Salesforce CPQ-301 Exam Prep
Configure and Administer a Salesforce CPQ Solution (Page 10 )

• Entradas grandes, de até aproximadamente 1 GB.
• Processamentos demorados, que podem levar até cerca de 1 hora.
• O cliente envia a solicitação e consulta o resultado depois, sem precisar manter uma conexão aberta durante todo o processamento.

• Real-time inference: indicada para respostas imediatas, com entradas menores e processamento rápido.
• Serverless inference: adequada para cargas variáveis e solicitações menores; não é ideal para processamento longo e arquivos grandes.
• Batch transform: processa grandes volumes em lote, mas não atende à necessidade de respostas próximas do tempo real.

• netstat: Shows local network connections and listening ports, but not which WAN path carries the traffic.
• nslookup: Resolves domain names to IP addresses.
• ping: Tests reachability and latency but does not show the route.

• A. Number ? Decimal — Correct. Salesforce Number fields are represented in Apex as Decimal.
• D. Date/Time ? Datetime — This is correct conceptually, but “Dateline” is not an Apex type. If the option literally says “Dateline,” it is incorrect.
• E. Checkbox ? Boolean — Correct. A checkbox contains true or false.

• Number ? Integer — A Number field maps to Decimal, even when its scale is zero.
• Text Area ? List<String> — A text area maps to a single String, not a list.

• Separate accounts/domains create a strong administrative boundary between non-production and production.
• Separate projects provide distinct IAM boundaries, billing, quotas, service accounts, and resources.
• Developers can receive permissions in the development project without automatically gaining access to production.
• Production administrators can be restricted from development resources, supporting separation of duties and least privilege.

• A: Creates excessive project fragmentation without being required by the stated requirement.
• C: Keeps development and production under one account and does not clearly separate administrative duties.
• D: Uses one account and only two projects; it provides some project isolation but weaker organizational separation.

• Honeypots: Decoy systems or services designed to attract attackers. Legitimate users should not access them, so activity on a honeypot is a strong indicator of unauthorized activity. Security teams can also observe attacker behavior.

• DNS sinkhole: Redirects requests for known malicious domains to a controlled internal server or blocks them. If an infected workstation attempts to contact command-and-control infrastructure, the sinkhole records the request and helps identify the compromised device.

• Tokenization: Protects sensitive data by replacing it with tokens.
• CI/CD: Automates software development and deployment.
• Threat modeling: Identifies potential risks before or during system design.
• Data obfuscation: Makes data harder to understand, but does not detect intruders.

1. Which host originated the infection

1. Which remaining hosts are infected

• Assign a Teams license to a user — Licenses are assigned through the Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft Entra ID, or PowerShell.
• Deploy the Teams client — The Teams admin center manages Teams policies and apps, but it is not the primary tool for deploying the desktop client.
• Prevent users from creating teams — Team creation depends on controlling the creation of Microsoft 365 groups, generally configured through Microsoft Entra ID and PowerShell rather than directly in the Teams admin center.

1. Get Data ? Folder in Power BI Desktop.
2. In Power Query Editor, expand the Attributes column to expose metadata such as hidden status and other file attributes.
3. Remove the Content column (and any other data columns you do not need).

• Name
• Extension
• Date accessed
• Date modified
• Folder Path
• Attributes
• Content

• Create and manage catalogs of approved IT services
• Govern and publish infrastructure-as-code (IaC) templates, commonly AWS CloudFormation templates
• Control which users can deploy specific products and configurations
• Apply versioning, permissions, and deployment constraints

• AWS Resource Explorer: Searches and discovers AWS resources; it does not govern IaC templates.
• AWS Organizations: Manages multiple AWS accounts, policies, and consolidated billing.
• AWS Systems Manager: Helps operate and manage deployed resources, such as patching and automation, but is not primarily a catalog for governed IaC products.

• A: Daily involvement is unnecessary and may not solve the availability problem.
• C: Clarifying all requirements at the start conflicts with agile’s iterative refinement.
• D: Simply reviewing based on availability leaves the problem unresolved and allows rework to continue.

• The user starts in the corporate portal.
• The portal launches the Salesforce resource.
• The IdP sends the SAML response to Salesforce.

• Connected App + OAuth is for OAuth authorization and API/app access, not this SAML-based seamless login scenario.
• SP-initiated SSO would begin when the user first requests the Salesforce resource and Salesforce redirects them to the IdP. That is not the described starting point.

Flat organisation

• Few levels of management
• A wide span of control—managers supervise many employees
• Shorter communication channels
• More employee autonomy and quicker decisions
• Fewer formal promotion levels

Tall organisation

• Many levels of management
• A narrow span of control—managers supervise relatively few employees
• A clear hierarchy and reporting structure
• More formal supervision and communication channels
• More obvious promotion and career stages

• Mesh: WAPs communicate wirelessly with one another, often to extend coverage without wired connections. It does not specifically describe centralized WLC management.
• Point-to-point: Connects two specific devices or locations.
• Ad hoc: Wireless devices communicate directly with one another without an access point.

• Aggregation happens once, during the scheduled job.
• Dashboard users query a relatively small, precomputed table.
• Repeated users do not trigger expensive aggregations against the detailed sales table.
• Overwriting is appropriate because the summary is rebuilt for the reporting period.

• B: Structured Streaming is unnecessary for data that only needs daily refreshes and adds operational/compute overhead.
• C: A view recomputes the aggregation at query time, increasing latency and query cost.
• D: Delta caching may improve reads but does not replace the need to materialize the expensive aggregation, and cache availability is not the main design guarantee.

• You provision the virtual machine.
• You manage the guest operating system, applications, and configuration.
• Azure manages the physical servers, datacenter, and underlying virtualization infrastructure.

• Normalize casing in the data source—for example, convert all values to uppercase or lowercase.
• Add an index key to provide a unique, stable identifier for each row or value.

• Admin access to the deployment pipeline (B) – lets the developers use the pipeline and deploy content.
• Contributor access to the Development and Test workspaces (E) – required to deploy items into those workspaces.
• Viewer access to the Production workspace (D) – lets them view Production content without allowing deployment or modification.

• Contributor access to Production (F), because that could allow changes or deployment there.
• Viewer access to Development/Test (C), because Viewer is insufficient for deployment.
• Build permission to Production semantic models (A), because building reports on a semantic model is not required merely to view Production items.

• Wiping securely overwrites the drive so the original data cannot reasonably be recovered. It is generally less expensive than physically destroying the device.
• Recycling could expose the data if the drive is not securely erased first.
• Shredding physically destroys the drive and is effective, but usually more costly and prevents reuse.
• Deletion only removes file references; it is not a secure sanitization method.

• A. IDS attack signatures: An IDS primarily detects suspicious network activity and usually does not provide dedicated file-upload malware scanning. It is generally detective rather than preventive.
• C. Load balancer: Distributes traffic among servers and improves availability; it does not inspect documents for malware.
• D. WAF: Helps block web-application attacks such as SQL injection, command injection, and XSS. Although a WAF may inspect upload requests, malware detection in PDF files is more directly addressed by antivirus or content-scanning functionality.

• The explanation states that Traffic Analytics can be enabled by a user with one of these subscription-level roles:

• Question 34 — Network Contributor: Yes
• Question 35 — Owner: Yes
• Question 36 — Reader: Yes, according to the stated explanation and documentation

• Árvores de decisão: usam regras sequenciais, como “se característica X > valor, siga para este ramo”. São fáceis de visualizar e explicar. Atendem bem a problemas de classificação e regressão com alta interpretabilidade.

• Regressão linear: prevê um valor numérico contínuo, como preço, custo ou temperatura. Não é a escolha principal para classificar genes em categorias.

• Regressão logística: calcula a probabilidade de uma categoria. Pode atender à classificação, inclusive multiclasses, mas sua explicação costuma ser menos intuitiva que uma árvore para documentar decisões.

• Redes neurais: atendem a tarefas complexas, como imagens, texto e padrões não lineares. Porém, são menos interpretáveis, funcionando mais como uma “caixa-preta”.

• Answer: No

• Why: Using several Azure AD directories (tenants) would create separate identity stores for each division, which significantly increases administrative overhead. You’d need cross-tenant access management, separate governance, and duplicated admin efforts, which goes against the goal of minimizing administrative work.

• How to meet the goal instead:

1. Selling price per unit: $750
2. Required annual return:

1. Required profit per unit:

1. Target cost per unit:

• Self-signed certificate: Causes a certificate warning, not incorrect IP resolution.
• Nameserver record: A DNS record problem would typically affect multiple users, not just one.
• IP helper: Relays DHCP or other broadcast traffic between networks; it does not control website name resolution.

• VPC: A logically isolated virtual network in a cloud environment; it describes networking, not shared application access.
• NFV: Replaces dedicated network appliances with virtualized network functions.
• SaaS: A cloud service model in which users consume an application without managing its infrastructure. It could describe how the application is delivered, but the question emphasizes serving multiple user groups, which points to multitenancy.

• Use private connectivity from a cloud provider
• Set up SSO for federated authentication

• Private connectivity—such as a cloud provider’s private endpoint—keeps Snowflake access within the company’s private network path instead of exposing access over the public internet. This fits the VPN/VDI requirement.
• SSO for federated authentication allows Snowflake users to authenticate using the credentials already managed by the company’s identity provider—the same identity system used for VDI—eliminating separate Snowflake passwords.

• Tri-Secret Secure protects encryption keys; it does not provide private network access or credential reuse.
• A proxy Snowflake account outside the VPN conflicts with the requirement that Snowflake have no internet visibility and is not the normal solution for federated login reuse.

• Failed login attempts
• The account being targeted
• The source user or system
• Time and frequency of attempts

• Two-factor authentication: Helps prevent unauthorized access, but does not primarily detect the employee’s attempts.
• Firewall: Controls network traffic; it generally does not monitor individual login attempts.
• Intrusion prevention system (IPS): Can detect certain network attacks, but this scenario is best addressed through authentication and audit logging.

• Options:

• Answer: The correct choice is A (800-61r3).

• NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 is the dedicated guide for incident handling/response and reflects the latest guidance on the incident response lifecycle (preparation, detection/analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, post-incident activity).
• 800-61r2 is an older revision of the same incident response guide.
• 800-53 covers security and privacy controls, not a specific incident response standard.
• 800-171 focuses on protecting CUI in non-federal systems and networks, not incident response guidance.