project schedule (E) are more traditional/plan-driven tools not typically used to analyze agile team performance.

In short: use burndown for pace of finishing work, and a cumulative flow diagram to visualize flow and identify bottlenecks.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User4554 on: June 19, 2026
Question 20:
Correct answer: A
Explanation:

“Progress iteratively with feedback” means delivering in small, workable increments and using regular feedback to adjust course. This approach helps you learn quickly and adapt, so you can discover and respond to failures earlier in the lifecycle.

Why not the others:

- B (Standardization) is more about consistent ways of working; it’s not the primary outcome of iterative progress with feedback. - C (Understanding customer value) is driven by the overall focus on value and engagement, not specifically the iterative progress principle. - D (Understanding the current state and what can be reused) aligns more with starting where you are, but isn’t the direct result of iterative progress with feedback.
In short, iterative progress with feedback emphasizes early detection of issues and rapid learning, enabling quicker course corrections.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343 on: June 27, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s why Question 1 maps RBAC roles to the groups for the QnA Maker chatbot:

Group: Management-Accountants ? Role: Cognitive Services User (read/write/publish)

- Rationale: They need to approve/publish FAQs (the publish action is included). They’re not given rights to manage roles or create new resources, aligning with least privilege.

Group: Consultant-Accountants ? Role: QnA Maker Editor (Create KB, Update KB, Replace KB, Train)

- Rationale: They must create and amend FAQs, but don’t need publishing rights or RBAC/resource creation permissions.

Group: Agent-CustomerServices ? Role: QnA Maker Read (Download KB, List KBs, Get KB details, Download Alterations)

- Rationale: They only need to browse/search FAQs, not modify them.
Why this fits the requirements:

Content must be approved before publishing, so publishing is restricted to a group with publish rights (Management-Accountants).

Least privilege: each group gets only the permissions they need.

Roles are assigned to Azure AD groups (not individual users), as required.

Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 27, 2026
Question 126:
Answer: D
Reasoning:

SW3 has all access ports in VLAN 50, so it has no ports in VLAN 60.

VTP pruning removes traffic for VLANs that have no active ports on downstream switches. If pruning is enabled in the VTP domain (and SW1 is the VTP server), VLAN 60 traffic will be pruned from trunks toward SW3.

Therefore, SW3 will only receive frames from VLAN 50.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

A: SW1(config)#vtp mode transparent — makes SW1 ignore VTP updates; pruning won’t function domain-wide.

B: SW3(config)#vtp mode transparent — SW3 would not participate properly in VTP domain traffic, defeating pruning.

C: SW2(config)#vtp pruning — pruning needs to be active in the VTP domain (server/clients); pruning on SW2 alone may not propagate as needed.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User4122 on: June 24, 2026
what is the Moa and MOU exacty?
Here are the exact meanings:

MOA (Memorandum of Agreement)

- A formal written document that describes an understanding between two or more parties to work together on a project, program, or service. - Usually outlines scope, roles, responsibilities, governance, resources, and sometimes timeline or budget. - Can be binding or non-binding depending on the language.

MOU (Memorandum of Understanding)

- A non-binding agreement that expresses the parties’ mutual interests and intent to collaborate. - Typically high-level, outlining goals, general terms, and next steps, but not enforceable like a contract.
Key differences:

Binding nature: MOA can be binding if drafted that way; MOU is usually non-binding.

Level of detail: MOA tends to be more detailed about roles/resources; MOU is broader and more exploratory.

Purpose: MOA formalizes collaboration; MOU signals intent to work together.

Tips:

Always read the language to see if it’s legally enforceable.

In exams, remember MOA = often more formal; MOU = expression of intent/non-binding.

Dasmariñas, Philippines

AI Explanation - verified by m.dasharatham on: June 10, 2026
Question 104:
For question Q104, you should select:

Box 1: Field security profile

- Rationale: Use field-level security to control access to sensitive fields like an employee’s employment status. This ensures only designated roles (e.g., the HR manager) can edit that field.

Box 2: Compliance policy (Intune) with Conditional Access

- Rationale: Use device compliance policies to enforce only approved device types can access the solution and data. When combined with Conditional Access, it blocks access from noncompliant or unapproved devices.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User2684 on: June 19, 2026
Question 18:
Question 18 explanation:

Correct answer: D — To prevent a single point of failure.

Why: If only one person understands how the script works, a disruption (leave, vacation, illness) can halt automation. Sharing knowledge distributes this risk, improving continuity and resilience.

Why not the others:

- A) Reducing implementation cost is not the primary benefit of broad knowledge sharing. - B) Identifying complexity could be a byproduct, but the main benefit is preventing outages from knowledge loss. - C) Remediating technical debt concerns code quality, not primarily about distributing knowledge.
Want a quick example of applying this principle to another script scenario?
Orlando, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User5634 on: July 04, 2026
Question 37:

Answer: D

Why D is the best explanation:

- The engineer previously showed initiative and solved problems creatively, yet now declines the invitation. This suggests a motivational issue tied to growth and recognition. - If the project manager hasn’t sufficiently supported and recognized the engineer’s professional growth, the engineer may feel unrewarded or stuck, leading to reluctance to take on new work. - PMI-themed reasoning: effective team motivation and development require recognition, clear growth opportunities, and alignment with career goals.

Why the other options are less likely:

- A (hiring process): Doesn’t fit why a previously proactive engineer would decline a new project. - B (burnout): Possible in some contexts, but no burnout indicators are given; D directly addresses motivation and growth. - C (not feeling welcome): Could matter, but D specifically targets growth/reward which often drive acceptance of new assignments.
Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User3091 on: July 02, 2026
Question 33:
Question 33 asks which two actions should be performed with Case escalation rules. The two correct actions are:

Send email notifications

Re-assign the Case

Why:

Escalation rules are designed to alert the right people and move cases to the next owner when SLAs are at risk. Email notifications ensure someone is aware of the escalation, and re-assigning the case hands it to the appropriate agent or queue who can handle the issue.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

Re-open the Case: Escalation rules don’t typically re-open a closed case. Escalation focuses on notifying and routing, not changing a case’s closed/open status.

Change the Case Priority: While you can adjust priority in some workflows, the canonical escalation actions are about reassigning and notifying. The question asks for two actions, and the strongest pair is email notifications plus re-assignment.

Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User8952 on: June 27, 2026
Question 49:
Question 49 explanation:

Correct answer: C — the virtual network settings for ta1.

Why: To restrict access to a Cognitive Services resource to a specific virtual network, you configure the resource’s networking settings. In ta1, set the virtual network rules (select the VNet, e.g., vnet1) so only resources inside that VNet can access ta1.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

- NSG for vnet1: Network security groups filter traffic at the network level but don’t specifically enforce access control to a particular Cognitive Services resource. - Azure Firewall for vnet1: Similar to NSG, it controls traffic at the network boundary, not the per-resource access control for ta1. - a Language service container for ta1: Not applicable here; Cognitive Services is a managed service, not a container you host yourself.

Takeaway: Use the Language service’s Virtual Network settings to bind access to ta1 to vnet1.

Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7950 on: July 01, 2026
Question 52:
Question 52 asks about consolidating bare-metal servers that run Windows, Linux, and Unix, while also considering data privacy and recurring costs. The provided answer is B: Containers.
Why containers fit (in many scenarios):

They offer OS-level virtualization, which reduces overhead and allows multiple applications to run on fewer physical servers, lowering recurring costs.

If you deploy on-prem, they can help keep data in-house (privacy) since workloads stay in the private environment.

Important caveats:

Containers share the host OS kernel. Windows containers run on Windows hosts, Linux/Unix containers run on Linux/Unix hosts. So truly cross-OS consolidation on a single server isn’t feasible with containers alone; you’d still need separate hosts or a different virtualization approach for a mixed-OS environment.

For true cross-OS consolidation, a Type 1 hypervisor (bare-metal) is typically more appropriate, though that option isn’t listed here.

In short, among the given choices, containers is the best fit for reducing overhead and costs in an on-prem setup, but note the OS diversity limits full consolidation without additional virtualization layers.
Port Louis, Mauritius

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 292:
Question 292 asks which capabilities are in the Platform Perspective of the AWS CAF. The two correct options are B) Data engineering and C) Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD).

B) Data engineering: The Platform Perspective focuses on building and enabling shared services and capabilities that platform teams provide to developers. Data engineering fits here as it covers data pipelines, storage, and data services that support workloads across teams.

C) CI/CD: Platform-level automation for software delivery, including CI/CD pipelines and related tooling, is a core platform capability to enable repeatable, rapid deployment.

Why the others aren’t correct:

A) Performance and capacity management is usually associated with operations or platform operations rather than the core Platform Perspective.

D) Infrastructure protection aligns with the Security Perspective.

E) Change and release management aligns with Governance/organizational processes, not primarily the Platform Perspective.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7034 on: July 01, 2026
Question 2:

Correct answer: C. The flow is a before save flow.

Explanation:

- When a flow is configured as a record-triggered flow with the run type set to “Before Save,” Salesforce restricts the Flow Builder toolbox to a limited set of elements (e.g., Assignment, Decision, Get Records, Loop) because the flow runs before the record is saved and there’s no UI or post-save actions involved. - If it were a Screen Flow, you would see a Screen element in the toolbox. The status (inactive/active) doesn’t change the toolbox; it affects deployment/editability, not the available elements in a before-save flow. - So the limited toolbox indicates you’re editing a Before Save flow, not a screen flow or a different activation state.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User3515 on: July 04, 2026
steps?
Here are concise steps to automate a weekly email in Automation Studio using Guided Send:

Prepare content and audience

- Ensure you have an Email Asset and a target Data Extension with subscribers. - Have a Sender Profile ready (From Name/From Email) or plan to set it in Guided Send.

Create the automation

- In Automation Studio, create a new automation. - Set the schedule to run weekly on your chosen day and time (Weekly).

Add Guided Send

- Add a Guided Send activity to the automation.

Configure Guided Send

- Select the Email Asset to send. - Choose the recipient source (your Data Extension). - Set subject and preheader, then specify sender details (use a Sender Profile or override in Guided Send). - Review any tracking options and personalization needs.

Save and activate

- Save the Guided Send configuration, then save the automation. - Activate the automation.

Optional refinements

- Add a Wait or pre/post filters (SQL/Filter) if you need to refine the audience. - Run a test send or preview to verify content and send details before going live.
These steps will schedule a weekly automated send using Guided Send in Automation Studio.
Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by mf2708 on: June 22, 2026
Question 5:
Here’s the core idea behind Question 5:

Problem focus: Who can enroll a new Autopilot device (Device6) in Intune?

Key concept: MDM enrollment is controlled by the Entra/Intune enrollment scope. In this scenario, Automatic Enrollment is configured with:

- MDM user scope: GroupA - MAM user scope: GroupB

What that means: Only users who are members of GroupA can enroll devices into Intune (i.e., perform MDM enrollment for new devices).

Why User1 and User4, not User2: User1 and User4 are members of GroupA (enabled for MDM enrollment). User2 is a Device Enrollment Manager (DEM), which governs enrollment behavior but does not grant MDM enrollment rights via GroupA’s scope. Therefore, User1 and User4 can enroll Device6, while User2 cannot.

Answer: A — User4 and User1 only
Notes:

The Intune Connector for Active Directory on Server1 will create the on-prem computer object during Autopilot enrollment, but enrollment authorization is determined by MDM user scope (GroupA), not by the DEM role.

Gurugram, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7588 on: June 10, 2026
Question 21:
Question 21 asks what you should change in the scanner to get the automated scans to work, given the header log.

What the log shows: requests with a common browser User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0) get 200 responses, while requests with UA like curl or python receive no response. This suggests the target is filtering or blocking non-browser clients.

Why the correct choice is D: Modify the scanner user agent. By making the scanner mimic a normal browser, you’re more likely to get consistent responses and avoid basic bot protections that block or ignore non-browser clients. This aligns with the observed pattern in the log (browser UA works; non-browser UA does not).

Why the other options are less appropriate here:

- Slow down the scan: may help with rate-limiting, but doesn’t solve UA-based blocking evident in the log. - Change the source IP with VPN: could help if there’s IP-based blocking, but the log indicates UA-based filtering rather than IP blocking. - Only using HTTP GET: would reduce coverage and not address the blocking issue seen with non-browser UAs.
In short, the server’s behavior points to user-agent-based blocking, so adjusting the scanner’s User-Agent to resemble a real browser is the proper fix.
Markkleeberg, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by martinivanov77 on: June 12, 2026
the answer should be B
You're right to question it. The correct answer is B.
Why:

With a contract dispute about closure and incomplete records, the PM should bring together the project team, sponsor, and client to decide what additional work is needed to close and to document it (often in lessons learned). This aligns with formal closure + stakeholder alignment.

A (seek legal advice) is not the immediate step; it’s a potential escalation if no agreement can be reached.

C (close and hand over) is inappropriate while the client disputes closure.

D (lessons learned workshop) is useful later but doesn’t resolve the immediate closure issue.

In short: hold a meeting with the project team, sponsor, and client to agree on the remaining work to close and capture it in lessons learned.
Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

AI Explanation - verified by User1205 on: June 11, 2026
Question 12:
Question 12 explanation:

Correct answer: Yes (A).

Why: Migrating VMs to Azure under a pay-as-you-go subscription uses an operational expenditure (OpEx) model. Pay-as-you-go is cloud-based billing (ongoing usage costs), not a one-time capital purchase.

Why not CapEx: CapEx would involve upfront hardware purchases or large capital investments. In Azure, you don’t own the hardware; you pay for use, which is OpEx.

Key concept: Cloud economics favor OpEx/pay-as-you-go for scalable, per-usage charges rather than upfront capital expenditure.

Thembisa, South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by User7903 on: June 28, 2026
Question 97:
The correct answer is B: netstat.

Why netstat first: Since users can ping the server (ICMP works) but a browser cannot reach HTTP, the issue is likely with the web service binding rather than basic network reachability. On the server, you want to verify that the web server is actually listening on the expected port (e.g., 80 for HTTP, 443 for HTTPS) and on the correct interface.

How to use it: run netstat -tulnp (or ss -tulnp) to view listening TCP/UDP ports and which process owns them. Look for lines like 0.0.0.0:80 or 127.0.0.1:80 to see if the web server is listening on all interfaces or only localhost. If nothing on port 80 is listening, fix the web server configuration or restart the service.

Why the other options are less suitable as first steps:

- traceroute checks network path from a host to another host, not the local service binding. - arp relates to local IP-to-MAC mapping and isn’t relevant once ping succeeds. - tcpdump can capture packets, but you’d use it after confirming the server is listening to diagnose traffic, not as the initial check.
Auckland, New Zealand

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 14 )

QUESTION: 60

QUESTION: 61

QUESTION: 62

Explanation:

QUESTION: 63

Reference:

QUESTION: 64

Reference:

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions
Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 14 )