Test Prep LSAT Test Exam
Law School Admission Test: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Analytical Reasoning (Page 8 )

Updated On: 19-Jan-2026

Unlike most graduates of American high schools, all graduates of high schools in Bermuda have completed four years of advanced mathematics.

Which one of the following, if true, would best explain the situation described above?

  1. Math anxiety is higher in the United States than in Bermuda.
  2. There are far more high schools and high school students in the United States than in Bermuda.
  3. More students in America take fulltime jobs without completing high school.
  4. Math programs in American high schools are frequently understaffed.
  5. High Schools in Bermuda require four years of advanced mathematics for graduation.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Though choices [Math anxiety is higher in...], [There are far more high schools and...], [More students in America take fulltime...] and [Math programs in American high schools are...] might contribute to increased study of math in Bermuda, option [High Schools in Bermuda require four years of...] leaves no doubt. High schools in Bermuda require four years of advanced math for graduation; high schools in the United States do not.



By refusing to ban smoking in restaurants, the city council has put the financial wellbeing of restaurant owners above the health of the citizens of this city. No doubt, the council would support the restaurants if they decided to use asbestos tablecloths and to barbecue using radioactivity. These devices would be no more risky.

The author of this paragraph makes her case by arguing

  1. from experience
  2. from example
  3. by authority
  4. from observation
  5. from analogy

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

The passage makes its point by analogy, comparing the dangers of smoking to the dangers of asbestos and radioactivity.



There are no edible fish in the streams of this county because there are no pesticide controls.
Which one of the following assumptions must be made before the conclusion above can be reached?

  1. Edible fish cannot be found in areas where there are no pesticide controls.
  2. If there are pesticide controls, there will be many edible fish.
  3. Without adequate pesticide controls, the fish population will rapidly decline.
  4. If there are pesticide controls, there will be some edible fish.
  5. With pesticide controls, the fish population will rapidly increase.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The assumption is that where there are no pesticide controls, no edible fish can be found, not the reverse as in options [If there are pesticide controls, there will be there will be many edible fish], [If there are pesticide controls, there will be some edible fish.] and [With pesticide controls, the fish...]



How can I write any of the essays when there are so many essays to be written? In terms of its logical structure, the remark above most closely resembles which one of the following?

  1. How can he buy a new car when he is already deeply in debt?
  2. How can she increase her collection of books when it is already so large?
  3. How can he iron any of his shirts when he has so many shirts that need ironing?
  4. How can she visit London and Paris when she has not yet visited New York and Washington?
  5. How can they raise horses when they already raise so many cows?

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

In each case, the verb ("iron".."need ironing";"write".."to be written") is repeated, while the adjective ("many") modifies the repeated noun.



Nutritionist: Recent studies show that the height of the average American has increased 2 inches in the past 10 years, lending support to the view that modern foods stimulate growth. The argument would be strengthened by pointing out that

  1. statistical studies were done on which foods were eaten
  2. modern foods are unhealthy
  3. all average heights are increasing
  4. comparisons have been studied in control groups
  5. there is no such thing as an average American

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Options [modern foods are unhealthy] and [there is no such thing as an average American] weaken the argument, option [statistical studies were done on which foods were eaten] repeats the argument, and [all average heights are increasing] makes no sense, since" average height" is a single composite of all heights.



Viewing page 8 of 188
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 934 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep LSAT Test exam prep with other Community members:

Join the LSAT Test Discussion