Free MCAT Test Exam Braindumps (page: 6)

Page 6 of 203

Muzak, the intentionally unobtrusive music that most people associate with elevators and dentists' waiting rooms, represents the paradoxical success story of a product designed to be ignored. Although few people admit to enjoying its blandly melodic sounds, Muzak reaches over 100 million listeners in 14 countries and has played in the White House, the Apollo lunar spacecraft, and countless supermarkets, offices, and factories. This odd combination of criticism and widespread acceptance is not surprising, however, when one considers that Muzak is not created for the enjoyment of its listeners: rather, its purpose is to modify physiological and psychological aspects of an environment.
In the workplace, Muzak is credited with increasing both productivity and profitability. Research into the relationship between music and productivity can be traced to the earliest days of the Muzak Corporation. Developed by a military officer in 1922 as a way of transmitting music through electrical wires, Muzak blossomed in the 1930's following a study which reported that people work harder when they listen to certain kinds of music. Impressed by these findings, the BBC began to broadcast music in English munitions factories during World War II in an effort to combat fatigue. When workers assembling weapons increased their output by 6 percent, the U.S. War Production Board contracted the Muzak Corporation to provide uplifting music to American factories. Today, the corporation broadcasts its "Environmental Music" to countless businesses and institutions throughout the world. And while most people claim to dislike Muzak's discreet cadences, it seems to positively influence both productivity and job satisfaction.
Researchers speculate that listening to Muzak and other soft music improves morale and reduces stress by modifying our physiology. Physiological changes such as lowered heart rate and decreased blood pressure have been documented in hospital studies testing the effect of calming music on cardiac patients. In addition, certain kinds of music seem to effect one's sense of emotional, as well as physical, well being. It is just this sort of satisfaction which is thought to result in increased performance in the workplace. In a study of people performing repetitive clerical tasks, those who listened to music performed more accurately and quickly than those who worked in silence; those who listened to Muzak did better still. Moreover, while Muzak was conceived as a tool for productivity, it also seems to influence a business' profitability. In an experiment in which supermarket shoppers shopped to the mellow sounds of Muzak, sales were increased by as much as 12 percent.
What makes Muzak unique is a formula by which familiar tunes are modified and programmed. Careful instrumentation adds to an overall sound that is neither monotonous nor rousing. But it is the precisely timed programming that separates Muzak from other "easy listening" formats. At the core of the programming is the concept of the "Stimulus Progression." Muzak programs are divided into quarter-hour groupings of songs, and are specifically planned for the time of day at which they will be heard. Each composition is assigned a mood rating between 1 and 6 called a stimulus value; a song with a rating of 2, for example, is slower and less invigorating than one with a value of 5. Approximately six compositions with ascending stimulus values play during any given quarter hour; each 15 minute segment ends in silence. Each segment of a 24-hour program is carefully planned. Segments that are considered more stimulating air at 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. (the times when workers typically tire), while more soothing segments play just after lunchtime and towards the end of the day, when workers are likely to be restless.
From the point of view of management, then, Muzak is a useful tool in the effort to maximize both productivity and profits. However, some people object to its presence, labeling it as a type of unregulated air pollution. Still others see it as an Orwellian nightmare, a manipulation of the subconscious. But Muzak's effectiveness seems to lie in the fact that most people never really listen to it. While it may be true that no one actually likes this carefully crafted aural atmosphere, many simply ignore it, allowing its forgettable sounds to soften the contours of the day.
According to the passage, a 15-minute segment of Muzak with an average stimulus value of 5 would most likely be broadcast at:

  1. there is no known way to isolate the DNA responsible for hemoglobin.
  2. naked hemoglobin tends to break down in the bloodstream.
  3. non-globulating PFCs have significantly abbreviated oxygen-carrying capacities.
  4. the use of PFCs may lead to blood clotting.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

This is a detail question. The fourth paragraph discusses Muzak's programming and the concept of the "Stimulus Progression". A segment with an average stimulus value of 5 would be rather lively, since segments are rated from 1-6. Since such invigorating segments are aired at the times of day when workers are likely to tire, and the last sentence of the fourth paragraph mentions 3 p.m. as such a time, (C) is the correct answer.
The last sentence of the fourth paragraph also mentions the periods of time just after lunch and towards the end of the day as times when more soothing segments play, so (A) and (D) are wrong. The passage does not say anything about what level of stimulus might be programmed in the early morning hours. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that invigorating music of a value of 5 would be played at the time indicated in choice (B).



Muzak, the intentionally unobtrusive music that most people associate with elevators and dentists' waiting rooms, represents the paradoxical success story of a product designed to be ignored. Although few people admit to enjoying its blandly melodic sounds, Muzak reaches over 100 million listeners in 14 countries and has played in the White House, the Apollo lunar spacecraft, and countless supermarkets, offices, and factories. This odd combination of criticism and widespread acceptance is not surprising, however, when one considers that Muzak is not created for the enjoyment of its listeners: rather, its purpose is to modify physiological and psychological aspects of an environment.
In the workplace, Muzak is credited with increasing both productivity and profitability. Research into the relationship between music and productivity can be traced to the earliest days of the Muzak Corporation. Developed by a military officer in 1922 as a way of transmitting music through electrical wires, Muzak blossomed in the 1930's following a study which reported that people work harder when they listen to certain kinds of music. Impressed by these findings, the BBC began to broadcast music in English munitions factories during World War II in an effort to combat fatigue. When workers assembling weapons increased their output by 6 percent, the U.S. War Production Board contracted the Muzak Corporation to provide uplifting music to American factories. Today, the corporation broadcasts its "Environmental Music" to countless businesses and institutions throughout the world. And while most people claim to dislike Muzak's discreet cadences, it seems to positively influence both productivity and job satisfaction.
Researchers speculate that listening to Muzak and other soft music improves morale and reduces stress by modifying our physiology. Physiological changes such as lowered heart rate and decreased blood pressure have been documented in hospital studies testing the effect of calming music on cardiac patients. In addition, certain kinds of music seem to effect one's sense of emotional, as well as physical, well being. It is just this sort of satisfaction which is thought to result in increased performance in the workplace. In a study of people performing repetitive clerical tasks, those who listened to music performed more accurately and quickly than those who worked in silence; those who listened to Muzak did better still. Moreover, while Muzak was conceived as a tool for productivity, it also seems to influence a business' profitability. In an experiment in which supermarket shoppers shopped to the mellow sounds of Muzak, sales were increased by as much as 12 percent.
What makes Muzak unique is a formula by which familiar tunes are modified and programmed. Careful instrumentation adds to an overall sound that is neither monotonous nor rousing. But it is the precisely timed programming that separates Muzak from other "easy listening" formats. At the core of the programming is the concept of the "Stimulus Progression". Muzak programs are divided into quarter-hour groupings of songs, and are specifically planned for the time of day at which they will be heard. Each composition is assigned a mood rating between 1 and 6 called a stimulus value; a song with a rating of 2, for example, is slower and less invigorating than one with a value of 5. Approximately six compositions with ascending stimulus values play during any given quarter hour; each 15-minute segment ends in silence. Each segment of a 24-hour program is carefully planned. Segments that are considered more stimulating air at 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. (the times when workers typically tire), while more soothing segments play just after lunchtime and towards the end of the day, when workers are likely to be restless.
From the point of view of management, then, Muzak is a useful tool in the effort to maximize both productivity and profits. However, some people object to its presence, labeling it as a type of unregulated air pollution. Still others see it as an Orwellian nightmare, a manipulation of the subconscious. But Muzak's effectiveness seems to lie in the fact that most people never really listen to it. While it may be true that no one actually likes this carefully crafted aural atmosphere, many simply ignore it, allowing its forgettable sounds to soften the contours of the day.
Of the following, the author is most interested in discussing:

  1. the origins of the Muzak Corporation.
  2. how Muzak modifies physical states and psychological atmospheres.
  3. how Muzak increases productivity in the workplace.
  4. the ways in which Muzak differs from other "easy listening" formats.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

This is a main idea question. This passage is mainly descriptive, not opinionated, and considers various aspects of Muzak, treating it as an unusual phenomenon. Although the second paragraph describes the history of the Muzak Corporation ­ mentioned in choice (A) ­ that is merely a paragraph topic, a supporting detail to the main idea of the passage. Similarly, the third paragraph discusses how Muzak increases productivity in the workplace, mentioned in (C), but that also is just one aspect of this passage, not its main focus. The passage does refer to how Muzak is different from other "easy listening'' music ­ choice (D); this is discussed in the fourth paragraph, but this does not refer to the main focus of the passage either. Only choice (B) correctly addresses the author's main interest in the passage: how Muzak modifies physical states and psychological atmospheres. Only this choice reflects the broadly descriptive focus of the passage, and reflects the various paragraphs' one, unifying theme.



Muzak, the intentionally unobtrusive music that most people associate with elevators and dentists' waiting rooms, represents the paradoxical success story of a product designed to be ignored. Although few people admit to enjoying its blandly melodic sounds, Muzak reaches over 100 million listeners in 14 countries and has played in the White House, the Apollo lunar spacecraft, and countless supermarkets, offices, and factories. This odd combination of criticism and widespread acceptance is not surprising, however, when one considers that Muzak is not created for the enjoyment of its listeners: rather, its purpose is to modify physiological and psychological aspects of an environment.
In the workplace, Muzak is credited with increasing both productivity and profitability. Research into the relationship between music and productivity can be traced to the earliest days of the Muzak Corporation. Developed by a military officer in 1922 as a way of transmitting music through electrical wires, Muzak blossomed in the 1930's following a study which reported that people work harder when they listen to certain kinds of music. Impressed by these findings, the BBC began to broadcast music in English munitions factories during World War II in an effort to combat fatigue. When workers assembling weapons increased their output by 6 percent, the U.S. War Production Board contracted the Muzak Corporation to provide uplifting music to American factories. Today, the corporation broadcasts its "Environmental Music" to countless businesses and institutions throughout the world. And while most people claim to dislike Muzak's discreet cadences, it seems to positively influence both productivity and job satisfaction.
Researchers speculate that listening to Muzak and other soft music improves morale and reduces stress by modifying our physiology. Physiological changes such as lowered heart rate and decreased blood pressure have been documented in hospital studies testing the effect of calming music on cardiac patients. In addition, certain kinds of music seem to effect one's sense of emotional, as well as physical, well being. It is just this sort of satisfaction which is thought to result in increased performance in the workplace. In a study of people performing repetitive clerical tasks, those who listened to music performed more accurately and quickly than those who worked in silence; those who listened to Muzak did better still. Moreover, while Muzak was conceived as a tool for productivity, it also seems to influence a business' profitability. In an experiment in which supermarket shoppers shopped to the mellow sounds of Muzak, sales were increased by as much as 12 percent.
What makes Muzak unique is a formula by which familiar tunes are modified and programmed. Careful instrumentation adds to an overall sound that is neither monotonous nor rousing. But it is the precisely timed programming that separates Muzak from other "easy listening" formats. At the core of the programming is the concept of the "Stimulus Progression". Muzak programs are divided into quarter-hour groupings of songs, and are specifically planned for the time of day at which they will be heard. Each composition is assigned a mood rating between 1 and 6 called a stimulus value; a song with a rating of 2, for example, is slower and less invigorating than one with a value of 5. Approximately six compositions with ascending stimulus values play during any given quarter hour; each 15-minute segment ends in silence. Each segment of a 24-hour program is carefully planned. Segments that are considered more stimulating air at 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. (the times when workers typically tire), while more soothing segments play just after lunchtime and towards the end of the day, when workers are likely to be restless.
From the point of view of management, then, Muzak is a useful tool in the effort to maximize both productivity and profits. However, some people object to its presence, labeling it as a type of unregulated air pollution. Still others see it as an Orwellian nightmare, a manipulation of the subconscious. But Muzak's effectiveness seems to lie in the fact that most people never really listen to it. While it may be true that no one actually likes this carefully crafted aural atmosphere, many simply ignore it, allowing its forgettable sounds to soften the contours of the day.
According to the passage, Muzak may provide all of the following benefits EXCEPT:

  1. increased work productivity.
  2. decreased blood pressure.
  3. increased business profitability.
  4. decreased job absenteeism.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

This is a detail question about the effects of Muzak. The objective here is to identify the one choice that is not a benefit of Muzak. As for choice (A), increased work productivity among clerical workers listening to music while performing repetitive tasks is mentioned in the middle of the third paragraph. As for (B), the possibility that Muzak decreases blood pressure can be inferred from the results of hospital tests of soft music on cardiac patients, as described in the third paragraph. The end of the third paragraph discusses the fact that Muzak seems to influence a business' profitability, choice (C). Only decreased job absenteeism, choice D, is not mentioned anywhere in the paragraph as a benefit of Muzak. So choice (D) is the correct answer.



Muzak, the intentionally unobtrusive music that most people associate with elevators and dentists' waiting rooms, represents the paradoxical success story of a product designed to be ignored. Although few people admit to enjoying its blandly melodic sounds, Muzak reaches over 100 million listeners in 14 countries and has played in the White House, the Apollo lunar spacecraft, and countless supermarkets, offices, and factories. This odd combination of criticism and widespread acceptance is not surprising, however, when one considers that Muzak is not created for the enjoyment of its listeners: rather, its purpose is to modify physiological and psychological aspects of an environment.
In the workplace, Muzak is credited with increasing both productivity and profitability. Research into the relationship between music and productivity can be traced to the earliest days of the Muzak Corporation. Developed by a military officer in 1922 as a way of transmitting music through electrical wires, Muzak blossomed in the 1930's following a study which reported that people work harder when they listen to certain kinds of music. Impressed by these findings, the BBC began to broadcast music in English munitions factories during World War II in an effort to combat fatigue. When workers assembling weapons increased their output by 6 percent, the U.S. War Production Board contracted the Muzak Corporation to provide uplifting music to American factories. Today, the corporation broadcasts its "Environmental Music" to countless businesses and institutions throughout the world. And while most people claim to dislike Muzak's discreet cadences, it seems to positively influence both productivity and job satisfaction.
Researchers speculate that listening to Muzak and other soft music improves morale and reduces stress by modifying our physiology. Physiological changes such as lowered heart rate and decreased blood pressure have been documented in hospital studies testing the effect of calming music on cardiac patients. In addition, certain kinds of music seem to effect one's sense of emotional, as well as physical, well being. It is just this sort of satisfaction which is thought to result in increased performance in the workplace. In a study of people performing repetitive clerical tasks, those who listened to music performed more accurately and quickly than those who worked in silence; those who listened to Muzak did better still. Moreover, while Muzak was conceived as a tool for productivity, it also seems to influence a business' profitability. In an experiment in which supermarket shoppers shopped to the mellow sounds of Muzak, sales were increased by as much as 12 percent.
What makes Muzak unique is a formula by which familiar tunes are modified and programmed. Careful instrumentation adds to an overall sound that is neither monotonous nor rousing. But it is the precisely timed programming that separates Muzak from other "easy listening" formats. At the core of the programming is the concept of the "Stimulus Progression". Muzak programs are divided into quarter-hour groupings of songs, and are specifically planned for the time of day at which they will be heard. Each composition is assigned a mood rating between 1 and 6 called a stimulus value; a song with a rating of 2, for example, is slower and less invigorating than one with a value of 5. Approximately six compositions with ascending stimulus values play during any given quarter hour; each 15-minute segment ends in silence. Each segment of a 24-hour program is carefully planned. Segments that are considered more stimulating air at 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. (the times when workers typically tire), while more soothing segments play just after lunchtime and towards the end of the day, when workers are likely to be restless.
From the point of view of management, then, Muzak is a useful tool in the effort to maximize both productivity and profits. However, some people object to its presence, labeling it as a type of unregulated air pollution. Still others see it as an Orwellian nightmare, a manipulation of the subconscious. But Muzak's effectiveness seems to lie in the fact that most people never really listen to it. While it may be true that no one actually likes this carefully crafted aural atmosphere, many simply ignore it, allowing its forgettable sounds to soften the contours of the day.
It can be inferred from the passage that some critics of Muzak believe that Muzak:

  1. is not significantly different from other "easy listening" programs.
  2. subtly manipulates the subconscious mind.
  3. is actually distracting to many workers.
  4. caters to the whims of supermarket consumers.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

This is an inference question about critics of Muzak. The passage's last paragraph states that although management finds Muzak useful and profitable, some people object to its presence. Two critiques mentioned label Muzak as "unregulated air pollution," and "an Orwellian nightmare, a manipulation of the subconscious." From that it can be inferred that some critics believe Muzak subtly manipulates the subconscious mind, choice (B). Choice (A) is incorrect because there is no indication of an argument against Muzak on the basis that it is not significantly different from other "easy listening" formats. On the contrary, the fourth paragraph is devoted to how Muzak differs from these other formats. Although the last paragraph says that some people object to, or criticize, Muzak, nowhere does the author suggest that this objection is based on the fact that Muzak actually distracts workers, choice (C); rather, the passage suggests, in both the first and fifth paragraphs, that most people ignore its unobtrusive tones. Finally, choice (D) distorts a detail of the passage. The author implies that Muzak in supermarkets works to the advantage of supermarket managers and owners, catering to their desires rather than the whims of consumers.



Page 6 of 203



Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep MCAT Test exam with other Community members:

Steven commented on October 17, 2024
Questions are spot on and I passed the exam.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Ntombi commented on October 17, 2024
i find the questions helpful for my exam preparation
Anonymous
upvote

Ntombi commented on October 17, 2024
The questions help me to see if I understood what I have learned
Anonymous
upvote

ntombi commented on October 17, 2024
writing exam at the end of the month
Anonymous
upvote

Apvj commented on October 17, 2024
Need to update section 5 questions,it was all new question today in exam , unitl section 4 it was fine even though pattern of question changed
Anonymous
upvote

ghada commented on October 17, 2024
it helps a lot
Anonymous
upvote

John commented on October 17, 2024
Good mock exam
Anonymous
upvote

test commented on October 17, 2024
Good content
UNITED STATES
upvote

Manoo commented on October 17, 2024
Hello guys, I hope everyone is doing good and preparing for this exam. I just wanted to share my experience about my exam. I wrote this exam yesterday and I passed. The key is to focus on each topic and memorize all these questions. You see most of them in your test. Good luck
INDIA
upvote

Ad commented on October 17, 2024
Hi I am new to IT
Anonymous
upvote

sadai commented on October 17, 2024
I really apricate this helpful test thank you so much
Anonymous
upvote

Lee commented on October 17, 2024
This is a very good resource. I'm glad this is provided for free for everyone to pass their exam. I'm sure everyone knows how difficult these exams are.
UNITED STATES
upvote

BANKEY BIHARI LAL commented on October 17, 2024
Very good mock exams as per the actual exam standards.
INDIA
upvote

Faruk commented on October 17, 2024
is free content is enough for pas az-900 ?
Anonymous
upvote

chad johnson commented on October 16, 2024
learning from this test
UNITED STATES
upvote

Keketso commented on October 16, 2024
This is a valuable resource for Az-900, i think
Anonymous
upvote

MP commented on October 16, 2024
Still Preparing Hopefully these are helpful
UNITED STATES
upvote

dado commented on October 16, 2024
cool thanks
BELGIUM
upvote

Harry commented on October 16, 2024
Thanks for the sample exam!
UNITED STATES
upvote

Rajesh K commented on October 16, 2024
fantastic contents provided by free braindumps, it is improving my accuracy.
Anonymous
upvote

chris commented on October 16, 2024
this dumps is very helpfull
Anonymous
upvote

Kiran commented on October 16, 2024
These are related questions
UNITED STATES
upvote

raj singh commented on October 16, 2024
This is a good resource for az-900, go for it.
INDIA
upvote

Gobenathan commented on October 16, 2024
This is a good exam done but the free version is not complete the PDF version has all the question. that is what I used to pass my exam.
INDIA
upvote

Girish commented on October 16, 2024
Question are nice
Anonymous
upvote

SS commented on October 16, 2024
Nice Interface
UNITED STATES
upvote

Mohit commented on October 16, 2024
Passed this exam on second try with the help of this exam dumps. Very close to real exam.
India
upvote

XyRome commented on October 15, 2024
Where is the next set?
FRANCE
upvote

ano commented on October 15, 2024
Nice one help me lot
Anonymous
upvote

Draksh commented on October 15, 2024
Good content
UNITED STATES
upvote

Kumar commented on October 15, 2024
I can confirm this is legit and valid in UK. Passed the exam today. Good work.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Ank commented on October 15, 2024
good questions
Anonymous
upvote

Ankita commented on October 15, 2024
Nice questions
Anonymous
upvote

Ankita commented on October 15, 2024
Interesting questions
Anonymous
upvote