ScenarioAdditional InformationChief Executive Officer (CEO): He started the company 25 years ago and knows his job very well. He injured his leg two years ago which has restricted his visits to the engineering are
Answer(s): B,C
The Sales Manager is suited as User Assurance because B) his recent enthusiasm and sales focus align with ensuring the project delivers market-facing benefits, and C) he can evaluate the calendar’s potential impact on sales, providing real user insight into value realization. A) Incorrect: reflects CEO resource commitment, not user assurance. D) Incorrect: stakeholder engagement advice is broader; not specifically user assurance role. E) Incorrect: career move motivation is not a justification for assurance responsibilities. F) Incorrect: conflict resolution between departments is governance, not the assurance role.
Answer(s): A,E
The correct answer explains why Central Records is suited to Project Support: A) because the CEO’s overarching perspective and resource authority align with strategic project support responsibilities; E) they perform a quality assurance function across projects, ensuring standards and governance are maintained.B) Incorrect: refers to configuration management for project products, not a generic project support role.C) Incorrect: existence or tenure does not define suitability for project support.D) Incorrect: compliance is typically broader than project support’s remit.F) Incorrect: organizational standards knowledge is relevant but not enough on its own without authority and QA function.
HOTSPOTAdditional InformationChief Executive Officer (CEO): He started the company 25 years ago and knows his job very well. He injured his leg two years ago which has restricted his visits to the engineering area. As CEO he has an overall perspective of the business strategic requirements and the authority to commit resources as required.Marketing Director: She has been with the company for three years, following a successful career with a publicity company. She has the ability to represent the needs of the business, particularly as this is a marketing project. She has the authority to commit the annual business marketing budget, from which the project will be funded, as she sees appropriate. She will be responsible for monitoring the expected benefits of the calendar, in particular the improvement of the company's image.Engineering Manager: He has been responsible for many engineering innovations in the company and is still as keen and energetic as the day he started. VVhilst he will not be part of the project team, his staff will feature in the photos for the promotional calendar.Central Records: This group of five staff looks after all company records and document control. They now maintain all project files.Bright Lights: This is the local office supplies company. It supplies all the stationery and office equipment needs of the company and will supply the stationery for this project.Portraits ltd: This is a professional photographic company with a number of excellent photographers and a history of successful work. This company has been selected to take the photos for the company calendar. It has yet to be decided which of the photographers to use.Using the additional Information provided for this question In the Scenario Booklet, answer the following question.Lines 1 to 5 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies. Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.
Answer(s): A
ScenarioAdditional InformationFurther information on some resources who could be involved in the project:Outcome Account Manager: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the Information Technology and Facilities teams during the project.Director of Finance Division: She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene.Hardware Manager: Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the needs of his colleagues working in software.Payroll Manager: Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry's business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards.Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed Executive for this project?
Outcome: Correct actions are to replace with Director of Finance Division and retain because he has the right authority? Wait: The provided correct answers are B and C.B) Replacing with Director of Finance Division is appropriate to ensure a cost-conscious approach and value for money across operational and project activities, aligning with ongoing financial stewardship.C) Retain because the individual has the appropriate level of authority to influence the project’s strategic direction, particularly for outsourcing decisions, ensuring governance alignment.A) Retain since outsourcing is best: incorrect because outsourcing decision needs financial governance and strategic impact, not just acceptance of outsourcing.D) Add Director of Finance: incorrect because not about operational understanding of IT/Facilities.E) Replace Payroll Manager: incorrect as payroll expertise is less central to strategic outsourcing governance.
ScenarioAdditional InformationFurther information on some resources who could be involved in the project:Outcome Account Manager: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the InformationTechnology and Facilities teams during the project.Director of Finance Division: She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene.Hardware Manager: Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the needs of his colleagues working in software.Payroll Manager: Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry's business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards.Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed Senior User for this project?
The correct answer is B and C.B) Replacing with Director of Research and Development is appropriate because the Senior User should represent all user interests and ensure both IT and Facilities needs are specified; a role with cross-divisional authority can consolidate requirements. C) Removing due to lack of authority to commit user resources is correct because the Senior User must be able to secure resources; the current Outcome representation cannot commit resources for the project.A) Retain for outsourcing resources is incorrect since the Senior User role is about user representation, not resourcing. D) Add Hardware Manager is incorrect because hardware provision is a support activity, not a user representative requirement. E) Retain for ongoing support misstates the Senior User’s authority and primary mandate.
ScenarioAdditional InformationFurther information on some resources who could be involved in the project:Outcome Account Manager: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the InformationTechnology and Facilities teams during the project.Director of Finance Division: She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene.Hardware Manager: Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the needs of his colleagues working in software.Payroll Manager: Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry's business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards.Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed Senior Supplier for this project?
Answer(s): A,B
The correct actions recognize the Senior Supplier should include individuals with up-to-date knowledge of the target products/services and impact on the supplier domain.A) Retain because she is responsible for the design of the future Information Technology organization and working practices.B) Add 'Director of Facilities' because he is responsible for the design of the future organization, processes, systems and operation models for Facilities.C) Add 'Hardware Manager' because he provides computer hardware to all business functions and will be impacted by the outcome.D) Remove because she only represents the Information Technology Division.E) Replace with 'Director of Facilities' because he supports the initiative and has many ideas about how to improve the service.
ScenarioAdditional InformationFurther information on some resources who could be involved in the project:Outcome Account Manager: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the Information Technology and Facilities teams during the project.Director of Finance Division: She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene.Hardware Manager: Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the needs of his colleagues working in software.Payroll Manager: Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry's business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards.Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed business assurance for this project?
Answer(s): D,E
The two correct actions are D and E because business assurance should include stakeholders with governance and business risk insight: Director of Finance Division oversees cost-consciousness and payment authorization, ensuring financial controls are maintained; familiarity with the business strategy, risk assessment, and standards supports alignment with the Business Case and ongoing assurance. A is wrong because the Payroll Manager is not a user or supplier-facing project assurance owner, and remove would misclassify him as a user. B is incorrect since the project is not deemed simple and still requires business assurance roles. C is wrong because Outcome consultants who did feasibility do not automatically become ongoing business assurance owners.
ScenarioAdditional InformationFurther information on some resources who could be involved in the project:Outcome Account Manager: He represents Outcome which is a recruitment agency that provides specialist outsourcing resources. Outcome provided the consultants who carried out the feasibility study and the same consultants will be providing support and guidance to the Information Technology and Facilities teams during the project.Director of Finance Division: She was transferred from the Information Technology Division 12 months ago. She is responsible for ensuring a cost-conscious approach is adopted in all operational and project activities across the Ministry of Food Hygiene.Hardware Manager: Reports to the Director of Information Technology. He provides computer hardware to all business functions but has little awareness of the needs of his colleagues working in software.Payroll Manager: Reports to the Director of Finance. He is a very experienced and efficient qualified accountant who has much of the responsibility of running the Finance Division on behalf of the Director of Finance. He has been involved in drafting the Ministry's business strategy and assisting in a full business risk assessment. He also drafted the corporate Business Case standards.Which 2 alternative actions apply to the proposed supplier assurance for this project?
Answer(s): B,D
Outcome Account Manager to advise on outsourcing options and impact on project products; add him as a verifier of supplier capabilities and risks. This aligns with ensuring supplier assurance covers outsourcing governance and product integrity.A) Incorrect: having a facilities qualification does not establish independence or supplier assurance relevance for outsourcing requirements.B) Correct: provides grounding on products and long-term outsourcing considerations, aiding assurance of fit with the business need.C) Incorrect: popularity or past performance in Facilities does not guarantee independence or suitability to judge outsourcing risk or product integrity.D) Correct: the Account Manager offers supplier-related insights affecting product integrity and risks, supporting assurance evidence.E) Incorrect: independence is about objectivity; involvement does not automatically disqualify but requires independence assessment.
Post your Comments and Discuss PRINCE2 PRINCE2 7 Practitioner exam prep with other Community members:
Our website is free, but we have to fight against AI bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the PRINCE2 7 Practitioner content, but please register or login to continue.