CGEIT Exam Discussions & Posts
AI Explanation - verified by User7840
on: June 28, 2026
Question 148:
Question 148 asks which migration strategy is best to modernize and convert a monolithic application into microservices and move it to AWS.
- Correct answer: Refactor (D)
- Why: Refactoring involves re-architecting the application to decompose it into independent microservices. This aligns with the goal of moving from a monolith to microservices, enabling independent deployment, scaling, and maintenance.
- Why others aren’t correct for this goal:
- Rehost (lift-and-shift): moves the app with minimal changes, preserving the monolithic architecture.
- Replatform: makes some cloud optimizations but still keeps a monolith.
- Repurchase: replaces the app with a different product (often SaaS), not microservices.
High-level AWS approach after refactoring (conceptual):
- Decompose into services with clear boundaries.
- Deploy per-service using containers or serverless (e.g.,
ECS/EKS/Fargate or Lambda).
- Use
API Gateway for service exposure and potentially a service mesh like App Mesh for communication.
- Implement per-service data stores and resilient communication, with CI/CD pipelines (
CodePipeline, CodeBuild).
If you want, I can walk through how to apply this with a sample monolith-to-microservices decomposition.
Dakar, Senegal
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 303:
Answer: A
Reasoning:
- To enforce a password expiry/age policy for local (local database) accounts on a Cisco gateway, you can attach the Common Criteria policy to the local user. The command would look like:
username admin privilege 15 password 0 Cisco13579! common-criteria-policy
- The
common-criteria-policy applies a baseline password policy that includes expiry (60 days in your scenario) and other criteria defined by the Common Criteria-compatible policy.
- The other options don’t configure local-password expiry:
- B (AAA server) handles authentication on the server side, not the local account expiry on the gateway itself.
- C, D don’t address the local-password expiry requirement.
So, enabling a Common Criteria policy on the local user is the correct way to ensure local passwords expire after 60 days. The referenced Cisco doc discusses the common-criteria-password policy for this purpose.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User7912
on: June 28, 2026
Question 58:
Question 58 is about Azure Policy scope and exclusions.
Key idea:
- Policy can be assigned at any of the fourScope levels: management groups, subscriptions, resource groups, or individual resources. You can also exclude a subscope from the assignment.
Based on the hotspot:
- Box 1 (where you can assign Policy1): Tenant Root Group, ManagementGroup1, Subscription1, RG1, and VM1.
- You can place a policy at the top of the hierarchy (root), a specific management group, a subscription, a resource group, or a single resource.
- Box 2 (what you can exclude from Policy1): ManagementGroup1, Subscription1, RG1, and VM1.
- You can exclude a subscope from the assignment, such as a particular management group, subscription, resource group, or even a specific resource.
Why this matters:
- Assigning at a higher scope applies the policy broadly; exclusions let you carve out exceptions without moving the policy.
- There are four levels of scope, and exclusions apply to subscopes within the chosen assignment.
Québec, Canada
AI Explanation - verified by User9954
on: June 28, 2026
Question 62:
The correct answer is D — RAID 6.
Reason: RAID 6 uses dual parity, so the array can tolerate up to two drives failing simultaneously without data loss. This provides higher fault tolerance than RAID 5, which can survive only a single drive failure. For comparison: RAID 0 has no redundancy, and RAID 1 tolerates one failed drive per mirrored pair, not multiple simultaneous failures across the array.
Paris, France
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 295:
Question 295 explanation:
- Correct answer: A) enable AAA override
- Why: When ISE assigns VLANs via RADIUS attributes, you need the WLC to accept and apply those attributes. Enabling
AAA Override (in the WLC, typically via the Advanced tab and the Allow AAA Override option) lets the RADIUS server’s attributes override the WLC’s local VLAN configuration. This is the standard fix to ensure clients get placed on the VLAN returned by the RADIUS server.
- Why the other options aren’t correct:
- set a NAC state: not the direct mechanism to apply RADIUS-provided VLANs.
- utilize RADIUS profiling: helpful for device/class identification but does not by itself override VLAN assignment.
- require a DHCP address assignment: unrelated to VLAN mapping based on authentication.
- Note on the exam key: The page shows answer C (utilize RADIUS profiling), but the correct Cisco practice is to enable
AAA Override to allow RADIUS-provided attributes to place the client on the proper VLAN.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 294:
Question 294: The scenario describes guest users on the same guest WLAN being able to reach each other. The fix is to prevent client-to-client traffic on that WLAN.
- Correct answer: A) implement P2P blocking
Why: P2P blocking (often called client isolation) stops peer-to-peer and direct client-to-client traffic at the WLAN level. This keeps each guest device from seeing or talking to other guest devices on the same SSID.
Why the other options aren’t suitable here:
- MFP client protection: protects against certain client threats, not client isolation.
- Wi-Fi Direct policy: related to devices connecting via Wi-Fi Direct, not typical guest WLAN isolation.
- Split tunneling: used with VPNs to choose which traffic goes through the VPN, not for isolating devices on a WLAN.
If you want, I can walk through how to enable P2P blocking on a specific Cisco wireless controller version.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User9455
on: June 28, 2026
Question 3:
Correct answer: B and C
Explanation:
- The Snowflake CLI supports two templating methods for passing variables into SQL scripts:
- LEGACY: legacy-style placeholders (e.g., ${VAR}) are substituted with values you provide.
- JINJA: Jinja templating (e.g., {{ VAR }}) allows more flexible, programmatic parameterization.
- The other options are not templating syntaxes used by the CLI in this context:
- STANDARD, NONE, ALL are not recognized templating syntaxes for this purpose.
Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 290:
- Correct answer: C — target 192.168.100.82 in the URI.
- Why: The show-control-connections output indicates the client (Postman) is not correctly reaching the vManage, i.e., the REST API calls are going to the wrong device. If Postman is pointing to a non-vManage IP, authentication will fail even if credentials are correct. By updating the URI to use the vManage IP (192.168.100.82), the request reaches the correct controller and authentication can proceed.
- Why the other options are less suitable:
- Use basic authentication: This doesn’t fix the endpoint mismatch; authentication method isn’t the root cause here.
- Change the port to 12446: There’s no evidence the port is the issue; the endpoint is the problem.
- Restart the vSmart host: The issue shown points to vManage reachability, not vSmart; rebooting won’t fix the endpoint being contacted.
- Concept note: In Cisco SD-WAN, REST API authentication must target the correct vManage controller. If you’re seeing a control connection issue, verify the API base URL/host first before changing auth methods or ports. If you want, I can walk through how to verify the target in Postman.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 287:
Question 287 explanation:
- Key concept: A standard ACL filters by source IP only and uses a wildcard mask to define the allowed set. You can’t express “odd-numbered hosts” in a single standard ACL entry for 10.0.0.0/24.
- What each option actually does:
- A: permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1 (two addresses), not all odd ones.
- B: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.254 effectively matches a small pair of addresses near 10.0.0.1 (not all odd addresses across the /24).
- C: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 matches only 10.0.0.1 (a single odd address).
- D: permit 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254 is equivalent in effect to 0.0.0.1 (matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1); not all odd addresses.
- Bottom line: None of the given single-entry options cleanly permits traffic from all odd-numbered hosts in 10.0.0.0/24. To achieve that, you’d need multiple ACL entries (one per odd address or a more complex filtering scheme), which isn’t represented by a single standard ACL line.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 286:
Question 286 recap:
- Client: 209.165.201.25
- Server: 209.165.200.225
- Service: TCP port 80
- ACL direction: inbound on the interface toward the web server (i.e., traffic entering the server)
Correct reasoning:
- For inbound traffic toward the server, the ACL must permit traffic with the client as the source and the server as the destination, using TCP and destination port 80.
- The proper entry is:
permit tcp host 209.165.201.25 host 209.165.200.225 eq 80
Why the other options are incorrect:
- B is the correct choice (source 209.165.201.25, destination 209.165.200.225, dest port 80).
- D would specify the reverse direction (server to client) or misapply the port, which is not what we want for inbound traffic to the server.
- A uses lt 80 (destination port < 80) which is not appropriate for HTTP.
- C also uses the reverse source/destination and would not allow client-to-server traffic.
Key takeaway: inbound ACL on the server-facing interface should permit tcp host 209.165.201.25 host 209.165.200.225 eq 80.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 285:
Question 285 asks how to write an ACL that permits packets with an ACK in the TCP header.
- Correct entry: access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 21 established
- Why: The Cisco ACL keyword
established matches TCP segments that belong to an already established connection, i.e., segments that have the ACK bit set. This is exactly the behavior you want for TCP ACK packets (after the initial SYN/handshake). The destination port 21 is shown, but the key factor is the established keyword.
- Why other options are not right:
- A uses tcp-ack, which is not a standard, portable match in IOS ACLs and may be device-specific.
- B/C differ only by ACL numbering; the essential concept is using established to match ACK-containing segments.
- D uses ip and would not specifically target TCP ACKs.
Tip: If you want to permit all ACK-containing TCP segments regardless of port, you could use something like permit tcp any any established.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 269:
- The correct component is the Cisco Stealthwatch system.
Why:
- Stealthwatch provides network visibility and security analytics by collecting and analyzing flow data (NetFlow/IPFIX) across the network.
- It can map flows to user identities and devices (user and flow context), enabling context-aware threat detection and behavior analytics.
- Other CTD components serve different roles: Firepower for firewall/threat prevention, AMP for endpoint protection, and WSA for web security; none of these are primarily focused on user/flow context analysis like Stealthwatch.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User6685
on: June 28, 2026
Question 26:
No. The proposed solution does not meet the goal.
- APIM can secure back-end calls using client certificates. Using Basic gateway credentials is not appropriate for a back-end hosted as an Azure resource like an Azure App Service.
- For an App Service back-end, configure backend authentication with a client certificate in API Management (upload the certificate to APIM and have the API Management service present it to the backend).
- The explanation in the question notes that the back end is an Azure resource and should use certificate-based authentication rather than basic authentication.
Jaitpur, India
AI Explanation - verified by User3059
on: June 28, 2026
Question 1:
Question 1 – explanation
Why:
- You need the private hosted zone cloud.example.com associated with every VPC that should resolve it. This lets each VPC answer queries for cloud.example.com locally.
- Deploying a Route 53 inbound resolver in a shared services VPC provides a single, high-performance path for on-premises DNS queries to reach AWS private DNS. On-prem DNS can forward cloud.example.com queries to this inbound resolver.
- Attaching all VPCs to the Transit Gateway creates a common, low-latency path between on-prem and all VPCs over the Direct Connect/Transit Gateway, enabling fast resolution through the inbound resolver.
- With on-prem DNS forwarding queries to the inbound resolver, and the private hosted zone attached to each VPC, both on-prem and all VPCs can resolve cloud.example.com efficiently.
Why not the others:
- B/C/D involve EC2 forwarders or outbound resolvers that don’t optimally address the on-prem to multiple VPCs resolution path or add extra hops, reducing performance or complicating routing.
Clarksburg, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User3059
on: June 28, 2026
Question 4:
Here’s how to understand Question 4.
- Correct answer: C — Enable Aurora Auto Scaling for Aurora Replicas. Use an Application Load Balancer (ALB) with the round-robin routing algorithm and sticky sessions enabled.
Why this is the best fit:
- Aurora scaling: The requirement is to scale the application and database tiers. Aurora can scale reads by automatically adding/removing read replicas (Aurora Replicas) via Auto Scaling. Writes are handled by the primary writer node; there isn’t an Aurora option to auto-scale the writer like replicas.
- App tier scaling: EC2 instances behind an ALB can scale with an Auto Scaling group. ALB distributes HTTP requests to healthy instances.
- Round-robin + sticky sessions: Round-robin evenly distributes requests across app servers, and sticky sessions (session affinity) helps maintain a consistent user experience for a stateful app by keeping a user’s requests on the same instance.
- Why not the others:
- A/D use a Network Load Balancer (NLB) or reference writer scaling, which isn’t aligned with HTTP-based web app needs or Aurora’s replica-based scaling.
- B suggests “Aurora writers,” which isn’t how Aurora Auto Scaling works (scaling is for replicas, not writers).
Note: In a real design, consider externalizing session state (e.g., with ElastiCache or DynamoDB) to reduce reliance on sticky sessions.
Clarksburg, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User7903
on: June 28, 2026
Question 97:
The correct answer is B: netstat.
- Why netstat first: Since users can ping the server (ICMP works) but a browser cannot reach HTTP, the issue is likely with the web service binding rather than basic network reachability. On the server, you want to verify that the web server is actually listening on the expected port (e.g., 80 for HTTP, 443 for HTTPS) and on the correct interface.
- How to use it: run
netstat -tulnp (or ss -tulnp) to view listening TCP/UDP ports and which process owns them. Look for lines like 0.0.0.0:80 or 127.0.0.1:80 to see if the web server is listening on all interfaces or only localhost. If nothing on port 80 is listening, fix the web server configuration or restart the service.
- Why the other options are less suitable as first steps:
- traceroute checks network path from a host to another host, not the local service binding.
- arp relates to local IP-to-MAC mapping and isn’t relevant once ping succeeds.
- tcpdump can capture packets, but you’d use it after confirming the server is listening to diagnose traffic, not as the initial check.
Auckland, New Zealand
Sania
on: June 28, 2026
Get familiar with the actual exam questions.
Bhubaneswar, India
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 235:
Correct answer: C
Explanation:
- Southbound APIs in Cisco DNA Center are the interface used by the controller (DNA Center) to communicate with the network devices. They handle provisioning, policy application, and telemetry to/from devices.
- The other options describe northbound or external interfaces:
- “interface between the controller and the consumer” = northbound API to external apps or orchestrators.
- “RESTful API interface for orchestrator communication” = typically northbound/external integration.
- “NETCONF API interface for orchestrator communication” is too specific; NETCONF is one possible southbound protocol, but southbound APIs encompass more than just NETCONF.
- In practice, DNA Center uses southbound protocols like NETCONF/RESTCONF (and others) to manage devices, while northbound APIs are used by external systems to request services from DNA Center.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User1464
on: June 28, 2026
Question 13:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 13.
- You need to deploy an AI solution in Azure and be able to build, test, and deploy predictive analytics.
- The proposed solution is to use Azure Cosmos DB.
- What the given answer implies
- Answer: No. Cosmos DB alone does not provide end-to-end AI tooling.
- Why Cosmos DB is not sufficient
- Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed database service. It stores and serves data, but it does not offer the native tooling to build, train, test, validate, and deploy predictive models.
- Building and deploying predictive analytics is typically done with an AI/ML platform such as Azure Machine Learning Studio (or the Azure ML service), which manages experiments, training, pipelines, and deployment.
- How to approach correctly
- Use Azure Machine Learning Studio or the Azure ML service to handle the ML lifecycle.
- You can use Cosmos DB as a data source or sink (e.g., feed training data from Cosmos DB into ML, or store model outputs back into Cosmos DB), but it’s not the end-to-end solution by itself.
- The correct choice is No, Cosmos DB does not meet the goal of building/testing/deploying predictive analytics. Use an AI/ML service (Azure Machine Learning) for the end-to-end process, possibly using Cosmos DB as a data source.
Calamba, Philippines
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 10:
Question 10 asks how to enable active learning for a natural language model (LUIS).
Correct answer: C — Add log=true to the prediction endpoint query.
Why:
- Active learning relies on collecting real user utterances to improve the model. The
log parameter, when set to true, enables logging of user queries from the prediction endpoint so you can review and label them for retraining.
- The other options don’t enable active learning:
- A) show-all-intents=true is about displaying intents in results, not collecting training data.
- B) Speech priming is unrelated to active learning.
- D) Sentiment analysis is a separate capability and not needed to enable active learning.
Practical note:
- This is based on the guidance to “log user queries to enable active learning” in the LUIS docs. Ensure you have the proper permissions and review/logged utterances can be used to periodically retrain and improve accuracy.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 27:
The correct choice is raw image binary.
Why:
- Form Recognizer accepts image data in the request body as raw binary (bytes). This sends the image directly to the API without wrapping it in JSON or encoding, helping satisfy the “do not store in the cloud” requirement.
- The other formats are not how you upload image data to Form Recognizer:
- “form” isn’t a valid upload format.
- “URL encoded” is not used for binary image data.
- “JSON” would require base64-encoding the image and isn’t the standard upload method.
Tips:
- Send the image bytes in the POST body with an appropriate Content-Type (e.g.,
image/jpeg or image/png).
- If you used a URL, the service would fetch the image, which may not align with strict non-storage requirements.
If you want, I can outline a quick example snippet for sending a JPEG image as binary to the endpoint.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 25:
The correct choice is A: From the Azure portal, configure parallel indexing.
Why:
- Parallel indexing allows the indexer to process multiple documents concurrently, which directly reduces the time required to build the index when you have a sizable data set (10 GB of scanned documents/images in this case).
- The other options don’t impact indexing speed:
- Scheduled indexing just controls when indexing runs, not how fast it builds the index.
- Configuring field mappings via REST API affects data mapping, not speed.
- Creating a text-based indexer via REST API doesn’t inherently speed up ingestion compared with parallel processing.
Notes:
- Enabling parallel indexing increases throughput but may consume more resources; ensure the data source supports parallel ingestion and monitor performance quotas.
Kolkata, India
Joachim
on: June 27, 2026
Deep and truly uses case.
Pachuca, Mexico
AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343
on: June 27, 2026
Question 1:
Here’s why Question 1 maps RBAC roles to the groups for the QnA Maker chatbot:
- Group: Management-Accountants ? Role: Cognitive Services User (read/write/publish)
- Rationale: They need to approve/publish FAQs (the publish action is included). They’re not given rights to manage roles or create new resources, aligning with least privilege.
- Group: Consultant-Accountants ? Role: QnA Maker Editor (Create KB, Update KB, Replace KB, Train)
- Rationale: They must create and amend FAQs, but don’t need publishing rights or RBAC/resource creation permissions.
- Group: Agent-CustomerServices ? Role: QnA Maker Read (Download KB, List KBs, Get KB details, Download Alterations)
- Rationale: They only need to browse/search FAQs, not modify them.
Why this fits the requirements:
- Content must be approved before publishing, so publishing is restricted to a group with publish rights (Management-Accountants).
- Least privilege: each group gets only the permissions they need.
- Roles are assigned to Azure AD groups (not individual users), as required.
Kolkata, India
AI Explanation - verified by User2464
on: June 27, 2026
Question 17:
Question 17: Answer: D — Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly.
Why this is correct:
- Ongoing cost capture and review gives visibility into spend, committed costs, and invoicing accuracy throughout the project, reducing the risk of late handover and inflated completion costs at closure.
Why the other options are weaker:
- A: Notifying vendors about invoicing deadlines addresses timing but not allocation or accuracy of costs; it doesn’t prevent misbilling.
- B: Reviewing committed vs. invoiced costs at close is a retrospective check; it won’t prevent delays during handover.
- C: Involving finance and the vendor helps resolve issues, but without regular cost capture, problems may be missed or discovered late.
Overall, continuous cost tracking aligns with PMI cost management and closing processes, preventing surprises at handover.
Abidjan, Ivory Coast
chris_infosec
on: June 27, 2026
Finally done with this exam after struggling through challenging material and brain dumps. Those real exam questions seem endless sometimes.
Portugal
lunch_break_labs
on: June 18, 2026
Three weeks of intense studying and endless brain dumps left me exhausted but I finally passed this exam. It was very hard and I had to rely on the AI Assistant and real exam questions to make it through.
Australia
desk_job_dreamer
on: June 17, 2026
Real exam questions caught me off guard despite using the dumps to study. The braindumps weren't enough for such a challenging exam.
Nigeria
k3rn3l_k
on: June 16, 2026
The exam dumps were my last resort after weeks of frustrating study with very hard material. Real exam quetions matched the dumps pretty closely but it still was a challenging exam.
India
justanothertechguy
on: June 15, 2026
Spent countless nights going through braindumps and the AI Assistant. The exam was very hard but I managed to pass.
Sweden
mark_passed_aws
on: June 13, 2026
Real exm questions were harder than expected so I finally resorted to braindumps after exhausting other resources. Now the stress is over and I am relieved.
UAE
JustPassedBro
on: June 05, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and honestly the braindumps were my last resort. The real exam questions were very hard and the stress was unreal.
Mexico
LinuxPlus_Len
on: June 03, 2026
Passed it after weeks of stress and hours with brain dumps. Real exam questions were tough and the AI Assistant was helpful but the exam was still very hard.
Kenya
jason_helpdesk
on: May 29, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this exam and the brain dumps were my last resort after realizing how challenging it was. The AI Assistant helped me piece together the real exam questions I kept stumbling on.
Malaysia
itz_mario
on: May 22, 2026
Underestimated this exm thinking the material was enough but needed brain dumps to make it through. The real exam questions were very hard without practice.
Romania
pkttracer_m
on: May 14, 2026
Finally done with this exam after turning to exam dumps because the real exam questions were very hard. Spent too many sleepless nights with the AI Assistant just getting through it.
Portugal
wei_syseng
on: May 10, 2026
Took two attempts to clear this challenging exm using braindumps and the AI Assistant. Real exam questions felt very hard but doable with some help.
France
linuxlover99
on: May 08, 2026
Failed two times and teh exam dumps finally made the difference. The AI Assistant was only helpful for very hard parts of this exam.
Egypt
nina_sysadmin
on: May 07, 2026
The exam was very hard and I probably wouldn't have managed without brain dumps. Real exam questions aligned just enough to push me over the line.
Sri Lanka
PingOfDeath_P
on: May 05, 2026
Underestimated the exam and had to grind through endless braindumps to finally get past it. The AI Assistant helped a bit but it was very hard overall.
Saudi Arabia
SleepDeprivedPass
on: May 04, 2026
The exm was surprisingly tough and I had to lean heavily on brain dumps to make it through. Even with the AI Assistant the real exam questions were a challenge.
Taiwan
ipv6_ready
on: May 01, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this exam and found the brain dumps really helpful for understanding the real exam questions. Very hard and honestly drained by the end.
Czech Republic
NoSleepNoCert
on: April 20, 2026
Took two attempts befoer finally passing this exam as the challenging questions had me doubting myself but the braindumps and AI Assistant were helpful. This prep resource made a difference when I needed help understanding tough concepts.
Japan
dhcp_d
on: April 07, 2026
Spent weeks on brain dumps and still found this exm very hard. Thankfully some real exam questions were recognizable but I barely scraped through.
United Kingdom
wei_syseng
on: April 07, 2026
Took two attempts and the exam was very hard with real exam questions that caught me off guard. The brain dumps helped a bit but the AI Assistant was what got me through.
New Zealand
JustPassedBro
on: April 05, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind through endless exam dumps just to get through it. Real exam questions felt very hard but the AI Assistant helped a bit.
Austria
osi_obsessed
on: April 03, 2026
Just cleared this exam and it was very hard. Used exam dumps and real exam questions to finally make it through.
Kuwait
xCertx
on: April 01, 2026
Took two attempts to finally clear this exam and the brain dumps were essential. Real exam quetions were very hard to predict without them.
Oman
jakob_vmware
on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks grinding through brain dumps to scrape a pass on this exam. It was very hard and the stress was real but real exam questions helped a bit.
Israel
AnsibleAndy
on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks trying to crack this exam with real exam questions and braindumps but it was still very hard. The AI Assistant was a bit of help but overall it took a lot out of me.
Spain