Free LSAT Test Exam Braindumps
Law School Admission Test: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Analytical Reasoning Questions 444–448 (page: 90)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Spiral galaxies rotate so fast that the gravitational force produced by their visible matter is insufficient to stop them from flying apart. A large amount of invisible or "dark" matter must therefore be holding these galaxies together. Astronomers once believed that this dark matter consisted of massive black holes. However, new calculations show that the gravitational force that would be produced by such black holes would cause stars to "evaporate." Since stars in spiral galaxies are not evaporating in this way, the dark matter holding these galaxies together cannot consist of massive black holes.

Which one of the following is a reasoning technique used in the argument above?

  1. rejecting a hypothesis on the grounds that it is inconsistent with what is Known to be true
  2. arguing that a hypothesis is false by showing that it is self-contradictory
  3. arguing that a hypothesis should be rejected because the question it attempts to answer is now known to be a spurious one
  4. arguing that a hypothesis should be rejected because there is a more plausible explanation for the facts the hypothesis was intended to explain
  5. refuting a generalization by providing a counterexample

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The argument rejects the hypothesis that dark matter consists of massive black holes because it is inconsistent with what is known to be true--namely, that stars in spiral galaxies are not "evaporating," which would occur if the hypothesis were correct.



Columnist: Awareness of the use of performance enhancing substances by professional athletes threatens to make the use of such potentially dangerous substances socially acceptable among amateur athletes and others. The more we test professional athletes for these substances, the more we will inevitably discover about their drug use. Thus, the goal of preserving professional athletes' status as role models who set a positive example actually seems best served by a policy of no testing.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the columnist's argument?

  1. Existing drug testing procedures often fail to detect the presence of performance enhancing substances in professional athletes who have used them.
  2. Medical research has produced mixed results concerning the potential health risks posed by the use of performance enhancing substances.
  3. Public opinion polls suggest that rumors of performance enhancing substance use seldom cause irreparable harm to a professional athlete's professional reputation.
  4. The majority of professional athletes who use performance enhancing substances obtain these substances legally.
  5. The threat of drug testing has little effect in curtailing the use of performance enhancing substances by professional athletes.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

The columnist's argument is strengthened by evidence that drug testing has little effect in curtailing professional athletes' use of performance-enhancing substances. This supports the idea that testing might increase public awareness of drug use without actually reducing it, undermining the goal of preserving athletes as positive role models.



Commentator: Lunar research shows that the composition of the Moon is far different from that of Earth. This suggests that two theories about the origin of the Moon are false: the theory that the Moon formed along with Earth and of the same materials; and the theory that the Moon is a large chunk that split off from Earth. Therefore, the Moon was originally a large rock that hit Earth and ricocheted into orbit.

The flawed reasoning in which one of the following arguments is most similar to the flawed reasoning in the commentator's argument?

  1. Jan does not want a career in law and does not want to train for a career in medicine, so Jan must want a career in business.
  2. This vacation cannot be taken in fall or winter, so it must take place during spring or summer.
  3. Taylor travels neither by plane nor by helicopter. Therefore, Taylor is probably afraid of high altitudes.
  4. The materials used in making this cup are different from those used in that plate, so they are not likely to be equally durable.
  5. It is not the case that Drew has university degrees in both literature and engineering. Since we know that Drew has a degree in literature, Drew has no degree in engineering.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The commentator's reasoning involves dismissing two possibilities (the Moon forming along with Earth or splitting off from Earth) and then concluding that the remaining option (the Moon being a rock that ricocheted into orbit) must be correct without adequately considering other potential explanations. This flawed reasoning mirrors the option, where Jan's rejection of two career options (law and medicine) leads to the unsupported conclusion that Jan must want a career in business, ignoring other possibilities.



Derek: I've discovered a case where a professor published the exact same paper twice, using the same title both times. This is a case of self-plagiarism, and self-plagiarism is an act of academic fraud.

Gina: But because the same title was used both times, the professor was not attempting to pass off one piece of work as two. The time to suspect academic fraud is when an author republishes a paper in slightly altered form.

Derek's and Gina's positions indicate that they disagree with each other about whether the professor

  1. published the exact same paper twice
  2. engaged in an act of academic fraud
  3. republished the paper using the same title
  4. believes that it is wrong to pass off one piece of work as two
  5. republished the paper in slightly altered form

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Derek asserts that the professor's actions constitute academic fraud because they represent self-plagiarism.
Gina disagrees, arguing that the use of the same title indicates the professor was not attempting to mislead, and thus it does not amount to academic fraud. This shows they disagree about whether the professor engaged in academic fraud.



Environmentalist: During the 1980s, concern for the earth's dwindling forests and the resulting reduction in biodiversity led to efforts to recognize environmentally sustainable and socially responsible timber production by means of timber certification programs. Although such programs fit today's market ethos and are succeeding in economically stable countries, they are not likely to be fully successful in countries that are economically unstable. Thus, in the latter countries, unprecedented and innovative forest preservation efforts must be made.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the environmentalist's argument?

  1. More interest in the plight of the earth's forests must be generated among ordinary citizens if the forests are to be saved.
  2. Timber certification programs alone will probably not successfully promote the recognition of environmentally sustainable and socially responsible timber production.
  3. People will have to make economic sacrifices if the earth's forests are to be saved for future generations.
  4. New solutions will have to be developed to deal with the problem of dwindling forests in countries that are economically unstable.
  5. Market-driven approaches to the problem of dwindling forests work best in countries that are economically stable.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The environmentalist concludes that "unprecedented and innovative forest preservation efforts must be made" in economically unstable countries, implying the need for new solutions.



Viewing page 90 of 188
Viewing questions 446 - 450 out of 934 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Test Prep LSAT Test exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!