Free LSAT Test Exam Braindumps
Law School Admission Test: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Analytical Reasoning Questions 439–443 (page: 89)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Bauer: It is clear that capuchin monkeys make mental plans for cracking open a nut before selecting the appropriate stone for the task.
When they approach two or three stones that differ in hardness, size, and weight, in nearly every case they choose the superior stone.

Chiu: That just suggests a proficiency at trial-and-error learning. Having spent their lives learning to associate certain types of stones with success at cracking nuts and others with failure, the capuchins apply this knowledge automatically.

Bauer and Chiu disagree over whether capuchin monkeys

  1. ever display intelligent behavior
  2. almost invariably choose the best stone for a task
  3. select stones as a result of planning
  4. are able to learn through trial and error
  5. sometimes behave automatically

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Bauer and Chiu disagree over whether capuchin monkeys select stones as a result of planning (as Bauer argues) or as an automatic application of trial-and-error learning (as Chiu contends).



The purpose of book reviews is chiefly to describe, not evaluate. And what a book review describes is not the book itself but the reviewer's encounter with the book. It tries to make manifest the act of reading in something like the way that travel writing dramatizes the experience of a place. So just as travel writing can serve its purpose without passing judgment on a place, a book review can serve its purpose without passing judgment on a book.

In the analogy drawn in the argument above, which one of the following plays a role that corresponds to that of the act of reading?

  1. a place
  2. a traveler
  3. the traveler's experience of a place
  4. passing judgment on a place
  5. the act of travel writing

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

In the analogy, the act of reading corresponds to the traveler's experience of a place. Both represent subjective encounters that the respective forms of writing (book reviews and travel writing) aim to describe.



Journalist: It's clear that studies of the health effects of consuming fast food tend to be biased in favor of the fast food industry when they are funded by that industry. After examining the funding sources of research studies published in recent years, I found that studies funded by fast food producers were five times more likely to find no link between hypertension and the consumption of fast food than were studies not funded by that industry.

The journalist's argument requires assuming which one of the following?

  1. Most studies of the health effects of fast food consumption that were not funded by the fast food industry were not biased against fast food.
  2. Researchers who conducted studies that were funded by the fast food industry had to clear their results with the industry before publication.
  3. Researchers should not seek funding from fast food producers for studies of the health effects of fast food consumption.
  4. Few research studies have found a link between hypertension and the consumption of foods other than fast foods.
  5. The fast food industry funds the majority of research studies on the health effects of fast food consumption.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The argument assumes that studies not funded by the fast food industry were not biased against fast food. This assumption is necessary to conclude that the observed difference in findings is due to bias in industry-funded studies rather than bias in the non-industry-funded studies.



Art appraiser: Camille Branson produced many landscape paintings of scenes on Vermillion Island, but none were done on canvas. This painting depicts a landscape on Vermillion Island. Since this painting is on canvas, it was not done by Branson.

The pattern of reasoning in the art appraiser's argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following arguments?

  1. Fourscore Fitness sells many kinds of bikes, but it does not sell racing bikes or mountain bikes. Rena's new bike is neither a racing bike nor a mountain bike. So she could have bought it at Fourscore Fitness.
  2. The bikes sold at Fourscore Fitness will last for years if they are regularly maintained. Kenny is quickly learning to maintain his bikes regularly. So the new bike that he bought at Fourscore Fitness will probably last for years.
  3. Fourscore Fitness has never sold a touring bike that is outfitted with a leather seat. Salvador's touring bike had a leather seat when he bought it. Thus he could not have bought it at Fourscore Fitness.
  4. Fourscore Fitness has introduced special sale prices on several of its bikes, but none of those bikes are touring bikes. Since Mitsuko is interested only in buying a touring bike, she will not be interested in the bike sale at Fourscore Fitness.
  5. Fourscore Fitness sells many brands of bikes, but none of those brands are low priced. So even though Fourscore Fitness has the lowest prices in town for the bikes that it sells, you can probably find a lower- priced bike elsewhere.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The reasoning in the art appraiser's argument matches the pattern in option C, where the absence of a certain characteristic (a leather seat for a touring bike or the use of canvas for Branson's paintings) is used to conclude that the item in question (the touring bike or the painting) could not have originated from the source (Fourscore Fitness or Branson).



Inventor: Patent law stipulates that no invention that has been shown to be useless should receive a patent. An existing patent on a useless device will generally be revoked if it is challenged in court. However, very few patents have been revoked on the thousands of devices that have been patented but subsequently proved useless.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the situation described by the inventor?

  1. Thousands of devices that have been proved useless have subsequently received patents nonetheless, in disregard of patent law.
  2. Almost no one has sufficient incentive to challenge in court a patent on a device that has been proved useless.
  3. Patent law does not stipulate that an existing patent on a device that is subsequently proved useless must be revoked.
  4. In many cases patents are issued on useless devices, and it is never subsequently proven that they are useless.
  5. Some devices that are demonstrably useless in themselves have provided the inspiration for other devices that have proven to be useful.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The situation is explained by the fact that almost no one has sufficient incentive to challenge in court a patent on a device that has been proved useless. This would result in very few patents being revoked, even if the devices are subsequently shown to be useless.



Viewing page 89 of 188
Viewing questions 441 - 445 out of 934 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep LSAT Test exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!