D-PSC-MN-01 Exam Discussions & Posts
Sania
on: June 28, 2026
Get familiar with the actual exam questions.
Bhubaneswar, India
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 235:
Correct answer: C
Explanation:
- Southbound APIs in Cisco DNA Center are the interface used by the controller (DNA Center) to communicate with the network devices. They handle provisioning, policy application, and telemetry to/from devices.
- The other options describe northbound or external interfaces:
- “interface between the controller and the consumer” = northbound API to external apps or orchestrators.
- “RESTful API interface for orchestrator communication” = typically northbound/external integration.
- “NETCONF API interface for orchestrator communication” is too specific; NETCONF is one possible southbound protocol, but southbound APIs encompass more than just NETCONF.
- In practice, DNA Center uses southbound protocols like NETCONF/RESTCONF (and others) to manage devices, while northbound APIs are used by external systems to request services from DNA Center.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User1464
on: June 28, 2026
Question 13:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 13.
- You need to deploy an AI solution in Azure and be able to build, test, and deploy predictive analytics.
- The proposed solution is to use Azure Cosmos DB.
- What the given answer implies
- Answer: No. Cosmos DB alone does not provide end-to-end AI tooling.
- Why Cosmos DB is not sufficient
- Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed database service. It stores and serves data, but it does not offer the native tooling to build, train, test, validate, and deploy predictive models.
- Building and deploying predictive analytics is typically done with an AI/ML platform such as Azure Machine Learning Studio (or the Azure ML service), which manages experiments, training, pipelines, and deployment.
- How to approach correctly
- Use Azure Machine Learning Studio or the Azure ML service to handle the ML lifecycle.
- You can use Cosmos DB as a data source or sink (e.g., feed training data from Cosmos DB into ML, or store model outputs back into Cosmos DB), but it’s not the end-to-end solution by itself.
- The correct choice is No, Cosmos DB does not meet the goal of building/testing/deploying predictive analytics. Use an AI/ML service (Azure Machine Learning) for the end-to-end process, possibly using Cosmos DB as a data source.
Calamba, Philippines
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 10:
Question 10 asks how to enable active learning for a natural language model (LUIS).
Correct answer: C — Add log=true to the prediction endpoint query.
Why:
- Active learning relies on collecting real user utterances to improve the model. The
log parameter, when set to true, enables logging of user queries from the prediction endpoint so you can review and label them for retraining.
- The other options don’t enable active learning:
- A) show-all-intents=true is about displaying intents in results, not collecting training data.
- B) Speech priming is unrelated to active learning.
- D) Sentiment analysis is a separate capability and not needed to enable active learning.
Practical note:
- This is based on the guidance to “log user queries to enable active learning” in the LUIS docs. Ensure you have the proper permissions and review/logged utterances can be used to periodically retrain and improve accuracy.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 27:
The correct choice is raw image binary.
Why:
- Form Recognizer accepts image data in the request body as raw binary (bytes). This sends the image directly to the API without wrapping it in JSON or encoding, helping satisfy the “do not store in the cloud” requirement.
- The other formats are not how you upload image data to Form Recognizer:
- “form” isn’t a valid upload format.
- “URL encoded” is not used for binary image data.
- “JSON” would require base64-encoding the image and isn’t the standard upload method.
Tips:
- Send the image bytes in the POST body with an appropriate Content-Type (e.g.,
image/jpeg or image/png).
- If you used a URL, the service would fetch the image, which may not align with strict non-storage requirements.
If you want, I can outline a quick example snippet for sending a JPEG image as binary to the endpoint.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 25:
The correct choice is A: From the Azure portal, configure parallel indexing.
Why:
- Parallel indexing allows the indexer to process multiple documents concurrently, which directly reduces the time required to build the index when you have a sizable data set (10 GB of scanned documents/images in this case).
- The other options don’t impact indexing speed:
- Scheduled indexing just controls when indexing runs, not how fast it builds the index.
- Configuring field mappings via REST API affects data mapping, not speed.
- Creating a text-based indexer via REST API doesn’t inherently speed up ingestion compared with parallel processing.
Notes:
- Enabling parallel indexing increases throughput but may consume more resources; ensure the data source supports parallel ingestion and monitor performance quotas.
Kolkata, India
Joachim
on: June 27, 2026
Deep and truly uses case.
Pachuca, Mexico
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s why Question 1 maps RBAC roles to the groups for the QnA Maker chatbot:
- Group: Management-Accountants ? Role: Cognitive Services User (read/write/publish)
- Rationale: They need to approve/publish FAQs (the publish action is included). They’re not given rights to manage roles or create new resources, aligning with least privilege.
- Group: Consultant-Accountants ? Role: QnA Maker Editor (Create KB, Update KB, Replace KB, Train)
- Rationale: They must create and amend FAQs, but don’t need publishing rights or RBAC/resource creation permissions.
- Group: Agent-CustomerServices ? Role: QnA Maker Read (Download KB, List KBs, Get KB details, Download Alterations)
- Rationale: They only need to browse/search FAQs, not modify them.
Why this fits the requirements:
- Content must be approved before publishing, so publishing is restricted to a group with publish rights (Management-Accountants).
- Least privilege: each group gets only the permissions they need.
- Roles are assigned to Azure AD groups (not individual users), as required.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by User2464
on: June 27, 2026
Question 17:
Question 17: Answer: D — Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly.
Why this is correct:
- Ongoing cost capture and review gives visibility into spend, committed costs, and invoicing accuracy throughout the project, reducing the risk of late handover and inflated completion costs at closure.
Why the other options are weaker:
- A: Notifying vendors about invoicing deadlines addresses timing but not allocation or accuracy of costs; it doesn’t prevent misbilling.
- B: Reviewing committed vs. invoiced costs at close is a retrospective check; it won’t prevent delays during handover.
- C: Involving finance and the vendor helps resolve issues, but without regular cost capture, problems may be missed or discovered late.
Overall, continuous cost tracking aligns with PMI cost management and closing processes, preventing surprises at handover.
Abidjan, Ivory Coast
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 161:
- Key idea: In OSPF, an ABR (here, Atlanta) can summarize routes between areas using the area range command. This reduces the number of Type 3 LSA floods into the backbone (Area 0) and provides a single or fewer inter-area routes to the other router (Dallas).
- What the command does: On the ABR, you configure
- area 0 range <network> <mask>
This creates a summary LSA for the specified network range when advertising into Area 0, thus cutting down the flooding of individual inter-area LSAs into the backbone.
- Why this matters for Dallas: With proper summarization at the ABR, Dallas sees summarized inter-area routes instead of many individual routes, reducing LSA churn.
- Answer reality check for Q161:
- The listed options include both area 0 and area 1 range commands with two different masks.
- The standard correct approach to limit flooding into the backbone is to use a summary for Area 0 (i.e., an area 0 range command), not an area 1 range command.
- The official key shows option D, but based on Cisco OSPF behavior, you’d expect an area 0 range command (with the appropriate mask) to achieve the stated effect. If the exhibit shows that the networks to summarize reside in Area 1, you’d still summarize into Area 0, not Area 1.
- If you can share the exact network plan in the exhibit, I can confirm which exact mask (255.255.252.0 vs 255.255.248.0) to use with the
area 0 range command.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 160:
Question 160 asks how SSO works with HSRP to minimize disruption.
- Correct concept: The answer should be C — "It enables data forwarding along known routes following a switchover, while the routing protocol reconverges."
Why:
- SSO (Stateful Switchover) preserves forwarding state on redundant supervisors. When the active HSRP router fails or a switchover occurs, the standby can resume forwarding using the already learned state (MACs, FIB entries, ARP, etc.) without waiting for full routing convergence.
- HSRP provides the active/standby pair for first-hop redundancy. SSO ensures the data plane continues to forward packets during the switchover, while the control plane (routing protocols) reconverges in the background.
- This minimizes disruption because traffic continues along known paths even as the routing topology updates.
Why the other options are less correct:
- A: HSRP election behavior isn’t the primary role of SSO.
- B: Fast link-failure failover is about link health, not the switchover of supervisors.
- D: “Failover to the standby RP on the same device” isn’t an accurate description of SSO’s effect.
Note: The provided key marks D, but the Cisco behavior described by SSO with HSRP is best described by option C.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna
on: June 27, 2026
Question 411:
Question 411 asks what two actions a project manager should take after the security department flags regulatory requirements.
Answer: The two correct actions are B and E.
- B: Ask the security department for details about regulations. Why: You need precise, testable requirements to understand what must be complied with. Without specifics, you can’t analyze impact or plan properly.
- E: Ask the team members to analyze the impact of including this regulation. Why: Impact analysis (cost, schedule, scope, risk) informs whether and how to implement the regulation and helps with prioritization and planning.
Why the other options aren’t the best immediate actions:
- A: The product owner owns the backlog; without specifics, adding requirements is premature. The PM should gather details first (B) and analyze impact (E) before backlog actions.
- C: Prioritizing with stakeholders is important, but you should first understand the regulation and its impact rather than asking for priority without analysis.
- D: Instructing the team to include it in the next iteration skips the necessary impact analysis and refinement.
In short, gather specifics from security, then perform an impact analysis before altering backlog or sprint plans.
Riga, Latvia
AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna
on: June 27, 2026
Question 397:
Question 397 explanation:
- Correct answer: A: Review the risk management plan to identify the response strategy.
- Why: When a deadline is at risk due to resource delays, the proper first step is to consult the project’s risk framework. The
risk management plan defines how risks are identified, analyzed, and responded to, including escalation paths and predefined response strategies. This ensures you act consistently with the project’s approved approach.
- Why not B: Escalation to the sponsor is appropriate only if the risk requires authority beyond the PM or if the plan calls for escalation; it’s not the immediate, defined next step by itself.
- Why not C: Fast-tracking tasks from the milestone list is a tactical schedule adjustment, not the correct first action to address the underlying risk.
- Why not D: A team meeting can help collaboration, but without applying the predefined risk response, it doesn’t address the formal process for handling the risk.
Next steps after A (brief): update the risk register as needed, apply the identified risk response per the plan, and escalate if the plan requires it.
Riga, Latvia
AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna
on: June 27, 2026
Question 396:
Question 396 scenario: A hybrid project (predictive for the bridge, agile for the software) faces delays due to lack of information. The best action is B: Make work visible using Kanban boards.
Why: Kanban boards visualize work items, status, and bottlenecks, making information gaps visible and helping the team manage flow. This supports both the predictive and agile parts of the project by signaling what’s blocked and where decisions or information are needed.
Why the other options are weaker here:
- A. Increasing retrospectives helps process improvement but doesn’t directly address the immediate information gaps causing delays.
- C. Incorporating small batches is useful in agile but doesn’t specifically surface or manage the information bottlenecks.
- D. Lean manufacturing isn’t appropriate for software development and doesn’t target information flow issues.
If you want, I can walk through how to set up a Kanban board for this project and what metrics to track.
Riga, Latvia
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 152:
Answer: Increase the dynamic channel assignment interval.
Why:
- The logs show APs going down with the reason “Radio channel set,” which means the WLC is reconfiguring AP channels.
- When a radio changes channels, clients can briefly disconnect. By increasing the DCA interval (default is about 10 minutes), channel changes occur less frequently, reducing user disconnections.
What each option does:
- enable coverage hole detection: helps find coverage gaps, not related to channel changes.
- increase the AP heartbeat timeout: affects AP-controller failure detection, not channel reconfiguration.
- enable BandSelect: band steering, not about channel changes.
- increase the dynamic channel assignment interval: directly reduces how often AP channels are changed, reducing user impact.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 144:
Question 144 asks about the role of the Rendezvous Point (RP) in PIM Sparse Mode.
- Correct answer: C — The RP is the multicast router that is the root of the PIM-SM shared multicast distribution tree.
Explanation:
- In PIM-SM, receivers initially join the shared tree by sending joins toward the RP. The RP acts as the root of this shared distribution tree (the RPT), so data from the source is forwarded along that shared path toward the receivers.
- The RP is not merely a control-plane entity; it participates in multicast forwarding for the shared tree.
- The other options are incorrect: the RP does not maintain default aging timeouts as its primary role; it is not only control-plane; and it does not “respond to joins with the source”—joins push toward the RP, and the path to the source may be established via the SPT if/when it’s desired.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 69:
The correct choice is A: speech-to-text in the Azure AI Speech service.
Why:
- To detect when the user asks a question in a video stream, you first need to convert spoken words to text. The Speech service provides real-time or batch transcription, which is the foundation for recognizing questions.
- Once you have the transcript, you can apply simple NLP (e.g., look for question words or a trailing question mark) to determine when a question is asked.
Why the others aren’t suitable:
- B (language detection) would identify the language but not whether the utterance is a question.
- C (Face service) analyzes imagery of faces, not spoken content.
- D (Custom Vision) detects objects in images, not spoken language.
Note: You’d likely use Speech to Text as the first step, then add lightweight text-analysis to flag questions in real time, keeping development effort minimal.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 133:
- Correct answer: Layer 3 intercontroller roaming (option B)
- Why: If a WLC has Mobility Role Anchor configured, that controller acts as the anchor for roaming clients. When the client roams to another WLC (intercontroller roam), the anchor preserves the session and traffic is routed back through the anchor, enabling Layer 3 mobility across controllers (i.e., intercontroller roaming with L3 behavior).
- Why the other options don’t fit:
- Indirect: not a standard Cisco roaming term in this context.
- Intracontroller: roaming within the same controller (not intercontroller).
- Layer 2 intercontroller: intercontroller roaming, but L2 mobility would not involve the anchor-based L3 mobility behavior described here.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 132:
- Correct answer: Mobility Express (option D)
- Why: Mobility Express is Cisco’s deployment model for small branches that provides a built-in controller on the APs, enabling CAPWAP-based management without a separate external WLC. This setup gives local management control at the branch while still using CAPWAP to manage and coordinate multiple APs.
- Why the other options don’t fit:
- Local mode autonomous: APs operate independently with no CAPWAP controller, so there isn’t centralized (or CAPWAP-based) management.
- SD-Access: This is Cisco’s fabric-driven, large-scale enterprise solution, not a small-branch local-management model.
- “Wireless” (in this context) isn’t a distinct deployment model like Mobility Express; the scenario specifically points to Mobility Express for local management with CAPWAP.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 68:
Question 68 asks how to ensure only specific resources can access an Azure AI Service CSAccount1, with minimal admin effort and no external access.
Answer: A and E
Why these two work:
- A. In VNet1, enable a service endpoint for CSAccount1.
- This allows traffic from resources in the VNet to reach CSAccount1 over the Azure backbone, rather than over the public internet. It’s the first step to confine access to the virtual network.
- E. In CSAccount1, modify the virtual network settings.
- After enabling the endpoint, restrict CSAccount1 to “Selected networks” (or equivalent) and specify VNet1 (and its subnet). This blocks external/public access and ensures only the chosen VNet/subnet can reach the service.
Why the other options aren’t part of the two-answer solution:
- B (IAM) manages control plane access, not data-plane network access.
- C (modify VNet settings) is too generic and not needed to achieve network-restricted access.
- D (create a subnet) would be necessary only if a subnet didn’t exist; the question already aims for a minimal-effort solution, and A+E suffices if a subnet exists.
Key concept: use a service endpoint to connect the VNet to the Cognitive Service and then lock the CSAccount1 to selected networks.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 66:
For question 66, the recommended choice is D: Univariate Anomaly Detection.
Why:
- You’re monitoring a single data stream (temperature). Univariate anomaly detection analyzes one time series and flags unusual values automatically, with minimal setup.
- It’s the simplest option that still detects atypical values without building a multi-variable model.
Why the others aren’t as suitable:
- A: Multivariate Anomaly Detection is overkill here since you don’t have multiple interdependent streams to consider.
- B: Azure Stream Analytics metric alerts in Azure Monitor are threshold-based, not true anomaly detection; they require predefined thresholds and may miss subtle or seasonally changing anomalies.
- C: The option isn’t about anomaly detection and would add unnecessary complexity.
How you might implement quickly:
- Use a built-in anomaly detector for a single variable, feed it your temperature stream, and trigger alerts (via Azure Monitor, Logic Apps, or Functions) when anomalies are detected.
- Tune the sensitivity to balance false positives/negatives.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 63:
- Correct answer: D — virtual network rules
Explanation:
- You want to restrict access to the Language service so only specific Azure processes can reach it, with minimal admin effort.
- Virtual network rules let you specify which VNets are allowed to access the Cognitive Services endpoint, providing network-level access control without complex configuration.
- Why not the others:
- IPsec rules: are for VPN connectivity, not fine-grained service access control.
- Azure Application Gateway: manages HTTP/S traffic, not direct access control to Cognitive Services.
- A virtual network gateway: used for connecting networks (VPN/ExpressRoute), not for restricting access to the service itself.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 61:
- Correct answer: A — Run the Bot Framework Emulator.
Explanation:
- The Bot Framework Emulator is the local testing tool for bots built with the Bot Framework SDK. It lets you validate the bot running on your own machine before you connect to any channels or deploy to Azure.
- How it helps: you simulate conversations, inspect messages and payloads, and verify dialog flows and logic against your local bot endpoint.
- Typical flow: run the bot locally (e.g., on http://localhost:3978/api/messages), open the Emulator, configure a new bot with that endpoint (and AppId/AppPassword if needed), then start a chat to validate behavior.
- Why not the other options:
- Compose is for bot design/testing environments but not the standard local runtime validator before connecting to channels.
- Registering with Azure Bot Service is for deployment to Azure, not local validation.
- Windows Terminal is just a shell, not a testing tool.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 126:
Answer: D
Reasoning:
- SW3 has all access ports in VLAN 50, so it has no ports in VLAN 60.
- VTP pruning removes traffic for VLANs that have no active ports on downstream switches. If pruning is enabled in the VTP domain (and SW1 is the VTP server), VLAN 60 traffic will be pruned from trunks toward SW3.
- Therefore, SW3 will only receive frames from VLAN 50.
Why the other options aren’t correct:
- A: SW1(config)#vtp mode transparent — makes SW1 ignore VTP updates; pruning won’t function domain-wide.
- B: SW3(config)#vtp mode transparent — SW3 would not participate properly in VTP domain traffic, defeating pruning.
- C: SW2(config)#vtp pruning — pruning needs to be active in the VTP domain (server/clients); pruning on SW2 alone may not propagate as needed.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 119:
Here’s the gist of Question 119 and why the chosen option (B) matters.
- Topic: Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) port-priority on a link with Link1 (copper) and Link2 (fiber). The fiber link should be the primary forwarding path, but on SW2 the fiber port is currently blocked.
- Key concept: For a given network segment, STP selects a designated port—the port on the segment that will forward toward the segment. The decision is made using the Port ID (Port Priority + Port Number). The lower Port ID wins; if costs to the root are equal, the port with the lower Port ID becomes designated.
- What the fix does: You influence which end of the Link2 segment becomes the designated port by adjusting the Port Priority on the ends of that link.
- The correct choice is: Enter spanning-tree port-priority 32 on SW1 (the end of Link2 opposite SW2). Lowering SW1’s port-priority on that link makes SW1’s Port ID smaller than SW2’s on that link, which causes the designated/forwarding role to align with the desired path.
- Why the SW2 change alone didn’t suffice: Simply changing SW2’s port-priority doesn’t guarantee SW1’s end won’t still win the designated role, depending on root paths and costs. Adjusting SW1’s end to a lower value ensures the intended designated-port outcome.
In short, by lowering SW1’s port-priority on the Link2 interface, you steer which end becomes the designated port for that link, resolving the blocked fiber path.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 57:
- Why: To authenticate to the Speech service with an Azure AD (Entra) token, the service must be exposed via a custom subdomain and be reachable over a private endpoint. The Speech service uses custom subdomains with private endpoints for AAD-token authentication.
- What the two actions mean:
- Configure a custom subdomain: Sets up a dedicated, recognized domain for the Speech resource to issue and validate AAD tokens.
- Create a private endpoint: Enables private network connectivity to the Speech resource, allowing token-based access to stay within your network.
- Why the other options aren’t correct here:
- Enable a virtual network service endpoint: not required for AAD token authentication.
- Request an X.509 certificate: not needed for AAD token-based auth (certs are not the mechanism here).
- Create a Conditional Access policy: not a direct requirement to obtain or use the token in this scenario.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 56:
- Correct answer: B. Billing
- Why: For the Azure Cognitive Services container to start, you must supply three things: EULA acceptance, Billing, and ApiKey. Without these, the container won’t start. In this scenario, the question is asking which parameter must be included, and Billing is the required one among the options listed.
- What Billing means here: it indicates billing against your Azure subscription and ties the container usage to your resource.
- ApiKey note: the ApiKey you provide must be the key from the resource (Keys and Endpoints) page for your Anomaly Detector.
- Where to find keys: the API key is available on the Azure Cognitive Services resource keys page (and also in the LUIS portal’s Keys and Endpoints if applicable).
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 110:
Question 110 describes a NAT setup with an internal network 10.1.1.0/27 and a public address pool 209.165.201.0/27.
- Correct answers: C and D.
Why:
- C: The 10.1.1.0/27 subnet is assigned as the inside local addresses. Inside local are the private addresses used on the internal network.
- D: Inside source addresses are translated to the 209.165.201.0/27 subnet. This is the inside global pool; internal hosts get translated to addresses in that public subnet as they reach the outside.
Why the other options aren’t correct:
- A: It states a one-to-one NAT translation. The scenario describes NAT to a public pool, which typically implies dynamic translation rather than a per-host static one-to-one mapping.
- B: The 209.165.201.0/27 subnet is assigned as the outside local address range. Outside local is the address the outside world sees for internal hosts, not the pool used for translation; this option is not accurate for this configuration.
Plano, United States
chris_infosec
on: June 27, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling through challenging material and brain dumps. Those real exam questions seem endless sometimes.
Portugal
AI Explanation - verified by User2971
on: June 27, 2026
Question 107:
Question 107 discusses a port-channel between SW2 and SW3 where SW2 isn’t running Cisco IOS, and the channel doesn’t come up.
- Correct answer: B — The port-channel on SW2 is using an incompatible protocol.
Why:
- A port-channel requires both ends to negotiate the same channel protocol (e.g., Cisco’s PAgP or LACP from IEEE 802.3ad).
- If SW2 is not Cisco, it likely doesn’t implement Cisco’s PAgP, or it uses a different protocol. In that case SW3’s side cannot complete the negotiation, so the channel never forms.
Why the other options aren’t correct:
- A: “The port-channel mode should be set to auto.” Auto (PAgP) or active (LACP) negotiations won’t succeed if the other side doesn’t speak the same protocol.
- C: “The port-channel trunk is not allowing the native VLAN.” This is a post-formation VLAN issue, not the reason the channel fails to form.
- D: “The port-channel interface load balance should be set to src-mac.” Load-balancing mode affects traffic, not the initial establishment.
What to check:
- Ensure both sides support the same protocol (best practice: use LACP with
channel-group <n> mode active on Cisco gear).
- If mixing vendors, verify that the non-Cisco device supports the chosen protocol and configuration.
Plano, United States
lunch_break_labs
on: June 18, 2026
Three weeks of intense studying and endless brain dumps left me exhausted but I finally passed this exam. It was very hard and I had to rely on the AI Assistant and real exam questions to make it through.
Australia
justanothertechguy
on: June 15, 2026
Spent countless nights going through braindumps and the AI Assistant. The exam was very hard but I managed to pass.
Sweden
gita_dataeng
on: June 07, 2026
Three weeks of using braindumps and the AI Assistant got me through this challenging exam. Real exam questions popped up but it was still very hard.
Poland
JustPassedBro
on: June 05, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and honestly the braindumps were my last resort. The real exam questions were very hard and the stress was unreal.
Mexico
LinuxPlus_Len
on: June 03, 2026
Passed it after weeks of stress and hours with brain dumps. Real exam questions were tough and the AI Assistant was helpful but the exam was still very hard.
Kenya
certgrind_2025
on: June 01, 2026
Finally done with this exam adn it was very hard but using brain dumps really made a difference. Without real exam questions I don’t think I would have passed.
Jordan
jason_helpdesk
on: May 29, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam and the brain dumps were my last resort after realizing how challenging it was. The AI Assistant helped me piece together the real exam questions I kept stumbling on.
Malaysia
nina_sysadmin
on: May 28, 2026
Underestimated this exam and found myself buried in braindumps for weeks. The AI Assistant and some exam dumps were the only reason I finally passed.
Denmark
itz_mario
on: May 22, 2026
Underestimated this exm thinking the material was enough but needed brain dumps to make it through. The real exam questions were very hard without practice.
Romania
dockerdave
on: May 21, 2026
This exam was very hard and underestimated it the first time. Passed after grinding throgh brain dumps with the AI Assistant.
UAE
wei_syseng
on: May 10, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this challenging exm using braindumps and the AI Assistant. Real exam questions felt very hard but doable with some help.
France
PingOfDeath_P
on: May 05, 2026
Underestimated the exam and had to grind through endless braindumps to finally get past it. The AI Assistant helped a bit but it was very hard overall.
Saudi Arabia
SleepDeprivedPass
on: May 04, 2026
The exm was surprisingly tough and I had to lean heavily on brain dumps to make it through. Even with the AI Assistant the real exam questions were a challenge.
Taiwan
ipv6_ready
on: May 01, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and found the brain dumps really helpful for understanding the real exam questions. Very hard and honestly drained by the end.
Czech Republic
omar_itpro
on: April 29, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and the AI Assistant plus the braindumps were key. An incredibly challenging exam.
South Africa
NoSleepNoCert
on: April 20, 2026
Took two attempts befoer finally passing this exam as the challenging questions had me doubting myself but the braindumps and AI Assistant were helpful. This prep resource made a difference when I needed help understanding tough concepts.
Japan
dhcp_d
on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks on brain dumps and still found this exm very hard. Thankfully some real exam questions were recognizable but I barely scraped through.
United Kingdom
wei_syseng
on: April 07, 2026
Took two attempts and the exam was very hard with real exam questions that caught me off guard. The brain dumps helped a bit but the AI Assistant was what got me through.
New Zealand
tcpdump_t
on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks preparing but the real exam questions caught me off guard even with all the braindumps. It was a very hard exam and that AI Assistant didn't make it much easier.
Canada
AnsibleAndy
on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks trying to crack this exam with real exam questions and braindumps but it was still very hard. The AI Assistant was a bit of help but overall it took a lot out of me.
Spain