HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not supported)Extract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Column 1 is a list of objectives. For each objective in Column 1, select from Column 2 the quality activity that addresses it. Each selection from Column 2 can be used once, more than once or not at all. Drop down the right answer.
Answer(s): A
HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not Supported)Extract from the Project Product Description (with errors)The information in Column 1 may be entered in the Product Description for the chosen label design. Column 2 is a list of the quality headings (excluding Quality Method) in a Product Description. For each entry in Column 1 decide if it should be included in the Product Description headings shown and select the heading from Column 2 under which it should be recorded.Drop down the right answer.
ScenarioExtract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Which 2 statements apply to the Composition section?
Answer(s): A,B
A) Correct: Amending entry 2 to 'Selected paper' aligns the composition with the actual product scope and ensures the Product Description is accurate as a component of the project product structure. B) Correct: Deleting entry 3 is appropriate if it does not represent a major product to be delivered by the project, maintaining relevance of the Composition section. C) Incorrect: Moving entry 6 to Derivation assumes pre-existing products; PRINCE2 composition should reflect planned deliverables, not pre-existing items. D) Incorrect: Deleting entry 7 is inappropriate if the photographer’s outputs are intended deliverables; removing them omits required products. E) Incorrect: Adding calendars distributed to customers changes the composition; additions must be justified by the project’s agreed product scope.
ScenarioExtract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Which 2 statements apply to the Derivation section?
Answer(s): C,D
The Derivation section involves asserting what derived products are produced from the project’s product flow and ensuring correct placement within the Product Breakdown. C) Delete entry 11 as this is already correctly shown under Development Skills required is correct because it avoids duplication by placing the capability in the proper parent product area. D) Move entry 12 to Composition, because this is within the scope of this project is correct as Composition is the appropriate derived product container for that entry. A) and B) misplace or remove items without aligning to derivation rules. E) Add 'Professional photographer' is not about derivation of existing entries. A) Move entry 9 to Composition because this is within the scope of the project is incorrect due to misalignment. B) Delete entry 10 because this is NOT a source product for this project is incorrect for derivation placement.
ScenarioExtract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Which 2 statements apply to the Development skills required section?
Answer(s): D,E
The correct options D and E identify deletions of non-required skills and addition of necessary data protection knowledge, aligning with tailoring Development skills to project context in the Project Product Description.A) Incorrect — Move to Composition is not justified by photographer appointment; misplaces content.B) Incorrect — Derivation is not the appropriate category for this information source in this context.C) Incorrect — Deleting entry 14 would remove a required skill if present; cannot assume not required.D) Correct — Deleting an unnecessary skill reflects tailoring; supported by project-specific requirements.E) Correct — Adding data protection knowledge reflects regulatory awareness and PRINCE2 focus on governance.
ScenarioExtract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Which 2 statements apply to the Customer's quality expectations section?
Answer(s): B,E
The two correct statements identify entries that do not belong in Customer's quality expectations within the Project Product Description.A) Incorrect: entry 16 belongs in the Product Description for photos, not in Customer’s quality expectations.B) Correct: entry 17 is beyond the project's scope and should not be in Customer’s quality expectations.C) Incorrect: entry 18 relates to standards and may be relevant to quality criteria, not excluded here.D) Incorrect: entry 19 concerns where calendar details belong, not a mismatch with Customer’s quality expectations.E) Correct: entry 20 is a benefit for business case, not a quality expectation in the Customer section.
ScenarioExtract from the Project Product Description (with errors)Which 2 statements apply to the Acceptance criteria section?
Answer(s): A,C
The correct answers identify appropriate edits to the Acceptance Criteria to reflect valid product acceptance conditions and scope alignment.A) Correct: Amending entry 21 to specify a concrete, measurable acceptance criterion (appearance via 12 photos of staff) aligns with the need for verifiable acceptance criteria.B) Incorrect: Moving entry 21 to Composition is inappropriate because Acceptance Criteria describe the product and its quality, not its component structure; photos are a product feature, not a compositional requirement.C) Correct: Deleting entry 22 if it concerns a feature (new logo) outside the project scope is consistent with keeping Acceptance Criteria within the Project Product Description’s scope.D) Incorrect: Moving entry 23 to Derivation is not justified; Derivation relates to guidance for reuse, not acceptance of current product criteria, and Data Protection Act status does not reclassify acceptance content.E) Incorrect: Deleting entry 24 requires justification that it is not suitable; without such justification, assuming unsuitability is premature.
ScenarioAdditional InformationProduct DescriptionQuality notes from the Daily LogThe Director of Information Technology Division (DIT) has been asked to ensure that any changes to the outsourced staff employment contracts adhere to employment law. The DIT will review future job descriptions of the transferred staff before the final contract is signed with the selected service provider.The service level agreement between MFH and the selected service provider will specify the type and quality of service required. The selected service provider must follow the industry standards for providing outsourced services.MFH has a quality management system which contains a document control procedure for all its documentation, however this does not include change management.All project documents will be subject to a quality review. Nominated products will require a formal approval record signed-off by the quality review chair.Extract from the draft Quality Management Strategy (may contain errors)Introduction1. This document defines the approach to be taken to achieve the required quality levels during the project.2. The Project Board will have overall responsibility for the Quality Management Strategy.3. Project Assurance will provide assurance on the implementation of the Quality Management Strategy.Quality management procedure - Quality standards4. The selected service provider will operate to industry standards for providing outsourced services.5. MFH document standards will be used.Records6. A Quality Register will be maintained to record the planned quality events and the actual results from the quality activities.7. Configuration Item Records will be maintained for each product to describe its status, version and variant.8. Approval records for products that require them will be stored in the quality database.Roles and responsibilities9. The DIT will check that the employment contracts for outsourced staff adhere to employment law.10. Team Managers will provide details of quality checks that have been carried out.11. Team Managers will ensure that the Quality Register is updated with the names of team members who are involved in the review process.12. The Senior User will review the Product Descriptions of the products to be produced by the selected service provider to ensure that they can be achieved.Which is a correctly defined acceptance criterion for the service level agreement (SLA) with the selected service provider?
The SLA should cover the full duration of the service contract to ensure ongoing alignment with expectations and formal governance across the contract lifecycle.A) The SLA must extend for the full duration of the service contract. This aligns with PRINCE2 quality and governance expectations that acceptance criteria and service levels are consistently maintained throughout the contract term. B) Any changes to the SLA must be managed through formal change control. While good practice, this is not an acceptance criterion for the initial SLA; it describes change management rather than the intrinsic acceptance of the service levels. C) External consultants are to assist in the creation of the SLA. Not specified as a required acceptance criterion and may introduce governance risk. D) The selected service provider should be located locally. Location is not a defined acceptance criterion for service quality or compliance in the provided information.
Post your Comments and Discuss PRINCE2 PRINCE2 7 Practitioner exam prep with other Community members:
Our website is free, but we have to fight against AI bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the PRINCE2 7 Practitioner content, but please register or login to continue.